±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1070
Total: 1070
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Treasury
05: Downloads
06: Community Forums
07: Downloads
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: News
12: Member Screenshots
13: Community Forums
14: Member Screenshots
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Home
26: Statistics
27: Photo Gallery
28: Home
29: Member Screenshots
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: News Archive
34: Downloads
35: Home
36: Photo Gallery
37: Photo Gallery
38: Community Forums
39: Statistics
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Member Screenshots
43: Downloads
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: News
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Member Screenshots
53: Member Screenshots
54: Community Forums
55: News Archive
56: Statistics
57: Home
58: Photo Gallery
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Member Screenshots
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Member Screenshots
68: Downloads
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: News
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Downloads
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Downloads
84: Downloads
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: News Archive
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Member Screenshots
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Downloads
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Member Screenshots
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Member Screenshots
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Member Screenshots
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: News
139: Home
140: Home
141: Photo Gallery
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Member Screenshots
147: Home
148: Member Screenshots
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Downloads
166: Community Forums
167: Member Screenshots
168: Community Forums
169: Member Screenshots
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: News Archive
178: Photo Gallery
179: Member Screenshots
180: Photo Gallery
181: Member Screenshots
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Member Screenshots
186: Community Forums
187: Member Screenshots
188: Community Forums
189: Member Screenshots
190: Home
191: Tell a Friend
192: Community Forums
193: Member Screenshots
194: Member Screenshots
195: Photo Gallery
196: Member Screenshots
197: Home
198: Member Screenshots
199: Downloads
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Treasury
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Community Forums
208: Member Screenshots
209: Downloads
210: Community Forums
211: News Archive
212: Community Forums
213: Supporters
214: Community Forums
215: Member Screenshots
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Member Screenshots
233: Member Screenshots
234: Member Screenshots
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Member Screenshots
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Member Screenshots
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: News Archive
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Member Screenshots
254: Member Screenshots
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Community Forums
259: Member Screenshots
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Statistics
264: Member Screenshots
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Member Screenshots
276: Member Screenshots
277: Member Screenshots
278: Member Screenshots
279: News Archive
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Member Screenshots
290: Community Forums
291: Member Screenshots
292: Home
293: Member Screenshots
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: News Archive
297: Community Forums
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: News Archive
312: Photo Gallery
313: Downloads
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Downloads
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Member Screenshots
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: News Archive
345: Community Forums
346: Photo Gallery
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Member Screenshots
353: Member Screenshots
354: Photo Gallery
355: Photo Gallery
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Member Screenshots
367: Community Forums
368: Downloads
369: Member Screenshots
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Downloads
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Member Screenshots
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Your Account
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: News Archive
392: Community Forums
393: News Archive
394: Community Forums
395: News Archive
396: Photo Gallery
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Member Screenshots
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: News
417: Statistics
418: Downloads
419: Member Screenshots
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Community Forums
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: Member Screenshots
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Member Screenshots
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: News Archive
436: Community Forums
437: Member Screenshots
438: Community Forums
439: Member Screenshots
440: Member Screenshots
441: Community Forums
442: Member Screenshots
443: Community Forums
444: Member Screenshots
445: Community Forums
446: Member Screenshots
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Downloads
452: Member Screenshots
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Member Screenshots
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Statistics
465: Community Forums
466: Photo Gallery
467: Community Forums
468: Home
469: Community Forums
470: Member Screenshots
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Member Screenshots
474: Home
475: Downloads
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Member Screenshots
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Member Screenshots
491: Community Forums
492: Photo Gallery
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Member Screenshots
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Downloads
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Member Screenshots
514: Community Forums
515: Member Screenshots
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Member Screenshots
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Statistics
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Downloads
539: Community Forums
540: Downloads
541: Photo Gallery
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Photo Gallery
547: Photo Gallery
548: Community Forums
549: Photo Gallery
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Photo Gallery
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Downloads
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Photo Gallery
562: Home
563: Photo Gallery
564: Community Forums
565: Downloads
566: Member Screenshots
567: Photo Gallery
568: Community Forums
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Member Screenshots
572: News
573: Community Forums
574: Photo Gallery
575: Community Forums
576: Downloads
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: News Archive
583: Community Forums
584: News Archive
585: Community Forums
586: News Archive
587: Your Account
588: Home
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Photo Gallery
592: Downloads
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Photo Gallery
596: Community Forums
597: Home
598: Community Forums
599: News Archive
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Photo Gallery
603: Home
604: Community Forums
605: Statistics
606: Community Forums
607: Member Screenshots
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Downloads
611: Photo Gallery
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Member Screenshots
615: Photo Gallery
616: News Archive
617: Community Forums
618: Member Screenshots
619: Downloads
620: Member Screenshots
621: Member Screenshots
622: Member Screenshots
623: Community Forums
624: Member Screenshots
625: Member Screenshots
626: Member Screenshots
627: Home
628: Home
629: Photo Gallery
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: News Archive
636: Home
637: Member Screenshots
638: Member Screenshots
639: Photo Gallery
640: Home
641: Community Forums
642: Member Screenshots
643: Member Screenshots
644: Your Account
645: Community Forums
646: Home
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: Home
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Photo Gallery
655: Photo Gallery
656: Downloads
657: Community Forums
658: Statistics
659: Home
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Member Screenshots
664: Community Forums
665: News
666: Community Forums
667: News Archive
668: Community Forums
669: Home
670: Community Forums
671: Downloads
672: Community Forums
673: Statistics
674: Community Forums
675: Your Account
676: Home
677: News Archive
678: Home
679: Search
680: Downloads
681: Member Screenshots
682: Community Forums
683: Downloads
684: Photo Gallery
685: Member Screenshots
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Member Screenshots
693: Home
694: Member Screenshots
695: Community Forums
696: Member Screenshots
697: Downloads
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: News
701: Community Forums
702: Photo Gallery
703: Community Forums
704: Photo Gallery
705: Home
706: Treasury
707: Community Forums
708: News Archive
709: Community Forums
710: Member Screenshots
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: News Archive
720: Community Forums
721: Downloads
722: Home
723: Community Forums
724: Photo Gallery
725: Home
726: News
727: Home
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Photo Gallery
731: Downloads
732: Community Forums
733: Home
734: Downloads
735: Member Screenshots
736: Photo Gallery
737: Photo Gallery
738: Member Screenshots
739: Community Forums
740: Member Screenshots
741: Home
742: News
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Community Forums
746: Home
747: News Archive
748: Downloads
749: Member Screenshots
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Member Screenshots
753: Member Screenshots
754: Photo Gallery
755: Member Screenshots
756: Community Forums
757: Photo Gallery
758: Community Forums
759: Photo Gallery
760: Downloads
761: Community Forums
762: Community Forums
763: News
764: News Archive
765: Member Screenshots
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Community Forums
772: News Archive
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Community Forums
776: Downloads
777: Community Forums
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums
780: Community Forums
781: Community Forums
782: Member Screenshots
783: Member Screenshots
784: Community Forums
785: Member Screenshots
786: Community Forums
787: Downloads
788: News Archive
789: Photo Gallery
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums
794: Community Forums
795: Community Forums
796: Downloads
797: Community Forums
798: Member Screenshots
799: Community Forums
800: Community Forums
801: Community Forums
802: Downloads
803: Home
804: Community Forums
805: Member Screenshots
806: Photo Gallery
807: Community Forums
808: Community Forums
809: Statistics
810: Member Screenshots
811: Member Screenshots
812: Community Forums
813: Community Forums
814: Community Forums
815: Community Forums
816: Community Forums
817: Community Forums
818: Community Forums
819: Community Forums
820: Member Screenshots
821: Community Forums
822: Member Screenshots
823: Member Screenshots
824: Photo Gallery
825: Community Forums
826: Community Forums
827: News Archive
828: Community Forums
829: Member Screenshots
830: Community Forums
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: Community Forums
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Member Screenshots
837: Home
838: Community Forums
839: Community Forums
840: News Archive
841: News Archive
842: Community Forums
843: News Archive
844: News Archive
845: Community Forums
846: Community Forums
847: News Archive
848: Community Forums
849: Community Forums
850: Community Forums
851: Community Forums
852: Community Forums
853: Photo Gallery
854: Community Forums
855: Community Forums
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: Community Forums
859: Home
860: Member Screenshots
861: Downloads
862: Community Forums
863: Community Forums
864: Statistics
865: Community Forums
866: Community Forums
867: Member Screenshots
868: Community Forums
869: Community Forums
870: Community Forums
871: Community Forums
872: Downloads
873: Community Forums
874: Community Forums
875: Community Forums
876: Home
877: Community Forums
878: Community Forums
879: Community Forums
880: Community Forums
881: Member Screenshots
882: Community Forums
883: Community Forums
884: News Archive
885: Community Forums
886: Community Forums
887: Member Screenshots
888: Community Forums
889: Member Screenshots
890: Community Forums
891: News Archive
892: Community Forums
893: Community Forums
894: Member Screenshots
895: Community Forums
896: Community Forums
897: Community Forums
898: Community Forums
899: Community Forums
900: Community Forums
901: Member Screenshots
902: Community Forums
903: Downloads
904: Member Screenshots
905: Community Forums
906: Community Forums
907: Community Forums
908: Photo Gallery
909: Supporters
910: Community Forums
911: Community Forums
912: Community Forums
913: Contact
914: Community Forums
915: Home
916: Photo Gallery
917: Photo Gallery
918: Community Forums
919: News Archive
920: Member Screenshots
921: Community Forums
922: Community Forums
923: Community Forums
924: Community Forums
925: Photo Gallery
926: Community Forums
927: Photo Gallery
928: Community Forums
929: Community Forums
930: Community Forums
931: Home
932: Community Forums
933: News Archive
934: Community Forums
935: Community Forums
936: Home
937: Community Forums
938: Community Forums
939: Community Forums
940: Member Screenshots
941: Downloads
942: Community Forums
943: Community Forums
944: Community Forums
945: Community Forums
946: Member Screenshots
947: Community Forums
948: Community Forums
949: Community Forums
950: Community Forums
951: Community Forums
952: Photo Gallery
953: Community Forums
954: Member Screenshots
955: Photo Gallery
956: Member Screenshots
957: Statistics
958: Community Forums
959: Community Forums
960: Community Forums
961: Community Forums
962: Community Forums
963: Home
964: Community Forums
965: Community Forums
966: Community Forums
967: Community Forums
968: Community Forums
969: Member Screenshots
970: Community Forums
971: Community Forums
972: Downloads
973: Community Forums
974: Member Screenshots
975: Community Forums
976: Community Forums
977: Community Forums
978: Community Forums
979: Your Account
980: Member Screenshots
981: Photo Gallery
982: Community Forums
983: Community Forums
984: Home
985: News Archive
986: Member Screenshots
987: Downloads
988: Community Forums
989: Community Forums
990: Community Forums
991: Community Forums
992: Community Forums
993: Home
994: Photo Gallery
995: Community Forums
996: Community Forums
997: Community Forums
998: Community Forums
999: Home
1000: Community Forums
1001: Community Forums
1002: Community Forums
1003: Community Forums
1004: Community Forums
1005: Community Forums
1006: Community Forums
1007: Community Forums
1008: Member Screenshots
1009: Community Forums
1010: Community Forums
1011: Community Forums
1012: Community Forums
1013: Community Forums
1014: Member Screenshots
1015: Community Forums
1016: Community Forums
1017: News Archive
1018: Community Forums
1019: Community Forums
1020: Member Screenshots
1021: Community Forums
1022: Community Forums
1023: Member Screenshots
1024: Community Forums
1025: Member Screenshots
1026: Tell a Friend
1027: Member Screenshots
1028: Community Forums
1029: Community Forums
1030: Community Forums
1031: Home
1032: Community Forums
1033: Home
1034: Community Forums
1035: Community Forums
1036: Community Forums
1037: Community Forums
1038: Community Forums
1039: Community Forums
1040: Community Forums
1041: Community Forums
1042: Community Forums
1043: Member Screenshots
1044: Community Forums
1045: Downloads
1046: Community Forums
1047: Member Screenshots
1048: Community Forums
1049: Community Forums
1050: Community Forums
1051: Photo Gallery
1052: Member Screenshots
1053: Community Forums
1054: Member Screenshots
1055: Member Screenshots
1056: Community Forums
1057: Community Forums
1058: Community Forums
1059: Community Forums
1060: Community Forums
1061: Community Forums
1062: Community Forums
1063: Community Forums
1064: Home
1065: Community Forums
1066: Community Forums
1067: Member Screenshots
1068: Home
1069: Community Forums
1070: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle
The cost of a new tank would possible be far more. There is NO plant, with skilled workers present, that can build new tanks.

You would have to find skilled workers, possible train some of them, check out all the equipment that was placed in storage (that is if any of it was saved), service and repair all of it as needed before restarting production. So less you are planning on building 10,000+ tanks, the restarting process cost would make 7 million per vehicle look cheap.



Thank you for the info. I was not aware that the production facilities had shut down. When the training and tooling-up and plant-building costs are added to the mix, i guess $7,000,000 *does* sound relatively "cheap'.

As for the next generation of fighting vehicles (i am resisting using the word "tank", here, because from what i've heard the resulting product might be something quite different), is this still in the planning phase? Or are there already facilities to build them? (I hate to think what the *new* machines are going to cost.....)
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

I wasn't aware that the Lima Tank Plant in Ohio wasn't producing the amount of armor that it once did. Below is what I found out about the plant. It's a little long but pretty well covers the use of the plant, past and present.
Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP)
The Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) manufactures the M-1 Abrams tank. The Tank Plant is a government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) facility, run presently by General Dynamics. The tank plant has produced more than seven-thousand tanks since opening in the early 1980s. The Tank Plant reduced its workforce from a peak of 3,800 to 450 by late 1996. With few new procurements on the horizon, the tracked armored vehicle segment of the industry is in decline. Upgrades to the M1A1 Abrams tank and the M1A2 System Enhancement Package should keep the Lima, Ohio, plant operating through 2005. The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges. These programs require but a fraction of the production capacity available at the facility. Production of a new light-armored military vehicle should increase the work force at the Lima Army Tank Plant by the end of 2001, and employment levels should exceed 600 workers.

The United States Army purchased the property on which the Lima Army Tank Plant sits in 1942 to manufacture weapons. The Army has contracted since then with private businesses to operate a plant to manufacture combat vehicles on the property. In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. agreed to manage the plant, commencing in 1983, and, in a separate contract, to manufacture tanks at the plant. General Dynamics does not pay rent for the plant; the Army has granted it a "revocable license to use" the plant and reimburses it for its expenses in managing the plant. General Dynamics receives its profits on the markup for producing the tanks.

As World War II approached, the U.S. Army developed a plan to utilize industrial firms to manufacture armored vehicles. The urgent need for these vehicles was not fully recognized until the Germans’ Blitzkrieg across Europe in 1939 and 1940. This situation presented a staggering mission for the Army Ordnance Department’s new (1941) Tank and Combat Vehicle Division. In one year, over one million vehicles, including 14,000 medium tanks, were to be produced and ready for shipment.

The Lima Army Tank Plant traces its 55-year history back to May 1941, when the Ohio Steel Foundry began building a government-owned plant to manufacture centrifugally-cast gun tubes. The site was chosen for its proximity to a steel mill, five railroads, and national highway routes. Before construction was completed, the Ordnance Department redesignated the site as an intermediate depot for modifying combat vehicles, to include tanks. In November 1942, United Motors Services took over operation of the plant to process vehicles under government contract. The plant prepared many vehicles for Europe, including the M-5 light tank, the T-26 Pershing tank, and a “super secret� amphibious tank intended for use on D-Day. During World War II, the Lima Tank Depot had over 5,000 employees, including many women, and processed over 100,000 combat vehicles for shipment.

Activity slowed during the post-WWII period, and the plant temporarily became a storage facility. In 1948, tanks were dismantled and deprocessed there. Numerous tanks were “canned� and stored in cylindrical gas containers with dehumidifiers. When the Korean War broke out, the depot expanded and industrial operations resumed. Over the next few years, the facility rebuilt combat vehicles and fabricated communication wiring harnesses. The Korean truce led to the depot’s eventual deactivation in March 1959 with little other activity taking place over the next 16 years.

In August 1976, the government selected Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) as the initial production site for the XM-1 tank, and Chrysler Corporation was awarded the production contract. The method of production differed from previous armor programs; the hull and turret sections were to be fabricated from armored plate, rather than castings, allowing Chrysler to produce a lighter, stronger tank.

Since this was a government-owned, contractor-oper-ated (GOCO) manufacturing facility controlled by the Army’s TankAuto-motive and Armaments Command (TACOM), the installation was expanded and specialized industrial plant equipment purchased. A sister plant was established in Michigan, the Detroit Tank Plant, to assist with the assembly of M1 sections fabricated at Lima.

On February 28, 1980, the first M1 tank rolled out of LATP. It was designated the M1 Abrams, in honor of General Creighton W. Abrams. The name, Thunderbolt, recalled the name Abrams gave to each of his seven tanks in WWII. One of the original XM-1 prototype tanks is permanently on display in front of the Patton Museum of Armor and Cavalry at Ft. Knox.

In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) bought Chrysler Defense Corporation and began producing the M1 at a rate of 30 tanks a month. By January 1985, the last M1 had rolled off the assembly line, and production began on the improved M1 (IPM1) the following October. The plant later transitioned to manufacture the M1A1, with the first pilot vehicle built in August 1985. By the end of 1986, the plant’s equipment was increased to meet a maximum monthly production capability of 120 M1A1 tanks. At that time GDLS employed over 4,000 workers in Lima with over 100 TACOM personnel monitoring the production and facilities contracts.

In June 1990, all government contract administration services at Lima were placed under the Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Contract Management Command, with TACOM as the procuring activity. During this period, the Marines received over 200 M1A1 tanks, and the first Abrams foreign military sales occurred. The plant supported Desert Storm by sending technical experts to Saudi Arabia for M1A1 fielding to units previously equipped with M1s.

The 1990 DOD base closure plan ordered the Detroit tank plant to reduce its operations, and in August 1991, the Lima Army Tank Plant became the only facility in the U.S. that is a hull/chassis/turret fabricator and final systems integrator of the M1.

The first M1A2 tanks rolled out of LATP in 1992 with upgrade versions produced in 1994.

The installation includes 370 acres and 47 buildings, it’s own railroad network, and two government-owned railroad locomotives. There is also is a 2-mile test track, steam plant, deep water fording pit, 60% and 40% test slopes, and an advanced armor technology facility. The main manufacturing building has over 950,000 square feet of enclosed space, equivalent to approximately 30 football fields. The government owns all of the real property and over 96% of the plant equipment, to include com-puterized machines, robotic welders, plate cutters, large fixtures, and special tooling. General Dynamics is under contract to operate the facility and produce the Abrams with government oversight.

The commander of the Lima plant, a government-owned, contractor-operated facility, is an Army lieutenant colonel. The government and contractor managerial staffs work together monitoring monthly production requirements while maintaining quality control. A partnership environment ensures the highest quality equipment is produced at a fair cost to the government. LATP is operated under the direction of an installation commander who is responsible for the efficient and economical operation, administration, service and supply of all individuals, units, and activities assigned to or under the jurisdiction of LATP. General Dynamics manages the tank plant in which it manufactures tanks. It pays no rent for the plant, and receives reimbursement of its costs in managing the plant. General Dynamics also may manufacture, subject to written approval of the Army, products for others at the plant; in fact, General Dynamics manufactured tanks for the government of Saudi Arabia at the plant. Furthermore, General Dynamics is responsible for security at the plant, securing it according to Army regulations. This security includes counterterrorism, crime prevention, and security of the property.

The Abrams Tank System Program has been using Depleted Uranium (DU) armor on the Abrams Tank since 1988. The DU is fabricated into armor packages by a contractor to the Department of Energy. The contractor ships the assembled armor packages to LATP for installation in the tanks. At LATP, the armor packages remain in the transportation containers until they are ready to be inserted into the tank. Following installation of the armor package and other tank components, the completed tanks are transported to military units as required for field use.

Abrams production originally occurred with over 9,000 Abrams having rolled off the assembly lines of the production facilities, including those produced for domestic and foreign sales.

The M1’s technological and tactical successes in Desert Storm made the tank the envy of the world armor community and generated foreign interest. Both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait now own M1A2 tanks produced at LATP. In a co-production program, M1A1 tank kits (hulls, turrets, components, etc.) are manufactured at LATP and shipped to Egypt for final assembly. Commercially, GDLS also produces “special armor� packages for the South Korean K1 tank.

GDLS is under a multi-year Army contract to upgrade approximately 600 M1/IPM1 tanks to M1A2. The plan is to upgrade 10 tanks a month over a five-year period. The cost of a new M1A2 tank is approximately $4.3 million.

The Army, in conjunction with General Dynamics Land Systems, hosted an acceptance ceremony for the Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Package (SEP) Tank and the Wolverine Assault Bridge Launcher, 01 September 1999 in Lima, Ohio, at the Lima Army Tank Plant.

The General Dynamics Land Systems Division is the system prime contractor for manufacturing and assembly of the XM104 “Wolverine� - Heavy Assault Bridge. Manufacturing and assembly during the EMD phase of Wolverine elements and components (except the engine/transmission) occurs primarily at GDLS, which uses two facilities: Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP), a government-owned, contractor-operated manufacturing facility located in Lima (Allen County), Ohio; and the GDLS Sterling Heights Complex (SHC), located in Sterling Heights (Macomb County), MI. The mission of LATP is to produce the M1 series Main Battle Tank (MBT). SHC serves as the division headquarters and is their engineering and prototype fabrication facility. The scope of the analysis of potential impacts from manufacturing will be limited to GDLS (LATP), and Anniston Army Depot. The analysis will not include investigation of subcontractors to GDLS and Anniston Army Depot.

Lima, Ohio, is a metropolitan community of 83,000 people situated along I-75, midway between Toledo and Dayton. Sundstrand Corporation, formerly Westinghouse, produced electrical systems for military and commercial aircraft, NASA's space shuttle program, and Abrams battle tanks. Sundstrand/ Westinghouse once employed 3,000, but steady lay-offs resulted in the displacement to only about 400 when it completely closed in June 1996. The Airfoil/Textron Company, a fan-blade maker for jet engines, shut its doors in the fall of 1995, laying off the last 300 workers from a workforce that once numbered 1,800. Since the Lima area's peak defense-related employment, Lima has lost in excess of 8,000 high-wage industrial jobs. The financial loss to the local economy between 1992 and 1996 is estimated at $300 million annually.

BRAC 2005
In its 2005 BRAC Recommendations, DoD would realign Lima Tank Plant, OH. It would retain the portion required to support the manufacturing of armored combat vehicles to include Army Future Combat System (FCS) program, Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle (EFV) chassis, and M1 Tank recapitalization program. Capacity and capability for armored combat vehicles existed at three sites with little redundancy among the sites. The acquisition strategy for the Army Future Combat System (FCS) and Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle would include the manufacturing of manned vehicle chassis at Lima Army Tank Plant. The impact of establishing this capability elsewhere would hinder the Department’s ability to meet the USA and USMC future production schedule. This recommendation to retain only the portion of Lima Army Tank Plant required to support the FCS, EFV, and M1 tank recap, would reduce the footprint. This would allow the Department of Defense to remove excess from the Industrial Base, create centers of excellence, avoid single point failure, and generate efficiencies within the manufacture and maintenance of combat vehicles.

The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation would be $0.2M. The net of all savings to the Department during the implementation period would be a savings of $5.9M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation would be $1.7M with payback expected immediately. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years would be a savings of $22.3M. This recommendation would not result in any job reductions over the period 2006-2011.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

The plant is more active than I was thinking. Still the area lost a lot of skilled workers.

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?


There were a couple of bits in that piece that made me think that it was old info, by about 3-4 years. I believe that early on it mentions 2000 as "next year" or something similar. I've not heard anything to indicate that the bridges have been re-funded.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Folks!

My take on the cost of newer equipment.

I think a large part of the higher cost has more to do with the way a system is being accouted for now days.

Another, I maybe wrong, but I am under the impression that in the passed systems didn't have every possible OVERHEAD expence added into the price of an item.

When you look at wages for people, cost of utilities for the plants, and then tack on every expence that one can get away with, the TOTAL cost of all systems has climbed like a ICBM going up. It is the packing on of OVERHEAD costs. If you could just count the cost of raw materials and the man hours of only the individuals who directly worked on the system, the cost would be a lot lower.

My take of way today's systems cost so much.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- SFC_Jeff_Button
[img][/img][img][/img]
Seems that the F14 costs to much to repair. An F14 requires 50 hours of maint for each 1 hour of flight, versus 5-10 hours of maint for the F18. Also mentioned was the fact that the F14 was aimed at dogfighting, (as in top-gun fame) but that it is no longer needed since jets now shoot missiles at each other from miles away. .


Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"

Spanner - If you look a couple messages below thatone you'll find my defense of the last true dog-fighter the F-15. As an old 'Eagle Keeper' I couldn't do anything else Smile

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


Bob, I assume you're referring to the proposed F-111B, rather than the Grumman F-11 Tiger Laughing The old F-11 (of one-time Blue Angels fame) certainly WAS a dogfighter.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

You got it. finger didn't hit enough 1s and I didn't catch it before it went (Actually I had to leave for a meeting as I sent it so didn't see it until now Sad

I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"


Oh and the F-111 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


..a mission which the F111 could have performed....at long range. There was an interesting episode during which the Navy COS or SecNav and Thomas Moorer (then CNO) were being grilled on why there was resistance from Naval aviators about accepting the F111 (marinized) as it's principle fighter in harmony with the Air Force...Moorers' boss being a "yes" man and saying "sure we can...it just needs more thrust to overcome it's mass".
The SecDef (I believe) noted Moorers' qualifications and skeptical look and asked him, in front of his boss, whether he thought more thrust would make the F111 (TFX) platform a fighter acceptable to the Navy. He replied (at some risk to his career) "Sir, in my opinion, all the thrust in Christendom would not make a fighter out of the F111."

It was virtually a dead issue after that....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


Hence my earlier remark about the F-4 and it's Rhino moniker. The "official" reason for the switch from F-4E to T-38A for the T-birds was fuel cost savings. About this time the Blue Angels went from F-4 to A-4 for similar reasons. I have no idea on the answer to your quiz.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....


I wasn't aware they had gone back to the F-100 after the F-105 (before my time...), but if so that is probably what Bob was referring to. The "Thud" wasn't much on close-in dogfighting, either. Although it did bag it's share of MiG's during the early years of the air war in Vietnam.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
You got it! It appears there were about 6 shows with the F105B when it was decided (after a fatal accident) thet the birds needed extensive modifications. Instead they went to the F-100D (They had used the F-100C before)

I was looking at the Thunderbird web site and it says they used the F-4 for sevral years and transitioned out of it because of the 'Energy Crisis' in the Early 70s. The entire group of T-38s used less fuell than one F-4!

A pilot I knew later on F-15s flew with the T-birds in the F-4 era and told a slightly different story. Although he loved the Phantom no one liked it in the type of flying the Tbirds did. Some of the Tbirds wanted to go to the F-5 but the powers that be didn't want to use a 'second rate fighter' The energy crisis gave them the excuse to go to the lighter airframe but the same powers that be wouldn't step up to the more poerful F-5E/F version that was just becoming available. So they were left with 'standard' T-38s

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

My Google-fu is strong, Master...

"Almost a footnote in the history of Thunderbird aviation, the Republic-built F-105B Thunderchief performed only six shows between April 26 and May 9, 1964. Extensive modifications to the F-105 were necessary, and rather than cancel the rest of the show season to accomplish this, the Thunderbirds quickly transitioned back to the Super Sabre. While the switch back to the F-100D was supposed to be temporary, the F-105 never returned to the Thunderbird hangar. The F-100 ended up staying with the team for nearly 13 years."

www.aviationheritagemu...rbirds.htm


BTW, there is (or was) an F-11 Tiger in Blue Angels colors in the aviation museum outside Topeka, I think it is...indoor...very nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum