±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 467
Total: 467
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: News Archive
05: Downloads
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Downloads
12: Member Screenshots
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Downloads
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Photo Gallery
21: Home
22: Downloads
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Supporters
31: Community Forums
32: Downloads
33: Community Forums
34: Member Screenshots
35: Home
36: Home
37: Downloads
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Home
43: Home
44: Downloads
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: News
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Home
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: News Archive
70: Community Forums
71: Downloads
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Photo Gallery
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Home
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Home
115: Downloads
116: Downloads
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: News Archive
124: Community Forums
125: Member Screenshots
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Member Screenshots
135: Community Forums
136: News
137: News
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Home
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: News Archive
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Downloads
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Member Screenshots
158: Member Screenshots
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Home
171: Home
172: Statistics
173: News
174: Home
175: News Archive
176: Community Forums
177: News
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Member Screenshots
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Statistics
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Downloads
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Statistics
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Photo Gallery
231: Photo Gallery
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Downloads
240: Member Screenshots
241: Community Forums
242: News Archive
243: Photo Gallery
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Member Screenshots
252: Member Screenshots
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: News
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: News Archive
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Your Account
286: Home
287: Home
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Photo Gallery
301: News Archive
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: News
307: Home
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Downloads
312: Downloads
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Home
323: Your Account
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Downloads
339: Member Screenshots
340: Your Account
341: Home
342: Home
343: Home
344: Home
345: Photo Gallery
346: Statistics
347: Home
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Home
353: Member Screenshots
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Member Screenshots
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: News Archive
371: Community Forums
372: Downloads
373: Home
374: News
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Home
381: Home
382: Home
383: Home
384: Home
385: Statistics
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Member Screenshots
389: Community Forums
390: Home
391: Home
392: Home
393: News Archive
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Home
398: Member Screenshots
399: Home
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Downloads
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Home
411: Home
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: News Archive
418: Home
419: Home
420: Home
421: Home
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Community Forums
426: Home
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Downloads
433: Home
434: Member Screenshots
435: Home
436: Home
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Home
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Home
444: Home
445: Home
446: Home
447: Photo Gallery
448: Home
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Member Screenshots
459: Member Screenshots
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Home
466: Photo Gallery
467: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum