±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 311
Total: 311
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Member Screenshots
06: Photo Gallery
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Member Screenshots
10: Photo Gallery
11: Photo Gallery
12: Photo Gallery
13: Your Account
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Member Screenshots
18: CPGlang
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Downloads
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: CPGlang
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Member Screenshots
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Member Screenshots
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Your Account
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: News
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Photo Gallery
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Photo Gallery
96: Member Screenshots
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Photo Gallery
107: Photo Gallery
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Downloads
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Downloads
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Statistics
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Your Account
132: CPGlang
133: Photo Gallery
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Photo Gallery
158: Member Screenshots
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Photo Gallery
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Downloads
189: Photo Gallery
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Downloads
197: Photo Gallery
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Your Account
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Community Forums
207: News
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: News Archive
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Your Account
217: Member Screenshots
218: Photo Gallery
219: Photo Gallery
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Photo Gallery
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Photo Gallery
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Downloads
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Your Account
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Photo Gallery
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Photo Gallery
284: Community Forums
285: News Archive
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Member Screenshots
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Photo Gallery
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Photo Gallery
298: Photo Gallery
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Photo Gallery
302: Your Account
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum