±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 745
Total: 745
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Home
05: Statistics
06: Member Screenshots
07: Member Screenshots
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Member Screenshots
11: Home
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: News Archive
18: Member Screenshots
19: Statistics
20: Photo Gallery
21: Member Screenshots
22: Community Forums
23: Downloads
24: Community Forums
25: Statistics
26: Your Account
27: Your Account
28: Member Screenshots
29: Member Screenshots
30: News Archive
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Member Screenshots
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Downloads
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Your Account
46: News Archive
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Your Account
50: Home
51: Search
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Home
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Member Screenshots
60: Home
61: Your Account
62: Member Screenshots
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Statistics
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: News Archive
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Member Screenshots
77: Photo Gallery
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Member Screenshots
82: Photo Gallery
83: Member Screenshots
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Downloads
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: News
96: Member Screenshots
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Member Screenshots
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Member Screenshots
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: News Archive
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Member Screenshots
127: Community Forums
128: Statistics
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Member Screenshots
135: News Archive
136: Home
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: News
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Downloads
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Member Screenshots
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Member Screenshots
159: Photo Gallery
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: News
163: Photo Gallery
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Statistics
169: News Archive
170: Member Screenshots
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: News Archive
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Photo Gallery
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Member Screenshots
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: Downloads
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: News Archive
199: Community Forums
200: Member Screenshots
201: Member Screenshots
202: Community Forums
203: Member Screenshots
204: Community Forums
205: Downloads
206: Community Forums
207: Member Screenshots
208: Community Forums
209: Downloads
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Downloads
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: Member Screenshots
218: Photo Gallery
219: Member Screenshots
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Member Screenshots
230: Member Screenshots
231: Photo Gallery
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Downloads
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Member Screenshots
239: Member Screenshots
240: Member Screenshots
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: News Archive
244: Downloads
245: Member Screenshots
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Treasury
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Member Screenshots
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: LinkToUs
257: Photo Gallery
258: Home
259: Photo Gallery
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: News
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Member Screenshots
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: News
277: Community Forums
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: Member Screenshots
281: Member Screenshots
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Community Forums
285: Your Account
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: News Archive
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Member Screenshots
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Photo Gallery
296: Home
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Member Screenshots
303: Downloads
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Member Screenshots
312: Community Forums
313: Member Screenshots
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Member Screenshots
317: Statistics
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Community Forums
321: Member Screenshots
322: Statistics
323: Community Forums
324: News Archive
325: Member Screenshots
326: Community Forums
327: Downloads
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Member Screenshots
339: Member Screenshots
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Member Screenshots
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Member Screenshots
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Member Screenshots
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: News Archive
356: Community Forums
357: Member Screenshots
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Photo Gallery
361: Member Screenshots
362: Photo Gallery
363: Member Screenshots
364: Photo Gallery
365: Photo Gallery
366: Community Forums
367: Downloads
368: Photo Gallery
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Downloads
375: Community Forums
376: Member Screenshots
377: Statistics
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: News Archive
387: Community Forums
388: Photo Gallery
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Member Screenshots
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Community Forums
398: News Archive
399: Community Forums
400: Statistics
401: Community Forums
402: News
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Downloads
411: Community Forums
412: Downloads
413: Community Forums
414: Member Screenshots
415: Member Screenshots
416: Downloads
417: Downloads
418: Downloads
419: Community Forums
420: Member Screenshots
421: Community Forums
422: Member Screenshots
423: Member Screenshots
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: News Archive
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Member Screenshots
434: Home
435: Photo Gallery
436: Community Forums
437: Member Screenshots
438: Member Screenshots
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Home
443: Member Screenshots
444: Home
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Photo Gallery
450: Home
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Community Forums
454: Member Screenshots
455: Downloads
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Photo Gallery
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: News
463: Member Screenshots
464: Member Screenshots
465: Community Forums
466: Member Screenshots
467: Member Screenshots
468: Community Forums
469: Photo Gallery
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Member Screenshots
474: Tell a Friend
475: Photo Gallery
476: Community Forums
477: Downloads
478: Community Forums
479: News Archive
480: Community Forums
481: Downloads
482: Home
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Downloads
486: Member Screenshots
487: News Archive
488: Member Screenshots
489: Member Screenshots
490: Member Screenshots
491: Community Forums
492: Member Screenshots
493: Member Screenshots
494: Home
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: News
499: News Archive
500: Member Screenshots
501: Community Forums
502: Statistics
503: Home
504: Downloads
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Photo Gallery
510: Community Forums
511: Home
512: Community Forums
513: News Archive
514: Downloads
515: Community Forums
516: Member Screenshots
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Photo Gallery
521: Community Forums
522: Home
523: Home
524: Home
525: Member Screenshots
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Statistics
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Member Screenshots
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: News Archive
539: Photo Gallery
540: Member Screenshots
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Home
544: Community Forums
545: Member Screenshots
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Statistics
550: Member Screenshots
551: Member Screenshots
552: News Archive
553: Member Screenshots
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Photo Gallery
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Photo Gallery
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Member Screenshots
570: News
571: Community Forums
572: Member Screenshots
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Home
576: Member Screenshots
577: Community Forums
578: News Archive
579: Member Screenshots
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Community Forums
584: Photo Gallery
585: Photo Gallery
586: Community Forums
587: Photo Gallery
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: News Archive
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Your Account
595: Community Forums
596: Member Screenshots
597: Home
598: Photo Gallery
599: Community Forums
600: Home
601: Community Forums
602: News Archive
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Member Screenshots
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Photo Gallery
613: Member Screenshots
614: Photo Gallery
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Community Forums
620: Home
621: News Archive
622: News Archive
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Photo Gallery
628: Photo Gallery
629: Home
630: Home
631: Community Forums
632: Member Screenshots
633: Community Forums
634: Photo Gallery
635: Home
636: Home
637: Home
638: Community Forums
639: Downloads
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Statistics
643: Photo Gallery
644: Community Forums
645: Home
646: Community Forums
647: Member Screenshots
648: Community Forums
649: Downloads
650: Photo Gallery
651: Community Forums
652: Home
653: Home
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Community Forums
659: Downloads
660: Home
661: Home
662: News Archive
663: Member Screenshots
664: Member Screenshots
665: Statistics
666: Home
667: Home
668: Member Screenshots
669: Member Screenshots
670: Community Forums
671: Home
672: Member Screenshots
673: Home
674: News Archive
675: Community Forums
676: Photo Gallery
677: Community Forums
678: Photo Gallery
679: Member Screenshots
680: Community Forums
681: Statistics
682: Photo Gallery
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Photo Gallery
686: Community Forums
687: News
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Photo Gallery
692: Member Screenshots
693: Home
694: Home
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Member Screenshots
700: Photo Gallery
701: News Archive
702: Photo Gallery
703: Community Forums
704: News Archive
705: Community Forums
706: News Archive
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Downloads
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Member Screenshots
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Home
723: Downloads
724: Downloads
725: Member Screenshots
726: Community Forums
727: Photo Gallery
728: Home
729: Tell a Friend
730: Downloads
731: Home
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Home
735: Community Forums
736: Home
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Home
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums
742: Home
743: Community Forums
744: Member Screenshots
745: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tiger I – pathetic reliability?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

This was posted on a forum on BoardGameGeek (I have the quote below so you do not have to use the link - for some reason BGG web pages can take a long time to download).

Geek List: wargames worth pre-ordering

The game’s designer gives some history of one of the units:

BTW, a little history of that counter....

That counter is schwere Panzer-Kompanie Hummel (K.St.N. 1176(f.g)) and was equipped with 14 PzKpfw VI Tiger Is...

It was formed in July 1944 at the Pz.Ers.Abt.500 in Paderborn, Germany as an "Alarmeinheit". After recovering from wounds in Italy, Hauptmann Hans Hummel was placed in command. Hummel selected his subcommanders available at PzErsAbt 500 from the officers present he knew from fighting in Italy with Pz.Abt 504.

His unit was alerted at around 12:30am on September 18th and was ordered to report to the Arnhem area. The unit arrived at Bocholt station on the morning of the 19th.

With the rail line blocked from allied air interdiction and other traffic proceeding in both directions, and with no tank transporters available, Hummel was ordered to proceed the 80 kms with the Tigers under their own power.

Tigers, as many of you might know, are not the most reliable of tanks under heavy use and all but 2 broke down during the trip. The two lucky tanks to make the trip without braking down were commanded by Leutnant Knaack and Feldwebel Barneki. They arrived around nightfall of the 19th at the Arnhem bridge perimeter.

The entire unit was not fully formed until the 24th - sans 3 Tigers.


Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?

What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?

What about 14 AFVs with which you have personal experience (including post WWII)?

I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.

Any comments, knowledge and experience greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The Tiger got a bad reputation (mechanically) at Kursk because they were deployed without first working all of the bugs out of them. Additionally, in wintery muddy weather, the mud would freeze between the road wheels overnight and immobilize the tank.

It also suffered from poor fuel consumption. I do not know the range of the tank off hand, but I believe it was less than 100 miles.

The Sherman was a mechanically sound vehicle and a 50 mile trip would have been easy to accomplish. The Sherman came with about four different engine types and fuel efficiency and reliability depended on which engine was being used.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
PattonCurator
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Agree about the Shermans - very reliable - probably 13 of the 14 would make the 50 mile trip (and the 14th would probably make it late after the crew repaired it. The T34 also has the same rugged reliability.

Charles
Back to top
View user's profile
Dubliner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

nt


Last edited by Dubliner on Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- lehr
Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?


The Tiger was a heavy and fairly complicated vehicle which needed a lot of maintenance to operate properly. IIRC the operation manuals for the Tiger states that the crew has to check a number of things on the vehicle for every 15km of road march and fix any problems encountered. So you need crews that know their mount, you need conditions that allows the crew to take care of the vehicle and of course you need spares and maintenance units to fix any problems that occur during the roadmarch. Once you start removing some of those prerequisites for keeping your Tiger happy, chances are there will be trouble.

Tigers of s.SS-PzAbt 101 travelled about 300 kilometers on the road from Northern France to Normandy in June 1944, starting out with 45 tanks on June 7th and was down to 17 operational Tigers on June 12th. Most of the reminder had broken down along the road. It is evident that once tanks start to brake down along a 300 kilometer journey, it is impossible for the maintenance company to help everyone and things will start to fall apart. I has to be said that this battalion did come under allied air attack as well, which clearly didn't help the situation any. AFAIK no Tigers were lossed to allied airpower until June 13th.
A major problem for s.SS-PzAbt 101 was that their new Tiges used the steel-rimmed wheels which were very hard on the tracks, particularily the tracks pins, when travelling on hard surfaces.

IIRC Kompanie Hummel took over their Tigers from Pz.Ers.u.Ausb.Abt 500, a training formation, so they might have been well used vehicles to begin with.

- lehr
What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?


WWII tanks were generally fragile beasts compared with modern equipment, but neither the Sherman nor the T-34 were as heavy and complex as the Tiger I. They would probably suffer a lot less from the strains of a long roadmarch and the Sherman in particular would benefit from its rubber rimmed wheels and rubber-bushed track pins.

That said, T-34s were not really known for their production quality or reliability, at least through parts of the war, so my money would be on the Sherman as the more reliable, everything else being equal.

- lehr
I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.


Indeed. But I think we have to keep in mind the day and age of these machines. In WWI, you could start with 400 tanks and in a couple of days you would have very few left in operational condition, the rest being mostly broken down or stuck rather than destroyed. That lesson was carried over to WWII which is why early war German armoured divisions had up to 350 tanks. That way they could afford to have half of them out of order and still pack a punch. That was clearly demonstrated during the Battle for France when a division could drop to 50% of its strength in a few days of operation and then raise the figure to 80% after a day or two of maintenance and repair.

My 2 ørers worth anyway

Claus B

PS: Sabot, the Tiger was first employed around Leningrad in November 1942, I think you are confusing it with the Panther, which had some serious issues during its combat debut at Kursk in 1943 (and several months after that as well, but that's a different issue).
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

I rather wonder if it was less a problem with the Tigers and more a problem with German maintenance units. You hear about American tank maintenance units doing heroic work all night long in order to get the tanks back up and running in the morning. Now that i recall, the book "Deathtraps" had some especially nasty things to say about the original Sherman radial engine. In that book I recall he broke-down what proportion of men in a Tank Battalion were involved in vehicle maintenance, and it was a grotesquely large number. By '44 Germany probably couldn't afford the manpower for an effective maintenance section.
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori. On 23 May, the company advanced across a railway embankment and engaged Allied armour, but during the crossing three Tigers were disabled, two with track problems and one with gearbox failure. The Tiger's 2.02m (6ft Sin) barrel-overhang also proved a problem, as two other Tiger tanks accidentally jammed their guns into the soil as they came down the steep-sided embankment and had to be towed clear. Eventually 13 Tigers continued the advance during which they knocked out six Sherman tanks. During this attack, however, Allied artillery damaged another Tiger which withdrew back to a German workshop. The next day Allied anti-tank fire disabled another Tiger which was blown up by its crew.

“The company was then ordered to withdraw. While five Tigers held back an Allied attack, the remaining six tanks tried to tow away the three disabled Tigers by the embankment. However, the strain caused four of the six towing Tigers to break down. The Germans then had to destroy the three disabled tanks by the embankment and use the remaining two Tigers to tow back the four that had broken down. By the time the company had withdrawn to Cori, two of its five rearguard tanks had been disabled (one by Allied fire and the other because of a gearbox fault) while one of the two towing tanks had also broken down. Hence, while the three operational rearguard Tigers continued to block the Allied advance, back at Cori the company commander could deploy just one working Tiger and six disabled ones. With the rearguard now unable to stop the Allied advance into Cori, and with recovery vehicles unable to reach the company in time, the commander ordered the destruction of the six disabled Tigers to prevent them falling into Allied hands, while his remaining four tanks withdrew north. The company had lost 12 Tigers, but only three had been disabled by Allied fire. Clearly, the Tiger's mechanical unreliability was more of a threat than Allied fire.�
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

As a career Tanker, I can only imagine the utter frustration of the crews. Knowing that they man such a powerful vehicle, but having to 'scuttle' them due to mechanical unreliability.

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- J.McGillivray
The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori.


In all fairness, this particular example is one of the worst performances of a Tiger unit and hardly typical. The unit was 3. Kompanie s.PzAbt 508 and there are at least two different accounts of what happened.

The company was caught in the middle of a major allied advance and apparently had no backup from the battalion maintenance company which had the heavy recovery vehicles. In the end, tanks with even minor damage, combat or mechanical, had to blown up or left to the enemy as the allies were advancing past the damaged vehicles. In such situations, armour losses are always high, regardless of type.

If you look at the incident, you start with three tanks breaking down on May 23rd. Two threw their tracks, which was not, to my knowledge, a common complaint with the Tiger, so it should probably not be put down to unreliability but rather accident (bad maintenance, bad driving, bad terriain or bad luck). One had transmission trouble, which is more like the kind of fault you would ascribe to mechanical deficiencies.

Then they try to recover the three broken down tanks by towing them after six other Tigers. AFAIK this procedure was actually forbidden unless there was imminent danger of the damaged tank falling into enemy hands. Tigers were not designed for such work, they had enough trouble shifting their own weight around.
Here the stories start to differ. In the Hart & Hart account, four of the towing tanks brakes down with transmission damage and one additional tank brakes down towing while two Tigers are trying to tow four other Tigers - a somewhat dubious claim, I think! In any case, this means that five Tigers broke down with transmission damage from towing.
In the report quoted by Jentz, four tanks of the six towing brakes down and then gets towed in turn by four other Tigers. These four Tigers make it, but later two of them brakes down transmission damage as well and it is tempting to assume that this had to do with the fact that they had been acting as recovery vehicles for most of the day. Another one of these four also brakes down later in the day with unspecified "technical problems".

Hart & Hart mentions another, non-towing Tiger braking down with transmission trouble later as well, which makes it two "unprovoked" transmission failures. In the Jentz account, you can argue that only one tank suffered from "unprovoked" transmission trouble while all the others broke down because of misuse.

When the allied forces neared the collection point for the damaged vehicles, the Tigers were blown up - six according to Hart & Hart, nine according to the Jentz report.

One could argue that if the company had the support from the necessary recovery vehicles, they might have lost between five and seven fewer tanks, namely those that broke down trying to recover the other losses.

During its time in Italy prior to this incident (from mid-february), the battalion managed to keep about 57% of its vehicles operational on average, with a low of 17% and a high of 93%. And it did see a fair amount of combat in the period.

Bottom line is that I think this story is more about the Tigers mechanical fragility than it unreliability. It did not stand up well to abuse, but does that make it unreliable? And of course it speaks of the problems involved in being overrun by the enemy!

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Thanks to all for your replies. It's easy to see the importance of firepower, armor and mobility, but now I have a greater appreciation for the importance of reliability and maintenance support.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dirk
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 115
Location: South Africa
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

great thread - interesting discussion .

My 2 cents - The Tiger did the job it was designed for and thus could perhaps be viewed as a success.

Only thing was that the support system for the Tiger was not implemented , IIRC from a post-graduate course in Logistics Engineering I had :

Support the design and design the support .

My humble opinion Wink

Dirk
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.

Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- mike_Duplessis
One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.


Or just doing sloppy work due to lack of training, skill, and motivation. But definately a factor - in one German plant (MAN Nürnberg), 55% of the work was made by foreign labour, non-Germans drafted as workers in the occupied countries.

- mike_Duplessis
Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.


That is really a different issue. Reliability, logistics and production concerns probably becomes a moot point if you are in the field, looking down the barrel of a bigger and badder enemy tank. On the other hand, if reliability, logistics and production does not work, you wont even have a tank, at least not at working one Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Robin Neillands in his book “The Desert Rats 7th Armoured Division 1940 – 1945� sums things up nicely as followers:

“At this point it may be necessary to explain to a section of the readership that the successful development of a new weapon is far from being the end of the story. The weapon will have a designed range of technical features and benefits, but at least half the effectiveness of any weapon in battle will depend on how it is used, manned, serviced and deployed in battle….. How a weapon is used is therefore as critical to its success as its designed technical performance.�

People who sing the praises of the German cats often talk of their performance under ideal theoretical conditions; although those conditions were seldom encountered in the field. One must take into consideration the actual conditions there the cats were used, or misused.

For example the Panthers with their excellent gun and well sloped armoured, were often thrown into reckless, rushed, poorly planned and poorly supported counter attacks, in Normandy; which exposed the weaknesses of their design.

The most important fact that one must consider is that the Germans, in spite of their Tigers and Panthers, still lost the war. In other words the big cats failed to get the job done!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum