±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 789
Total: 789
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Member Screenshots
04: News Archive
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Member Screenshots
08: Member Screenshots
09: News Archive
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Member Screenshots
16: Member Screenshots
17: Community Forums
18: Downloads
19: Home
20: Member Screenshots
21: Member Screenshots
22: Member Screenshots
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Member Screenshots
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Member Screenshots
40: News Archive
41: News Archive
42: Community Forums
43: Member Screenshots
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Member Screenshots
51: Home
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Downloads
60: Member Screenshots
61: News Archive
62: Member Screenshots
63: Member Screenshots
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Member Screenshots
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: News Archive
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Member Screenshots
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: News Archive
91: Downloads
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: News
99: Member Screenshots
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: News Archive
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: News Archive
113: Community Forums
114: News Archive
115: Home
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Member Screenshots
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Member Screenshots
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: News
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: News Archive
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Member Screenshots
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: News Archive
155: News Archive
156: Member Screenshots
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Downloads
160: Photo Gallery
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Member Screenshots
181: Member Screenshots
182: Your Account
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Statistics
191: Supporters
192: News
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: News Archive
196: Member Screenshots
197: Downloads
198: News Archive
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Statistics
203: Member Screenshots
204: News Archive
205: Photo Gallery
206: Statistics
207: Home
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Member Screenshots
211: Downloads
212: News Archive
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: Photo Gallery
216: Community Forums
217: Member Screenshots
218: Member Screenshots
219: Home
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Member Screenshots
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Downloads
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Supporters
259: Community Forums
260: Downloads
261: Downloads
262: Community Forums
263: Downloads
264: Home
265: Downloads
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Your Account
271: Community Forums
272: Downloads
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Member Screenshots
277: Member Screenshots
278: Community Forums
279: Downloads
280: Home
281: Member Screenshots
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Statistics
285: Photo Gallery
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Member Screenshots
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Downloads
301: Photo Gallery
302: Photo Gallery
303: Photo Gallery
304: LinkToUs
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Photo Gallery
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: News Archive
314: Member Screenshots
315: Home
316: LinkToUs
317: Member Screenshots
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Member Screenshots
321: Member Screenshots
322: Member Screenshots
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Member Screenshots
327: News Archive
328: Home
329: Photo Gallery
330: Downloads
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: News Archive
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: News Archive
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Downloads
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Photo Gallery
346: Photo Gallery
347: Home
348: Photo Gallery
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Home
353: Downloads
354: Photo Gallery
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Member Screenshots
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Photo Gallery
361: Member Screenshots
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Photo Gallery
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: News Archive
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Photo Gallery
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: News
381: Member Screenshots
382: Community Forums
383: Your Account
384: News Archive
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Member Screenshots
390: Community Forums
391: Member Screenshots
392: News
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Home
396: Community Forums
397: Member Screenshots
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Downloads
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Photo Gallery
410: Member Screenshots
411: Photo Gallery
412: Member Screenshots
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Member Screenshots
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: News Archive
419: News Archive
420: Member Screenshots
421: Member Screenshots
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: News Archive
425: Community Forums
426: Statistics
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Home
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Member Screenshots
435: Community Forums
436: Statistics
437: Member Screenshots
438: Member Screenshots
439: Community Forums
440: News Archive
441: News
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: News Archive
445: Community Forums
446: Member Screenshots
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Home
451: Downloads
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Statistics
456: Community Forums
457: Member Screenshots
458: Photo Gallery
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Photo Gallery
462: News Archive
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Home
467: Member Screenshots
468: Community Forums
469: Member Screenshots
470: Photo Gallery
471: News Archive
472: Community Forums
473: Home
474: Community Forums
475: Downloads
476: Community Forums
477: Member Screenshots
478: Member Screenshots
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Downloads
482: News Archive
483: Downloads
484: Community Forums
485: Member Screenshots
486: Community Forums
487: Member Screenshots
488: Photo Gallery
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: News
495: Community Forums
496: Home
497: News
498: Member Screenshots
499: Community Forums
500: News Archive
501: Statistics
502: Member Screenshots
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Photo Gallery
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Treasury
514: Home
515: News
516: Community Forums
517: Member Screenshots
518: Photo Gallery
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Home
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Home
528: Community Forums
529: Photo Gallery
530: Home
531: News
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Downloads
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Member Screenshots
540: Community Forums
541: Member Screenshots
542: Member Screenshots
543: Member Screenshots
544: Member Screenshots
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Member Screenshots
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Home
553: Home
554: Member Screenshots
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Photo Gallery
559: Member Screenshots
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: News
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Member Screenshots
569: Home
570: News Archive
571: Member Screenshots
572: Photo Gallery
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Downloads
576: Member Screenshots
577: Community Forums
578: Home
579: Home
580: Community Forums
581: Home
582: Photo Gallery
583: Home
584: Community Forums
585: Downloads
586: Member Screenshots
587: Community Forums
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: News
591: Member Screenshots
592: Home
593: Downloads
594: Home
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Member Screenshots
598: Downloads
599: Community Forums
600: News
601: Community Forums
602: Home
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Statistics
608: Photo Gallery
609: Community Forums
610: News
611: Downloads
612: Community Forums
613: Home
614: Home
615: Home
616: News Archive
617: Home
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Your Account
622: Member Screenshots
623: Your Account
624: Home
625: Community Forums
626: Photo Gallery
627: Your Account
628: Community Forums
629: Your Account
630: Member Screenshots
631: Home
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: Member Screenshots
639: Home
640: Home
641: Downloads
642: Member Screenshots
643: Member Screenshots
644: Home
645: Photo Gallery
646: Downloads
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Photo Gallery
651: Photo Gallery
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: News Archive
656: LinkToUs
657: Community Forums
658: Member Screenshots
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Photo Gallery
664: Community Forums
665: Photo Gallery
666: Photo Gallery
667: Downloads
668: Downloads
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Home
672: Downloads
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Community Forums
677: Home
678: Statistics
679: Downloads
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: Community Forums
683: Member Screenshots
684: Community Forums
685: Member Screenshots
686: News
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Home
690: Photo Gallery
691: News
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Downloads
695: Community Forums
696: Home
697: Community Forums
698: Photo Gallery
699: Photo Gallery
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: News
703: News Archive
704: Community Forums
705: Member Screenshots
706: Community Forums
707: Your Account
708: Home
709: Community Forums
710: Photo Gallery
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Downloads
714: Home
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Member Screenshots
718: Member Screenshots
719: Your Account
720: News
721: Photo Gallery
722: Community Forums
723: News Archive
724: Community Forums
725: Photo Gallery
726: Home
727: Community Forums
728: Member Screenshots
729: Home
730: News Archive
731: Photo Gallery
732: Community Forums
733: Member Screenshots
734: Community Forums
735: Community Forums
736: Home
737: Community Forums
738: Photo Gallery
739: Downloads
740: News
741: Home
742: Photo Gallery
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Community Forums
748: Photo Gallery
749: Community Forums
750: Photo Gallery
751: Home
752: Community Forums
753: Photo Gallery
754: Photo Gallery
755: Photo Gallery
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Community Forums
759: Community Forums
760: Photo Gallery
761: Community Forums
762: News
763: Photo Gallery
764: Community Forums
765: News Archive
766: Community Forums
767: Home
768: Community Forums
769: Supporters
770: Home
771: Community Forums
772: Downloads
773: Downloads
774: Community Forums
775: Home
776: Home
777: Community Forums
778: Community Forums
779: Home
780: Member Screenshots
781: Community Forums
782: Community Forums
783: Community Forums
784: Community Forums
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: News Archive
788: News
789: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:43 pm
Post subject: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Question for former Army museum employees & volunteers: in your experience, is there a distinction between artifacts that are useful for soldier training and those of historical value? I dont see the distinction, particularly if you are training soldiers on the history of their branch...

But that's the baby the Senate Armed Services Committee is asking the Army to try to divide for the Armor/Ordnance/ADA collections. That being said, the intent of the language below is to enable the "historical" artifacts to be put on public display at privately-funded museums (vs the "training" artifacts that will be stored for soldier training at facilities paid for with public funds). Unfortunately, the committee is opposed to using public funds to enable public access.

Maybe (hopefully?) the Army will use this distinction to recreate what existed at Fort Knox with the Patton Museum vs Richardson Motor Pool? Who knows...

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...srpt26.pdf

"Storage of Army artifacts
The fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Department of the Army recommended funding in Military Construction, Army, for three climate controlled storage buildings at Forts Benning, Lee, and Sill. These facilities were intended to support movement of Army macro-artifacts which were following Training and Doctrine Command schools re-locating as part of the Base Closure and Realignment 2005 process. Although the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) did not authorize these projects, the committee supports the requirement to protect and preserve these historical collections.

"The committee has encouraged the Army to investigate all options for facility solutions. The committee encourages the Army to pursue the solutions that best address the priorities the Army has identified and that are the most fiscally prudent from a life cycle standpoint. Therefore, the committee directs the Army to complete its review of all options under consideration and provide a report to the committee not later than September 30, 2011, on its preferred solution set. The report shall contain, at a minimum, the following:
1. The Army’s requirements and priorities with respect to storing these artifacts;
2. Identification of various solution sets and a business case analysis for each course of action, as well as identifying any legal or regulatory barriers for the different options;
3. Estimates for the life cycle cost to the government for each option;
4. The expected cost and implications of not providing appropriate storage locations for the artifacts;
5. The Army’s recommendation for the appropriate option at each installation;
6. Any necessary legislative changes necessary to dispose of any artifacts that are not deemed to be of national historic significance; and
7. Delineation and listing of all artifacts to be stored, with special emphasis on those that are to be used for training and in what context, and those that merely have historical value as an artifact.

"With respect to the Army’s preferred option for each of the three installations, the committee notes that it does not and will not support the use of any appropriated funds being used to build or support a public museum."
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical valu

just a note : it is good to read this, because it shows that the Senate is preoccupated by the fate of these historical artifacts.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Maybe we should set up an AFVNDG warehouse in the US to take any 'spare' vehicles that the Army doesn't want...

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Don, Bob, Garry,
Any comments?
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:06 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

My fear is that anything supplied to a private museum will end up at a 'Museum' like the VMMV or the one in Florida that bought the collection from Hubbard OH.

Yes there are some good collections but most are the projects of individuals and subject to the vagries of life. Good intentions run up against tough budgets, wills and probate, divorce and even fraud. Maybe I am glad the Czech T35 went home instead of staying at the Ordinance Museum

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:52 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Bob,
The report seems (or at least tries) to distinguish amongst three different types of artifacts:
1) Those "not deemed to be of national historic significance" - these items could well be given away to various museums like you said.
2) Those of "national historic significance" - these items would remain Army property, but would be displayed at co-located (or nearby) museums - akin to the old Patton Museum, and to a lesser degree the Ordnance Museum.
3) Those "to be used for training" - these items would be stored at publicly-funded storage facility, for use by soldiers.

I suspect the artifacts falling under #1 will be relatively few - or at least that's what I can only hope the Army will say.

My primary curiousity/concern regards #2 & #3 - I dont see the distinction.

For those that worked & volunteered at the old museums, I am curious if you saw any practical distinction between artifacts that were used to train soldiers and "historical" artifacts displayed merely for public benefit. Seems to me soldiers are/were trained on the same historical items... But I could be wrong...

Neil

I believe the intent would still be to have a privately funded "museum" co-located (or nearby) the publicly-funded
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:06 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Hi Folks!

My bet is when it's done and over with, all of the artifacts will be left out in the rain.

There is NO difference between #2 and #3.

The last time I was at the Ft Bliss museum, a Capt and a 1st Sgt came by. They were from a NG Air Defense unit. They were going to bring they unit by for a look at the Air Defense items still at the museum. Training is walking around a item and looking at it. Hopefully someone knows some history about it and can tell the troops. Next day, a family stops by and walks around the same item. Both the troops and the family do the same thing. They look and learn.

I somehow get the feeling that some one is thinking the troops get on or in an item and do something with it.

My 2 cents.
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Neil

The only thing I can offer is the personal view point that the 'training tool' excuse has been far over-used by Army Officials.

A few soldiers going thru the museum once a month is not viable training experience but an excuse for a day away from the normal routine.

Is there any sort of training plan? (NO!)
"Task, Conditions, & Standards" (NO!)
Pre or post training testing ? (NO!)

These are (or at least were) minimum requirements for a basic training session.

Oh yeah, a bunch of young "LTs" climbing on old tanks after having their 'threat' class was always fun to babysit. They tended to do more harm to subject vehicles than any sort of beneficial training value. This is why we colocated all the Soviet/Russian vehicles together. Those were realistically the only vehicles that gave them any sort of training value.

The greatest casualty to this whole episode? The general public, veterans, and their families. And then there is the volunteers.

Volunteers spend (or have spent) Thousands of man hours to preserve or restore vehicles (utilizing private &/or personal funds) for public display & exhibitions that draw thousands of interested veterans, families, and enthusists.

The greatest success of the Ft Knox Armor Museum (ie old Patton Museum), was the ability of seeing, touching, smelling, and hearing Armor History. That is now gone for the most part and the ability of experiencing history in such a manner is now only possible through private collection museums.

a few items to consider....
What is Historical property? technically anything is....(no clear answer there!)

'Publically Funded Storage Facility" is a government built garage. A building that houses equipment. (There seems to be no interest in preservation or historical presentation.)

Sadly, the future seems to be bleak for any sort of "World Class Armor Museum" BRAC 05 destroyed an institution its history. Its too late to get any of that back, and there is no interest or funding for a future institution. THAT is the crime of this whole episode.

Of course this is merely my personal opinion.... Sorry for the ranting, I'll shut up now...

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Okay now that I vented

I can see someone deciding that anything from the late cold war is to be kept as a 'training aid' "So we can show the troops the weak spots, strengths, how to defend against it, etc". Fiberglass models would be about as useful (and a whole lot cheaper to maintain) if you just want to show the troops what a Panther or a Tiger looked like and how it compared to a Sherman or Stuart. And do Ordnance troops today even need to know that? They are only interested in recovering repairing and maintaining tanks. It took over 10 years for the Recovery Branch of the Ordnance school to move the Elefant one mile! (And eventually it was accomplished in the manner I suggested nine years ago - You embarrass the leaders - I suggested a bar bet with the senior NCOs, it was done by the Base Commander in a staff meeting to the OIC of the recovery Branch)

Another example - I used to make a point to groups about how bad the interleaved roadwheels of the Panther were for maintenance. A training aid set up with interleaved wheels that you could actually have trainees swap out the inside center wheel will make as much impression as showing them and telling them how unmaintanable they were compared to the spaced wheels of a T-34 or T-72 or a VVSS unit of a Sherman.

The older vehicles were more of professional interest to the designers and engineers who were developing the next generation by looking at how previous developers solved problems. But those folks aren't at Ft Lee or Benning so what training purpose do the vehicles serve there?

Their purpose is in building esprit, keeping the public enthused, having trophies to show off. And that isn't done by locking them away in a training area where only professionals who have already made a commitment can see them. They serve a major purpose by being down the center of the main road into the base where a 9 year old can be driven by them and think WOW and be in a place where a grandfather can bring his grand children and tell them 'that is what I did in the great war' Or where a group of Cub Scouts can walk around them and look at the gouges where rounds bounced off while a docent tells the story of a last ditch fruitless defense

A few will be deemed 'of national historic significance' (and probably for all the wrong reasons) Things like Patton's command truck, Cobra King (hopefully) Some M1 Combat car that they have a picture of Patton or Rose or someone else famous in Maybe some of the one of a kinds from the 20s and 30s. A few Shermans, Maybe some M-48s painted up like they were in Vietnam. You know as well as I do they have very few records on the vehicles at Aberdeen to be able to tell much about specific vehicles and what their 'significance is' The Tiger I (if it ever comes back) and the JagdTiger that we have photographic evidence of when and where it was captured may be some of the best documented. Will they keep the two Ordnance Museum Panthers side by side so someone can show the improvements made between early and late production? I doubt it.

Then there will be a lot put on the block for units or bases to request as monuments. Then they will start accepting requests from museums, probably based on who knows which Senator. Some will hopefully be well cared for and made available for some folks to see. Others will end up as trophies or playtoys for fatcats to show off to their friends and pat themselves on the back about how they are 'saving history'

The intellectual midgets that we have making these decisions in DC only think of what they can do to embarrass members of the other party and blame the previous administration for all the problems They want a 'feel good' sound bite that they will forget before the next reporter talks to them

I guess I just vented again

In actuality the 'training tool' excuse has always just been politically correct lip service used to justify the keeping of trophies. Everyone knew why they were being kept, they were being kept to show off to family and friends, Show the Taxpayer what their sacrifices (back in the big war) were for and be a center of pride for the organization. Well someone is now enforcing 'the letter of the law'. This is the 21st century version of the WWII and Korean war scrap drives

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Interesting feedback. I suppose my hope is that the Army will say that most (if not almost all) artifacts have national historic value, but are not needed for direct soldier training per see... Setting them up for display at museums co-located at Benning, Lee and Sill.

My fear is that the collections will end up slit between the privately-funded museum and the publicly-funded storage facilities - with the latter (ironically) not accessible by the public.

BTW, I am told there is one particular well-known Senator that is firmly opposed to using public funds for public access (ie museums). The same Senator that rails against pork barrel spending on a regular basis...
Back to top
View user's profile
ShermanWasRight
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Posts: 165
Location: Central Ohio/Northern Kentucky
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:07 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical valu

I find the disdain for private museums here interesting, as it's quite the opposite of what I've seen among warbird enthusiasts-they love the "free market approach."

Of course, I agree with the opinion here; "preserving" history in someone's garage/hangar that the public only sees 5 days a year is next to worthless. Unfortunately I don't really know that I can offer any real solutions to the problem-it's hard even for me as someone who loves history to think that these vehicles could be used for training modern soldiers in any real fashion.

^^^^the storage facilites being off limits for "security reasons," of course, like the numerous gateguards at airbases across the country Rolling Eyes . The freaking Iranian planespotters have better access to their air force than I do, based on what I see on airliners.net. If I asked the USAF for permission to take pictures of their birds at, say, Rickenbacker, the chances are good they'd tell me about all the security/OPSEC risks before they then said no.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Keep in mind that you can go to an airshow once (or a few times) a year to see privately restored warbirds, and you can also go almost any day a year to an aviation museum.

That balance has been upset for the AFV world in the US. You can still go to the open houses to see privately restored vehicles, but the two largest AFV museum collections are now in storage.

It would be akin to having the Air & Space Museum and USAF Museum collections in storage at the same time due to impending - and as yet uncertain and unfunded - moves.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical valu

And keep in mind that while the country groans under crushing debt and the DoD creaks under indecipherable accounting practices, we're "saving money" by moving an entire branch (or two) of the army at considerable expense, yet "closing" nothing under BRAC in the move. To say nothing of leaving behind an essentially empty and amortized museum that was well suited to it's task while it's key displays are left to rot out of public view for who-knows-how long?

A new museum (if, in fact, one is ever started, let alone completed) will cost many millions. I predict we will not see such a facility for at least ten years...and I'm skeptical that it will ever happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 6:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

....and to think some 'Brain Surgeon' decided that moving the Armor Center from Ft Knox (that has well developed training ranges and additional available 'unused' land) to Ft Benning (that had to expand to include currently unusable land for armor training...and now may have to export personnel to locations to conduct actual basic & advanced armor training...!?) due to the fact it was 'cheaper'!? WTF!!

I got to quit commenting, this is getting my elevated blood pressure even higher !! (Wheres my B.P. pills !!)

Oh well, such is life
Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

- Dontos
....and to think some 'Brain Surgeon' decided that moving the Armor Center from Ft Knox (that has well developed training ranges and additional available 'unused' land) to Ft Benning (that had to expand to include currently unusable land for armor training...and now may have to export personnel to locations to conduct actual basic & advanced armor training...!?) due to the fact it was 'cheaper'!? WTF!!

Don


The ultimate irony will be when they starting sending people TDY from Benning to Knox to conduct training on facilities that Benning doesn't have.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum