±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 689
Total: 689
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Photo Gallery
03: Statistics
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Downloads
09: Home
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Downloads
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Member Screenshots
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Your Account
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Downloads
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: CPGlang
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Downloads
49: News
50: Downloads
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Downloads
76: Community Forums
77: CPGlang
78: Downloads
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Downloads
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Downloads
120: Downloads
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: Downloads
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Downloads
142: News
143: News Archive
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Downloads
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Downloads
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Downloads
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Photo Gallery
180: Downloads
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Your Account
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Statistics
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Member Screenshots
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: CPGlang
213: Community Forums
214: Member Screenshots
215: News Archive
216: Community Forums
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Member Screenshots
226: Member Screenshots
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Member Screenshots
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Photo Gallery
234: Statistics
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Downloads
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: CPGlang
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Statistics
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Your Account
261: Photo Gallery
262: News
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Home
268: Photo Gallery
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Photo Gallery
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Photo Gallery
288: Photo Gallery
289: Home
290: Home
291: Home
292: Member Screenshots
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Statistics
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Photo Gallery
317: Community Forums
318: Member Screenshots
319: Photo Gallery
320: Member Screenshots
321: Home
322: Home
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Photo Gallery
328: Downloads
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Photo Gallery
341: Home
342: Home
343: Photo Gallery
344: CPGlang
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Photo Gallery
349: CPGlang
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Member Screenshots
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Photo Gallery
356: Downloads
357: Community Forums
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Member Screenshots
367: Community Forums
368: Photo Gallery
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Downloads
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Photo Gallery
393: Downloads
394: Community Forums
395: Statistics
396: Home
397: Downloads
398: Community Forums
399: Downloads
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Your Account
403: Home
404: Downloads
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Downloads
414: Photo Gallery
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Photo Gallery
418: Community Forums
419: Downloads
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Downloads
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: News
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Member Screenshots
439: Photo Gallery
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Member Screenshots
444: Community Forums
445: Photo Gallery
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: CPGlang
451: Community Forums
452: Home
453: Photo Gallery
454: Home
455: News
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Home
459: Photo Gallery
460: Community Forums
461: Photo Gallery
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Home
467: Statistics
468: Your Account
469: Downloads
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Downloads
473: Community Forums
474: Photo Gallery
475: News
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Home
481: Photo Gallery
482: Community Forums
483: Photo Gallery
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Photo Gallery
488: CPGlang
489: Community Forums
490: Photo Gallery
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Home
499: Community Forums
500: Home
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: News Archive
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: News
507: Community Forums
508: Your Account
509: Community Forums
510: Home
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Photo Gallery
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Downloads
520: Home
521: Community Forums
522: Downloads
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Your Account
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Photo Gallery
529: Community Forums
530: Statistics
531: Photo Gallery
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Home
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Photo Gallery
539: Community Forums
540: Your Account
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Downloads
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Home
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Photo Gallery
552: Home
553: Photo Gallery
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Photo Gallery
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: News Archive
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Photo Gallery
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Your Account
571: Photo Gallery
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Photo Gallery
575: Home
576: Photo Gallery
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Member Screenshots
582: Photo Gallery
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Home
586: Community Forums
587: Statistics
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Home
595: Search
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Photo Gallery
601: Community Forums
602: Photo Gallery
603: Downloads
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Photo Gallery
608: Downloads
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Member Screenshots
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Member Screenshots
619: Photo Gallery
620: Community Forums
621: Statistics
622: Community Forums
623: Home
624: Photo Gallery
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Photo Gallery
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Photo Gallery
631: Home
632: Photo Gallery
633: Member Screenshots
634: Community Forums
635: Member Screenshots
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: CPGlang
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: News
642: Member Screenshots
643: Member Screenshots
644: Home
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Home
649: Home
650: Photo Gallery
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Photo Gallery
654: Member Screenshots
655: Downloads
656: Photo Gallery
657: Home
658: Photo Gallery
659: Home
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Photo Gallery
663: Home
664: Home
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Member Screenshots
671: Home
672: Community Forums
673: Community Forums
674: Photo Gallery
675: Photo Gallery
676: Member Screenshots
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Downloads
682: Community Forums
683: CPGlang
684: Community Forums
685: Home
686: Statistics
687: News Archive
688: Community Forums
689: Member Screenshots

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX :: Archived
A forum for Microsoft's Flight Simulator X
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  FSX

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:59 pm
Post subject: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Doesn't look like Directx 10 and Vista will save the day for FSX

forums.avsim.net/dcboa...1837&page=


Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Mechy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Posts: 41
Location: Philly
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

What needs to be saved??? As far as I'm concerned it's a great looking and running program that runs at low fps. It hasn't crashed on me, I don't have any stutters, the ground isn't blocky and this is right out of the box. Once the third party boys figure it out, it's even going to be better.

Besides, I don't want a program that is going to be dated and worthless in a year. If everyone had killer 'fps' with it now, how good would it be in a year. This game has always been built with several years of use in mind. The same boys over there at Avsim who are crying about FSX are probably the same ones who were crying about FS9. I don't know about the rest of you but I'm just going to enjoy it and look forward to the addons!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Mechy wrote
This game has always been built with several years of use in mind.


Well why then does it not use dual cores effectively?

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Shades
Forum Tree-Rat

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6473
Location: 3rd Branch up, 'Ye Olde Oak', Green Wood.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Think you'll probably find it's the system set-ups rather than the hardware in them that's dragging things down.
There may be a patch due as well.
In the meantime, Stoopy made a very good and thorough explanation of ways to tweak/improve your hardwares' performance (it's the first sticky in the section) over in CFS3. Obviously it's tailored to CFS3, but you'll find a lot of it relates to other games, specifically Flight Simulators, and is just as applicable.
It explains why low frame rates are achieved and how to improve them in several areas.

_________________
Skwerl's place.

Com-Central's cutest, fluffiest, twitchiest, tail.
CPU > Intel i9-9900k (o/c 4.9GHz); COOLING > BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4;
MOBO > ASUS PRIME Z390-A; RAM > 2x32GB Corsair LPX 2666MHz;
GPU > Gigabyte GEFORCE GTX650Ti PCI-e 3.0 2Gb GDDR5;
AUDIO > Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (plus - Universal Audio UAD2 Quad Custom accelerator);
HDD > 3x1TB+ M.2. SSDs; LCD > DELL - S2419HGF (1920x1080);
PSU > 650W be quiet Straight Power 11 - 80+ Gold;
CASE > BeQuiet! SILENT BASE 601; OS > Windows 11 Home Advanced (64-bit).
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Kitform
Bar Maid

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 2005
Posts: 2011
Location: Cleveland. UK.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

- Adrian_Wainer
Doesn't look like Directx 10 and Vista will save the day for FSX


He's gotta be doing something wrong, I run FSX at 1920x1200 and with sliders set to high, I get good frame rates and my system is inferior to his. (3DMark06 of 8,548) with DX9c
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Amen, Mechy!!!!!

Adrian.....hey bud! Did you miss the post at AVSIM by Phil Taylor, ACES program development lead? He tried to explain, very comprehensively and very politely I thought, why FSX is not written to take direct advantage of dual core CPU's as a multithreaded application. To summarize, two very good reasons: The lead time incolved in makign design/architectural desicions, and the intense work involved in exact process timing to ensure processes stay in synch. In other words, the threads managing the aircraft dynamics, the world dynamics, the weather dynamics, the scenery dynamics, etc etc must all be in exact synch or you get trees moving around slightly, an aircraft that thinks it landed when it appears to still be above the ground, etc. Imagine the howling of the user base if we had those kinds of problems instead. AND imagine all the small things that could have gotten "broken" in such a redesign process....and then imagine the additional delays.

And let's not forget that dual core technology came along to be proven only AFTER the FSX effort was already underway. So now the decision should be to scrap the months of effort on top of the associated longer development time and risks mentioned above? As a longtime FS customer I THANK the development team for sticking with their decision....it was right!

It's also very relevant to this discussion because Mr. Taylor did imply, strongly, that their team is "looking at what can be done" to give some relief to dual-core users, and that he woudl be back to report more around or shortly after the Thanksgiving timeframe, I wouldn't start advertising that a patch is coming from that statement, but take it any way you want it. This is positive stuff, and shows the commitment to support and quality does exist, IMHO.

There was also a revealing (and sadly typical) reference to Marketing having more to do with the state in which the product shipped than the ACES developers and testers did...in other words, and this is just like a Vista discussion we had here a while back, the project timeline and milestones rule all, regardless of quality, to some people. It's another illustration of why product delays are inevitably a GOOD thing for the users.

There are a lot of people making assumptions about how easy it shoud be to take a legacy software architecture and covert it into a mutithreaded app for dual-core, as if waving a magic wand and it shall be done. I don't talk about my own real-world gig but rest assured it's deep in the real-time software and firmware realm, having to do with some extremely fast industrial automation equipment for a very very large organization, with 26 years years as a developer in several languages ranging from Assembler to C++ under my belt, and am now a program manager myself for an extensive base of mission-critical equipment. I appreciate what the ACES team considereed and am absolutey appalled by every Tom, Dick and Harry (or self-important IT guy...no offense to any IT professionals around here) who claims MS creates "bloated code"...when they haven't even SEEN one bit of the code! It's as sad, and as ignorant, as the big ol' WAV file that went around a few months ago by that dude (steve somethingorother) who, while obviously overloaded on some kind of pain medication, went on a big ol' rant about FSX after his experience as a BETA tester....if I remember right, he even went on about CFS3 being written in "Windows XP Code"....as if there's really such a thing, LMAO! It's an O/S, not a development language (and strangely CFS3 also worked just fine on my old PC running Windows 2000 O/S). Some people's kids, you know....??

Sorry about my own rant here. but folks just don't get it that this is supposed to be fun, a hobby, meaning an optional way to spend your time, and there is NO LAW that says any of us HAVE to buy it and run it. It's odd too, that those folks who are constantly griping that FS9 is better aren't spending their time flying FS9 but instead are spending a considerable amount of time and effort bashing FSX. Wonder if they're really just members of the X-Plane sales staff?

As someone who now no longer is allowed to do any development work due to a changed job description (and a GREAT team of people who are really good at it anyway) I don't even dare call myself a developer any more, despite all the years and projects and languages. But it's getting to where anyone who does a most basic repaint and uploads it then claims themselves to be a "developer" and thus qualified to perform a blindfolded code review by merely looking at an FPS counter.

Gotta admit the demo is gettin' old even though it runs like a striped-@ss ape on my rig now....I hope AVSIM gets those promo copies of FSX from MS soon and it arrives on the doorstep in a coupla weeks.....can't WAIT to have some fun with the rest of ya's!

I mean it IS fun, right? And it's all ABOUT fun, right? Or why else are we all here in our spare time...we're not nuts, are we?




_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Shades
Forum Tree-Rat

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6473
Location: 3rd Branch up, 'Ye Olde Oak', Green Wood.
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 9:16 am
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

- JG300-Stoopy
it runs like a striped-@ss ape on my rig now
There's no way you can tell me that's legitimate!

_________________
Skwerl's place.

Com-Central's cutest, fluffiest, twitchiest, tail.
CPU > Intel i9-9900k (o/c 4.9GHz); COOLING > BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4;
MOBO > ASUS PRIME Z390-A; RAM > 2x32GB Corsair LPX 2666MHz;
GPU > Gigabyte GEFORCE GTX650Ti PCI-e 3.0 2Gb GDDR5;
AUDIO > Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (plus - Universal Audio UAD2 Quad Custom accelerator);
HDD > 3x1TB+ M.2. SSDs; LCD > DELL - S2419HGF (1920x1080);
PSU > 650W be quiet Straight Power 11 - 80+ Gold;
CASE > BeQuiet! SILENT BASE 601; OS > Windows 11 Home Advanced (64-bit).
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:02 am
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Laughing

Well, it's maybe a dated benchmarking technique, you're right! But I done seen me one of those things once and MAN can they haul butt!

Laughing

(Maybe I shoulda qualified my statement as saying "with sliders in mid position and with some basic tweaks").

_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Here is an absolutely brilliant discussion largely between three very experienced and informed people on the subjext of multi-core support as specifically relates to FSX. It's also pleasantly devoid of any negative, useless comments from the bashers in the peanut gallery.

http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=121&topic_id=372401&mode=full

And definitely take their word for it...I'm an old-style non-thread-aware programmer, but it's clear these gents are quite savvy on the subject (two of them particularly).

When done reading, take a flight and enjoy FSX and be happy we have it now instead of another year or two from now....and in the meantime, a very large company with some brilliant programmers and resources is also working the issue, no doubt.

_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Mechy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Posts: 41
Location: Philly
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

Good read Stoopy .... Funny thing is if you read the forums over there they still talk about the frustration of having a duel core and it not taking full advantage in FSX .... I have a duel core and find it an exciting time of what's coming next.

Here is an example of what they can do now with a quad core :
www.youtube.com/watch?...qoWKNbA&NR
what people have to realize here is that this is probably a more scripted type game then FSX is but this new technology is going to open up a whole new world of computing.

And who knows, microsoft may come out with some patch to take advantage of multicore proc. .... but if they don't FSX should still make you happy right out of the box. Problem is, I think, sometimes people forget when they first purchased FS9 ... they only talk about it as it is today, what I mean is at the end of it's run. Where the hardware has surpassed the software and anything you add on runs super. In a few years FSX will be the greatest thing and FSXI will be terrible, incomplete and the worst software ever made !!! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

Laughing

That's absolutely spot-on, Mechy. Heck, even today, FS9 still continues to benefit from hardware upgrades. Case in point, my video card fan started making some noise 2 weeks ago, and over the weekend I saw that one store was having a special on 1Gig DDR RAM that my system takes. So long story short, I now have 3 Megs of RAM and a new ATI 1650 Pro vid card with 512MB on it, nothing special compared to what's out there I know, but it wasn't expensive either and it's a decent price/performance card for us highly prudent "married with kids" types.

Anyway yeah I'll admit I had FSX in mind when doing this but the whole system and especially FS9 benefited from it even further. Lately I've been getting heavy into recording and playing back formation aerobatics and when it replays 3 or 4 Decathlons roaring by with smoke on, it's been stutterville.....much better now.

Now, FS9 is even better, and this is 4 years after the release. Sheesh!

And when hasn't flight simming been an exercise in frustration with hardware and seeking upgrades. Compared to the old days - and I mean getting maybe 1 to 2 frames per sec back in the early 80's on the Commodore 64 with Sublogic flight sim (maybe Bushy can back me up here I think - seriously you could watch the screen update in synch with the second-hand on your watch during when landing at Meigs) we have it GREAT today.

The CPU architecture conversations are great and all, very interesting, but they miss out on the point that the performance of a system is the culmination of many fine details and bottlenecks and is best treated in like, a complete, systemic, like, holistic, approach, man, not just brute force in one or two components. I can't help but think that some people are just first-time upgraders or otherwise just outraged that the system specs being boasted about in their signatures are letting them down now.

_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

Stoopy if it sounded like I was being critical of ACES/Microsoft for not makeing FSX tailored to exploit dual-cores, I wasn't, since I well know that there is a considerable time lag between commissioning a software product and its release and since Intel was expecting major leaps in processor performance but hit a brick wall and had to do a U-turn to multicore processors, it is not un-reasonable to assume that FSX might have been commissioned and designed in the expectation of a leap in processor speeds which never happened. Furthermore given the very great difficulties of makeing an application such as FSX utilize multicores and do so efficently it was not unreasonable for ACES/Microsoft to go down the the single processor route rather than multicore. All that said, the issue is that, in the present / near future, processor speeds have plateaued and FSX will not be speeded up by the next generation of processors which will be quadcore and therfore I would be dubious about FSX's ability to run faster in soon to be available machines.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Shades
Forum Tree-Rat

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 6473
Location: 3rd Branch up, 'Ye Olde Oak', Green Wood.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

By the time Quad core is enhanced enough to run any games properly we will have a new type of processor biting at the heels of the kind we know currently, and it could make them appear positively prehistoric by comparison.
I would wait and see what's coming because we're about to take a leap into the unknown.
Wink

_________________
Skwerl's place.

Com-Central's cutest, fluffiest, twitchiest, tail.
CPU > Intel i9-9900k (o/c 4.9GHz); COOLING > BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4;
MOBO > ASUS PRIME Z390-A; RAM > 2x32GB Corsair LPX 2666MHz;
GPU > Gigabyte GEFORCE GTX650Ti PCI-e 3.0 2Gb GDDR5;
AUDIO > Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music (plus - Universal Audio UAD2 Quad Custom accelerator);
HDD > 3x1TB+ M.2. SSDs; LCD > DELL - S2419HGF (1920x1080);
PSU > 650W be quiet Straight Power 11 - 80+ Gold;
CASE > BeQuiet! SILENT BASE 601; OS > Windows 11 Home Advanced (64-bit).
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JG300-Stoopy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 5840
Location: Group W bench
PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day FSX

Oh hey, Adrian, dude....no worries. I went a little overboard in my diatribe there but it wasn't against you or anything. You were just passing along some discussion stuff. Sorry and hope you don't think I was yellin'....well, at you! Laughing

I've since learned to try to stay away from reading that place too much, it's too depressing....although I can't help but go there and check in, what with curiousity and also wondering WHEN the HECK they're gonna ship my copy!

Which I just found out they have received, according to the news today (the 20th). And their news page then says their shipping department is closed until the 27th "For the Thanksgiving Holidays" which is fine and all, but ....SEVEN days???......that's a helluva lotta turkey they must be eatin'! Man I can hear the grumbling on this one already!

So anyway I give it another 7 days after that to get here which means in about 2 weeks I wont be so snippy. Sorry bud!!


_________________
"Once your reputation is ruined, you can live quite freely."
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
401RCAF_Sly
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 223

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Doesn't look like DirectX 10 and Vista will save the day

This multi core processor thing can ulimately only go one of two ways Shocked

Either it will expand to become a kinda matrix of processors processing a matrix of binary switches..... kinda like a fractal cube and evermore expanding..

Or

It may turn out that the undoubted inefficiency in having to split data send it to various processors, transport it back and re-assemble is a short term fillip until the next big thing (leap in performance) Laughing

I personally do not regard dual core as a pure performance enhancement its just sharing the load between two donkeys (or four) Laughing

within 2 years we should get a pointer and within 5 all this will be history


Have Fun

Sly
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  FSX
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.