±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 210
Total: 210
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Your Account
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: CPGlang
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Photo Gallery
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: CPGlang
20: Home
21: Your Account
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: Photo Gallery
28: Downloads
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Downloads
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: Downloads
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Your Account
40: Home
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Member Screenshots
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Treasury
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Home
71: Member Screenshots
72: Treasury
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Downloads
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Member Screenshots
89: Photo Gallery
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Photo Gallery
98: Community Forums
99: Your Account
100: Community Forums
101: Photo Gallery
102: News
103: CPGlang
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Photo Gallery
107: Home
108: CPGlang
109: CPGlang
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: News Archive
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Photo Gallery
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Member Screenshots
121: Photo Gallery
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: News
126: Downloads
127: News
128: Your Account
129: Home
130: Your Account
131: Photo Gallery
132: Member Screenshots
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Your Account
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: CPGlang
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Your Account
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: News Archive
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: News Archive
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Member Screenshots
170: Photo Gallery
171: News
172: Photo Gallery
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Member Screenshots
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Photo Gallery
182: Community Forums
183: Your Account
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: CPGlang
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Member Screenshots
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Downloads
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
can't have too little spare tracks...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
panthertank
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:43 pm
Post subject: can't have too little spare tracks...

Cool
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:06 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

The track was usually old stuff and used to increase the protection of the vehicle - but then again you probably knew that so this is intended for the consumption of those that didn't...

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:08 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

That makes them Heavy Tanks then, right? Laughing


Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:13 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Razz

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Hellfish6
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 2006
Posts: 151
Location: Orlando
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:47 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Was using tracks for armor effective?
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

An extra few inches of armour - yes it was but it was hard on the engines, transmission & suspension.

Some thought obviously went into the track mounting on the vehicle images as the way its mounted with the spuds towards the armour must provide a modicum of spaced armour effect to protect against heat/hollow charge rounds. It would have been far easier to mount it 'spuds' out.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Hellfish6
Was using tracks for armor effective?


The use of the extra track sections was two-fold. To provide additional protection and to enable the vehicle to carry additional track sections incase of damaged track.

These vehicles are taking the additional protection idea a bit too far. Taht much track per vehicle would seriously hinder mobility and possibly cause mechanical failure.

Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.


d*mn thats it - I kept looking at that image thinking something is strange about it and couldn't quite put my finger on it... I mistakenly assumed the track was chuchill stuff.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:19 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Those tanks must be Canadian. The Canadians were notorious for beefing up the armour on their Shermans. In Normandy Maj. Radley-Walters had 140 track links welded on his tank Caribou for an additional weight of 3.5 tonnes. This seemed to work because Caribou survived 9 hits during the campaign before it was finally knocked out on the 14th of August, 1944.

According to Radley-Walters the trick was to have the tracks only lightly welded so that they had some give. This increased the lightly hood that the shot would not bite into the armour, but would be deflected instead.

Canadians crews were not worried about the life of their drive train, or whether they could drive 500 miles or 800 hours. They just wanted to get through the next battle.

The tracks on the Firefly look like they are from a Panzer IV. I’ve seen other photos where the crews were using Tracks from Panthers, Tigers and Churchills.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- JimWeb
- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.


d*mn thats it - I kept looking at that image thinking something is strange about it and couldn't quite put my finger on it... I mistakenly assumed the track was chuchill stuff.

Cool


I ID'ed it only because I had to do some track repair to 'our' Marder II a few years ago, and those d*mn pins & links were a real pain to replace.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:46 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

In the wouldn't that be cool department, suppose those Shermans were Rad's in the 27th Armoured Regiment (Sherbrooke Fusiliers) and suppose one of them was Bomb ....

www.convoymagazine.com...1oLjpg.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

One also could argue just how effective tracks as extra armor really was for some thought of them as a shot trap and also the tracks themselves were made of a more brittle material than the armor it was reinforcing.


Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:33 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

What I found interesting is a Firefly and a 105mm Sherman in the same unit. I didn't think many 105mm Shermans were provided to Commonwealth units.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:11 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

British and Canadian Armoured Regiments started to receive 105mm M4 Shermans in late 1944. There were four in each Regiment. They could have one attached to each Sqn HQ and one in the Regt. HQ, or all four could be group together as a fire support troop.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:30 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle


Wonder whether it could be CDP (Canadian Dry Pin) tracks rather than German?



Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum