±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: DIEGO38
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6597

People Online:
Members: 1
Visitors: 103
Total: 104
Who Is Where:
 Members:
01: JWB2 > Community Forums
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Downloads
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Statistics
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Downloads
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Downloads
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Downloads
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
can't have too little spare tracks...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:32 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- clausb
- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle


Wonder whether it could be CDP (Canadian Dry Pin) tracks rather than German?



Claus B


I believe you may be correct. Quite similiar to Panzer III & Panzer IV styled 'pin' track.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:01 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- clausb
Wonder whether it could be CDP (Canadian Dry Pin) tracks rather than German?


Claus, knocked out German tanks were in abundance, CDP track was not. . .
So I would put a bet on German tank track.

Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:17 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

I scanned a close up of CDP tracks on a Grizzly tank in a book that I have. I positioned the photo upside down to get the same prospective as the tracks that Claus posted.

Compare them to the types of the Panzer IV tracks.

It dose look like the tracks on the Firefly are CDP.

.%20
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 26, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

So the tracks on the Firefly tank are definitely CDP ..



Pierre-Olivier
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:51 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Hanno_Spoelstra
- clausb
Wonder whether it could be CDP (Canadian Dry Pin) tracks rather than German?


Claus, knocked out German tanks were in abundance, CDP track was not. . .
So I would put a bet on German tank track.


I still think it looks more like CDP than German track, though. AFAIK Sextons were mostly running on CDP, so they might have come across a few links dumped by the artillery Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
panthertank
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:48 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

not much of an track expert here, but this one on the side of the turret doesn't look quite right either.
Back to top
View user's profile
Coldsteel
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:15 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- panthertank
not much of an track expert here, but this one on the side of the turret doesn't look quite right either.

They're grousers aren't they. Not track links. They fit over the end connectors of the regular tracks so you have a raised rib which digs in a gives better traction.
Here, from the Sherman register:

web.inter.nl.net/users...es/t41.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:33 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

They are grousers and not track links. The grousers clip onto the tracks of the tank and are used to improve traction on soft ground. The Stuarts have brackets on the turret sides and/or the hull front (depending on the model of Stuart) to carry the grousers when they are not in use.
Back to top
View user's profile
GerryChester
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

The Churchill's advantage over both Tigera and Panthers (in North Africa and Italy) was the higher rate of fire and speedier traverse. When the OK arrived to use track links for additional protection, as tests showed that adding them to the turret slowed the speed of traverse, we were not allowed to add them other than on the hull. The report on the the tests was submmitted to the UK but, for some unexplained reason, was not passed on to the Churchill units in NWE.
Back to top
View user's profile
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:21 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Coldsteel
Here, from the Sherman register:


Source: web.inter.nl.net/users.../track.htm
Back to top
View user's profile
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:26 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- the_shadock
So the tracks on the Firefly tank are definitely CDP ..


Pierre-Olivier, looks like you're right!

Thanks,
Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:40 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

By all accts the crews thought the extra protection offered was a bonus and as the main threat at that stage of war was a chemical vs kinetic munition such as a Panzerfaust then they also offered a dgree of spaced armour . Crews more than tanks were important at that stages as it was relatively easy to replace a vehicle but the commonwealth formations were running out of manpower.
Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum