±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 741
Total: 741
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Downloads
03: Home
04: News Archive
05: Downloads
06: Member Screenshots
07: News Archive
08: Downloads
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: News Archive
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: News Archive
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Photo Gallery
44: Member Screenshots
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: News Archive
51: Member Screenshots
52: Member Screenshots
53: Members List
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Photo Gallery
57: News Archive
58: Community Forums
59: News Archive
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Downloads
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: News Archive
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: News Archive
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Downloads
85: Member Screenshots
86: Home
87: Downloads
88: Community Forums
89: News Archive
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Member Screenshots
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Member Screenshots
111: Photo Gallery
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Member Screenshots
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: News Archive
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Downloads
132: Downloads
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Member Screenshots
139: Member Screenshots
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Member Screenshots
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Member Screenshots
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Downloads
151: Community Forums
152: Downloads
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Photo Gallery
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: News Archive
166: Member Screenshots
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Your Account
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: News Archive
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Downloads
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Member Screenshots
182: Member Screenshots
183: Member Screenshots
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Member Screenshots
192: Community Forums
193: Downloads
194: Member Screenshots
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Member Screenshots
205: Member Screenshots
206: Member Screenshots
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: Community Forums
241: Statistics
242: Home
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Photo Gallery
257: Photo Gallery
258: Member Screenshots
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Downloads
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Statistics
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Home
270: Photo Gallery
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Downloads
276: Statistics
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Home
285: Member Screenshots
286: Community Forums
287: Statistics
288: Member Screenshots
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Member Screenshots
300: Community Forums
301: Photo Gallery
302: Community Forums
303: Downloads
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Member Screenshots
307: Photo Gallery
308: Photo Gallery
309: Photo Gallery
310: Member Screenshots
311: Member Screenshots
312: Downloads
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Downloads
316: Community Forums
317: Your Account
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Member Screenshots
327: Home
328: Statistics
329: News Archive
330: Photo Gallery
331: Photo Gallery
332: Home
333: News Archive
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Home
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Statistics
341: Community Forums
342: Member Screenshots
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Member Screenshots
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: Member Screenshots
355: Downloads
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Downloads
362: Supporters
363: Home
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Community Forums
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Statistics
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Member Screenshots
384: Photo Gallery
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Photo Gallery
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Photo Gallery
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Photo Gallery
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Downloads
410: Community Forums
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: News Archive
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Photo Gallery
421: Home
422: Home
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: News Archive
426: Home
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Photo Gallery
430: News Archive
431: Photo Gallery
432: Member Screenshots
433: Community Forums
434: Member Screenshots
435: News Archive
436: Community Forums
437: Member Screenshots
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Member Screenshots
443: Community Forums
444: Member Screenshots
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Photo Gallery
450: Downloads
451: Home
452: Home
453: Photo Gallery
454: Your Account
455: News Archive
456: Photo Gallery
457: Photo Gallery
458: Photo Gallery
459: News Archive
460: Photo Gallery
461: Community Forums
462: News Archive
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Member Screenshots
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Member Screenshots
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Photo Gallery
477: Home
478: Community Forums
479: Member Screenshots
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Home
487: Photo Gallery
488: Community Forums
489: Photo Gallery
490: Home
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Member Screenshots
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Member Screenshots
500: Photo Gallery
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Photo Gallery
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Community Forums
510: Member Screenshots
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Home
516: Member Screenshots
517: Member Screenshots
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: Member Screenshots
523: Member Screenshots
524: Community Forums
525: Downloads
526: Member Screenshots
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Member Screenshots
534: Community Forums
535: Member Screenshots
536: Community Forums
537: Photo Gallery
538: Community Forums
539: Home
540: Member Screenshots
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: News Archive
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Member Screenshots
552: Community Forums
553: Home
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Photo Gallery
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Member Screenshots
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Home
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: News Archive
575: Member Screenshots
576: Member Screenshots
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: News Archive
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Member Screenshots
584: Community Forums
585: Member Screenshots
586: Photo Gallery
587: Member Screenshots
588: Member Screenshots
589: Member Screenshots
590: Home
591: Community Forums
592: Your Account
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Home
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Home
601: Community Forums
602: Photo Gallery
603: Community Forums
604: Downloads
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Home
609: Community Forums
610: Photo Gallery
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Home
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Statistics
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Your Account
622: Photo Gallery
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Home
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Photo Gallery
630: Photo Gallery
631: News Archive
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Photo Gallery
635: Downloads
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: Home
644: Downloads
645: Home
646: Community Forums
647: Photo Gallery
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Home
651: Your Account
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Home
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Home
658: Your Account
659: Home
660: Home
661: Community Forums
662: Home
663: Home
664: Home
665: Home
666: Community Forums
667: Member Screenshots
668: Home
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Home
672: Photo Gallery
673: Photo Gallery
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Home
677: Community Forums
678: Home
679: Member Screenshots
680: Home
681: Member Screenshots
682: Member Screenshots
683: Community Forums
684: Member Screenshots
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Photo Gallery
688: Member Screenshots
689: Home
690: Home
691: News Archive
692: Your Account
693: Member Screenshots
694: Home
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Home
700: Community Forums
701: News Archive
702: Downloads
703: Downloads
704: Community Forums
705: Community Forums
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Member Screenshots
715: Community Forums
716: News Archive
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Member Screenshots
720: News Archive
721: Downloads
722: Photo Gallery
723: Home
724: Member Screenshots
725: Downloads
726: Photo Gallery
727: Photo Gallery
728: Home
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Photo Gallery
732: Home
733: Home
734: Community Forums
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tiger I – pathetic reliability?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

This was posted on a forum on BoardGameGeek (I have the quote below so you do not have to use the link - for some reason BGG web pages can take a long time to download).

Geek List: wargames worth pre-ordering

The game’s designer gives some history of one of the units:

BTW, a little history of that counter....

That counter is schwere Panzer-Kompanie Hummel (K.St.N. 1176(f.g)) and was equipped with 14 PzKpfw VI Tiger Is...

It was formed in July 1944 at the Pz.Ers.Abt.500 in Paderborn, Germany as an "Alarmeinheit". After recovering from wounds in Italy, Hauptmann Hans Hummel was placed in command. Hummel selected his subcommanders available at PzErsAbt 500 from the officers present he knew from fighting in Italy with Pz.Abt 504.

His unit was alerted at around 12:30am on September 18th and was ordered to report to the Arnhem area. The unit arrived at Bocholt station on the morning of the 19th.

With the rail line blocked from allied air interdiction and other traffic proceeding in both directions, and with no tank transporters available, Hummel was ordered to proceed the 80 kms with the Tigers under their own power.

Tigers, as many of you might know, are not the most reliable of tanks under heavy use and all but 2 broke down during the trip. The two lucky tanks to make the trip without braking down were commanded by Leutnant Knaack and Feldwebel Barneki. They arrived around nightfall of the 19th at the Arnhem bridge perimeter.

The entire unit was not fully formed until the 24th - sans 3 Tigers.


Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?

What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?

What about 14 AFVs with which you have personal experience (including post WWII)?

I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.

Any comments, knowledge and experience greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The Tiger got a bad reputation (mechanically) at Kursk because they were deployed without first working all of the bugs out of them. Additionally, in wintery muddy weather, the mud would freeze between the road wheels overnight and immobilize the tank.

It also suffered from poor fuel consumption. I do not know the range of the tank off hand, but I believe it was less than 100 miles.

The Sherman was a mechanically sound vehicle and a 50 mile trip would have been easy to accomplish. The Sherman came with about four different engine types and fuel efficiency and reliability depended on which engine was being used.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
PattonCurator
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Agree about the Shermans - very reliable - probably 13 of the 14 would make the 50 mile trip (and the 14th would probably make it late after the crew repaired it. The T34 also has the same rugged reliability.

Charles
Back to top
View user's profile
Dubliner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

nt


Last edited by Dubliner on Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- lehr
Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?


The Tiger was a heavy and fairly complicated vehicle which needed a lot of maintenance to operate properly. IIRC the operation manuals for the Tiger states that the crew has to check a number of things on the vehicle for every 15km of road march and fix any problems encountered. So you need crews that know their mount, you need conditions that allows the crew to take care of the vehicle and of course you need spares and maintenance units to fix any problems that occur during the roadmarch. Once you start removing some of those prerequisites for keeping your Tiger happy, chances are there will be trouble.

Tigers of s.SS-PzAbt 101 travelled about 300 kilometers on the road from Northern France to Normandy in June 1944, starting out with 45 tanks on June 7th and was down to 17 operational Tigers on June 12th. Most of the reminder had broken down along the road. It is evident that once tanks start to brake down along a 300 kilometer journey, it is impossible for the maintenance company to help everyone and things will start to fall apart. I has to be said that this battalion did come under allied air attack as well, which clearly didn't help the situation any. AFAIK no Tigers were lossed to allied airpower until June 13th.
A major problem for s.SS-PzAbt 101 was that their new Tiges used the steel-rimmed wheels which were very hard on the tracks, particularily the tracks pins, when travelling on hard surfaces.

IIRC Kompanie Hummel took over their Tigers from Pz.Ers.u.Ausb.Abt 500, a training formation, so they might have been well used vehicles to begin with.

- lehr
What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?


WWII tanks were generally fragile beasts compared with modern equipment, but neither the Sherman nor the T-34 were as heavy and complex as the Tiger I. They would probably suffer a lot less from the strains of a long roadmarch and the Sherman in particular would benefit from its rubber rimmed wheels and rubber-bushed track pins.

That said, T-34s were not really known for their production quality or reliability, at least through parts of the war, so my money would be on the Sherman as the more reliable, everything else being equal.

- lehr
I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.


Indeed. But I think we have to keep in mind the day and age of these machines. In WWI, you could start with 400 tanks and in a couple of days you would have very few left in operational condition, the rest being mostly broken down or stuck rather than destroyed. That lesson was carried over to WWII which is why early war German armoured divisions had up to 350 tanks. That way they could afford to have half of them out of order and still pack a punch. That was clearly demonstrated during the Battle for France when a division could drop to 50% of its strength in a few days of operation and then raise the figure to 80% after a day or two of maintenance and repair.

My 2 ørers worth anyway

Claus B

PS: Sabot, the Tiger was first employed around Leningrad in November 1942, I think you are confusing it with the Panther, which had some serious issues during its combat debut at Kursk in 1943 (and several months after that as well, but that's a different issue).
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

I rather wonder if it was less a problem with the Tigers and more a problem with German maintenance units. You hear about American tank maintenance units doing heroic work all night long in order to get the tanks back up and running in the morning. Now that i recall, the book "Deathtraps" had some especially nasty things to say about the original Sherman radial engine. In that book I recall he broke-down what proportion of men in a Tank Battalion were involved in vehicle maintenance, and it was a grotesquely large number. By '44 Germany probably couldn't afford the manpower for an effective maintenance section.
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori. On 23 May, the company advanced across a railway embankment and engaged Allied armour, but during the crossing three Tigers were disabled, two with track problems and one with gearbox failure. The Tiger's 2.02m (6ft Sin) barrel-overhang also proved a problem, as two other Tiger tanks accidentally jammed their guns into the soil as they came down the steep-sided embankment and had to be towed clear. Eventually 13 Tigers continued the advance during which they knocked out six Sherman tanks. During this attack, however, Allied artillery damaged another Tiger which withdrew back to a German workshop. The next day Allied anti-tank fire disabled another Tiger which was blown up by its crew.

“The company was then ordered to withdraw. While five Tigers held back an Allied attack, the remaining six tanks tried to tow away the three disabled Tigers by the embankment. However, the strain caused four of the six towing Tigers to break down. The Germans then had to destroy the three disabled tanks by the embankment and use the remaining two Tigers to tow back the four that had broken down. By the time the company had withdrawn to Cori, two of its five rearguard tanks had been disabled (one by Allied fire and the other because of a gearbox fault) while one of the two towing tanks had also broken down. Hence, while the three operational rearguard Tigers continued to block the Allied advance, back at Cori the company commander could deploy just one working Tiger and six disabled ones. With the rearguard now unable to stop the Allied advance into Cori, and with recovery vehicles unable to reach the company in time, the commander ordered the destruction of the six disabled Tigers to prevent them falling into Allied hands, while his remaining four tanks withdrew north. The company had lost 12 Tigers, but only three had been disabled by Allied fire. Clearly, the Tiger's mechanical unreliability was more of a threat than Allied fire.�
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

As a career Tanker, I can only imagine the utter frustration of the crews. Knowing that they man such a powerful vehicle, but having to 'scuttle' them due to mechanical unreliability.

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- J.McGillivray
The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori.


In all fairness, this particular example is one of the worst performances of a Tiger unit and hardly typical. The unit was 3. Kompanie s.PzAbt 508 and there are at least two different accounts of what happened.

The company was caught in the middle of a major allied advance and apparently had no backup from the battalion maintenance company which had the heavy recovery vehicles. In the end, tanks with even minor damage, combat or mechanical, had to blown up or left to the enemy as the allies were advancing past the damaged vehicles. In such situations, armour losses are always high, regardless of type.

If you look at the incident, you start with three tanks breaking down on May 23rd. Two threw their tracks, which was not, to my knowledge, a common complaint with the Tiger, so it should probably not be put down to unreliability but rather accident (bad maintenance, bad driving, bad terriain or bad luck). One had transmission trouble, which is more like the kind of fault you would ascribe to mechanical deficiencies.

Then they try to recover the three broken down tanks by towing them after six other Tigers. AFAIK this procedure was actually forbidden unless there was imminent danger of the damaged tank falling into enemy hands. Tigers were not designed for such work, they had enough trouble shifting their own weight around.
Here the stories start to differ. In the Hart & Hart account, four of the towing tanks brakes down with transmission damage and one additional tank brakes down towing while two Tigers are trying to tow four other Tigers - a somewhat dubious claim, I think! In any case, this means that five Tigers broke down with transmission damage from towing.
In the report quoted by Jentz, four tanks of the six towing brakes down and then gets towed in turn by four other Tigers. These four Tigers make it, but later two of them brakes down transmission damage as well and it is tempting to assume that this had to do with the fact that they had been acting as recovery vehicles for most of the day. Another one of these four also brakes down later in the day with unspecified "technical problems".

Hart & Hart mentions another, non-towing Tiger braking down with transmission trouble later as well, which makes it two "unprovoked" transmission failures. In the Jentz account, you can argue that only one tank suffered from "unprovoked" transmission trouble while all the others broke down because of misuse.

When the allied forces neared the collection point for the damaged vehicles, the Tigers were blown up - six according to Hart & Hart, nine according to the Jentz report.

One could argue that if the company had the support from the necessary recovery vehicles, they might have lost between five and seven fewer tanks, namely those that broke down trying to recover the other losses.

During its time in Italy prior to this incident (from mid-february), the battalion managed to keep about 57% of its vehicles operational on average, with a low of 17% and a high of 93%. And it did see a fair amount of combat in the period.

Bottom line is that I think this story is more about the Tigers mechanical fragility than it unreliability. It did not stand up well to abuse, but does that make it unreliable? And of course it speaks of the problems involved in being overrun by the enemy!

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Thanks to all for your replies. It's easy to see the importance of firepower, armor and mobility, but now I have a greater appreciation for the importance of reliability and maintenance support.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dirk
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 115
Location: South Africa
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

great thread - interesting discussion .

My 2 cents - The Tiger did the job it was designed for and thus could perhaps be viewed as a success.

Only thing was that the support system for the Tiger was not implemented , IIRC from a post-graduate course in Logistics Engineering I had :

Support the design and design the support .

My humble opinion Wink

Dirk
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.

Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- mike_Duplessis
One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.


Or just doing sloppy work due to lack of training, skill, and motivation. But definately a factor - in one German plant (MAN Nürnberg), 55% of the work was made by foreign labour, non-Germans drafted as workers in the occupied countries.

- mike_Duplessis
Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.


That is really a different issue. Reliability, logistics and production concerns probably becomes a moot point if you are in the field, looking down the barrel of a bigger and badder enemy tank. On the other hand, if reliability, logistics and production does not work, you wont even have a tank, at least not at working one Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Robin Neillands in his book “The Desert Rats 7th Armoured Division 1940 – 1945� sums things up nicely as followers:

“At this point it may be necessary to explain to a section of the readership that the successful development of a new weapon is far from being the end of the story. The weapon will have a designed range of technical features and benefits, but at least half the effectiveness of any weapon in battle will depend on how it is used, manned, serviced and deployed in battle….. How a weapon is used is therefore as critical to its success as its designed technical performance.�

People who sing the praises of the German cats often talk of their performance under ideal theoretical conditions; although those conditions were seldom encountered in the field. One must take into consideration the actual conditions there the cats were used, or misused.

For example the Panthers with their excellent gun and well sloped armoured, were often thrown into reckless, rushed, poorly planned and poorly supported counter attacks, in Normandy; which exposed the weaknesses of their design.

The most important fact that one must consider is that the Germans, in spite of their Tigers and Panthers, still lost the war. In other words the big cats failed to get the job done!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum