±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 779
Total: 779
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Statistics
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Downloads
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: LinkToUs
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Photo Gallery
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Member Screenshots
49: Your Account
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Statistics
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Downloads
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Home
71: Photo Gallery
72: CPGlang
73: Downloads
74: Community Forums
75: Downloads
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Photo Gallery
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: News
91: CPGlang
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Downloads
101: Photo Gallery
102: Downloads
103: Photo Gallery
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Downloads
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: CPGlang
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: CPGlang
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Your Account
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Member Screenshots
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Statistics
152: Community Forums
153: Your Account
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Member Screenshots
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Your Account
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Downloads
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: CPGlang
204: Community Forums
205: Your Account
206: Home
207: Photo Gallery
208: Photo Gallery
209: Community Forums
210: Your Account
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Downloads
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Photo Gallery
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Photo Gallery
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Downloads
245: Member Screenshots
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Photo Gallery
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Member Screenshots
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: CPGlang
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Photo Gallery
279: Downloads
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Member Screenshots
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Downloads
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Member Screenshots
301: Home
302: Your Account
303: Home
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Your Account
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Downloads
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Downloads
329: CPGlang
330: Photo Gallery
331: Photo Gallery
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Member Screenshots
337: Photo Gallery
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Home
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Your Account
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Community Forums
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Photo Gallery
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: News Archive
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Home
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Home
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Photo Gallery
379: Photo Gallery
380: Photo Gallery
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Photo Gallery
390: Home
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Photo Gallery
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Downloads
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Member Screenshots
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Photo Gallery
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Member Screenshots
427: Home
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Statistics
434: Downloads
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Statistics
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Downloads
452: Community Forums
453: Photo Gallery
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Home
457: Member Screenshots
458: Photo Gallery
459: Photo Gallery
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Photo Gallery
464: Community Forums
465: Home
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Downloads
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Home
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Photo Gallery
487: Community Forums
488: Home
489: Home
490: Home
491: Search
492: Photo Gallery
493: Photo Gallery
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Photo Gallery
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Photo Gallery
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Home
511: Community Forums
512: Member Screenshots
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Downloads
516: Photo Gallery
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Photo Gallery
520: Community Forums
521: CPGlang
522: Photo Gallery
523: Photo Gallery
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Photo Gallery
527: Your Account
528: Community Forums
529: Home
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Downloads
534: Photo Gallery
535: Home
536: Community Forums
537: Your Account
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Home
544: Community Forums
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Photo Gallery
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Photo Gallery
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Community Forums
559: Photo Gallery
560: Home
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Home
566: Photo Gallery
567: Photo Gallery
568: Your Account
569: Community Forums
570: Home
571: Downloads
572: Photo Gallery
573: Community Forums
574: Home
575: Photo Gallery
576: CPGlang
577: Home
578: Photo Gallery
579: Community Forums
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Downloads
584: Member Screenshots
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Downloads
589: Community Forums
590: CPGlang
591: Photo Gallery
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Member Screenshots
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: News Archive
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Photo Gallery
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums
611: Statistics
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Downloads
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Home
620: Community Forums
621: Community Forums
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Photo Gallery
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Member Screenshots
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Downloads
639: Member Screenshots
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Downloads
643: Community Forums
644: Member Screenshots
645: Member Screenshots
646: CPGlang
647: Photo Gallery
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Downloads
655: Photo Gallery
656: CPGlang
657: Community Forums
658: Community Forums
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Home
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Photo Gallery
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Photo Gallery
673: Community Forums
674: CPGlang
675: Community Forums
676: Community Forums
677: Photo Gallery
678: Community Forums
679: Photo Gallery
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: News
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Member Screenshots
691: Community Forums
692: News Archive
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: News Archive
700: Photo Gallery
701: Downloads
702: Community Forums
703: Downloads
704: Community Forums
705: Downloads
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Photo Gallery
711: Photo Gallery
712: Community Forums
713: Home
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Photo Gallery
717: Photo Gallery
718: Photo Gallery
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Photo Gallery
723: Photo Gallery
724: Community Forums
725: Photo Gallery
726: Community Forums
727: Photo Gallery
728: Community Forums
729: CPGlang
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Home
733: Home
734: Community Forums
735: Photo Gallery
736: Community Forums
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Home
741: Community Forums
742: Photo Gallery
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Photo Gallery
746: Downloads
747: Community Forums
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Member Screenshots
752: Downloads
753: Community Forums
754: Photo Gallery
755: Downloads
756: Photo Gallery
757: Photo Gallery
758: Your Account
759: Community Forums
760: Community Forums
761: Community Forums
762: Community Forums
763: Community Forums
764: Photo Gallery
765: Community Forums
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Photo Gallery
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Home
775: Your Account
776: Community Forums
777: Downloads
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:07 am
Post subject: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

money.cnn.com/news/new...RTUNE5.htm

Marines Not Recommending End Of General Dynamics Amphib Pact

February 22, 2007: 06:54 PM EST

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. Marines aren't recommending that a big General Dynamics Corp. (GD) amphibious vehicle contract be canceled, even though a new competition is on the table, a Marine Corps spokesman said Thursday.

The Marines are trying to get their multibillion dollar Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle program back on track, after it failed initial testing last year. Last month, program officials said it faced up to three years in redesign work.

Now the Pentagon has asked industry about possible alternate designs for the program. Replies to the "sources sought" notice are due Friday, and could include anything from minor modifications to an entire new vehicle design.

This raises questions about whether General Dynamics will keep the program. Defense Department officials have turned up the heat on General Dynamics in recent weeks - for example, on Feb. 13, Navy Secretary Donald Winter told a House Appropriations Committee panel that the Navy was considering "funding of a second source."

But the Marines say it's too early to throw in the towel on the General Dynamics design.

"We have not made any recommendation to terminate our contracts with General Dynamics," said David Branham, a spokesman for the Marine Corps program office, in a Thursday telephone interview.

The Marine Corps plan calls for buying seven new vehicles over the next two years to build and test improvements to the original design. Industry responses could complement that effort.

"The only thing that we're doing, is we're trying to hear from who's out there that has the requisite expertise to weigh in with capabilities that may be applied to these problems," Branham said.

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) is the only other major manufacturer of tracked vehicles. Industry observers said BAE might contribute to the redesign effort, but it's unlikely the military would want a completely new alternate design.

"It is not realistic at this point in the history of the EFV program to talk about a new design or a second source," said Lexington Institute defense analyst Loren Thompson. "If the existing amphibious vehicles are not replaced expeditiously, people are going to die."

Defense Department weapons buyers are scheduled to discuss the program next week at a Defense Acquisition Board meeting. That panel will weigh alternatives and possibly settle on a way forward.

General Dynamics spokesman Rob Doolittle said the current EFV design has met most of its performance parameters. The company will continue to work on improvements.

"We are working closely with the marines to achieve the reliability that they desire," Doolittle said.

BAE Systems declined to comment.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

www.dodtechmatch.com/D...7854070032

This announcement constitutes a Sources Sought Synopsis for market research. This is NOT a Request for Proposal. The following information is requested to assist the United States Marine Corps Direct Reporting Program Manager, Advanced Amphibious Assault (DRPM AAA) in conducting market research of industry. The DRPM AAA is seeking source information from industry leaders who develop and produce track combat vehicles that can provide an alternate design concept of the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) that will include concept drawings, architecture, design analysis for selected alternate subsystems (Preliminary Design Review level of design completion). A follow-on effort may be requested for a possible detailed alternate design to include design analysis, test results (where applicable) for selected alternate subsystems (Critical Design Review level of design completion). This request is for information only and is intended to identify companies that can devel! op and produce a reliable amphibious capability that is a self-deploying, high-water-speed, amphibious, armored tracked vehicle and is capable of seamlessly transporting Marines from ships located beyond the horizon (approximately 25 nautical miles) to inland objectives. It must provide essential command, control, communications, and intelligence (C4I) functions for embarked personnel and EFV units. The mission of the EFV Program is to field an EFV that will provide the principle means of tactical surface mobility for the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) during both ship-to-objective maneuver and sustained combat operations ashore as part of the Navy and Marine Corps concepts within the Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare (EMW) capstone. The EFV will provide the MAGTF with increased operational tempo, survivability, and lethality throughout the battle space and across all quadrants of conflict. Companies or teams interested in responding to this request should mail the fol! lowing: a statement of the company's professional, technical and other capabilities, facilities and history with this type of development or similar development, the name and telephone number of a company representative that can be contacted, and the company's address. Contractors should submit responses electronically to Robin Kuschel at Kuschelrj @ efv.usmc.mil, no later than 5:00 PM EST on February 23, 2007. Information submitted to DRPM AAA in response to this notice will be treated as subject to the Trade Secrets Act and not generally releasable to the public unless otherwise indicated. It is emphasized this information is for planning and information purposes only and is NOT to be construed as a commitment by the Government to enter into a contractual agreement, nor will the Government pay for information solicited. No solicitation exists; therefore, do not request a copy of the solicitation. It is a potential offeror's responsibility to monitor these sites for the release of any solicitation or synopsis.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Hi Folks!

I think within the last two months or so, I have seen the Gunny do a report on the EFV on Mail Call and last week, or maybe the week before that ex-Navy Seal did a report on Future Weapons.

One of the things that was done on Future Weapons that impressed me was one of the test vehicles was lifted up in the air and the driver retracted the track system. At the front and rear, panels slide out to cover the opening left by the tracks. For the long bottom run, panels mounted flat along the hull bottom folded outward to cover the bottom run. After all the different panels did their thing, the track system was up and out of sight and not dragging in the water.

Both shows gave it glowing reports. I wonder what the problem or problems are?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:24 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I think the main problem is finding money to pay for anything that won't be used in Iraq.

Ever since Desert Storm I've been wondering how much sense it made to use AAVs for long cross country runs. in ODS I figured 'well it's a one time thing' but then we saw them used on the long run up to Bahgdad in the latest adventure and I kept seeing them used as regular cross country transportation. I wonder what shape they will be in for amphibious use after they have been driven around the desert so much?

I saw part of the Future Weapons segment and found myself wondering how practical a beach landing weapons system is these days. Even with the high speed and longer range I just wonder if the capability would ever be used.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Did anybody see a mention of which design goals weren't met? That's a rather diffuse phrase. It could either refer to seat cover material cracking or the thing refusing to float for more than fifteen minutes. Both of those would be considered a 'failed test'. The U.S. has a longtime history of its reach exceeding its grasp on light vehicle design. Remember aaaaaall those light tank designs to replace Sheridan over the past 25-ish years?
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- mike_Duplessis
Did anybody see a mention of which design goals weren't met? That's a rather diffuse phrase. It could either refer to seat cover material cracking or the thing refusing to float for more than fifteen minutes. Both of those would be considered a 'failed test'. The U.S. has a longtime history of its reach exceeding its grasp on light vehicle design. Remember aaaaaall those light tank designs to replace Sheridan over the past 25-ish years?


I don't recall the Army (in particular) really seeming to want one very badly....and certainly not enough to divert any funds from anything it wanted more...like Bradley or Abrams. I had the impression that lighter "tanks" (as we understand them) had been pretty much dismissed as irrelevant. Not that I agree with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:23 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Here's the Gov't Accounting Office's report on the EFV:

www.gao.gov/new.items/d06349.pdf

Do you realize that they currently cost 12 million dollars+ each? Yikes!
After watching the complicated track retraction sequence on "Future Weapons" (first time I ever saw a good view of it), small wonder that they are having hydraulic problems...

Alan
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:31 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I'm sure I read an article where Vickers engineers took a look at the EFV and when they had finished laughing suggested that the whole hydraulic folding nonsense be abandoned in favor of a bolt on box on the front of the vehicle that held an inflatable bottom section. The idea being that once the vehicle entered the water the bottom section was inflated it formed a bow and covered the tracks etc. Then the vehicle commenced its high-speed run into the beach. When it was close enough to the beach the bottom section was then deflated and jettisoned and the EFV finished the run in its normal amphibious mode.

It sounded a more practical idea as the EFV doesn't have to make the high-speed approach everytime its used but I suspect the idea fell foul of the NIH syndrome and, probably the manufacturers profit margin as it could have slashed the cost of the vehicle apparently despite having to fit a new inflatable section each time.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:03 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I sort of expected mechanical arms & legs to be deployed and that the pilot would stand the thing up and stride down the beach into the sea and walk along undetected on the sea bottom Wink
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- Cloudy
I sort of expected mechanical arms & legs to be deployed and that the pilot would stand the thing up and stride down the beach into the sea and walk along undetected on the sea bottom Wink


I think that was the backup irish solution... Laughing

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
johnestauffer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I saw some pictures of a 'EFV" like vehicle on that was in development by the PRC that looked much like a clone of the USMC's vehicle (except for the turret)

It does seem that the EFV concept is stretching things a bit.
Why go to the trouble of creating a single service, expensive vehicle?
It would seem more cost effective to focus on more LCAC's or similiar platforms that had more versitility.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- johnestauffer
It does seem that the EFV concept is stretching things a bit.
Why go to the trouble of creating a single service, expensive vehicle?
It would seem more cost effective to focus on more LCAC's or similiar platforms that had more versitility.


I get to watch those from time to time out here where I live and while they kick up a mess o' mist, I see your point.

I saw that "Futureweapons" episode and the one point I thought strange was the emphasis on "over the horizon" approach. I think he kept referencing distances like 20 miles out or so...maybe more, like 25-30. That seems like a long way to be cruising in for the sake of stealth. OK, it's probably less detectable than a low flying CH-46, but a lot slower. I just wonder how sneaky that kind of op really is and how often you'd get to use it in a forced entry kind of scenario? (if you'd even defined that as "forced") Then again, I'm not used to thinking like a Marine. Seems like a lot of water to cross, to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:38 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I theory thats the advantage, keeps ships out of visual & artillery distance from shore - that way enemy may know the Marines are somewhere over the horizon, but dont know exactly what beach they will hit...

My biggest question about Marine Corps amtracs is the need to carry 2 squads in each. It raises/stresses a lot of the requirements when you have to stuff 20+ guys in the back. Of course just carrying a squad like other APCs / IFVs means a lot more vehicles you have to buy... But you know, there is a reason why armies dont go around in vehicles like M59s and M75s...

Way back in the 80s United Defense offered an amphib version of the Bradley...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:53 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- Neil_Baumgardner
I theory thats the advantage, keeps ships out of visual & artillery distance from shore - that way enemy may know the Marines are somewhere over the horizon, but dont know exactly what beach they will hit...
Neil


Yeah, I recognized the advantage of keeping 'em guessing, though there are now missiles that'll reach out that far. Still, 30-45 minutes or so to reach the beach?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Marine squads are larger than Army squads - as I recall around 13 men. Transporting more men per vehicle is probably more efficient when it comes to storing the vehicles aboard ship. I wonder how they would be used? Suppress the defenses with Marine air assets and advertise that the Marines will soon be landing , send in the EFV's with no softening up from over the horizon in a "stealth" attack with CAS timed to arrive as they hit the beach or no CAS until called to avoid radar detection of the assault force?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum