±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 267
Total: 267
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: CPGlang
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Downloads
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Downloads
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Home
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: CPGlang
80: Home
81: Home
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: CPGlang
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Contact
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Home
99: News Archive
100: CPGlang
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: CPGlang
112: Downloads
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Your Account
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Member Screenshots
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: CPGlang
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: CPGlang
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: News Archive
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Member Screenshots
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Search
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: Photo Gallery
170: Downloads
171: Community Forums
172: CPGlang
173: News Archive
174: Community Forums
175: Downloads
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: News Archive
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: CPGlang
188: Member Screenshots
189: CPGlang
190: Home
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Home
197: Downloads
198: Community Forums
199: CPGlang
200: Home
201: Downloads
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Downloads
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Supporters
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Home
238: Your Account
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: CPGlang
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: CPGlang
245: Home
246: Home
247: CPGlang
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: News Archive
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: CPGlang
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
New Bradley at Ft Bliss
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:48 am
Post subject: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Hi Folks!

Found this guy the last time I did an area recon of the base for old vehicles. Serial Number is 832. I think it is a M2A1 or maybe a M2A0.


This vehicle is now on display in front of the old 3rd ACR HQs building which how has the HQs for the 5th BCT, 1st AD in it.

Neil! I have sent you two PMs to update changes for Ver 3.0

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:12 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Thanks Roy!

832? That's odd... Should be like 2A or 3A and then three numbers... Did you get it from the same location, near the tow lug, as identified on the SN guide?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:32 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Hi Neil! Hi Folks!

- Neil_Baumgardner

832? That's odd... Should be like 2A or 3A and then three numbers... Did you get it from the same location, near the tow lug, as identified on the SN guide?


I used the guide to find it which says check the front left LIFTING point! There are no numbers around the front towing lugs that I could find.

The number is very easy to read. Vehicle looks like it only has two layers of paint on the most of the hull.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:44 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Right, lifting point, sorry... I couldnt think of the right words... Well, its odd, but I guess thats it...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:54 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Does the 2A or 3A specify M2 or M3 Bradley? Maybe with the low number it was built before someone decided that the designator should be part of the serial number to reduce confusion? Also is it always only 3 numbers after the 2A/3A? I would think there were more Bradleys around than that. I wouldn't be surprised if it could be three or four numbers (at least) behind the 2A/3A

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:09 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Yes. Actually its 2AA and 3AA - for M2 and M3 respectively - and then _five_ numbers actually... Here's one Jeff found...



Oddly enough, MLRS SNs are 4AA... I guess since they are Bradley-based...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Geoff_walden
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:47 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

- Neil_Baumgardner
Yes. Actually its 2AA and 3AA - for M2 and M3 respectively - and then _five_ numbers actually... Here's one Jeff found...

Oddly enough, MLRS SNs are 4AA... I guess since they are Bradley-based...

Neil



Neil,

Right ... 2AA = M2 (basic), 3AA = M3 (basic), 4AA = M993 (basic).

2AD = M2A2, 3AD = M3A2.

2AB = M2A1. Since all A1s were (theoretically) converted to A2s, if there are any out there, they would be few and far between.

2AC = M2A1(-). There weren't very many of these to start with, and they were all later converted to full-up A1s (and theoretically later to A2s).

2ADR = an M2A2 converted or reconditioned at Red River Army Depot. There may be some Brads out there with a "M" in the S/N - this would be a vehicle that was converted from A1 to A2 at Mainz Army Depot.

I don't know if the M993A1 changed S/N prefix, but it might be 4AC.

There were also some onesy-twosy Brads produced with oddball S/Ns, like 3MM00001 - this was an M3A1 produced for Martin-Marietta in June 1986. There may still be some of these oddball vehicles stashed around somewhere.

Geoff Walden
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:13 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Geoff, can you explain the apparent three-digit SN above?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Geoff_walden
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:07 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Neil,

No, I can't - never saw a S/N on a Bradley like that. If it was the 832nd Bradley built, that would put it in the 2nd or 3rd year buy (I think), so it certainly wasn't an early or experimental model.

Geoff
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Something I've always wondered-Why would this vehicle have been taken out of service?

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:08 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

I Mark! Hi Folks!

- MarkHolloway
Something I've always wondered-Why would this vehicle have been taken out of service?


My guess would be NOT ENOUGH MONEY to upgrade all of the older vehicles to A2 configurtion or convert it into something else like the medevac/treatment vehicles that were being developed.

My 2 cents,
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:50 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Who knows... For a while, the FCS office at Aberdeen Proving Ground had a Stryker on a concrete pad. It was only there for a few months, so I guess they realized they needed it afterall Wink

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:44 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

- Neil_Baumgardner
Who knows... For a while, the FCS office at Aberdeen Proving Ground had a Stryker on a concrete pad. It was only there for a few months, so I guess they realized they needed it afterall Wink

Neil


I've always thought it odd that they'd make a museum piece out of something that was still in the inventory. Maybe this is cheaper than warehousing it Wink

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:29 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

Early F-15s were being turned into training hulks before the first production run was finished. Sometimes there are details in the fitting out that make it difficult to incorporate early production items in with true production line examples.

It is also possible that it is advantagous to declare some early production items as not worth upgrading so that congress will fund continued production of new items. That helps keep voters employed in certain districts and larg eemployers in those districts happy also

Then there are the pieces of equipment that have been abused in various test programs and it has been decided that it isn't worth (or the abuse is so great that it can't) bringing the unit back to FMC (fully mission capable) status

And there are the items like the M48C and early M60 tanks that had flaws in the armor and could be used for training but couldn't be trusted for operational use. With the draw down at the end of the cold war there would be less reason to keep marginal equipment in the inventory. It could be used for monuments and the duties it previously filled could be done by excess FMC equipment.

Oh and that Stryker at Aberdeen was later seen sitting beside the museum. If I ever get up there again Rolling Eyes I'll have to ask but I think it may be stashed away somewhere

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:49 pm
Post subject: Re: New Bradley at Ft Bliss

- bsmart
Oh and that Stryker at Aberdeen was later seen sitting beside the museum. If I ever get up there again Rolling Eyes I'll have to ask but I think it may be stashed away somewhere


OK, that sounds truly ominous.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum