±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 741
Total: 741
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Photo Gallery
03: Home
04: Photo Gallery
05: Photo Gallery
06: Home
07: Photo Gallery
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Member Screenshots
13: Home
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Photo Gallery
17: Photo Gallery
18: Home
19: Photo Gallery
20: Statistics
21: Photo Gallery
22: Photo Gallery
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Photo Gallery
26: Home
27: Photo Gallery
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Statistics
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Statistics
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Home
42: Downloads
43: Photo Gallery
44: Home
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Downloads
54: Home
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Downloads
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: Home
65: Photo Gallery
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Downloads
69: Photo Gallery
70: Photo Gallery
71: Photo Gallery
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Home
75: Photo Gallery
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Photo Gallery
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: News
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Home
88: Photo Gallery
89: Member Screenshots
90: Photo Gallery
91: Photo Gallery
92: Photo Gallery
93: Photo Gallery
94: Downloads
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Photo Gallery
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Photo Gallery
101: Home
102: Downloads
103: Home
104: Photo Gallery
105: Home
106: News Archive
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Downloads
115: Home
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Home
122: Home
123: Photo Gallery
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Photo Gallery
128: Photo Gallery
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Photo Gallery
133: Photo Gallery
134: Home
135: Downloads
136: Photo Gallery
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Photo Gallery
143: Home
144: Home
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Photo Gallery
148: Home
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: News Archive
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Photo Gallery
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Member Screenshots
166: Photo Gallery
167: News
168: Home
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Home
176: Home
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Treasury
180: Photo Gallery
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Home
184: Home
185: Home
186: Home
187: Home
188: Downloads
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Photo Gallery
193: Home
194: Home
195: Home
196: Home
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: News
205: Home
206: Photo Gallery
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Home
215: Home
216: Home
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Home
221: Home
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: News
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Home
234: Home
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Your Account
239: Photo Gallery
240: Home
241: Home
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Home
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: News Archive
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Photo Gallery
277: Downloads
278: Photo Gallery
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Home
282: Downloads
283: Community Forums
284: Member Screenshots
285: Home
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Home
299: Home
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: News Archive
308: Home
309: Home
310: Home
311: Photo Gallery
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Photo Gallery
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Downloads
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: News Archive
324: Photo Gallery
325: Photo Gallery
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Photo Gallery
329: Home
330: Home
331: Search
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Member Screenshots
335: Home
336: Home
337: Photo Gallery
338: Home
339: Home
340: Home
341: Home
342: Home
343: Home
344: Home
345: Home
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Photo Gallery
349: Home
350: Photo Gallery
351: Photo Gallery
352: Home
353: Home
354: Home
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Home
359: Home
360: Home
361: Photo Gallery
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: Member Screenshots
366: News Archive
367: Downloads
368: Photo Gallery
369: Downloads
370: Member Screenshots
371: Home
372: Home
373: Photo Gallery
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: Home
378: Home
379: Home
380: Photo Gallery
381: Home
382: Photo Gallery
383: Photo Gallery
384: News Archive
385: Photo Gallery
386: Home
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Home
390: Home
391: Photo Gallery
392: Home
393: Home
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Community Forums
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Photo Gallery
401: Downloads
402: Member Screenshots
403: Downloads
404: Photo Gallery
405: Photo Gallery
406: Community Forums
407: Statistics
408: Contact
409: Photo Gallery
410: Photo Gallery
411: Community Forums
412: News
413: Home
414: Photo Gallery
415: Home
416: Home
417: Home
418: Home
419: Photo Gallery
420: Home
421: Home
422: Home
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Statistics
426: Home
427: Home
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Photo Gallery
431: Home
432: Home
433: Home
434: Home
435: Photo Gallery
436: Downloads
437: Home
438: Home
439: Home
440: Home
441: Photo Gallery
442: Downloads
443: Photo Gallery
444: Home
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Home
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Home
451: Community Forums
452: Statistics
453: Downloads
454: Photo Gallery
455: Photo Gallery
456: Community Forums
457: Photo Gallery
458: Home
459: Photo Gallery
460: Photo Gallery
461: Downloads
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Home
466: Statistics
467: Photo Gallery
468: Photo Gallery
469: Photo Gallery
470: Photo Gallery
471: Home
472: Home
473: Photo Gallery
474: Photo Gallery
475: Downloads
476: Member Screenshots
477: Home
478: Home
479: Home
480: Statistics
481: Home
482: Community Forums
483: Photo Gallery
484: Photo Gallery
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: Photo Gallery
488: Photo Gallery
489: Photo Gallery
490: Home
491: Photo Gallery
492: Photo Gallery
493: Home
494: Photo Gallery
495: Photo Gallery
496: Your Account
497: Home
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Photo Gallery
502: Community Forums
503: News Archive
504: Home
505: Community Forums
506: Home
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Community Forums
510: Photo Gallery
511: Home
512: Home
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Photo Gallery
516: Photo Gallery
517: Downloads
518: Photo Gallery
519: News Archive
520: Home
521: Home
522: Home
523: Home
524: Photo Gallery
525: Home
526: Home
527: Home
528: Home
529: Photo Gallery
530: Home
531: Home
532: Photo Gallery
533: Photo Gallery
534: Photo Gallery
535: Photo Gallery
536: Statistics
537: Photo Gallery
538: Home
539: Photo Gallery
540: Photo Gallery
541: Home
542: Member Screenshots
543: Home
544: Home
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Home
548: Member Screenshots
549: Home
550: Photo Gallery
551: Downloads
552: Photo Gallery
553: Community Forums
554: Downloads
555: Photo Gallery
556: Community Forums
557: News
558: Photo Gallery
559: News Archive
560: Photo Gallery
561: Home
562: Home
563: Photo Gallery
564: Community Forums
565: Home
566: Community Forums
567: Home
568: Photo Gallery
569: Home
570: Photo Gallery
571: Home
572: Community Forums
573: Downloads
574: Community Forums
575: Photo Gallery
576: Photo Gallery
577: Photo Gallery
578: Home
579: Statistics
580: Community Forums
581: Home
582: Community Forums
583: Photo Gallery
584: Home
585: Home
586: Photo Gallery
587: Home
588: Home
589: Home
590: Home
591: Photo Gallery
592: Home
593: Home
594: Photo Gallery
595: Photo Gallery
596: Community Forums
597: Home
598: Photo Gallery
599: Community Forums
600: Member Screenshots
601: Downloads
602: Member Screenshots
603: Home
604: Home
605: Home
606: Home
607: Community Forums
608: Home
609: Home
610: Photo Gallery
611: Member Screenshots
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Photo Gallery
616: Photo Gallery
617: Photo Gallery
618: Photo Gallery
619: Downloads
620: Photo Gallery
621: Home
622: Photo Gallery
623: Home
624: Home
625: Downloads
626: Home
627: Home
628: Photo Gallery
629: Home
630: Home
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Your Account
634: Home
635: Photo Gallery
636: Community Forums
637: Home
638: Photo Gallery
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Statistics
642: Photo Gallery
643: Member Screenshots
644: Home
645: Member Screenshots
646: Photo Gallery
647: Community Forums
648: Home
649: Home
650: Home
651: Community Forums
652: Photo Gallery
653: Downloads
654: Photo Gallery
655: Home
656: Home
657: Home
658: Home
659: Home
660: Statistics
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Home
664: Home
665: Home
666: Photo Gallery
667: Downloads
668: Community Forums
669: Photo Gallery
670: Photo Gallery
671: Photo Gallery
672: Statistics
673: Home
674: Photo Gallery
675: Downloads
676: Photo Gallery
677: Photo Gallery
678: Photo Gallery
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: Home
683: Photo Gallery
684: Home
685: Home
686: Home
687: Home
688: Home
689: Home
690: Home
691: Community Forums
692: Photo Gallery
693: Community Forums
694: Home
695: Photo Gallery
696: News
697: Member Screenshots
698: Member Screenshots
699: Community Forums
700: Photo Gallery
701: Photo Gallery
702: Home
703: Downloads
704: Photo Gallery
705: Community Forums
706: Home
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Home
710: Home
711: Photo Gallery
712: Home
713: Home
714: News Archive
715: Community Forums
716: Member Screenshots
717: Home
718: Home
719: Home
720: Home
721: Photo Gallery
722: Community Forums
723: Home
724: Photo Gallery
725: Photo Gallery
726: Community Forums
727: Photo Gallery
728: Photo Gallery
729: Community Forums
730: Photo Gallery
731: Community Forums
732: Home
733: Photo Gallery
734: Photo Gallery
735: Home
736: Community Forums
737: Photo Gallery
738: Home
739: Home
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle
The cost of a new tank would possible be far more. There is NO plant, with skilled workers present, that can build new tanks.

You would have to find skilled workers, possible train some of them, check out all the equipment that was placed in storage (that is if any of it was saved), service and repair all of it as needed before restarting production. So less you are planning on building 10,000+ tanks, the restarting process cost would make 7 million per vehicle look cheap.



Thank you for the info. I was not aware that the production facilities had shut down. When the training and tooling-up and plant-building costs are added to the mix, i guess $7,000,000 *does* sound relatively "cheap'.

As for the next generation of fighting vehicles (i am resisting using the word "tank", here, because from what i've heard the resulting product might be something quite different), is this still in the planning phase? Or are there already facilities to build them? (I hate to think what the *new* machines are going to cost.....)
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

I wasn't aware that the Lima Tank Plant in Ohio wasn't producing the amount of armor that it once did. Below is what I found out about the plant. It's a little long but pretty well covers the use of the plant, past and present.
Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP)
The Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) manufactures the M-1 Abrams tank. The Tank Plant is a government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) facility, run presently by General Dynamics. The tank plant has produced more than seven-thousand tanks since opening in the early 1980s. The Tank Plant reduced its workforce from a peak of 3,800 to 450 by late 1996. With few new procurements on the horizon, the tracked armored vehicle segment of the industry is in decline. Upgrades to the M1A1 Abrams tank and the M1A2 System Enhancement Package should keep the Lima, Ohio, plant operating through 2005. The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges. These programs require but a fraction of the production capacity available at the facility. Production of a new light-armored military vehicle should increase the work force at the Lima Army Tank Plant by the end of 2001, and employment levels should exceed 600 workers.

The United States Army purchased the property on which the Lima Army Tank Plant sits in 1942 to manufacture weapons. The Army has contracted since then with private businesses to operate a plant to manufacture combat vehicles on the property. In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. agreed to manage the plant, commencing in 1983, and, in a separate contract, to manufacture tanks at the plant. General Dynamics does not pay rent for the plant; the Army has granted it a "revocable license to use" the plant and reimburses it for its expenses in managing the plant. General Dynamics receives its profits on the markup for producing the tanks.

As World War II approached, the U.S. Army developed a plan to utilize industrial firms to manufacture armored vehicles. The urgent need for these vehicles was not fully recognized until the Germans’ Blitzkrieg across Europe in 1939 and 1940. This situation presented a staggering mission for the Army Ordnance Department’s new (1941) Tank and Combat Vehicle Division. In one year, over one million vehicles, including 14,000 medium tanks, were to be produced and ready for shipment.

The Lima Army Tank Plant traces its 55-year history back to May 1941, when the Ohio Steel Foundry began building a government-owned plant to manufacture centrifugally-cast gun tubes. The site was chosen for its proximity to a steel mill, five railroads, and national highway routes. Before construction was completed, the Ordnance Department redesignated the site as an intermediate depot for modifying combat vehicles, to include tanks. In November 1942, United Motors Services took over operation of the plant to process vehicles under government contract. The plant prepared many vehicles for Europe, including the M-5 light tank, the T-26 Pershing tank, and a “super secret� amphibious tank intended for use on D-Day. During World War II, the Lima Tank Depot had over 5,000 employees, including many women, and processed over 100,000 combat vehicles for shipment.

Activity slowed during the post-WWII period, and the plant temporarily became a storage facility. In 1948, tanks were dismantled and deprocessed there. Numerous tanks were “canned� and stored in cylindrical gas containers with dehumidifiers. When the Korean War broke out, the depot expanded and industrial operations resumed. Over the next few years, the facility rebuilt combat vehicles and fabricated communication wiring harnesses. The Korean truce led to the depot’s eventual deactivation in March 1959 with little other activity taking place over the next 16 years.

In August 1976, the government selected Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) as the initial production site for the XM-1 tank, and Chrysler Corporation was awarded the production contract. The method of production differed from previous armor programs; the hull and turret sections were to be fabricated from armored plate, rather than castings, allowing Chrysler to produce a lighter, stronger tank.

Since this was a government-owned, contractor-oper-ated (GOCO) manufacturing facility controlled by the Army’s TankAuto-motive and Armaments Command (TACOM), the installation was expanded and specialized industrial plant equipment purchased. A sister plant was established in Michigan, the Detroit Tank Plant, to assist with the assembly of M1 sections fabricated at Lima.

On February 28, 1980, the first M1 tank rolled out of LATP. It was designated the M1 Abrams, in honor of General Creighton W. Abrams. The name, Thunderbolt, recalled the name Abrams gave to each of his seven tanks in WWII. One of the original XM-1 prototype tanks is permanently on display in front of the Patton Museum of Armor and Cavalry at Ft. Knox.

In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) bought Chrysler Defense Corporation and began producing the M1 at a rate of 30 tanks a month. By January 1985, the last M1 had rolled off the assembly line, and production began on the improved M1 (IPM1) the following October. The plant later transitioned to manufacture the M1A1, with the first pilot vehicle built in August 1985. By the end of 1986, the plant’s equipment was increased to meet a maximum monthly production capability of 120 M1A1 tanks. At that time GDLS employed over 4,000 workers in Lima with over 100 TACOM personnel monitoring the production and facilities contracts.

In June 1990, all government contract administration services at Lima were placed under the Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Contract Management Command, with TACOM as the procuring activity. During this period, the Marines received over 200 M1A1 tanks, and the first Abrams foreign military sales occurred. The plant supported Desert Storm by sending technical experts to Saudi Arabia for M1A1 fielding to units previously equipped with M1s.

The 1990 DOD base closure plan ordered the Detroit tank plant to reduce its operations, and in August 1991, the Lima Army Tank Plant became the only facility in the U.S. that is a hull/chassis/turret fabricator and final systems integrator of the M1.

The first M1A2 tanks rolled out of LATP in 1992 with upgrade versions produced in 1994.

The installation includes 370 acres and 47 buildings, it’s own railroad network, and two government-owned railroad locomotives. There is also is a 2-mile test track, steam plant, deep water fording pit, 60% and 40% test slopes, and an advanced armor technology facility. The main manufacturing building has over 950,000 square feet of enclosed space, equivalent to approximately 30 football fields. The government owns all of the real property and over 96% of the plant equipment, to include com-puterized machines, robotic welders, plate cutters, large fixtures, and special tooling. General Dynamics is under contract to operate the facility and produce the Abrams with government oversight.

The commander of the Lima plant, a government-owned, contractor-operated facility, is an Army lieutenant colonel. The government and contractor managerial staffs work together monitoring monthly production requirements while maintaining quality control. A partnership environment ensures the highest quality equipment is produced at a fair cost to the government. LATP is operated under the direction of an installation commander who is responsible for the efficient and economical operation, administration, service and supply of all individuals, units, and activities assigned to or under the jurisdiction of LATP. General Dynamics manages the tank plant in which it manufactures tanks. It pays no rent for the plant, and receives reimbursement of its costs in managing the plant. General Dynamics also may manufacture, subject to written approval of the Army, products for others at the plant; in fact, General Dynamics manufactured tanks for the government of Saudi Arabia at the plant. Furthermore, General Dynamics is responsible for security at the plant, securing it according to Army regulations. This security includes counterterrorism, crime prevention, and security of the property.

The Abrams Tank System Program has been using Depleted Uranium (DU) armor on the Abrams Tank since 1988. The DU is fabricated into armor packages by a contractor to the Department of Energy. The contractor ships the assembled armor packages to LATP for installation in the tanks. At LATP, the armor packages remain in the transportation containers until they are ready to be inserted into the tank. Following installation of the armor package and other tank components, the completed tanks are transported to military units as required for field use.

Abrams production originally occurred with over 9,000 Abrams having rolled off the assembly lines of the production facilities, including those produced for domestic and foreign sales.

The M1’s technological and tactical successes in Desert Storm made the tank the envy of the world armor community and generated foreign interest. Both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait now own M1A2 tanks produced at LATP. In a co-production program, M1A1 tank kits (hulls, turrets, components, etc.) are manufactured at LATP and shipped to Egypt for final assembly. Commercially, GDLS also produces “special armor� packages for the South Korean K1 tank.

GDLS is under a multi-year Army contract to upgrade approximately 600 M1/IPM1 tanks to M1A2. The plan is to upgrade 10 tanks a month over a five-year period. The cost of a new M1A2 tank is approximately $4.3 million.

The Army, in conjunction with General Dynamics Land Systems, hosted an acceptance ceremony for the Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Package (SEP) Tank and the Wolverine Assault Bridge Launcher, 01 September 1999 in Lima, Ohio, at the Lima Army Tank Plant.

The General Dynamics Land Systems Division is the system prime contractor for manufacturing and assembly of the XM104 “Wolverine� - Heavy Assault Bridge. Manufacturing and assembly during the EMD phase of Wolverine elements and components (except the engine/transmission) occurs primarily at GDLS, which uses two facilities: Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP), a government-owned, contractor-operated manufacturing facility located in Lima (Allen County), Ohio; and the GDLS Sterling Heights Complex (SHC), located in Sterling Heights (Macomb County), MI. The mission of LATP is to produce the M1 series Main Battle Tank (MBT). SHC serves as the division headquarters and is their engineering and prototype fabrication facility. The scope of the analysis of potential impacts from manufacturing will be limited to GDLS (LATP), and Anniston Army Depot. The analysis will not include investigation of subcontractors to GDLS and Anniston Army Depot.

Lima, Ohio, is a metropolitan community of 83,000 people situated along I-75, midway between Toledo and Dayton. Sundstrand Corporation, formerly Westinghouse, produced electrical systems for military and commercial aircraft, NASA's space shuttle program, and Abrams battle tanks. Sundstrand/ Westinghouse once employed 3,000, but steady lay-offs resulted in the displacement to only about 400 when it completely closed in June 1996. The Airfoil/Textron Company, a fan-blade maker for jet engines, shut its doors in the fall of 1995, laying off the last 300 workers from a workforce that once numbered 1,800. Since the Lima area's peak defense-related employment, Lima has lost in excess of 8,000 high-wage industrial jobs. The financial loss to the local economy between 1992 and 1996 is estimated at $300 million annually.

BRAC 2005
In its 2005 BRAC Recommendations, DoD would realign Lima Tank Plant, OH. It would retain the portion required to support the manufacturing of armored combat vehicles to include Army Future Combat System (FCS) program, Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle (EFV) chassis, and M1 Tank recapitalization program. Capacity and capability for armored combat vehicles existed at three sites with little redundancy among the sites. The acquisition strategy for the Army Future Combat System (FCS) and Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle would include the manufacturing of manned vehicle chassis at Lima Army Tank Plant. The impact of establishing this capability elsewhere would hinder the Department’s ability to meet the USA and USMC future production schedule. This recommendation to retain only the portion of Lima Army Tank Plant required to support the FCS, EFV, and M1 tank recap, would reduce the footprint. This would allow the Department of Defense to remove excess from the Industrial Base, create centers of excellence, avoid single point failure, and generate efficiencies within the manufacture and maintenance of combat vehicles.

The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation would be $0.2M. The net of all savings to the Department during the implementation period would be a savings of $5.9M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation would be $1.7M with payback expected immediately. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years would be a savings of $22.3M. This recommendation would not result in any job reductions over the period 2006-2011.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

The plant is more active than I was thinking. Still the area lost a lot of skilled workers.

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?


There were a couple of bits in that piece that made me think that it was old info, by about 3-4 years. I believe that early on it mentions 2000 as "next year" or something similar. I've not heard anything to indicate that the bridges have been re-funded.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Folks!

My take on the cost of newer equipment.

I think a large part of the higher cost has more to do with the way a system is being accouted for now days.

Another, I maybe wrong, but I am under the impression that in the passed systems didn't have every possible OVERHEAD expence added into the price of an item.

When you look at wages for people, cost of utilities for the plants, and then tack on every expence that one can get away with, the TOTAL cost of all systems has climbed like a ICBM going up. It is the packing on of OVERHEAD costs. If you could just count the cost of raw materials and the man hours of only the individuals who directly worked on the system, the cost would be a lot lower.

My take of way today's systems cost so much.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- SFC_Jeff_Button
[img][/img][img][/img]
Seems that the F14 costs to much to repair. An F14 requires 50 hours of maint for each 1 hour of flight, versus 5-10 hours of maint for the F18. Also mentioned was the fact that the F14 was aimed at dogfighting, (as in top-gun fame) but that it is no longer needed since jets now shoot missiles at each other from miles away. .


Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"

Spanner - If you look a couple messages below thatone you'll find my defense of the last true dog-fighter the F-15. As an old 'Eagle Keeper' I couldn't do anything else Smile

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


Bob, I assume you're referring to the proposed F-111B, rather than the Grumman F-11 Tiger Laughing The old F-11 (of one-time Blue Angels fame) certainly WAS a dogfighter.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

You got it. finger didn't hit enough 1s and I didn't catch it before it went (Actually I had to leave for a meeting as I sent it so didn't see it until now Sad

I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"


Oh and the F-111 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


..a mission which the F111 could have performed....at long range. There was an interesting episode during which the Navy COS or SecNav and Thomas Moorer (then CNO) were being grilled on why there was resistance from Naval aviators about accepting the F111 (marinized) as it's principle fighter in harmony with the Air Force...Moorers' boss being a "yes" man and saying "sure we can...it just needs more thrust to overcome it's mass".
The SecDef (I believe) noted Moorers' qualifications and skeptical look and asked him, in front of his boss, whether he thought more thrust would make the F111 (TFX) platform a fighter acceptable to the Navy. He replied (at some risk to his career) "Sir, in my opinion, all the thrust in Christendom would not make a fighter out of the F111."

It was virtually a dead issue after that....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


Hence my earlier remark about the F-4 and it's Rhino moniker. The "official" reason for the switch from F-4E to T-38A for the T-birds was fuel cost savings. About this time the Blue Angels went from F-4 to A-4 for similar reasons. I have no idea on the answer to your quiz.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....


I wasn't aware they had gone back to the F-100 after the F-105 (before my time...), but if so that is probably what Bob was referring to. The "Thud" wasn't much on close-in dogfighting, either. Although it did bag it's share of MiG's during the early years of the air war in Vietnam.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
You got it! It appears there were about 6 shows with the F105B when it was decided (after a fatal accident) thet the birds needed extensive modifications. Instead they went to the F-100D (They had used the F-100C before)

I was looking at the Thunderbird web site and it says they used the F-4 for sevral years and transitioned out of it because of the 'Energy Crisis' in the Early 70s. The entire group of T-38s used less fuell than one F-4!

A pilot I knew later on F-15s flew with the T-birds in the F-4 era and told a slightly different story. Although he loved the Phantom no one liked it in the type of flying the Tbirds did. Some of the Tbirds wanted to go to the F-5 but the powers that be didn't want to use a 'second rate fighter' The energy crisis gave them the excuse to go to the lighter airframe but the same powers that be wouldn't step up to the more poerful F-5E/F version that was just becoming available. So they were left with 'standard' T-38s

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

My Google-fu is strong, Master...

"Almost a footnote in the history of Thunderbird aviation, the Republic-built F-105B Thunderchief performed only six shows between April 26 and May 9, 1964. Extensive modifications to the F-105 were necessary, and rather than cancel the rest of the show season to accomplish this, the Thunderbirds quickly transitioned back to the Super Sabre. While the switch back to the F-100D was supposed to be temporary, the F-105 never returned to the Thunderbird hangar. The F-100 ended up staying with the team for nearly 13 years."

www.aviationheritagemu...rbirds.htm


BTW, there is (or was) an F-11 Tiger in Blue Angels colors in the aviation museum outside Topeka, I think it is...indoor...very nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum