±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 793
Total: 793
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Your Account
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Statistics
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Photo Gallery
58: Downloads
59: Community Forums
60: Your Account
61: Photo Gallery
62: Downloads
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Member Screenshots
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Your Account
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Downloads
83: Statistics
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Photo Gallery
88: Home
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: News Archive
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Statistics
97: Photo Gallery
98: Community Forums
99: Downloads
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Community Forums
103: News
104: Downloads
105: Downloads
106: Community Forums
107: CPGlang
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Member Screenshots
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: CPGlang
125: Community Forums
126: CPGlang
127: Treasury
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Member Screenshots
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: Member Screenshots
151: CPGlang
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Photo Gallery
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Photo Gallery
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Member Screenshots
186: Downloads
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Statistics
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Downloads
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Statistics
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: News
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Photo Gallery
230: Statistics
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Your Account
240: Home
241: Home
242: Photo Gallery
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Photo Gallery
257: Photo Gallery
258: Home
259: Member Screenshots
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: CPGlang
268: Downloads
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Photo Gallery
280: Photo Gallery
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Community Forums
285: Photo Gallery
286: Photo Gallery
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Your Account
290: Photo Gallery
291: Downloads
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Statistics
302: Community Forums
303: Downloads
304: Community Forums
305: Your Account
306: CPGlang
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Statistics
312: Photo Gallery
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Member Screenshots
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Downloads
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Member Screenshots
328: Downloads
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Member Screenshots
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Photo Gallery
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Downloads
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Photo Gallery
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: CPGlang
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Photo Gallery
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Downloads
373: Photo Gallery
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Photo Gallery
379: Community Forums
380: Photo Gallery
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Member Screenshots
384: Community Forums
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Member Screenshots
389: Your Account
390: Photo Gallery
391: Statistics
392: Home
393: Home
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Photo Gallery
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Downloads
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Photo Gallery
410: Downloads
411: Downloads
412: Community Forums
413: Home
414: Community Forums
415: Photo Gallery
416: Community Forums
417: Photo Gallery
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: News Archive
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Photo Gallery
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Photo Gallery
432: Photo Gallery
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Home
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Your Account
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Photo Gallery
444: Downloads
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Statistics
450: Photo Gallery
451: Community Forums
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Photo Gallery
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Photo Gallery
464: Downloads
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Your Account
468: Community Forums
469: Photo Gallery
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Photo Gallery
473: Community Forums
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Photo Gallery
479: Community Forums
480: Home
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: CPGlang
484: Community Forums
485: Downloads
486: Photo Gallery
487: Downloads
488: Community Forums
489: Home
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Photo Gallery
493: Downloads
494: Community Forums
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Home
498: Photo Gallery
499: Home
500: Community Forums
501: Photo Gallery
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: News Archive
508: Photo Gallery
509: Photo Gallery
510: Community Forums
511: News
512: Community Forums
513: CPGlang
514: Downloads
515: Community Forums
516: Home
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Home
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Photo Gallery
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Home
533: News Archive
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Member Screenshots
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Photo Gallery
545: Downloads
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Photo Gallery
549: Member Screenshots
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Downloads
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Photo Gallery
557: Community Forums
558: Photo Gallery
559: Community Forums
560: Home
561: Community Forums
562: Home
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: CPGlang
566: Downloads
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Photo Gallery
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Photo Gallery
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Downloads
587: Photo Gallery
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Photo Gallery
594: Home
595: Community Forums
596: Photo Gallery
597: Photo Gallery
598: Community Forums
599: Photo Gallery
600: Photo Gallery
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Photo Gallery
605: Photo Gallery
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Photo Gallery
609: Community Forums
610: Photo Gallery
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Member Screenshots
617: Community Forums
618: Downloads
619: Photo Gallery
620: Community Forums
621: Home
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Downloads
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Photo Gallery
629: Home
630: Downloads
631: Community Forums
632: Photo Gallery
633: Home
634: Community Forums
635: Downloads
636: Photo Gallery
637: Photo Gallery
638: Photo Gallery
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: Photo Gallery
644: Photo Gallery
645: News Archive
646: Community Forums
647: Photo Gallery
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Home
651: Photo Gallery
652: Community Forums
653: Member Screenshots
654: Community Forums
655: CPGlang
656: Home
657: Community Forums
658: Photo Gallery
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Photo Gallery
664: Community Forums
665: CPGlang
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Community Forums
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Member Screenshots
676: Community Forums
677: Photo Gallery
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: Home
683: Photo Gallery
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: Home
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Home
697: Home
698: Statistics
699: Community Forums
700: Community Forums
701: Member Screenshots
702: Photo Gallery
703: Community Forums
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Community Forums
707: News
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Photo Gallery
717: Community Forums
718: Downloads
719: Community Forums
720: Photo Gallery
721: Photo Gallery
722: Community Forums
723: Community Forums
724: Community Forums
725: Your Account
726: Community Forums
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Your Account
734: Photo Gallery
735: Community Forums
736: Downloads
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Home
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Photo Gallery
744: Community Forums
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Community Forums
748: Community Forums
749: Home
750: Home
751: Community Forums
752: Community Forums
753: Photo Gallery
754: Downloads
755: Community Forums
756: Photo Gallery
757: Community Forums
758: Community Forums
759: News Archive
760: Community Forums
761: Home
762: News Archive
763: Photo Gallery
764: Photo Gallery
765: Photo Gallery
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Photo Gallery
770: Community Forums
771: Community Forums
772: CPGlang
773: Community Forums
774: Photo Gallery
775: Community Forums
776: Photo Gallery
777: Community Forums
778: Photo Gallery
779: Community Forums
780: Home
781: Home
782: Photo Gallery
783: Community Forums
784: Community Forums
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: Home
788: Photo Gallery
789: Community Forums
790: Home
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Skeet
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 7:12 pm
Post subject: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

The Abrams carries a 120 mm non-rifled cannon. I understand the non-rifled cannon allows a shaped charge projectile to function better, but it also seems to be able to hit targets waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out there.

How's it do that?
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 3:26 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Skeet,
I can name two basic changes. Modern fire control systems that compensate for variables such as Range, Air Temp, Barometric pressure, Ammo temp, Cant, Lead, etc. coupled with ballistic solutions that can be calculated for individual type rounds within 1 meter using this data. All is done with the gunner pressing a lase button. The other is that almost all modern tank rounds are fin stabilized and do not need to be spun to stay accurate. Even the old 105mm rifled guns eventually fired primarily fin stabilzed rounds. Quality of production also reduces round to round dispersion within round types allowing longer more accurate engagements too. I guess that makes three. I can write pages of what has been done in the last 30 years to improve accuracy, but basically what modern electronics has done for automobiles pretty much applies to tanks.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 5:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

I dimmly recall in the early 80s someone (the British?) held a competition to see which gun they were going to choose for their next generation tank. They used the standard 105mm gun as a baseline for comparison, firing its APFSDS round. To everyone's horror the 105mm solidly outperformed all the modern technology 120mm contenders as far as accuracy went. It seems even with driving bands a 105mm APFSDS round would still be given a slight rotation. Apparently this was enough to turn any tendency to drift into a corkscrew path as the dart flew downrange. - I hope I'm recalling this story correctly.

Rheinmetall in particular didn't like the results of those tests. It's possible this embarrassment in trials drove much of the insane standards in modern fire controls. Everything from tube wear to weather to propellant temperature is thrown into the mix.
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

I have a dumb question.
I read somewhere how when firing the Russian 125mm gun the ballistics calculations are adjusted according to propellant temps. I also read somewhere that one flavor of Merkava or another includes temperature-controlled ammo storage to maximize performance (or more accurately, to avoid degradation). At least at one point Israeli 120mm gun ammo was quite temp-sensitive.

Here's the dumb question - What about Abrams? How do they monitor propellant temps? Is that rear turret bustle temp-controlled at all? or is it monitored by a themostat in order to automatically adjust ballistics computations? I believe for T-72s they'd simply take an air temp reading in the morning and use those calculations all day (yesterday was -8 c, today its +40 c).
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

- mike_Duplessis
....Here's the dumb question - What about Abrams? How do they monitor propellant temps? Is that rear turret bustle temp-controlled at all? or is it monitored by a themostat in order to automatically adjust ballistics computations? I believe for T-72s they'd simply take an air temp reading in the morning and use those calculations all day (yesterday was -8 c, today its +40 c).


No such thing as a dumb question....

Actually there is an ammo temp gauge in the turret. One simply input temp into FCS and the 'little hamsters in the white box' ( Shocked - Just kidding on the hamsters...) calculates the ballistic solution with all inputed info.

Ammo 'wells' seem to run much cooler than crew compartment. Ammo doors block out residual heat from turret & outside.

Many times (as am M-1, IPM-1, & M1A1 gunner) I remember temps in ammo wells running in 100-120 degree range. Ft Polk actually seemed to be the worst.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

- mike_Duplessis
I dimmly recall in the early 80s someone (the British?) held a competition to see which gun they were going to choose for their next generation tank. They used the standard 105mm gun as a baseline for comparison, firing its APFSDS round. To everyone's horror the 105mm solidly outperformed all the modern technology 120mm contenders as far as accuracy went. It seems even with driving bands a 105mm APFSDS round would still be given a slight rotation. Apparently this was enough to turn any tendency to drift into a corkscrew path as the dart flew downrange. - I hope I'm recalling this story correctly.

Rheinmetall in particular didn't like the results of those tests. It's possible this embarrassment in trials drove much of the insane standards in modern fire controls. Everything from tube wear to weather to propellant temperature is thrown into the mix.


Mike

In 1988 'we' had some serious problems with the 120mm ammo. Initially it was packaged, shipped, and delivered in wooden crates like the 105 ammo. This caused serious preformance reliability problems.

When 'we' were doing CAT 89 train up, we found that round to round dispersion was way off the scale. 'Our' goal was to hit a coke can at 1500m. With the first generation (training) Sabot, it was difficult to hit the Screening panels at 1500m with more than one round, let alone a coke can.

After 'much pain' it was finally determined that the ammo was at fault. This is about the time that the sealed 'catacomb' containers made their appearence.

Voila!!! We started screening and hitting a 12 inch 'bulls-eye' at 1500m, round after round.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Hey Dontos,
Yeah, there were some issues with the old M865 anyway when it first came out. With the newer PA-116 (I think that's what they're called)containers you probably got the newer M865IP (PIP) or whatever they called it then. We used to have to ID it from the older ones by the groves cut in the petals. Both had the same ID and DODIC. I think we are on our 4th or 5th connotation of the M865 now.
Mike, gotta remember that unless you are firing service ammunition results may vary. Training ammo has to be good but the other factor is cost as opposed to service rounds where money doesn't factor in that much. I can believe the 105 was more accurate during the test just because the rounds for the 120mm were not a mature of a system at that time. My experience with 105 training APDS compared to 120 training APCSDS was that the 105 seemed more accurate. I will tell you when they screened service rounds in Kuwait prior to the war (OIF) the results we most impressive, especially the shot groups. 1st UK didn't screen, they zero'd using L29 and then switched to L27 CHARM. Fired a lot more ammo but I personally believed they had a more accurate final result. They do have some impressive long range gunnery ability.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 1:04 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

PIP...thats it.

I believe it had a lot number of '88F' the only APCSDS-T that we were allowed to use.

In the days prior, (CAT89) we zeroed every different lot we got. 5 rounds. Fire 3 at 'bull', determine MPI, toggle adjust, then fire 2 confirmation rounds. No 'Fleet Zero' for us.

(I still have my zero data from May - June 89.... I'm NOT a 'pack-rat' damn it!!!) Laughing

Of course, that was 'E-ONS' ago.... Cool


_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 2:30 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Dontos,
I still think that zeroing is better than screening Smile , but of course money talks Rolling Eyes . The theory is that if all tanks were made and maintained to a equal level of quality and the ammunition was constructed within certain tolerences than one could reasonably expect the same firing results across the board. Screening just verifies that the tank and ammo meet these tolerances. It may not be the most accurate but the standard is 2 rounds within the circle of the ST-5 panel (formerly ST-4 octogon). If it can accomplish this it meets the accuracy requirements. The problem with zeroing is you can potentially hide a maintenance problem Sad . Just because you can adjust the reticle to get a bulls eye at 1500 meters doesn't mean you can do the same thing at 1000 or 2000. The FCS could be flawed and not correctly calculate the ballistic solution. All you accomplished was make it hit at 1500 meters standing still. Other factors are also mechanical. It can be very frustrating with older systems Evil or Very Mad .That's the reason why Master Gunner's look the way they do on a range. But..., if the tank is good and the ammo is good, zeroing is far more accurate Wink . All comments made are my personal opinion and do not reflect any official doctrin or procedures

Enjoy the Armor conference
Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Skeet
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 10:00 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Thanks folks.

In reply to another question I made, this link was provided:

www.globalsecurity.org...m830a1.htm

That pretty much answers my question. I didn't know that that all the 120mm rounds were fin stabilized.

Interesting idea about using that round being used on helicopters. I wouldn't think you could bring a 120 mm to bear on such a target.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

HI Skeet! Hi Folks!

- Skeet

Interesting idea about using that round being used on helicopters. I wouldn't think you could bring a 120 mm to bear on such a target.


That idea has been around for bit. The MPAT round makes it work a lot better.

Sometime around 1972-73, when I was stationed at Hunter Liggett Military Reservation, the unit I was in conducted a test to see if it was possible for Soviet Tanks to engage US Cobra Attack Helicopters firing Sabot ammo. The unit had five platoons of M60A1 tanks which were fitted with a Soviet type of sight retinal. Using the Great Grand Father version of the system used now days at the NTC, it was learned that Soivet's Tanks using Sabot could not hit a moving Cobra most of the time.

After the test was over, then some one asked the question, "Can US tankers using our current FCS and Sabot, hit a Soviet gunship"? Back to range with the nomal sight retianls reinstalled. It was found that our system could nail a hovering or slowly moving helo. Last I heard of that test program was they where going someplace else to try and learn how much damage a Sabot round could do to a helicopter. I wonder if somewhere in the developement of MPAT round, those old tests had anything to do with it's design?

Some of my old history.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

I recall reading somewhere (warning, I may be remembering this all wrong) that German tanks were slated to get a 'dual-purpose' laser rangefinder for combatting helicopters. I believe the article said - and I'm really shakey on this info - that a laser reflection can give multiple range returns due to laser scatter. A standard ground combat rangefinder will, I think, discard all but the last return. This is the opposite of what you want for a helicopter which would be primary laser return followed by background clutter. So I think the article said the German rangefinders had a switch that would allow either accepting last or first laser return depending on the target type.

What this implies is a helicopter close enough to be within the APFSDS dart's flat trajectory would be dead meat, but if ballistics calculations are involved (beyond 2500m?) then hit probability may be hindered by the ground-optimized ranging equipment.

Any REAL tankers willing to help me on this?
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

- mike_Duplessis
I recall reading somewhere (warning, I may be remembering this all wrong) that German tanks were slated to get a 'dual-purpose' laser rangefinder for combatting helicopters. I believe the article said - and I'm really shakey on this info - that a laser reflection can give multiple range returns due to laser scatter. A standard ground combat rangefinder will, I think, discard all but the last return. This is the opposite of what you want for a helicopter which would be primary laser return followed by background clutter. So I think the article said the German rangefinders had a switch that would allow either accepting last or first laser return depending on the target type.

What this implies is a helicopter close enough to be within the APFSDS dart's flat trajectory would be dead meat, but if ballistics calculations are involved (beyond 2500m?) then hit probability may be hindered by the ground-optimized ranging equipment.

Any REAL tankers willing to help me on this?


Mike

I 'used' to be a REAL Tanker, so I'll try to take a stab at explaining this....

The Abrams LRF has dual settings for '1st return' & 'Last return'.

If lasing on a target on a hill top (or in the air) with a limited possibility of any obstructions then this means the LRF will give a range to the actual target.

Many times multiple range returns are noted due to tree limbs, grass, (etc) that are in the line of sight between the tank and the intended target. When in 'Last Return' the indexed range should be the target you are lying the reticle on.

There is a 'multiple range return' bar in the symbology of the GPS which lets the gunner know that more than one range return has been received. Its up to him to assess if the indexed range seems appropriate.

Hope this helps,
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum