±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 829
Total: 829
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Photo Gallery
15: Member Screenshots
16: Photo Gallery
17: Photo Gallery
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: CPGlang
29: CPGlang
30: CPGlang
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: CPGlang
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: CPGlang
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: CPGlang
51: News
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Member Screenshots
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Supporters
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: CPGlang
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Home
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: CPGlang
74: Downloads
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: CPGlang
81: Community Forums
82: Downloads
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Home
86: Home
87: Your Account
88: Member Screenshots
89: Community Forums
90: CPGlang
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: CPGlang
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: CPGlang
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Photo Gallery
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: Photo Gallery
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: CPGlang
110: Community Forums
111: News Archive
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: CPGlang
115: Community Forums
116: Downloads
117: Downloads
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: CPGlang
124: Home
125: CPGlang
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Your Account
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Member Screenshots
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: CPGlang
142: Community Forums
143: CPGlang
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: CPGlang
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: CPGlang
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: CPGlang
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Downloads
162: CPGlang
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Home
166: CPGlang
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Member Screenshots
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Downloads
174: CPGlang
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: CPGlang
182: Statistics
183: Home
184: Member Screenshots
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: CPGlang
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: CPGlang
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: CPGlang
207: Community Forums
208: CPGlang
209: CPGlang
210: Photo Gallery
211: Home
212: Home
213: CPGlang
214: Member Screenshots
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Downloads
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Home
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: CPGlang
227: Photo Gallery
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: CPGlang
231: Home
232: Photo Gallery
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: CPGlang
239: Community Forums
240: Your Account
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Member Screenshots
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Downloads
272: Downloads
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: CPGlang
277: Your Account
278: CPGlang
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Member Screenshots
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Downloads
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Downloads
289: Community Forums
290: Member Screenshots
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Photo Gallery
294: Community Forums
295: Downloads
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Home
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: CPGlang
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Member Screenshots
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Supporters
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Your Account
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: CPGlang
325: CPGlang
326: CPGlang
327: Photo Gallery
328: Home
329: CPGlang
330: Photo Gallery
331: Community Forums
332: CPGlang
333: CPGlang
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Downloads
337: CPGlang
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Your Account
341: Photo Gallery
342: Downloads
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Photo Gallery
347: Downloads
348: CPGlang
349: News Archive
350: CPGlang
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Member Screenshots
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Downloads
359: Community Forums
360: CPGlang
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: CPGlang
364: Community Forums
365: Photo Gallery
366: Home
367: Photo Gallery
368: News
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Home
374: CPGlang
375: CPGlang
376: Photo Gallery
377: Community Forums
378: CPGlang
379: Photo Gallery
380: Downloads
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Your Account
384: Your Account
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: Community Forums
389: Home
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Statistics
409: Photo Gallery
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: CPGlang
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Member Screenshots
426: Home
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Downloads
431: Community Forums
432: Home
433: Home
434: CPGlang
435: CPGlang
436: Member Screenshots
437: CPGlang
438: CPGlang
439: CPGlang
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: Member Screenshots
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Photo Gallery
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: CPGlang
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Photo Gallery
464: Community Forums
465: CPGlang
466: Photo Gallery
467: Community Forums
468: CPGlang
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Home
472: Community Forums
473: CPGlang
474: Community Forums
475: Downloads
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: CPGlang
482: CPGlang
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Home
489: Photo Gallery
490: Photo Gallery
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Your Account
495: Community Forums
496: Downloads
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Photo Gallery
500: Photo Gallery
501: CPGlang
502: Community Forums
503: Photo Gallery
504: Photo Gallery
505: Photo Gallery
506: Community Forums
507: CPGlang
508: Community Forums
509: Photo Gallery
510: Community Forums
511: CPGlang
512: Home
513: Home
514: Home
515: Home
516: Community Forums
517: Home
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Photo Gallery
525: Community Forums
526: Downloads
527: Photo Gallery
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: CPGlang
531: Member Screenshots
532: Community Forums
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Home
536: CPGlang
537: News Archive
538: Community Forums
539: CPGlang
540: Home
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: CPGlang
544: Community Forums
545: Photo Gallery
546: Community Forums
547: Home
548: Home
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: CPGlang
554: Photo Gallery
555: Downloads
556: Community Forums
557: Member Screenshots
558: Community Forums
559: CPGlang
560: Downloads
561: Community Forums
562: Photo Gallery
563: Your Account
564: Member Screenshots
565: Community Forums
566: Photo Gallery
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Home
571: Photo Gallery
572: Community Forums
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: CPGlang
576: Home
577: Photo Gallery
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Photo Gallery
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Downloads
586: Community Forums
587: Photo Gallery
588: Photo Gallery
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: CPGlang
592: CPGlang
593: Photo Gallery
594: News
595: Photo Gallery
596: Photo Gallery
597: Community Forums
598: CPGlang
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Your Account
604: Community Forums
605: Home
606: Photo Gallery
607: Community Forums
608: CPGlang
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums
611: CPGlang
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: Photo Gallery
616: Photo Gallery
617: CPGlang
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: Photo Gallery
624: Community Forums
625: CPGlang
626: Home
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Photo Gallery
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Photo Gallery
633: Photo Gallery
634: CPGlang
635: Community Forums
636: Member Screenshots
637: Photo Gallery
638: Community Forums
639: Your Account
640: Photo Gallery
641: Downloads
642: Member Screenshots
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Home
649: Downloads
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Photo Gallery
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Photo Gallery
657: Community Forums
658: Community Forums
659: Photo Gallery
660: Member Screenshots
661: Your Account
662: Photo Gallery
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Home
666: Community Forums
667: Photo Gallery
668: Home
669: Community Forums
670: Photo Gallery
671: Community Forums
672: Community Forums
673: Photo Gallery
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Community Forums
677: Photo Gallery
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: CPGlang
681: Home
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: CPGlang
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: CPGlang
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Photo Gallery
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Downloads
697: Downloads
698: Photo Gallery
699: Home
700: Community Forums
701: CPGlang
702: Home
703: Photo Gallery
704: Community Forums
705: Photo Gallery
706: Downloads
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Home
710: Community Forums
711: Photo Gallery
712: Photo Gallery
713: Community Forums
714: Your Account
715: Community Forums
716: Photo Gallery
717: Home
718: Community Forums
719: Statistics
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Photo Gallery
724: CPGlang
725: Member Screenshots
726: Community Forums
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Photo Gallery
730: Photo Gallery
731: Community Forums
732: Statistics
733: Community Forums
734: Photo Gallery
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Photo Gallery
738: Photo Gallery
739: Community Forums
740: CPGlang
741: CPGlang
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Photo Gallery
745: Photo Gallery
746: Your Account
747: Community Forums
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Member Screenshots
752: Downloads
753: Downloads
754: CPGlang
755: Home
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Community Forums
759: Community Forums
760: Community Forums
761: Home
762: Community Forums
763: Community Forums
764: Community Forums
765: Photo Gallery
766: Home
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: CPGlang
770: CPGlang
771: CPGlang
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Photo Gallery
776: Community Forums
777: Community Forums
778: Home
779: Statistics
780: Community Forums
781: Photo Gallery
782: Photo Gallery
783: Member Screenshots
784: Community Forums
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: News
789: Photo Gallery
790: Downloads
791: Community Forums
792: Photo Gallery
793: Community Forums
794: Community Forums
795: Community Forums
796: Community Forums
797: Photo Gallery
798: CPGlang
799: CPGlang
800: CPGlang
801: CPGlang
802: CPGlang
803: CPGlang
804: Community Forums
805: Member Screenshots
806: Community Forums
807: Community Forums
808: Photo Gallery
809: Downloads
810: Community Forums
811: Photo Gallery
812: Home
813: Photo Gallery
814: Community Forums
815: Community Forums
816: Home
817: CPGlang
818: Community Forums
819: Photo Gallery
820: Community Forums
821: Community Forums
822: Photo Gallery
823: Photo Gallery
824: Home
825: CPGlang
826: Community Forums
827: Home
828: Community Forums
829: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:07 am
Post subject: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

money.cnn.com/news/new...RTUNE5.htm

Marines Not Recommending End Of General Dynamics Amphib Pact

February 22, 2007: 06:54 PM EST

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. Marines aren't recommending that a big General Dynamics Corp. (GD) amphibious vehicle contract be canceled, even though a new competition is on the table, a Marine Corps spokesman said Thursday.

The Marines are trying to get their multibillion dollar Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle program back on track, after it failed initial testing last year. Last month, program officials said it faced up to three years in redesign work.

Now the Pentagon has asked industry about possible alternate designs for the program. Replies to the "sources sought" notice are due Friday, and could include anything from minor modifications to an entire new vehicle design.

This raises questions about whether General Dynamics will keep the program. Defense Department officials have turned up the heat on General Dynamics in recent weeks - for example, on Feb. 13, Navy Secretary Donald Winter told a House Appropriations Committee panel that the Navy was considering "funding of a second source."

But the Marines say it's too early to throw in the towel on the General Dynamics design.

"We have not made any recommendation to terminate our contracts with General Dynamics," said David Branham, a spokesman for the Marine Corps program office, in a Thursday telephone interview.

The Marine Corps plan calls for buying seven new vehicles over the next two years to build and test improvements to the original design. Industry responses could complement that effort.

"The only thing that we're doing, is we're trying to hear from who's out there that has the requisite expertise to weigh in with capabilities that may be applied to these problems," Branham said.

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) is the only other major manufacturer of tracked vehicles. Industry observers said BAE might contribute to the redesign effort, but it's unlikely the military would want a completely new alternate design.

"It is not realistic at this point in the history of the EFV program to talk about a new design or a second source," said Lexington Institute defense analyst Loren Thompson. "If the existing amphibious vehicles are not replaced expeditiously, people are going to die."

Defense Department weapons buyers are scheduled to discuss the program next week at a Defense Acquisition Board meeting. That panel will weigh alternatives and possibly settle on a way forward.

General Dynamics spokesman Rob Doolittle said the current EFV design has met most of its performance parameters. The company will continue to work on improvements.

"We are working closely with the marines to achieve the reliability that they desire," Doolittle said.

BAE Systems declined to comment.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

www.dodtechmatch.com/D...7854070032

This announcement constitutes a Sources Sought Synopsis for market research. This is NOT a Request for Proposal. The following information is requested to assist the United States Marine Corps Direct Reporting Program Manager, Advanced Amphibious Assault (DRPM AAA) in conducting market research of industry. The DRPM AAA is seeking source information from industry leaders who develop and produce track combat vehicles that can provide an alternate design concept of the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) that will include concept drawings, architecture, design analysis for selected alternate subsystems (Preliminary Design Review level of design completion). A follow-on effort may be requested for a possible detailed alternate design to include design analysis, test results (where applicable) for selected alternate subsystems (Critical Design Review level of design completion). This request is for information only and is intended to identify companies that can devel! op and produce a reliable amphibious capability that is a self-deploying, high-water-speed, amphibious, armored tracked vehicle and is capable of seamlessly transporting Marines from ships located beyond the horizon (approximately 25 nautical miles) to inland objectives. It must provide essential command, control, communications, and intelligence (C4I) functions for embarked personnel and EFV units. The mission of the EFV Program is to field an EFV that will provide the principle means of tactical surface mobility for the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) during both ship-to-objective maneuver and sustained combat operations ashore as part of the Navy and Marine Corps concepts within the Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare (EMW) capstone. The EFV will provide the MAGTF with increased operational tempo, survivability, and lethality throughout the battle space and across all quadrants of conflict. Companies or teams interested in responding to this request should mail the fol! lowing: a statement of the company's professional, technical and other capabilities, facilities and history with this type of development or similar development, the name and telephone number of a company representative that can be contacted, and the company's address. Contractors should submit responses electronically to Robin Kuschel at Kuschelrj @ efv.usmc.mil, no later than 5:00 PM EST on February 23, 2007. Information submitted to DRPM AAA in response to this notice will be treated as subject to the Trade Secrets Act and not generally releasable to the public unless otherwise indicated. It is emphasized this information is for planning and information purposes only and is NOT to be construed as a commitment by the Government to enter into a contractual agreement, nor will the Government pay for information solicited. No solicitation exists; therefore, do not request a copy of the solicitation. It is a potential offeror's responsibility to monitor these sites for the release of any solicitation or synopsis.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Hi Folks!

I think within the last two months or so, I have seen the Gunny do a report on the EFV on Mail Call and last week, or maybe the week before that ex-Navy Seal did a report on Future Weapons.

One of the things that was done on Future Weapons that impressed me was one of the test vehicles was lifted up in the air and the driver retracted the track system. At the front and rear, panels slide out to cover the opening left by the tracks. For the long bottom run, panels mounted flat along the hull bottom folded outward to cover the bottom run. After all the different panels did their thing, the track system was up and out of sight and not dragging in the water.

Both shows gave it glowing reports. I wonder what the problem or problems are?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:24 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I think the main problem is finding money to pay for anything that won't be used in Iraq.

Ever since Desert Storm I've been wondering how much sense it made to use AAVs for long cross country runs. in ODS I figured 'well it's a one time thing' but then we saw them used on the long run up to Bahgdad in the latest adventure and I kept seeing them used as regular cross country transportation. I wonder what shape they will be in for amphibious use after they have been driven around the desert so much?

I saw part of the Future Weapons segment and found myself wondering how practical a beach landing weapons system is these days. Even with the high speed and longer range I just wonder if the capability would ever be used.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Did anybody see a mention of which design goals weren't met? That's a rather diffuse phrase. It could either refer to seat cover material cracking or the thing refusing to float for more than fifteen minutes. Both of those would be considered a 'failed test'. The U.S. has a longtime history of its reach exceeding its grasp on light vehicle design. Remember aaaaaall those light tank designs to replace Sheridan over the past 25-ish years?
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- mike_Duplessis
Did anybody see a mention of which design goals weren't met? That's a rather diffuse phrase. It could either refer to seat cover material cracking or the thing refusing to float for more than fifteen minutes. Both of those would be considered a 'failed test'. The U.S. has a longtime history of its reach exceeding its grasp on light vehicle design. Remember aaaaaall those light tank designs to replace Sheridan over the past 25-ish years?


I don't recall the Army (in particular) really seeming to want one very badly....and certainly not enough to divert any funds from anything it wanted more...like Bradley or Abrams. I had the impression that lighter "tanks" (as we understand them) had been pretty much dismissed as irrelevant. Not that I agree with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:23 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Here's the Gov't Accounting Office's report on the EFV:

www.gao.gov/new.items/d06349.pdf

Do you realize that they currently cost 12 million dollars+ each? Yikes!
After watching the complicated track retraction sequence on "Future Weapons" (first time I ever saw a good view of it), small wonder that they are having hydraulic problems...

Alan
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:31 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I'm sure I read an article where Vickers engineers took a look at the EFV and when they had finished laughing suggested that the whole hydraulic folding nonsense be abandoned in favor of a bolt on box on the front of the vehicle that held an inflatable bottom section. The idea being that once the vehicle entered the water the bottom section was inflated it formed a bow and covered the tracks etc. Then the vehicle commenced its high-speed run into the beach. When it was close enough to the beach the bottom section was then deflated and jettisoned and the EFV finished the run in its normal amphibious mode.

It sounded a more practical idea as the EFV doesn't have to make the high-speed approach everytime its used but I suspect the idea fell foul of the NIH syndrome and, probably the manufacturers profit margin as it could have slashed the cost of the vehicle apparently despite having to fit a new inflatable section each time.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:03 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I sort of expected mechanical arms & legs to be deployed and that the pilot would stand the thing up and stride down the beach into the sea and walk along undetected on the sea bottom Wink
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- Cloudy
I sort of expected mechanical arms & legs to be deployed and that the pilot would stand the thing up and stride down the beach into the sea and walk along undetected on the sea bottom Wink


I think that was the backup irish solution... Laughing

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
johnestauffer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I saw some pictures of a 'EFV" like vehicle on that was in development by the PRC that looked much like a clone of the USMC's vehicle (except for the turret)

It does seem that the EFV concept is stretching things a bit.
Why go to the trouble of creating a single service, expensive vehicle?
It would seem more cost effective to focus on more LCAC's or similiar platforms that had more versitility.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- johnestauffer
It does seem that the EFV concept is stretching things a bit.
Why go to the trouble of creating a single service, expensive vehicle?
It would seem more cost effective to focus on more LCAC's or similiar platforms that had more versitility.


I get to watch those from time to time out here where I live and while they kick up a mess o' mist, I see your point.

I saw that "Futureweapons" episode and the one point I thought strange was the emphasis on "over the horizon" approach. I think he kept referencing distances like 20 miles out or so...maybe more, like 25-30. That seems like a long way to be cruising in for the sake of stealth. OK, it's probably less detectable than a low flying CH-46, but a lot slower. I just wonder how sneaky that kind of op really is and how often you'd get to use it in a forced entry kind of scenario? (if you'd even defined that as "forced") Then again, I'm not used to thinking like a Marine. Seems like a lot of water to cross, to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:38 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I theory thats the advantage, keeps ships out of visual & artillery distance from shore - that way enemy may know the Marines are somewhere over the horizon, but dont know exactly what beach they will hit...

My biggest question about Marine Corps amtracs is the need to carry 2 squads in each. It raises/stresses a lot of the requirements when you have to stuff 20+ guys in the back. Of course just carrying a squad like other APCs / IFVs means a lot more vehicles you have to buy... But you know, there is a reason why armies dont go around in vehicles like M59s and M75s...

Way back in the 80s United Defense offered an amphib version of the Bradley...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:53 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- Neil_Baumgardner
I theory thats the advantage, keeps ships out of visual & artillery distance from shore - that way enemy may know the Marines are somewhere over the horizon, but dont know exactly what beach they will hit...
Neil


Yeah, I recognized the advantage of keeping 'em guessing, though there are now missiles that'll reach out that far. Still, 30-45 minutes or so to reach the beach?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Marine squads are larger than Army squads - as I recall around 13 men. Transporting more men per vehicle is probably more efficient when it comes to storing the vehicles aboard ship. I wonder how they would be used? Suppress the defenses with Marine air assets and advertise that the Marines will soon be landing , send in the EFV's with no softening up from over the horizon in a "stealth" attack with CAS timed to arrive as they hit the beach or no CAS until called to avoid radar detection of the assault force?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum