Skip to main Skip to content Skip to menu

Com-Central.net

`±`Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

`±`User Info-big

Welcome Anonymous

Membership:

Latest: cgsimpson

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 6645

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 939

Total: 939

Who Is Where:

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Forum FAQ

Moderators

BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 909
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA

Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 12:15 am Post subject: BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.
Here's 3 old Armed Forces Day photos. Rick

Costas_TT
Power User

Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:01 am Post subject: Re: BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.
Nice photos. Also, the missiles on the 9P148 are not the 9M113 Konkurs (AT-5 Spandrel), but the shorter ranged 9M111 Fagot (AT-4 Spigot). The Konkurs has a fatter rear end on the tube. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..._Fagot.jpg _________________ 1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.

Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 909
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA

Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:23 am Post subject: Re: BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.
Costas, They apparently are Fagot Missiles, Spandel was wrote on the sign. Thanks for the correction. Rick

Costas_TT
Power User

Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:36 pm
Post subject: Re: BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.

You are welcome, but Spandrel is also correct as far as it pertains to the vehicle's capabilities.
As it happens, the 9P148 is capable of firing either the 9M111 or the 9M113 without modification. In fact, any launcher capable of launching one of the two can also fire the other, since the interfaces are identical. It applies to the infantry tripod launcher, the one found on the BMP-2 and so on, so forth and such like. The 9M113 is more common on dedicated AT platforms like the 9P148 BRDM.
Kind of the same thing applies to the Strela-10 (SA-13 Gopher) TELAR, which is backwards compatible with the Strela-1 (SA-9 Gaskin) missile round.

_________________
1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.

Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 909
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA

Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:59 pm Post subject: Re: BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.
So either missile is compatible then, but this vehicle is armed with the 9M111 Fagot, thanks again.

Costas_TT
Power User

Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:56 am Post subject: Re: BRDM-2 AA and AT 5-21-94 at Aberdeen.
Again, you are welcome. As a point of interest, this variant, despite being so obviously a missile armed tank destroyer, was frequently identified in the West as the BRDM-3, i.e. a scout vehicle, just because it used the BRDM-2 chassis. The actual BRDM-3 is a variant of the BTR-80A. _________________ 1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1

All times are GMT - 6 Hours

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

±Recent Visitors

±User Info-big

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big