±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 191
Total: 191
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: CPGlang
05: CPGlang
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Member Screenshots
09: Community Forums
10: CPGlang
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Downloads
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Photo Gallery
20: CPGlang
21: Downloads
22: Home
23: Downloads
24: Member Screenshots
25: CPGlang
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Photo Gallery
32: Photo Gallery
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Downloads
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: CPGlang
45: Community Forums
46: CPGlang
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: CPGlang
64: Photo Gallery
65: Photo Gallery
66: Photo Gallery
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: CPGlang
76: News
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Home
82: News
83: Home
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Home
91: Downloads
92: Photo Gallery
93: Home
94: Photo Gallery
95: CPGlang
96: CPGlang
97: Photo Gallery
98: CPGlang
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Photo Gallery
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: CPGlang
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Your Account
110: CPGlang
111: CPGlang
112: Community Forums
113: CPGlang
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: News
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Photo Gallery
126: Photo Gallery
127: Photo Gallery
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Home
135: Photo Gallery
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Photo Gallery
140: Home
141: CPGlang
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Statistics
145: Photo Gallery
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Your Account
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Downloads
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Member Screenshots
160: Photo Gallery
161: CPGlang
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Photo Gallery
165: Photo Gallery
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Photo Gallery
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: CPGlang
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Your Account
180: CPGlang
181: Home
182: CPGlang
183: Photo Gallery
184: Home
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Is there room for another processor company? :: Archived
Resolve issues with your computer problems here or read about the latest computer parts and information.
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  Hardware

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
401RCAF_HitMan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 26, 2004
Posts: 1469
Location: Ontario, CANADA (next to the beer store)
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:53 pm
Post subject: Is there room for another processor company?

A very interesting read...

San Jose (CA) - P.A. Semi is a new player in the processor market that competes for a portion of the cut-throat CPU market. The company hopes to carve out its place by avoiding direct confrontation with Intel: P.A. Semi's 65 nm low-power dual-core system-on-a-chip design is based on IBM's Power Architecture. Announced today, the first 2 GHz chips are scheduled to sample by Q3 2006.

read more here:
www.tgdaily.com/2005/1...index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Shadow_Bshwackr
Janitor

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 7019
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:43 am
Post subject: Re: Is there room for another processor company?

Here is some of the article. I remember reading about this chipset in recent past and while it was developed for Notebooks primarily, the concepts are something to 'keep an eye' on...:wink:

Most important, perhaps, PWRficient is not x86-based and therefore avoids direct competition with Intel and AMD. Instead, P. A. Semi licensed IBM's Power Architecture and sees actually IBM, ARM and Freescale as its initial competitors. But Bannon mentioned that the chip could compete with Intel in higher-end cluster applications one day.

So, what does P. A. Semi offer? The PWRficient is said to debut as 65 nm PA6T-1682M model 200 million transistors. The chip design integrates two 2 GHz cores, each with 64 KByte I-cache and 64 KByte D-cache. The cores are connected through an interface named "Connexium" that connects to 2 MByte shared L2 cache. The bandwidth of the interface is 16 GByte in read and write processes. Other components of the SoC include transaction trace memory, peripheral trace memory, as well as the "Envoi" component as I/O protocol engine that covers PCI Express, dual 10 Gbit Ethernet, I/O cache, DMA and offload engines, for example.

For the future, P. A. Semi says, the design is scalable to eight cores, to 2.5 GHz clock speed and up to 8 MByte L2 cache.

The result, apparently, is a PowerPC-based processor that is promised to deliver a performance-per-watt scenario, that is "much superior" to what processors offer today. According to Bannon, the PWRficient's performance-per-watt ratio is "10-15 times" better than what today's mobile processors deliver and "about 3 times better than Intel's future chips." The company says that "typical" power consumption of the 2 GHz dual-core chip is between 5 and 13 watts.


Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  Hardware
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.