±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 625
Total: 625
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Photo Gallery
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Your Account
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: News Archive
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: CPGlang
35: Community Forums
36: CPGlang
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Member Screenshots
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: News
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Statistics
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Downloads
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: News Archive
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Downloads
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Downloads
97: Photo Gallery
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Downloads
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: Photo Gallery
108: Home
109: Home
110: Downloads
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: CPGlang
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: CPGlang
120: Downloads
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Downloads
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: CPGlang
129: Community Forums
130: Downloads
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Downloads
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Your Account
147: Photo Gallery
148: Photo Gallery
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Photo Gallery
156: Photo Gallery
157: Photo Gallery
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: News Archive
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Photo Gallery
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: CPGlang
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: News Archive
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Your Account
191: Photo Gallery
192: Photo Gallery
193: CPGlang
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: News Archive
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Member Screenshots
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Your Account
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Statistics
245: Downloads
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Home
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Statistics
260: Home
261: Photo Gallery
262: Photo Gallery
263: Member Screenshots
264: Community Forums
265: Downloads
266: Photo Gallery
267: Home
268: Photo Gallery
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Photo Gallery
289: Photo Gallery
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Photo Gallery
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Photo Gallery
317: Community Forums
318: Member Screenshots
319: Photo Gallery
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Member Screenshots
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Downloads
331: Home
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Your Account
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: CPGlang
339: Your Account
340: CPGlang
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Statistics
351: Community Forums
352: Downloads
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Member Screenshots
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Your Account
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: News Archive
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Downloads
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: CPGlang
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Your Account
389: CPGlang
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Downloads
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: News Archive
412: Photo Gallery
413: Home
414: Community Forums
415: Your Account
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Home
419: Home
420: Downloads
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Photo Gallery
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Photo Gallery
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: Statistics
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Downloads
446: Community Forums
447: Statistics
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Statistics
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: Home
456: Photo Gallery
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Downloads
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Member Screenshots
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Member Screenshots
480: Community Forums
481: Photo Gallery
482: Downloads
483: CPGlang
484: Home
485: Home
486: Home
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Photo Gallery
490: Home
491: Community Forums
492: Photo Gallery
493: Photo Gallery
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Photo Gallery
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Downloads
503: Community Forums
504: Photo Gallery
505: Home
506: Photo Gallery
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Home
511: Downloads
512: Home
513: CPGlang
514: Photo Gallery
515: Community Forums
516: Home
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: News
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Statistics
528: Community Forums
529: Downloads
530: Photo Gallery
531: Downloads
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: Photo Gallery
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Your Account
539: Community Forums
540: Home
541: Photo Gallery
542: Statistics
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Statistics
546: Photo Gallery
547: Community Forums
548: Photo Gallery
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Home
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Home
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Home
559: Member Screenshots
560: Community Forums
561: Home
562: Photo Gallery
563: Member Screenshots
564: Community Forums
565: Home
566: Photo Gallery
567: Home
568: Member Screenshots
569: Photo Gallery
570: Photo Gallery
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Photo Gallery
574: Community Forums
575: CPGlang
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Photo Gallery
580: Downloads
581: News Archive
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Photo Gallery
587: Photo Gallery
588: Photo Gallery
589: Statistics
590: Photo Gallery
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Home
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Downloads
610: Photo Gallery
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Member Screenshots
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Member Screenshots
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: Photo Gallery
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Any special request for Knox this weekend?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Here's my XM800T pictures for good measure...







I think I have more, but they're not immediately handy / on photobucket.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

YEEEHAAAA!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi AJ2! Hi Folks!

- armyjunk2

Anyone have anything special they would like me to attempt to photograph this weekend, I'll do my best to do it, but no guarantees....


A 360 walk around of the XM800T would be great if you have the time AJ2.

Thanks,
Sgt, Scouts Out!


I'll add my shots of the XM 800 to AJ's excellent series, Roy, but in the continuing saga of "Ft. Knox scenes - pics #3". Was going to do this in a week or so but it seems topical now.

What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- A-109E
What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn


Continnuing saga of the eternal struggle between wheeled vs. tracked proponents, especially vis-a-vis the recon role...so they built and tested both versions. In the end, neither offered significant mobility advantages over vehicles already in the inventory (like the M113) and represented a huge investment that would have diverted funds from other programs. It was fortunate that neither was pursued because the Bradley was not far over the horizon and this was money far better spent. Too little, too late for the returns.

This is why I maintain now that the Dutch YPR concept series should have been adopted as an interim vehicle instead of wasting money on schemes like this...proven, something we already had experience with. Basically a Product Improved M113A1 without the funky turret/hatch layout of our version that never got off the boards.

The wheeled version:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
- A-109E
What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn


Continnuing saga of the eternal struggle between wheeled vs. tracked proponents, especially vis-a-vis the recon role...so they built and tested both versions. In the end, neither offered significant mobility advantages over vehicles already in the inventory (like the M113) and represented a huge investment that would have diverted funds from other programs. It was fortunate that neither was pursued because the Bradley was not far over the horizon and this was money far better spent. Too little, too late for the returns.

This is why I maintain now that the Dutch YPR concept series should have been adopted as an interim vehicle instead of wasting money on schemes like this...proven, something we already had experience with. Basically a Product Improved M113A1 without the funky turret/hatch layout of our version that never got off the boards.

The wheeled version:


Thanks for the history, Doug. And great action photos: Yeehaaah! times two!

--Bob
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Doug, I think we continue to disagree on the subject, although I'll defer to your Armor Board knowledge. But if Hunnicutt's Bradley has any weight (page 244), it appears that the XM800T at least was superior than the M113:

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV. The XM800W performed well on roads and its quiet operation and high road speed were goals to be achieved for future scout vehicles. However, its limited cross country capability and safety hazards associated with lateral instability and directional control made it less effective than the M113A1."

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Doug, I think we continue to disagree on the subject, although I'll defer to your Armor Board knowledge. But if Hunnicutt's Bradley has any weight (page 244), it appears that the XM800T at least was superior than the M113:

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV.
Neil


It was, but marginally so, the benefits primarily due to weight and size...but not nearly by enough to justify the cost to field it and the time it would have taken to get it there. See my comment "too little, to late". It would have been nearly 1980 by the time this thing could have been fielded in numbers and the Brad was well in the works by then...a choice had to be made and this wasn't it (even though the role of the Brad wasn't pure Scout, the concept was sacrificed for something the Army wanted more).

On balance, it was a worthwhile sacrifice, IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Okay, understood & granted. We're talking the age-old capability vs cost. Was a dedicated scout vehicle worth the cost.

However, I would point out that the abandonment of the ARSV led to both HMMWV and Bradley mounted scouts. And the Army has recently abandoned HMMWV mounted scout units as too vulnerable, leaving "scouting in a Winnebago" as the only mechanized scout capability (besides Stryker RSTA vehicles - which would probably be good scout vehicles across the board IMO).

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Okay, understood & granted. We're talking the age-old capability vs cost. Was a dedicated scout vehicle worth the cost.

However, I would point out that the abandonment of the ARSV led to both HMMWV and Bradley mounted scouts. And the Army has recently abandoned HMMWV mounted scout units as too vulnerable, leaving "scouting in a Winnebago" as the only mechanized scout capability (besides Stryker RSTA vehicles - which would probably be good scout vehicles across the board IMO).

Neil

Neil,

After how many years? And only after the experience of Iraq and the IED's attendant thereto. Recall that the forerunner to the HMMWV, the X311, was a proposed wheeled scout vehicle at one time with substantial armament capabilty for the day and was seriously considered. Gotta' consider these things in the context of the times, not what is known today. Wink

D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

True enough, although folks back then I believe knew that the HMMWV was too light for scouts and the Bradley was too heavy...

Certainly the Iraq IED issue exposed one big facet of HMMWV vulnerability in this role - but isnt that merely one aspect (albeit a new one) of an overall vulnerability & inadequacy in the scout role that has been known for some time?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

There is always a problem with the concept of a dedicated "Scout Vehicle"...if it's mobile/fast enough, it's necessarily vulnerable to all sorts of stuff....the converse situation is obvious. That's why I think a dedicated Scout vehicle (on land) is an anachronism and has been for a couple of decades. Scouting needs to be a combined operation itself...with a light arm and a backup. Not unlike the Cav units that combined tanks with lighter AFV's or even Sheridans for scouting. Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".

Increasingly, the need for this as a dedicated unit is probably diminished over what it was in the '70's, what with UAV's, other imaging, etc., but it's always nice to send somebody out there for a look-see without getting your a$$ shot off just for the effort. And it's nice if you can carry some guys with you, just in case. Three-man scout vehicle...I'm not sure the need still exists..., but that's just me.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Here's the door that was 'unlocked'.


_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:09 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".


I wonder if it's all relative, to wit: Sitting up here at 3000 ft. AGL with a fully-loaded XM-21 Weapons Sub-system seemed relatively safe. Stats bore this out. No one wanted to mess with the front end of this one.


On the other hand, we didn't particularly consider it safe to be down there despite the overhead cover of two gunships. There are two Loaches here and I ain't gonna tell you where they are. You hafta find 'em on your own, then calculate their survival quotient when their rotorwash uncovers a full NVA squad manning their 57mm AA gun.


I mean, it's a very serious situation.

_________________
--Bob Steinbrunn
BSteinIPMS at aol.com


Last edited by A-109E on Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- A-109E
There are two Loaches here and I ain't gonna tell you where they are. You hafta find 'em on your own,


One just right of center, one at 11o'clock...now you find mine... Mr. Green

(copy and paste "properties" for full size)

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:37 am
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
There is always a problem with the concept of a dedicated "Scout Vehicle"...if it's mobile/fast enough, it's necessarily vulnerable to all sorts of stuff....the converse situation is obvious. That's why I think a dedicated Scout vehicle (on land) is an anachronism and has been for a couple of decades. Scouting needs to be a combined operation itself...with a light arm and a backup. Not unlike the Cav units that combined tanks with lighter AFV's or even Sheridans for scouting. Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".

Increasingly, the need for this as a dedicated unit is probably diminished over what it was in the '70's, what with UAV's, other imaging, etc., but it's always nice to send somebody out there for a look-see without getting your a$$ shot off just for the effort. And it's nice if you can carry some guys with you, just in case. Three-man scout vehicle...I'm not sure the need still exists..., but that's just me.


I agree that UAVs and other sensors are increasingly supplementing, possibly replacing conventional scouting and reconnaissance, but I think there is also still is a role for dedicated scout vehicles. These tend to come in two varieties: the 3-man versions as you mentioned, but now fitted out with lots of sensors; and the scout-team carrier variety. The Army sorely needs a sensor-equipped scout vehicle, especially one with a mast. I understand an NTC rotation a few years back was extremely jealous of the Canadian Army Grizzly (LAV III) recon vehicles that have a mast-mounted sensor. The US Army simply doesnt have this capability today. It was intended for FSCS/TRACER (ie the ARSV successor) and now the FCS MGV RSTA vehicle... The current question appears to be whether scout-team carriers are needed. Recent thinking seems to have shifted away from them, but I suspect Iraq may cause a rethink of this...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum