±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1018
Total: 1018
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Downloads
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Statistics
14: Downloads
15: News Archive
16: Community Forums
17: Statistics
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Downloads
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: News Archive
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Statistics
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Member Screenshots
41: Downloads
42: Member Screenshots
43: Downloads
44: News Archive
45: News
46: News Archive
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Downloads
56: Downloads
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Photo Gallery
60: Photo Gallery
61: Photo Gallery
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Downloads
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Statistics
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Member Screenshots
77: Home
78: Member Screenshots
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: News Archive
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Member Screenshots
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Member Screenshots
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Downloads
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Photo Gallery
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Downloads
114: News Archive
115: Photo Gallery
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Member Screenshots
119: Member Screenshots
120: Member Screenshots
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: Member Screenshots
128: Downloads
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Downloads
134: Member Screenshots
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Member Screenshots
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Supporters
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Downloads
154: Member Screenshots
155: Community Forums
156: News Archive
157: News Archive
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: News Archive
165: Photo Gallery
166: News Archive
167: Community Forums
168: Member Screenshots
169: Community Forums
170: News Archive
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Downloads
183: Member Screenshots
184: Member Screenshots
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Member Screenshots
189: Member Screenshots
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Member Screenshots
194: Member Screenshots
195: Member Screenshots
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Member Screenshots
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Member Screenshots
202: Member Screenshots
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Member Screenshots
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Downloads
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Member Screenshots
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Home
227: Downloads
228: Downloads
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Member Screenshots
232: Member Screenshots
233: Your Account
234: Downloads
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: News Archive
243: Home
244: Member Screenshots
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Member Screenshots
249: Member Screenshots
250: News Archive
251: Downloads
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Member Screenshots
259: News
260: News Archive
261: News Archive
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Member Screenshots
273: Member Screenshots
274: Home
275: News Archive
276: Photo Gallery
277: Photo Gallery
278: Downloads
279: Community Forums
280: Member Screenshots
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: News Archive
289: Statistics
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Downloads
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Your Account
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Contact
310: Photo Gallery
311: News Archive
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Supporters
320: Member Screenshots
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Downloads
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Member Screenshots
336: Member Screenshots
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Downloads
340: Downloads
341: Photo Gallery
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Photo Gallery
345: Member Screenshots
346: Downloads
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Downloads
354: Photo Gallery
355: Community Forums
356: News Archive
357: Community Forums
358: Member Screenshots
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Search
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Member Screenshots
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: News Archive
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: News Archive
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Downloads
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Home
392: Photo Gallery
393: Member Screenshots
394: Downloads
395: Home
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Downloads
401: Member Screenshots
402: Home
403: Downloads
404: Community Forums
405: News
406: Community Forums
407: News Archive
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Member Screenshots
419: Downloads
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Photo Gallery
427: Community Forums
428: Photo Gallery
429: Community Forums
430: News Archive
431: Photo Gallery
432: Community Forums
433: Downloads
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Photo Gallery
437: Photo Gallery
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Member Screenshots
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Downloads
444: Community Forums
445: Search
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: Member Screenshots
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Downloads
455: Community Forums
456: News Archive
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Home
460: Member Screenshots
461: News Archive
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Photo Gallery
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Member Screenshots
472: News Archive
473: News Archive
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: News Archive
478: Member Screenshots
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Tell a Friend
484: Community Forums
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: News Archive
492: Community Forums
493: Photo Gallery
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Member Screenshots
497: Downloads
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Member Screenshots
502: Home
503: Community Forums
504: Member Screenshots
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Downloads
510: News Archive
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Photo Gallery
514: Photo Gallery
515: Community Forums
516: Photo Gallery
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: Member Screenshots
523: Downloads
524: Community Forums
525: Home
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Downloads
529: Photo Gallery
530: Downloads
531: Community Forums
532: Home
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Home
539: Community Forums
540: Photo Gallery
541: Community Forums
542: Downloads
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Photo Gallery
547: Home
548: Member Screenshots
549: Community Forums
550: Home
551: Community Forums
552: Photo Gallery
553: Photo Gallery
554: Photo Gallery
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: News Archive
560: Downloads
561: Photo Gallery
562: Community Forums
563: Downloads
564: Community Forums
565: Photo Gallery
566: News
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Home
573: Community Forums
574: Member Screenshots
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Member Screenshots
578: Member Screenshots
579: Photo Gallery
580: Photo Gallery
581: News Archive
582: News Archive
583: Community Forums
584: Member Screenshots
585: Member Screenshots
586: Downloads
587: Member Screenshots
588: Member Screenshots
589: Member Screenshots
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Member Screenshots
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Photo Gallery
603: Photo Gallery
604: News
605: Community Forums
606: Home
607: Photo Gallery
608: Member Screenshots
609: Home
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Member Screenshots
619: Community Forums
620: Member Screenshots
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: News Archive
624: Member Screenshots
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Downloads
628: Community Forums
629: Downloads
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Home
634: Photo Gallery
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Home
639: Photo Gallery
640: Community Forums
641: Member Screenshots
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Downloads
649: Member Screenshots
650: Community Forums
651: Member Screenshots
652: Member Screenshots
653: Member Screenshots
654: Member Screenshots
655: Member Screenshots
656: Member Screenshots
657: Community Forums
658: Photo Gallery
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Photo Gallery
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Photo Gallery
667: Member Screenshots
668: Community Forums
669: Member Screenshots
670: Member Screenshots
671: Home
672: Member Screenshots
673: News Archive
674: Member Screenshots
675: Community Forums
676: News Archive
677: Member Screenshots
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Member Screenshots
681: Photo Gallery
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: News Archive
685: Community Forums
686: Member Screenshots
687: Member Screenshots
688: Community Forums
689: Downloads
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Downloads
693: Home
694: Member Screenshots
695: Member Screenshots
696: Photo Gallery
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: Community Forums
703: News Archive
704: Member Screenshots
705: Community Forums
706: Community Forums
707: Photo Gallery
708: Community Forums
709: Member Screenshots
710: Community Forums
711: Photo Gallery
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: News Archive
715: News
716: Community Forums
717: Photo Gallery
718: Downloads
719: Member Screenshots
720: News Archive
721: Community Forums
722: Tell a Friend
723: Community Forums
724: Member Screenshots
725: News Archive
726: Downloads
727: Photo Gallery
728: Home
729: News Archive
730: Photo Gallery
731: Community Forums
732: Member Screenshots
733: Community Forums
734: Member Screenshots
735: Member Screenshots
736: Community Forums
737: Community Forums
738: Member Screenshots
739: Home
740: Community Forums
741: Member Screenshots
742: Community Forums
743: Downloads
744: Community Forums
745: Member Screenshots
746: Community Forums
747: Community Forums
748: Member Screenshots
749: Downloads
750: Photo Gallery
751: Community Forums
752: Member Screenshots
753: Member Screenshots
754: Member Screenshots
755: Home
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: News Archive
759: Photo Gallery
760: Your Account
761: Supporters
762: Member Screenshots
763: Member Screenshots
764: Home
765: Home
766: Home
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Photo Gallery
772: Photo Gallery
773: Home
774: Photo Gallery
775: News Archive
776: Community Forums
777: Your Account
778: Home
779: Downloads
780: Community Forums
781: Community Forums
782: Community Forums
783: Downloads
784: Community Forums
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: News Archive
788: Member Screenshots
789: Community Forums
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Member Screenshots
794: Community Forums
795: Member Screenshots
796: Community Forums
797: Member Screenshots
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: Community Forums
801: Member Screenshots
802: Member Screenshots
803: Community Forums
804: Downloads
805: Community Forums
806: Community Forums
807: Photo Gallery
808: Member Screenshots
809: Photo Gallery
810: Community Forums
811: Member Screenshots
812: Community Forums
813: Photo Gallery
814: Member Screenshots
815: Community Forums
816: Member Screenshots
817: News Archive
818: News Archive
819: Member Screenshots
820: Member Screenshots
821: Community Forums
822: Community Forums
823: Home
824: Community Forums
825: Community Forums
826: Member Screenshots
827: Member Screenshots
828: Community Forums
829: Statistics
830: Tell a Friend
831: Member Screenshots
832: Home
833: Member Screenshots
834: Community Forums
835: Home
836: Member Screenshots
837: Member Screenshots
838: Downloads
839: Photo Gallery
840: Community Forums
841: Community Forums
842: Your Account
843: Community Forums
844: Downloads
845: Home
846: Downloads
847: Photo Gallery
848: Photo Gallery
849: Community Forums
850: Member Screenshots
851: Community Forums
852: Tell a Friend
853: Member Screenshots
854: Downloads
855: Community Forums
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: Community Forums
859: Community Forums
860: Contact
861: Community Forums
862: Community Forums
863: Photo Gallery
864: Photo Gallery
865: Community Forums
866: Statistics
867: Home
868: Community Forums
869: Community Forums
870: Photo Gallery
871: Photo Gallery
872: Community Forums
873: Community Forums
874: Community Forums
875: Community Forums
876: Statistics
877: Community Forums
878: Your Account
879: Community Forums
880: Home
881: Photo Gallery
882: Community Forums
883: Community Forums
884: Member Screenshots
885: Your Account
886: Community Forums
887: Community Forums
888: Photo Gallery
889: Statistics
890: Member Screenshots
891: Community Forums
892: Member Screenshots
893: Downloads
894: Community Forums
895: News Archive
896: Home
897: Community Forums
898: Member Screenshots
899: Community Forums
900: Community Forums
901: News Archive
902: Community Forums
903: Downloads
904: Photo Gallery
905: Community Forums
906: Community Forums
907: Home
908: Home
909: Photo Gallery
910: Downloads
911: Community Forums
912: Home
913: Photo Gallery
914: Member Screenshots
915: Community Forums
916: Community Forums
917: Member Screenshots
918: News
919: Community Forums
920: Member Screenshots
921: Downloads
922: Home
923: Photo Gallery
924: Photo Gallery
925: Member Screenshots
926: Community Forums
927: Community Forums
928: Home
929: Community Forums
930: Home
931: Member Screenshots
932: Community Forums
933: Community Forums
934: Photo Gallery
935: Community Forums
936: Community Forums
937: Community Forums
938: News Archive
939: Home
940: News Archive
941: Member Screenshots
942: Community Forums
943: Community Forums
944: Your Account
945: Community Forums
946: Home
947: Community Forums
948: Community Forums
949: Home
950: Community Forums
951: Community Forums
952: Community Forums
953: Community Forums
954: Home
955: Home
956: Community Forums
957: Home
958: Photo Gallery
959: Community Forums
960: Community Forums
961: Community Forums
962: Downloads
963: Photo Gallery
964: Downloads
965: Photo Gallery
966: Home
967: Photo Gallery
968: Member Screenshots
969: Member Screenshots
970: Community Forums
971: Community Forums
972: Home
973: Community Forums
974: Community Forums
975: Community Forums
976: Community Forums
977: Community Forums
978: Community Forums
979: Home
980: Community Forums
981: Community Forums
982: Community Forums
983: Downloads
984: Photo Gallery
985: Home
986: Community Forums
987: Home
988: Photo Gallery
989: Photo Gallery
990: Community Forums
991: Community Forums
992: Your Account
993: Home
994: Photo Gallery
995: Photo Gallery
996: Home
997: Downloads
998: Downloads
999: Community Forums
1000: Community Forums
1001: Community Forums
1002: Community Forums
1003: Community Forums
1004: Downloads
1005: Home
1006: Member Screenshots
1007: Community Forums
1008: Home
1009: Community Forums
1010: Home
1011: Community Forums
1012: Photo Gallery
1013: Community Forums
1014: Member Screenshots
1015: Your Account
1016: Downloads
1017: Community Forums
1018: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tiger I – pathetic reliability?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

This was posted on a forum on BoardGameGeek (I have the quote below so you do not have to use the link - for some reason BGG web pages can take a long time to download).

Geek List: wargames worth pre-ordering

The game’s designer gives some history of one of the units:

BTW, a little history of that counter....

That counter is schwere Panzer-Kompanie Hummel (K.St.N. 1176(f.g)) and was equipped with 14 PzKpfw VI Tiger Is...

It was formed in July 1944 at the Pz.Ers.Abt.500 in Paderborn, Germany as an "Alarmeinheit". After recovering from wounds in Italy, Hauptmann Hans Hummel was placed in command. Hummel selected his subcommanders available at PzErsAbt 500 from the officers present he knew from fighting in Italy with Pz.Abt 504.

His unit was alerted at around 12:30am on September 18th and was ordered to report to the Arnhem area. The unit arrived at Bocholt station on the morning of the 19th.

With the rail line blocked from allied air interdiction and other traffic proceeding in both directions, and with no tank transporters available, Hummel was ordered to proceed the 80 kms with the Tigers under their own power.

Tigers, as many of you might know, are not the most reliable of tanks under heavy use and all but 2 broke down during the trip. The two lucky tanks to make the trip without braking down were commanded by Leutnant Knaack and Feldwebel Barneki. They arrived around nightfall of the 19th at the Arnhem bridge perimeter.

The entire unit was not fully formed until the 24th - sans 3 Tigers.


Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?

What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?

What about 14 AFVs with which you have personal experience (including post WWII)?

I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.

Any comments, knowledge and experience greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The Tiger got a bad reputation (mechanically) at Kursk because they were deployed without first working all of the bugs out of them. Additionally, in wintery muddy weather, the mud would freeze between the road wheels overnight and immobilize the tank.

It also suffered from poor fuel consumption. I do not know the range of the tank off hand, but I believe it was less than 100 miles.

The Sherman was a mechanically sound vehicle and a 50 mile trip would have been easy to accomplish. The Sherman came with about four different engine types and fuel efficiency and reliability depended on which engine was being used.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
PattonCurator
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Agree about the Shermans - very reliable - probably 13 of the 14 would make the 50 mile trip (and the 14th would probably make it late after the crew repaired it. The T34 also has the same rugged reliability.

Charles
Back to top
View user's profile
Dubliner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

nt


Last edited by Dubliner on Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- lehr
Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?


The Tiger was a heavy and fairly complicated vehicle which needed a lot of maintenance to operate properly. IIRC the operation manuals for the Tiger states that the crew has to check a number of things on the vehicle for every 15km of road march and fix any problems encountered. So you need crews that know their mount, you need conditions that allows the crew to take care of the vehicle and of course you need spares and maintenance units to fix any problems that occur during the roadmarch. Once you start removing some of those prerequisites for keeping your Tiger happy, chances are there will be trouble.

Tigers of s.SS-PzAbt 101 travelled about 300 kilometers on the road from Northern France to Normandy in June 1944, starting out with 45 tanks on June 7th and was down to 17 operational Tigers on June 12th. Most of the reminder had broken down along the road. It is evident that once tanks start to brake down along a 300 kilometer journey, it is impossible for the maintenance company to help everyone and things will start to fall apart. I has to be said that this battalion did come under allied air attack as well, which clearly didn't help the situation any. AFAIK no Tigers were lossed to allied airpower until June 13th.
A major problem for s.SS-PzAbt 101 was that their new Tiges used the steel-rimmed wheels which were very hard on the tracks, particularily the tracks pins, when travelling on hard surfaces.

IIRC Kompanie Hummel took over their Tigers from Pz.Ers.u.Ausb.Abt 500, a training formation, so they might have been well used vehicles to begin with.

- lehr
What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?


WWII tanks were generally fragile beasts compared with modern equipment, but neither the Sherman nor the T-34 were as heavy and complex as the Tiger I. They would probably suffer a lot less from the strains of a long roadmarch and the Sherman in particular would benefit from its rubber rimmed wheels and rubber-bushed track pins.

That said, T-34s were not really known for their production quality or reliability, at least through parts of the war, so my money would be on the Sherman as the more reliable, everything else being equal.

- lehr
I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.


Indeed. But I think we have to keep in mind the day and age of these machines. In WWI, you could start with 400 tanks and in a couple of days you would have very few left in operational condition, the rest being mostly broken down or stuck rather than destroyed. That lesson was carried over to WWII which is why early war German armoured divisions had up to 350 tanks. That way they could afford to have half of them out of order and still pack a punch. That was clearly demonstrated during the Battle for France when a division could drop to 50% of its strength in a few days of operation and then raise the figure to 80% after a day or two of maintenance and repair.

My 2 ørers worth anyway

Claus B

PS: Sabot, the Tiger was first employed around Leningrad in November 1942, I think you are confusing it with the Panther, which had some serious issues during its combat debut at Kursk in 1943 (and several months after that as well, but that's a different issue).
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

I rather wonder if it was less a problem with the Tigers and more a problem with German maintenance units. You hear about American tank maintenance units doing heroic work all night long in order to get the tanks back up and running in the morning. Now that i recall, the book "Deathtraps" had some especially nasty things to say about the original Sherman radial engine. In that book I recall he broke-down what proportion of men in a Tank Battalion were involved in vehicle maintenance, and it was a grotesquely large number. By '44 Germany probably couldn't afford the manpower for an effective maintenance section.
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori. On 23 May, the company advanced across a railway embankment and engaged Allied armour, but during the crossing three Tigers were disabled, two with track problems and one with gearbox failure. The Tiger's 2.02m (6ft Sin) barrel-overhang also proved a problem, as two other Tiger tanks accidentally jammed their guns into the soil as they came down the steep-sided embankment and had to be towed clear. Eventually 13 Tigers continued the advance during which they knocked out six Sherman tanks. During this attack, however, Allied artillery damaged another Tiger which withdrew back to a German workshop. The next day Allied anti-tank fire disabled another Tiger which was blown up by its crew.

“The company was then ordered to withdraw. While five Tigers held back an Allied attack, the remaining six tanks tried to tow away the three disabled Tigers by the embankment. However, the strain caused four of the six towing Tigers to break down. The Germans then had to destroy the three disabled tanks by the embankment and use the remaining two Tigers to tow back the four that had broken down. By the time the company had withdrawn to Cori, two of its five rearguard tanks had been disabled (one by Allied fire and the other because of a gearbox fault) while one of the two towing tanks had also broken down. Hence, while the three operational rearguard Tigers continued to block the Allied advance, back at Cori the company commander could deploy just one working Tiger and six disabled ones. With the rearguard now unable to stop the Allied advance into Cori, and with recovery vehicles unable to reach the company in time, the commander ordered the destruction of the six disabled Tigers to prevent them falling into Allied hands, while his remaining four tanks withdrew north. The company had lost 12 Tigers, but only three had been disabled by Allied fire. Clearly, the Tiger's mechanical unreliability was more of a threat than Allied fire.�
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

As a career Tanker, I can only imagine the utter frustration of the crews. Knowing that they man such a powerful vehicle, but having to 'scuttle' them due to mechanical unreliability.

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- J.McGillivray
The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori.


In all fairness, this particular example is one of the worst performances of a Tiger unit and hardly typical. The unit was 3. Kompanie s.PzAbt 508 and there are at least two different accounts of what happened.

The company was caught in the middle of a major allied advance and apparently had no backup from the battalion maintenance company which had the heavy recovery vehicles. In the end, tanks with even minor damage, combat or mechanical, had to blown up or left to the enemy as the allies were advancing past the damaged vehicles. In such situations, armour losses are always high, regardless of type.

If you look at the incident, you start with three tanks breaking down on May 23rd. Two threw their tracks, which was not, to my knowledge, a common complaint with the Tiger, so it should probably not be put down to unreliability but rather accident (bad maintenance, bad driving, bad terriain or bad luck). One had transmission trouble, which is more like the kind of fault you would ascribe to mechanical deficiencies.

Then they try to recover the three broken down tanks by towing them after six other Tigers. AFAIK this procedure was actually forbidden unless there was imminent danger of the damaged tank falling into enemy hands. Tigers were not designed for such work, they had enough trouble shifting their own weight around.
Here the stories start to differ. In the Hart & Hart account, four of the towing tanks brakes down with transmission damage and one additional tank brakes down towing while two Tigers are trying to tow four other Tigers - a somewhat dubious claim, I think! In any case, this means that five Tigers broke down with transmission damage from towing.
In the report quoted by Jentz, four tanks of the six towing brakes down and then gets towed in turn by four other Tigers. These four Tigers make it, but later two of them brakes down transmission damage as well and it is tempting to assume that this had to do with the fact that they had been acting as recovery vehicles for most of the day. Another one of these four also brakes down later in the day with unspecified "technical problems".

Hart & Hart mentions another, non-towing Tiger braking down with transmission trouble later as well, which makes it two "unprovoked" transmission failures. In the Jentz account, you can argue that only one tank suffered from "unprovoked" transmission trouble while all the others broke down because of misuse.

When the allied forces neared the collection point for the damaged vehicles, the Tigers were blown up - six according to Hart & Hart, nine according to the Jentz report.

One could argue that if the company had the support from the necessary recovery vehicles, they might have lost between five and seven fewer tanks, namely those that broke down trying to recover the other losses.

During its time in Italy prior to this incident (from mid-february), the battalion managed to keep about 57% of its vehicles operational on average, with a low of 17% and a high of 93%. And it did see a fair amount of combat in the period.

Bottom line is that I think this story is more about the Tigers mechanical fragility than it unreliability. It did not stand up well to abuse, but does that make it unreliable? And of course it speaks of the problems involved in being overrun by the enemy!

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Thanks to all for your replies. It's easy to see the importance of firepower, armor and mobility, but now I have a greater appreciation for the importance of reliability and maintenance support.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dirk
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 115
Location: South Africa
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

great thread - interesting discussion .

My 2 cents - The Tiger did the job it was designed for and thus could perhaps be viewed as a success.

Only thing was that the support system for the Tiger was not implemented , IIRC from a post-graduate course in Logistics Engineering I had :

Support the design and design the support .

My humble opinion Wink

Dirk
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.

Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- mike_Duplessis
One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.


Or just doing sloppy work due to lack of training, skill, and motivation. But definately a factor - in one German plant (MAN Nürnberg), 55% of the work was made by foreign labour, non-Germans drafted as workers in the occupied countries.

- mike_Duplessis
Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.


That is really a different issue. Reliability, logistics and production concerns probably becomes a moot point if you are in the field, looking down the barrel of a bigger and badder enemy tank. On the other hand, if reliability, logistics and production does not work, you wont even have a tank, at least not at working one Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Robin Neillands in his book “The Desert Rats 7th Armoured Division 1940 – 1945� sums things up nicely as followers:

“At this point it may be necessary to explain to a section of the readership that the successful development of a new weapon is far from being the end of the story. The weapon will have a designed range of technical features and benefits, but at least half the effectiveness of any weapon in battle will depend on how it is used, manned, serviced and deployed in battle….. How a weapon is used is therefore as critical to its success as its designed technical performance.�

People who sing the praises of the German cats often talk of their performance under ideal theoretical conditions; although those conditions were seldom encountered in the field. One must take into consideration the actual conditions there the cats were used, or misused.

For example the Panthers with their excellent gun and well sloped armoured, were often thrown into reckless, rushed, poorly planned and poorly supported counter attacks, in Normandy; which exposed the weaknesses of their design.

The most important fact that one must consider is that the Germans, in spite of their Tigers and Panthers, still lost the war. In other words the big cats failed to get the job done!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum