±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 660
Total: 660
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Photo Gallery
03: Member Screenshots
04: Home
05: Member Screenshots
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Member Screenshots
09: Downloads
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Member Screenshots
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Member Screenshots
20: News Archive
21: News Archive
22: News Archive
23: Home
24: Member Screenshots
25: Photo Gallery
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Home
30: Home
31: News Archive
32: Community Forums
33: Downloads
34: Member Screenshots
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: News Archive
39: Downloads
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Photo Gallery
43: News Archive
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Member Screenshots
47: Home
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Member Screenshots
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Member Screenshots
64: Member Screenshots
65: Community Forums
66: News Archive
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Member Screenshots
70: Member Screenshots
71: Community Forums
72: News Archive
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: News Archive
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: News Archive
80: Member Screenshots
81: Home
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Your Account
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Statistics
90: Home
91: News
92: Home
93: Member Screenshots
94: Member Screenshots
95: News Archive
96: Member Screenshots
97: Photo Gallery
98: Home
99: Member Screenshots
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: News Archive
104: Community Forums
105: News Archive
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: News Archive
117: Member Screenshots
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Member Screenshots
121: Statistics
122: Member Screenshots
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Downloads
128: Downloads
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: News Archive
132: Community Forums
133: News Archive
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: News Archive
139: Your Account
140: Statistics
141: Home
142: Statistics
143: Home
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: Member Screenshots
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: Home
153: Photo Gallery
154: Photo Gallery
155: Home
156: News Archive
157: Community Forums
158: News Archive
159: Home
160: Member Screenshots
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Statistics
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Home
171: Home
172: News Archive
173: Member Screenshots
174: Member Screenshots
175: Photo Gallery
176: Member Screenshots
177: Member Screenshots
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Member Screenshots
181: Photo Gallery
182: Home
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Statistics
189: Your Account
190: Member Screenshots
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: News Archive
196: Community Forums
197: Member Screenshots
198: Photo Gallery
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: News Archive
208: News Archive
209: News
210: Your Account
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Member Screenshots
215: Photo Gallery
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: News
219: Your Account
220: Home
221: News Archive
222: News Archive
223: Photo Gallery
224: News
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Member Screenshots
228: News Archive
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Member Screenshots
232: Photo Gallery
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Member Screenshots
236: Photo Gallery
237: News Archive
238: Member Screenshots
239: News Archive
240: Photo Gallery
241: Downloads
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Member Screenshots
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Member Screenshots
256: Home
257: Home
258: News Archive
259: Home
260: Downloads
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Home
264: Photo Gallery
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Home
274: Member Screenshots
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Member Screenshots
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Home
285: Home
286: Member Screenshots
287: Photo Gallery
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: News Archive
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Downloads
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Member Screenshots
305: Home
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Home
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Photo Gallery
318: Community Forums
319: News Archive
320: Member Screenshots
321: News Archive
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: News Archive
329: Photo Gallery
330: Photo Gallery
331: Photo Gallery
332: Member Screenshots
333: Downloads
334: Member Screenshots
335: Member Screenshots
336: Photo Gallery
337: Photo Gallery
338: News
339: Home
340: News Archive
341: Community Forums
342: Member Screenshots
343: News Archive
344: Member Screenshots
345: Member Screenshots
346: Home
347: Member Screenshots
348: Home
349: Photo Gallery
350: Photo Gallery
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: News
354: Home
355: Photo Gallery
356: Member Screenshots
357: Downloads
358: Home
359: Member Screenshots
360: Photo Gallery
361: Home
362: Photo Gallery
363: Member Screenshots
364: Member Screenshots
365: News Archive
366: Member Screenshots
367: News Archive
368: News Archive
369: Member Screenshots
370: Statistics
371: Statistics
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: News Archive
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Photo Gallery
380: Home
381: Photo Gallery
382: Home
383: News Archive
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: Home
387: Member Screenshots
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: News Archive
397: Member Screenshots
398: News Archive
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Member Screenshots
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: News Archive
406: Downloads
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Community Forums
412: Member Screenshots
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: News Archive
419: Community Forums
420: Member Screenshots
421: Member Screenshots
422: Member Screenshots
423: News Archive
424: Member Screenshots
425: News Archive
426: Community Forums
427: Member Screenshots
428: Member Screenshots
429: News Archive
430: Member Screenshots
431: Member Screenshots
432: Community Forums
433: News Archive
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Photo Gallery
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Member Screenshots
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Member Screenshots
444: Home
445: Member Screenshots
446: Home
447: Downloads
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Member Screenshots
454: Community Forums
455: News Archive
456: Home
457: Community Forums
458: Member Screenshots
459: News Archive
460: Community Forums
461: Member Screenshots
462: Community Forums
463: News Archive
464: Member Screenshots
465: News Archive
466: Community Forums
467: Home
468: Community Forums
469: Home
470: Photo Gallery
471: Community Forums
472: Home
473: Community Forums
474: News Archive
475: Home
476: Community Forums
477: News
478: Photo Gallery
479: Community Forums
480: Downloads
481: Home
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Home
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Home
490: Home
491: Photo Gallery
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Downloads
496: Home
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Home
500: Photo Gallery
501: Photo Gallery
502: Photo Gallery
503: Home
504: Community Forums
505: Home
506: Community Forums
507: Home
508: Photo Gallery
509: Home
510: Community Forums
511: Home
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Home
516: Community Forums
517: Photo Gallery
518: Downloads
519: Community Forums
520: Downloads
521: Home
522: Home
523: Member Screenshots
524: Search
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Home
530: Community Forums
531: Photo Gallery
532: Member Screenshots
533: Downloads
534: Photo Gallery
535: Photo Gallery
536: News Archive
537: Treasury
538: Home
539: News Archive
540: News Archive
541: Home
542: Home
543: Your Account
544: Member Screenshots
545: Member Screenshots
546: Community Forums
547: Photo Gallery
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Home
551: Home
552: Community Forums
553: Member Screenshots
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Downloads
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: News Archive
560: Statistics
561: Member Screenshots
562: Photo Gallery
563: Member Screenshots
564: Community Forums
565: Member Screenshots
566: Community Forums
567: Member Screenshots
568: Home
569: Community Forums
570: Member Screenshots
571: Member Screenshots
572: Photo Gallery
573: Member Screenshots
574: Community Forums
575: Photo Gallery
576: Home
577: Home
578: Community Forums
579: Member Screenshots
580: Photo Gallery
581: Member Screenshots
582: Photo Gallery
583: News
584: Downloads
585: Community Forums
586: Photo Gallery
587: Community Forums
588: Your Account
589: Member Screenshots
590: Community Forums
591: Member Screenshots
592: Home
593: News Archive
594: Member Screenshots
595: Home
596: Photo Gallery
597: Home
598: Downloads
599: Home
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Home
605: Community Forums
606: Downloads
607: Community Forums
608: Downloads
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Home
613: Community Forums
614: Photo Gallery
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Home
618: Home
619: Community Forums
620: Downloads
621: Home
622: Home
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Photo Gallery
628: Home
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Home
632: Community Forums
633: Downloads
634: Home
635: Member Screenshots
636: Your Account
637: Home
638: News
639: Community Forums
640: Home
641: Member Screenshots
642: Community Forums
643: Photo Gallery
644: Home
645: Home
646: Home
647: Home
648: Home
649: Community Forums
650: Home
651: Community Forums
652: Home
653: Community Forums
654: Home
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Home
659: Home
660: Member Screenshots

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Well there is an big difference in the upgrading of the various weapons used in the different countries between 1942 (Africa landings) and 1944 (D-day)

The Russians upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier German armour
The T34/85, ISU-152, ISU-122, IS-2, etc where all developed mainly in response to the German Tiger

The Germans mainly upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier Russian armour to expected to appear
They had already some nasty suprises in the past, with Russian armour

The British, they did not realy standarised
However they dropped the ones that became obselete, like the Valentine and the Crusader, and replaced it with others
The upgrading of the weapons was not an real succes, except for the 17pdr on the Sherman

The US army had the know-how and the capable weapons available to defeat German armour
The 3in or 76mm AA gun, on which the 76mm tank gun was based, was capable with the MV it had to defeat German armour
The breech was modified to fit inside an tank, that made sense
However the barrel was made shorter because it was sticking out to far Shocked
With reducing the barrel length, the profit of the high MV was lost

The upgrade of the suspension was only something on the side
It did not improve the performance of the gun

When you build in an WW2 76mm Sherman gun into an modern M1A1 Abrams you still can not defeat the armour of an German Tiger or Panther
The only benefit you will have is mobility and armour protection

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

About the several theaters
True the US (and UK) also had the pacific to operate in and this was not so for Russia or Germany
However the Japanese tanks where not the problem to defeat, no matter if an 75mm or an 76mm was used

The 76mm was developed to defeat the German armour and it failed in doing so

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

Michel


Sorry to disillusion you, but this is just plain wrong.

I recommend you do some additional reading. Regarding this point above, you might want to start with "Marines Under Armor" by Kenneth W. Estes, COL. (ret.), in particular the relevant chapters concerning the campaign in the Pacific. There was enormous friction between the Army and the USMC regarding the allocation of the limited resource of equipment.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:02 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel

As you stated only the U.S. and U.K had to deal with the requirements of a worldwide war. The need to defeat German armor was only part of the tasks that U.S. and U.K. tank designors had to worry about. The users in teh Pacific and Southern Asia saw no need to spend time developing heavier tanks with more powerful guns. If anything they wanted development time spent on ways to transfer tanks from ships to beaches, fight in jungles and cross wide, deep rivers.

On top of that the U.S. was commited to supplying vehicles to many of the allies, some of whom had requirements that differed from the U.S. Army. And it did matter if a 75mm or a 76mm was used. When working in the tight confines of Pacific jungle a long barreled 76mm was not acceptable. Having a short barreled gun that wouldn't get hung up on nearby trees demanded a short barrel weapon.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:42 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel


Actually, it was precisely typical (and very much so) in it's application to different priorities to the USMC and the Army...from no less a source than Gen. George C. Marshall, the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, who openly wondered (and I paraphrase) if any of the necessary warfighting equipment that was considered necessary to the Army prosecuting the war would even be available, after he had finished supplying the USMC (as they were clearly in the fight in the PTO first and had most immediate needs for that equipment). When the Army CoS wonders if the material he needs will be available to him, you have to accept that this is a problem typical of the U.S. Armed Forces from the outset of the war. Everybody was jockying for weapons systems, means of production, aircraft engines, etc. for the perceived needs of all the services...all the time while trying to meet the needs of our lend-lease partners while trying to keep them afloat. U.S. production means were substantial, but not limitless, and this problem was not solved before the end of the war.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html


very well spotted, Rafal !!

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

The problem with poor HE ammunition for the 17-pdr and the 76mm could easily have been solved by developing an HE round with thinner walls, fired at a lower velocity. The Germans did this from day one with the 7,5cm KwK 40 L/43 (later L/48) and that round contained about the same amount of explosive as the Us 75mm HE round. Possibly, a slight modification of the existing 75mm HE might have sufficed.

The British actually developed first a low velocity version of the original 17 pdr HE round and later - possibly post war - developed two different High Capacity rounds with more HE filler than the orginal.

So developing a good 17 pdr or 76mm HE round can hardly have been a significant technical problem, so the reason those two guns did not have a good HE round in WWII must be found elsewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:02 am
Post subject: Re: WIP wait to look at.

Hi Folks!

Sorry I am so late to join in.

Maybe these photos might help some.

Below is a 1942 issued M2 treadway floating bridge. This bridge was designed to carry the M2 medium tank during the mid 1930s. The M3 Lee and the early M4s pushed the limits of this system. Note how close the outside edges of the M4 is to the edges of the treadways.
Note how the water level is over the top of the pontoons and parts of the saddles are in the water. This was the equipment the Chief of Engineers was concerned about. This was the system his engineers had to work with. Priority for steel for larger saddles and rubber for larger pontoons was low on the totom pole for the engineers.



This is the heavy M2 treadway with larger saddles and pontoons that large quanties only started reaching the ETO in late 1944. The heavier and longer saddles and larger pontoons also required larger and heavier trucks to transport this equipment. All needing room on the available shipping. The treadways have been moved outward, but not by that much. Still a tight fit for the M4E8's.



Below is the problem the Chief of Engineers had with sending the T-26 to the ETO. That bridge has been modified so the tracks would not damage the equipment along the outer edges of the deck. Anyone who has ever driven a tracked vehicle will understand this is just asking for trouble.


Four comments about the 76 gun tanks.
1. On June 6, 1944, there was a large number of 76mm tanks in storage in England. Not one single tank battalion commader wanted to replace his 75 gun tanks with the 76 prior to D-Day. The excuss given later was there wasn't time to retrain on those tanks. After the US Army started running into a larger numbers of Panther tanks than Army level intell expected did those same commanders started asking for those 76 guns tanks setting back in England. By now the fighting is all out in France and those battalion commanders who could not find the time in England found the time to retrain in France after the landings.

2. The proof testing of the 76mm AT ammo was flawed. Ike was told as late as June that the 76 AT ammo would go through the front hull of a Panther tank. It was only after the troops started using it that it was learned it could not do the job per the claims of the ordinance corps.

3. The 76mm HE round. Major case of could have, should have. Facts are the tankers did NOT like the one that was available, therefore, they didn't like the 76. They were not thinking about killing German tanks with their tanks. See comment below on doctrine.

4. Between the breakout and the start of the Battle of the Bulge. General Abrams who is one of the best known US tank battalion commanders in the ETO. His tank, Thunderbolt 6 was a 75mm M4. As a battalion commander he could pick the type of M4 he wanted. His Commanding Officer had to order him to use a 76mm M4 (Thunderbolt 7 a VVSS). My point here is that there was a MAJOR lack of end users asking for better tank guns. See comment below on doctrine.

If you look at the T-26 program, only the final version of the program was equiped with a 90 mm. All the others still had the same 76 the Sheman had. Before the Air Forces gained air superiorty on the battelfield, priorty of 90mm gun barrels went to air defense for the M-1 and M-2 90mm AAA weapon systems.

A study of the deployment of the first 40 T-26s (untested and not approved for issue) to the ETO shows that was the best that could have been done after the problem had been learned the hard way in June of 1944.


A study of the M6 heavy tank will also show the lack of interest in heavier tanks prior to the battles of June 44 in France.

Doctrine, championed by Gen McNair, Commanding Gereral of Army Ground Forces (he answered only to Gen. Marshall), had a MAJOR impact on limiting the upgrading of tanks. As late as D-Day he was still in favor of TOWED anti-tanks guns to deal with German tanks. He reportly said "Give tankers bigger guns and they will go tank hunting". A volition of HIS Tank Destoryers ONLY fight enemy tanks. This doctrine which was drilled into all tankers and tank unit commanders during the war. It was only after the war and the results of lessons learned that the highest levels of the US Army accepted the fact this doctrine was wrong. That acceptance resulted it the disbandment of the Tank Destroyer Command and all that equipment declared obsolete and surplus. This doctrine WAS the NUMBER ONE problem that delayed more fire power and better protection from reaching the field. All the other excuses could have been over come if the WILL was there. The WILL was just NOT THERE in the right places.

There are MANY details that caused the Sherman to be the tank the US fielded. In the end, in the hands of fast learning US and UK tankers, the Sherman was the best tank on the western side of the ETO. I understand that Soviet tankers who had M4A2/76s learned to use they very well also. The history of the Sherman is a major example of a path once chosen, is very hard to change once travel on it has started.

All of this from one who a long time ago and before hanging out here also felt that the Sherman was the worst tank ever.

In the end, the Sherman and the T-34 won WWII with help for all the other AFVs that where fielded, not the Panther and not the Tigers.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Good to hear from you, Roy!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Doug!

Good to hear from you, Love this thread. Reminds me of the way AFV News was a long time ago. We were learning a lot back then.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 8:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Boy, hadn't noticed this thread, much more like the old days, dueling pistols at twenty paces. OK time for me to get into the line of fire.

A lot of changes had to made to the Sherman to use the 17 pounder
"
It was W.G.K. Kilbourn, a Vickers engineer at the time working for the Department of Tank Design, who transformed the prototype into the tank that would serve the British forces from D-day onwards. The first thing Kilbourn had to fix was the lack of a workable recoil system for the 17-pounder. The 17-pounder travelled 40 in (1.0 m) back as it absorbed the recoil of the blast. This was too long for the Sherman turret. Kilbourn solved this problem by redesigning the recoil system completely rather than modifying it. The recoil cylinders were shortened to allow the turret to take the gun and its recoil, and the new cylinders were placed on both sides of the gun to take advantage of the width of the Sherman's turret rather than be hindered by its height.

The gun breech itself was also rotated 90 degrees to allow for loading from the left rather than from on top. The radio which was mounted in the back of the turret in British tanks had to be moved. An armoured box (a "bustle") was attached to the back of the turret to house the radio. Access was through a large hole cut through the back of the turret.

The next problem encountered by Kilbourn was that the gun cradle, the metal block the gun sits on, had to be shortened to allow the gun to fit into the Firefly, and thus the gun itself was not very stable. Kilbourn had a new barrel designed for the 17-pounder that had a longer untapered section at the base, which helped solve the stability problem. A new mantlet was designed to house the new gun and accept the modified cradle. The modifications were extensive enough to require that 17-pounders intended for the Firefly had to be factory built specifically for it.

Kilbourn had to deal with other problems. On the standard Sherman tank, there was a single hatch in the turret through which the tank commander, gunner and loader entered and left the tank. However the 17-pounder's larger breech and recoil system significantly reduced the ability of the loader to quickly exit from the tank if it was hit. As a result, a new hatch was cut into the top of the turret over the gunner's position. The final major change was the elimination of the hull gunner in favour of space for more 17-pounder ammunition, which was significantly longer than the 75 mm shell and thus took up more room.
"

so it's not just a drop in the new gun and go, and you lose the hull MG that could be vital fighting infantry.

Regarding The Tiger's and Panther's. They were not mechanically reliable enough to meet US standards. Something like 40 % were lost due to breakdown. What good is a superior gun if you can't get it to the fight?

I think the policy of having a less powerful gun, but having it always available makes more sense then not having a gun 40% of the time.
OK open fire

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Any help ? is that/was a Firefly ?
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Sherman Ic hull with a normal 75mm turret (doesn't have the British loader's hatch beside the commander's cupola).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 4 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum