±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 713
Total: 713
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: News
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Your Account
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Downloads
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Downloads
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: CPGlang
24: Member Screenshots
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Home
37: Home
38: Contact
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: CPGlang
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Home
46: Downloads
47: CPGlang
48: Home
49: Downloads
50: Community Forums
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: News
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Downloads
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Downloads
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Member Screenshots
98: Community Forums
99: Downloads
100: CPGlang
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: Member Screenshots
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: CPGlang
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Member Screenshots
121: Home
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: News
127: Community Forums
128: Your Account
129: Community Forums
130: Your Account
131: News
132: Photo Gallery
133: Member Screenshots
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: CPGlang
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: CPGlang
164: Photo Gallery
165: Downloads
166: Community Forums
167: Member Screenshots
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: Community Forums
173: Downloads
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Photo Gallery
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Your Account
190: Downloads
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: CPGlang
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: News
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Photo Gallery
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Your Account
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: CPGlang
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Downloads
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: CPGlang
249: Home
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Home
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Home
261: Statistics
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Home
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: News Archive
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Downloads
278: Home
279: Home
280: Photo Gallery
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Photo Gallery
284: Community Forums
285: Photo Gallery
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Member Screenshots
295: Community Forums
296: Member Screenshots
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Member Screenshots
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Downloads
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Statistics
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Member Screenshots
325: Home
326: Your Account
327: Home
328: Photo Gallery
329: Member Screenshots
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Photo Gallery
336: CPGlang
337: Community Forums
338: Member Screenshots
339: Downloads
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Downloads
348: Community Forums
349: Statistics
350: Your Account
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Downloads
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Your Account
373: Downloads
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: News Archive
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Downloads
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Community Forums
395: Photo Gallery
396: Photo Gallery
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Photo Gallery
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Home
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Photo Gallery
410: News Archive
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Photo Gallery
415: Home
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Statistics
419: Photo Gallery
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Downloads
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Your Account
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Photo Gallery
434: Member Screenshots
435: Photo Gallery
436: Community Forums
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Home
443: Community Forums
444: Photo Gallery
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Photo Gallery
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Photo Gallery
452: Downloads
453: Downloads
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Home
467: Photo Gallery
468: Home
469: Photo Gallery
470: Your Account
471: Member Screenshots
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Home
475: Photo Gallery
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Photo Gallery
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Your Account
482: Member Screenshots
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Photo Gallery
489: Photo Gallery
490: Photo Gallery
491: Photo Gallery
492: Community Forums
493: Home
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Member Screenshots
497: Your Account
498: Photo Gallery
499: Photo Gallery
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Photo Gallery
504: CPGlang
505: Community Forums
506: Photo Gallery
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Your Account
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Home
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Home
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Photo Gallery
529: Member Screenshots
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: News
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Photo Gallery
540: Community Forums
541: Photo Gallery
542: Member Screenshots
543: Home
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Home
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Member Screenshots
561: Home
562: Photo Gallery
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Photo Gallery
568: Home
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Member Screenshots
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Home
589: Community Forums
590: Photo Gallery
591: Community Forums
592: Photo Gallery
593: Photo Gallery
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Home
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Your Account
607: Statistics
608: Community Forums
609: Home
610: Photo Gallery
611: Community Forums
612: Photo Gallery
613: Home
614: Home
615: Photo Gallery
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Downloads
620: Home
621: Community Forums
622: Your Account
623: Your Account
624: Community Forums
625: Member Screenshots
626: Home
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Home
630: Home
631: Community Forums
632: Photo Gallery
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Member Screenshots
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Downloads
642: Home
643: Community Forums
644: Photo Gallery
645: Search
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Photo Gallery
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Tell a Friend
653: Community Forums
654: CPGlang
655: Home
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Downloads
659: Community Forums
660: Downloads
661: Photo Gallery
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Downloads
666: Community Forums
667: Member Screenshots
668: Community Forums
669: Statistics
670: Statistics
671: Photo Gallery
672: Home
673: Home
674: Photo Gallery
675: Home
676: Community Forums
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Member Screenshots
680: Community Forums
681: News
682: Photo Gallery
683: Photo Gallery
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Home
689: Statistics
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Home
696: Community Forums
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Photo Gallery
701: Photo Gallery
702: Photo Gallery
703: Community Forums
704: Member Screenshots
705: Community Forums
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Home
710: Statistics
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:51 am
Post subject: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I dont just post rare old armor, I post rare "new" armor as well! Per the article below, there are only 44 of these in the U.S. inventory. There were these 6 in the 36th ENG BDE, 4th ID motor pool and 6 more in a motorpool next door. When I was here in 2000 with 3-66th Armor, 4th ID, civilians brought one to our motor pool as a "demo" and it was pretty neat. Now they are actually stationed here. I haven't seen any in the 1st Cav area motor pools but I'd bet they have some too. I was in this motor pool to photograph an M4A3 that I cant seem to find a serial number for. I purchased some sandpaper this afternoon however and that serial wont be hidden long! Below is some info on the Wolverine.

The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.

For over a quarter of a century the US Army has made use of armored bridgelaying vehicles based on the M60/M48 Patton series of tanks. In recent years, however, the Army discovered that the aging M60 AVLB (Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge) was too slow to keep up with the M1 Abrams during field maneuvers. Additionally, the M1 was so heavy that it could safely cross the AVLB's bridge only at a very slow speed.

Program development for a new armored bridgelaying vehicle began in 1983, and by 1994 General Dynamics Land Systems had been awarded a contract. The first prototype vehicles were being tested by 1996, and the first production models were delivered to the Army by 2003.

Because the Wolverine is essentially an M1A2 SEP tank with bridgelaying gear instead of a turret it shares virtually all of the parent vehicle's speed, mobility, survivability, and automotive components. This commonality was a key design factor in the Wolverine's development. The Wolverine also features an advanced communication package designed to keep it in contact with local field commanders. However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed.

The Wolverine is operated by two crewmen who sit within the hull. Both crewmen have access to the bridging controls, while the bridge itself is carried in two sections above the hull. Once a bridging site is chosen the vehicle securely anchors itself in place with a spade. The two sections of the bridge are joined together, and then the entire bridge is extended across the obstacle and dropped into place. During launch the crewmen have the ability to make minor corrections if needed. Once operations are complete the Wolverine drives across the bridge and retrieves it from the other side simply by reversing the process. The bridge can be launched in under 5 minutes or retrieved in less than 10, all without the crewmen ever leaving the safety of their vehicle.

Once launched, the 26 meter bridge can support a 70 ton vehicle moving at 16 km/h. The Wolverine allows even the heaviest of vehicles to cross craters, ditches, and even partially damaged bridges at combat speed. This mobility is a decisive advantage for armored units.

To date the U.S. Army has received 44 Wolverines, which have been distributed to a few select engineer units. The Army had originally intended to purchase 465 vehicles, however budget cuts and the recent shift in philosophy toward a lighter fighting force have cast the future of the Wolverine program in doubt. Currently the Army does not plan to purchase any more Wolverines, but it has reserved the right to restart production in the future if necessary.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

"The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.
...
However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed."

Yikes!! That's got to change. If this is such a rare bird, the opposing forces are going to know it too. Their troops will do what they can to harass or attack it. Even a .50 in a protected remote controlled weapons pod would be an improvement over nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:54 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I agree, I was surprised to see that it wasn't armed at all. Especially since its such a high-dollar vehicle. I wouldn't want to crew this.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:32 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Lets face it the M9 ACE is the same. I was amused to read in a combat report the following description of it 'one man, alone, unarmed'

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

The proto-type M-48 AVLB had two cuplo mounted M2 50 cal machine guns. The production versions didn't have them. The M-60 AVLB were also unarmed.

That vehicle should never be sent out by its self. There should be more than enough firepower around it to ensure the crew only has to work on getting the bridge down in the right spot so over vehicles can cross ASAP.

Jeff, super thanks for this set of photos. I have hopes of some day trying to scratch build a Wolverine sense none of the model companies will most likly never do one.

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:14 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!


But you loose the advantage of commonality and have to continue stocking parts in the system for the older vehicles that you would not otherwise have to have.

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:28 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

But there is commonality with the old AVLB's, it's called the Hercules M88A2 and they have a very good track record. We also have plenty of M88A1's too. If you look closely at the M60 AVLB/AVLM systems they are now using M88 components when rebuilt. Much cheaper than converting old M1 hulls, Also cheaper to operate. BTW, the Wolverine uses the old M1 hull, just like the SEP's. One automotive difference is the the hydraulic pump is driven off the angle drive of the transmission and the generator was moved to the Auxillary Gear Box from what I saw in 98. What the Wolverine has is speed, but with the current fight we are in it's a moot point.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:05 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!


I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:19 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.


The 1970s! The last half was hard on all of DOD. I remember reading about new F-16s coming off the production line in Ft. Worth. The Air Force would install an engine, send the aircraft up for a test flight and then remove the engine so it could installed in the next aircraft. The Army was putting a lot of it's available funding into the new Abrams/Bradley vehicles and there was very little funds for very much of any thing else. God help the AFV Crewman who lost a tool needed to work on his vehicle because the supply room didn't have any funds to buy replacement tools.

Hell, costs and the need from funds for other programs is the only reason the Navy has retired the F-14 Tomcats. I have heard, but I have not confired it, that the S-3 Vikings have been or are being retired, or there is a plan to retire them for the same reason.

All this is an outstanding example of why the DOD doesn't always buy good things at the right time. Sad
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum