±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 309
Total: 309
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Downloads
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: News
09: Member Screenshots
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Downloads
13: Downloads
14: Home
15: Home
16: CPGlang
17: Downloads
18: News
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: CPGlang
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: Home
27: Downloads
28: Downloads
29: Home
30: Downloads
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Community Forums
36: Downloads
37: Downloads
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: CPGlang
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: CPGlang
45: Downloads
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Downloads
49: Community Forums
50: News
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Your Account
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: News Archive
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: Member Screenshots
65: Member Screenshots
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Member Screenshots
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Downloads
77: Downloads
78: Downloads
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Downloads
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Photo Gallery
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Downloads
111: News
112: Home
113: Downloads
114: Home
115: Home
116: Downloads
117: Statistics
118: Community Forums
119: Downloads
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Downloads
125: Community Forums
126: News
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Downloads
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Downloads
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Downloads
137: News Archive
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Photo Gallery
144: Community Forums
145: CPGlang
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: CPGlang
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: News
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: CPGlang
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Downloads
170: Downloads
171: Home
172: Downloads
173: Photo Gallery
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Downloads
177: Downloads
178: CPGlang
179: Downloads
180: Photo Gallery
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Photo Gallery
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Photo Gallery
196: Downloads
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Search
203: Contact
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: Member Screenshots
211: CPGlang
212: Community Forums
213: Your Account
214: Your Account
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Home
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Downloads
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Photo Gallery
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: News Archive
238: Home
239: Photo Gallery
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: CPGlang
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Your Account
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Treasury
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Home
270: Downloads
271: Downloads
272: News
273: Home
274: Photo Gallery
275: Member Screenshots
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: News
281: Downloads
282: Downloads
283: Community Forums
284: Home
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: CPGlang
292: Photo Gallery
293: Downloads
294: Home
295: Your Account
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: News Archive
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Home
304: Member Screenshots
305: Downloads
306: Community Forums
307: Downloads
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:22 am
Post subject: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Below is a 1942 GPW (Ford Script) Jeep. It belongs to a Captain here at Ft Hood and he was sent my way by the 4ID museum director to possibly assist in its identification. It's serial number from the dash plate says 12078, built 4 April 1942 at the Ford plant in Dallas. He bought the jeep in the past year from a man that lived just east of Dallas. The previous owner said it had been there since 1989 but he knew nothing else about the jeep. The Captain has sanded the jeep down and revealed these markings but knows little about them. Can this esteemed board of experts lend a hand?










_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:59 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Hi Jeff,

Good post! I'm going to guess the top number is "C4" but the botttom one looks pretty long to be an Army bumper number. Could it be a registration number? I guess there's a chance it came from Camp Hood. Wish my 'photo shop' had sandpaper mode so I could dig a little deeper. Wink

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:37 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Looks like he may need to sand a bit more.....

Too cool, I have GPW 15170 built in Dallas in April 13 42 ! You have my jeep's slightly older brother here.

You should have him add this jeep to the S/N number list on G503.com if he has not already done so.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:00 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

I think the 2nd bumper has an "AB" in the top row, but I'm not sure what this would relate to in Army terms. I beleive he's already afraid he may have sanded too much already. He sand a little and then photographs, sands some more, etc... He is already a memeber of G503 and that's where these pictures came from. I have yet to meet this Captain in person but he lives only about 15-20 minutes from me in Harker Heights, TX. We have communicated via phone and e-mail thus far.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

- SFC_Jeff_Button
I think the 2nd bumper has an "AB" in the top row.


Any chance it's 82AB? That would be the 82nd Airborne.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:24 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

I think there's a good chance you might be right about the 82nd Airborne. I found this photo of a restored 82nd Jeep. It had pictures from WWII as well and this could be it. However I still need to try and decipher the lower lettering. This one belonged to the 320th Field Artillery.

[img][/img]

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Dennis_Smith
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:18 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Wikepedia shows a chart with all the units in 82nd Division (modern day). Towards the bottom of the page shows the structure during WW2. It may help with deciphering.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...ed_States)

Of interest, it shows 320F as artillery delivered by gliders!
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:47 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Yes, I found the 320th did come in on gliders with the 82nd.
I tried various unit numbers and did come up with what might be one close match. Prehaps the bottom number below the 82nd says; 899TD, for the 899th Tank Destroyer Battalion. They were a separate Battalion that was attached to the 82nd for a few days, (16-18 Jun 1944), and Charlie company would match what was on the other bumperette.
Since the 899th was a Separate Battalion, they went where needed every few days. Below is what I am tracking;

A period of training in the Algerian desert followed the Tunisian campaign and on 1 November 1943 the 899th departed North Africa and landed in Italy on 10 November 1943. A short time later, the Battalion was withdrawn and embarked for England to train in preparation for D-Day invasion at Normandy.

Company “A� and Company “C� landed on Utah Beach on D-Day, with the remainder of the 899th arriving D plus 4 and 5. The 899th, the first TD Bn to land in France, teamed with four infantry divisions, including the Fourth Infantry Division, until D plus 11, when it was attached to the Ninth Infantry Division. objective Cherbourg.


Attachments of Independent Tank Destroyer Battalions and Groups to Infantry, Armored, and Airborne Divisions in the ETO

4th Infantry Division
Cos A&C, 899th TD Bn (SP) 9-13 Jun 44

82d Airborne Division
Co C, 899th TD Bn (SP) 16-18 Jun 44

90th Infantry Division
Co B 899th TD Bn (SP) 17-19 Jun 44

9th Infantry Division
899th TD Bn (SP) (- 2 cos) 19-20 Jun 44
899th TD Bn (SP) 20-24 Jul 44

3rd Armored Division
Co C, 899th TD Bn (SP)(Support of 47th Inf Regt)6-10 Sep 1944
Co C, 899th TD Bn (SP)(Part of 47th RCT) 25Oct – 10Nov 1944

I also found an article where the 899th Commander commented that of all the units the 899th was attached to, the 82nd AirBorne was the Battalions favorite due to the soldiers ferocity and tenacity with the enemy.
Prehaps this is the unit I have been looking for. If not, at least I did learn alot about tank destroyer units in WWII.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Jens_O_Mehner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 511
Location: Giessen, Germany
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Before you get too carried away...

The 899TD would have kept the higher command markings they were assigned to and would not have changed them for a couple of days with the 82nd. IIRC, TD battalions were independent Army or Corps assets, so the first combination would have been that, then 899TD, then individual vehicle on the other side, if in fact they even put the highest command on there, many independent tank and tank destroyer battalions only had their own codes on the vehicles.

A lot of Jeeps assigned to airborne units show no bumper markings at all in contemporary photos in theater, not because they have been censored, but because they a) were not painted on in the first place due to opsec or b) the original ones were overpainted because the vehicles were, ah, appropriated, from their original units. The airborne divisions did have less Jeeps assigned to them than for instance infantry divisions, most of their movement was done on foot, by air, on semitrailers or by rail in the good old "8 or 40"s.

Many, if not most, vehicles remained in theatre and were either used by the Army of occupation, allied nations, UNRRA and other rebuilding efforts, MDAP etc. etc., many of them ended up either in collector's hands over here, many more were scrapped, some of them had a second or third life in Africa or Asia Minor.

There is a good chance that this 1942 Ford GPW never left CONUS, but it may have been assigned to the 82nd when they returned after the war or to a stateside ABN training element during the war.

What about the front bumper? The codes should have been painted on that one as well, maybe those could be recovered more easily? I also recommend tracing them with a piece of paper and a pencil- you know, the old trick every PI and detective uses in a gazillion of movies... Wink



Jens O.

_________________
Information not shared is information lost.
"Don't order the Schnitzel, they're using Schnauzer."
Back to top
View user's profile
Dennis_Smith
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:14 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

The first digit looks like a "G" instead of a number. WW2 regiments had 12 companys, A-M skipping J. I wonder if the number might mean G company, xxx regiment?

This site shows all the airborne divisions and their regiments. (None that fit very well, though)...


www.militaryhistoryonl...valry.aspx
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:52 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

The front bumper was one of the few pieces that were not with this mostly original vehicle.
I agree that Tank Destroyer bit was a bit much to hope for, but once I got into the research of the unit, I got a little bit carried away since it was all new to me.
Once I get some more time, I will research / check out the stateside 82nd AB units and try to find a match. I still need to see this vehicle in person which I hope to do within the next week or two. Thanks to all that have helped.
I have an Ontos here in Texas I need to visit as well with the "hook-up" from Dontos as an assist.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

I found out that the jeeps hood had "2066837" painted on as its Registration / USA number. I sent this number to a friend for research but does anyone else know how this number might assist in deciphering this jeeps unit history?

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:30 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

The USA number won't help you much in tracing unit history.
Tom Wobolt on G503 is the guy to ask if that hood number seems right for that GPW.
Was the number painted in White or in Blue drab?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Blue Drab was on the hood numbers. This Captain is part of G503 and I know he posts there quite often.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:58 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Thats too cool to have the original Blue Drab numbers!
If he has put this same info on the Gee, I'm sure that he has been talking with Tom.
I wish I could have found my original hood numbers, I am sooo jealous
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum