±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: DIEGO38
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6597

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 172
Total: 172
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Your Account
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Members List
24: Home
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: Downloads
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: Your Account
52: Your Account
53: Home
54: Home
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Downloads
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: Home
68: Downloads
69: Downloads
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Search
77: Home
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Photo Gallery
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: News
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: CPGlang
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Photo Gallery
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Photo Gallery
124: News
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Downloads
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Your Account
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Your Account
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Your Account
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: News Archive
163: Community Forums
164: Your Account
165: Community Forums
166: News Archive
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Your Account
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Track throwing
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Taranov
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: 342
Location: Moscow, Russia
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:30 pm
Post subject: Track throwing

Few shots from Sholokhovo (T-34 tank museum), 5 april 2009

Disassembling
This%20is%20SPARTAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11%20:lol:%20 Assembling%20with%20full%20wheels%20set%20for%20right%20side%20of%20T-34 Done.%20Tracks%20working,%20have%20short%20(2%20meters)%20session%20of%20track%20surfing%20:lol:%20
Back to top
View user's profile
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Real heavy metal!

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 397
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

I know how they feel.

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
Posts: 6249
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Of all the things I miss doing, that isn't one of them.

Much more appealing to see pics of someone else doing it. Smile

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: 2024
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

I don't know,

Nothing brings a platoon together better than a good track changing party.

Very hard work but really satisfying when done, especially when it gets done before dark.

_________________
Joe D
*****************
My M60 Gallery
*****************
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 07, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

I don't miss that snow! Cool

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Taranov
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: 342
Location: Moscow, Russia
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 12:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Yep, good show.
"Working" track of T-34 - 12 Kg
"Blank" track of T-34 - 10 kg

Need to pick up 22 kg and throw 3-5 times for mud cleaning, sledgehammer show as a bonus Smile

In T-34 track 74 per side Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Posts: 4632
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 12:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Joe can check my figures and correct, but if I'm not mistaken, "Chevron" track on M48-M60 series were 50lb's per block (23kg.), 79 on one side, 80 on the other.

That about right, Joe?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: 2024
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 8:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Doug,

"Chevron" T97 should be about 50lbs a block, or two tons per side. T142 was about 60lbs IIRC. I haven't found any "official" manual giving the exact weight (But I'm sure I seen it somewhere before). All the TM's I've seen (Including the first ones) on M60's have stated 80 per side, both for T97 and T142. We'd normally get it in 2 sections of eight banded together with a wood bracket in between. If you were unlucky you'd get a big box with single blocks and individual center guides and end connectors. Life sucked then.

In the seven years I spent on M60's we always used 80 per side. Funny thing is Hunnicutt's "Patton" states 81 per side with T97. Not sure where he got his info from Confused .

_________________
Joe D
*****************
My M60 Gallery
*****************
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Posts: 4632
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 9:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

- Joe_D
Doug,

"Chevron" T97 should be about 50lbs a block, or two tons per side. T142 was about 60lbs IIRC. I haven't found any "official" manual giving the exact weight (But I'm sure I seen it somewhere before). All the TM's I've seen (Including the first ones) on M60's have stated 80 per side, both for T97 and T142. We'd normally get it in 2 sections of eight banded together with a wood bracket in between. If you were unlucky you'd get a big box with single blocks and individual center guides and end connectors. Life sucked then.

In the seven years I spent on M60's we always used 80 per side. Funny thing is Hunnicutt's "Patton" states 81 per side with T97. Not sure where he got his info from Confused .


Joe,

Eight block sections (on pallets) were what I recall dealing with most of the time. Never individual blocks, unless it was a repair rather than replacement.

Maybe the 79/80 thing was an unoffcial thing, but I feel pretty sure about those numbers....think it had to do with amount of track tension adjustment WRT the offset of torsion bars. I don't recall which side was which, but we shorted one side. It's been 36 years so my recollection is suspect.

Don't know what happened later, but we never "backed out" used end connecter bolts, we just tightened them with cheater bar until they broke, much faster to remove since they weren't re-used.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: 2024
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 11:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Track throwing

Doug,

The 79/80 thing was still going strong the whole time I was on M60's. The torsion bar off set rational was the supposed reason. Had a guy actually make me look at the front side of the tank and show me the different angle of the track from the idler to the number one road wheels between the left and right, then state "That's why you use one less one the right side". I then took him around back and showed the the angle was reversed, negating his argument. This theory also carried over to the M1's for a while, except it was 77/78.

Officially the -20 stated that if proper tension could only be achieved by removing a block, it was not necessary to remove a block on the opposite side if tension was correct. Went on to say that being short one block on a side would not effect the vehicles operation. Bottom line was as long as the tension was able to be set, 79 or 80 made no difference, and once the track got really old, both sides could have only 79 blocks.

About removing end connectors, yep, did the same thing, 3/4" breaker bar or ratchet with 15/16" socket, tighten until head breaks off and then hit with 2 lb ball peen hammer. Some crews used to save the old broken wedges just for those Demonstrators vehicles during road marches.

"Don't know how that happened, broken wedge must have flew off the track and hit their car sir." Rolling Eyes

_________________
Joe D
*****************
My M60 Gallery
*****************
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum