±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 564
Total: 564
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Downloads
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Downloads
23: Home
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Downloads
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Member Screenshots
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Downloads
56: Home
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Photo Gallery
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: CPGlang
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Your Account
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Photo Gallery
96: Downloads
97: Photo Gallery
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Photo Gallery
101: Member Screenshots
102: Member Screenshots
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Downloads
110: News
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Your Account
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Downloads
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: News
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Member Screenshots
128: Home
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Downloads
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Your Account
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Downloads
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: CPGlang
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Home
186: Photo Gallery
187: Photo Gallery
188: Member Screenshots
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Downloads
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Community Forums
208: Downloads
209: Your Account
210: Community Forums
211: Statistics
212: Downloads
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Downloads
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: News
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Member Screenshots
247: CPGlang
248: Community Forums
249: Downloads
250: Community Forums
251: Downloads
252: Home
253: Photo Gallery
254: Member Screenshots
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Downloads
262: Photo Gallery
263: Photo Gallery
264: CPGlang
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Home
268: Home
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Community Forums
288: Downloads
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Your Account
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Member Screenshots
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Photo Gallery
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Photo Gallery
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Your Account
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Photo Gallery
320: Photo Gallery
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: CPGlang
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Downloads
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Photo Gallery
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Photo Gallery
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Photo Gallery
355: Home
356: Home
357: Your Account
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Downloads
362: Photo Gallery
363: Member Screenshots
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Member Screenshots
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Photo Gallery
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Your Account
382: Community Forums
383: Your Account
384: News Archive
385: Community Forums
386: Member Screenshots
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Photo Gallery
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Member Screenshots
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Downloads
402: Home
403: Home
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Photo Gallery
410: Photo Gallery
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Photo Gallery
415: Photo Gallery
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Home
424: Home
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Downloads
428: Downloads
429: Photo Gallery
430: Photo Gallery
431: Your Account
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Member Screenshots
435: Photo Gallery
436: Photo Gallery
437: Home
438: Member Screenshots
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Photo Gallery
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Photo Gallery
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Downloads
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Statistics
458: Member Screenshots
459: Community Forums
460: Statistics
461: Home
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Downloads
466: Home
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Downloads
472: Photo Gallery
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: News Archive
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: CPGlang
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Downloads
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: CPGlang
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Member Screenshots
495: Community Forums
496: Member Screenshots
497: Photo Gallery
498: Downloads
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: News
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Photo Gallery
506: Home
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Downloads
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Member Screenshots
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Downloads
528: Photo Gallery
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: Home
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Home
538: Community Forums
539: Home
540: Downloads
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Statistics
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Photo Gallery
561: Home
562: Photo Gallery
563: Community Forums
564: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum