±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 340
Total: 340
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: News Archive
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: CPGlang
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Member Screenshots
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Your Account
20: CPGlang
21: Downloads
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Downloads
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Downloads
36: CPGlang
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Member Screenshots
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Downloads
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Photo Gallery
64: Community Forums
65: Member Screenshots
66: Your Account
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Photo Gallery
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Downloads
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Photo Gallery
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Home
92: Photo Gallery
93: News Archive
94: Downloads
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: CPGlang
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Your Account
105: Home
106: Statistics
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Statistics
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: CPGlang
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Downloads
129: Home
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Your Account
133: News Archive
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Your Account
137: CPGlang
138: CPGlang
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Photo Gallery
145: Home
146: Your Account
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Photo Gallery
153: Search
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Downloads
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Your Account
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Statistics
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: CPGlang
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Statistics
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Statistics
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: CPGlang
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Downloads
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Your Account
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Your Account
253: CPGlang
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Member Screenshots
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Home
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Your Account
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: CPGlang
282: Community Forums
283: Statistics
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Downloads
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: News
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: News Archive
300: Photo Gallery
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Statistics
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Your Account
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Photo Gallery
326: Photo Gallery
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Supporters
330: Contact
331: Home
332: CPGlang
333: Community Forums
334: CPGlang
335: News
336: Community Forums
337: Photo Gallery
338: Community Forums
339: Statistics
340: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
AFVS on Mythbusters
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:14 am
Post subject: AFVS on Mythbusters

I just watched a segment of Mythbusters that caught my attention with an M551 in the teaser at the beginning.

The myth they were 'busting' was that two phone books with the pages interlaced could not be pulled apart. They atrted with one person pulling on each book then stepped up to 5 people on each side. The books would not pull apart. They then took two cars (generic frontwheel drive sedans) and ended up spinning the tires. This attempt was done on dirt.

So they went to Jacque Littlefields place. They had a short but nice photo shoot inside and outside (I didn't realize his buildings were set up as a U shape, I really want to get out there)

They hooked the books up to an M551 and an M113 FSV (The Aussie version with a Saladin turret) using the trailer pintle (I wondered if they should have used the tow hooks) and pulled. This was done on a paved lot.

I'll hold off till tomorrow to tell what happens. I will say that they upgraded the rig that held the rope/cable to the phone books from plywood and nylon rope to heavy metal plates and chains.

Anyone else see this? It was actually a pretty straight forward attempt to bust a myth and I think done in a pretty straight forward manner (I've faulted their methodology on some in the last few years but I think they did this one right)

And for anyone who didn't see it what do you think happened?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DanFong
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:19 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

I saw the show last night too. The one thing I can fault them on in their experiments is that they changed the conditions from the cars to the AFV's. The cars tried to pull while on bare ground and the AFV's pulled from a concrete pad. I wonder if the cars could have done the job if they were on concrete? They should have put the AFV's on bare ground just to be consistant.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:41 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

It depends. Were they trying to see if they could pull the books apart or show that tracked vehicles could do what cars could not? The substrate is really irrelevant in the former and critical in the latter.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

I am curious as to their choice of AFVs. I wonder if there was any reason to choose those particular vehicles. Did they just happen to be the two most readily available? I can see not wanting to use some of the older tanks but I could see an M60 and a Soviet T-54 or T-72 being used.

I think the choice of surface for the cars was the one weak point in the tests. putting them on dirt pretty much guarranteed early wheel spin. but I wonder if it was done on concrete if there could have been transmission damage instead of wheel spin?

I'll wait a little longer before revealing the results Rolling Eyes

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:22 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

- bsmart
I am curious as to their choice of AFVs. I wonder if there was any reason to choose those particular vehicles. Did they just happen to be the two most readily available? I can see not wanting to use some of the older tanks but I could see an M60 and a Soviet T-54 or T-72 being used:


It is my understanding that the Littlefield vehicles are tested and then the fluids are drained for storage/display. These might have been the ones that could be prepped out quickly, plus they are pretty close in visual size.

Gary
Back to top
View user's profile
toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:44 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

I'm giving one of the tours Saturday morning at the MVTF. If Jacques is there, I'll ask why they chose the M551 & M113FSV. BTW, his daughter is driving one of the vehicles used in the show.

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:17 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

No one has made any guesses about the results of the segment so I'll finish it up. The did a quick synopsis of the weight and horsepower of each vehicle and did the obligatory photo shoots of the stars in teh hatches of the vehicles. The AFVs took a strain on the cable. There was a guage in the rig to measure the amount of force being applied. after a few moments of on screen pulling the phone books parted. The guage showed the effort was 8,000 pounds. As they commented later both cars could have been hung from the rig and it wouldn't have pulled the phonebooks apart. Earlier in the show they speculated that something other than just friction causes the large amount of force needed. These were 'City size' phgone books (I think the mentioned 800 pages). I suspect that a combination of the large contact area and the weight of the stack of pages along with the relatively rough surface of phone book paper is the reason

It was an interesting segment.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum