±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1011
Total: 1011
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Home
03: Member Screenshots
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Your Account
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Member Screenshots
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: News Archive
17: Downloads
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: News Archive
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Member Screenshots
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: News Archive
39: Downloads
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Photo Gallery
46: Photo Gallery
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Member Screenshots
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Member Screenshots
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: News Archive
65: Community Forums
66: Downloads
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: News Archive
75: Home
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: News Archive
81: Treasury
82: Community Forums
83: Member Screenshots
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: News Archive
89: Photo Gallery
90: Photo Gallery
91: Downloads
92: Community Forums
93: Downloads
94: Community Forums
95: Member Screenshots
96: Member Screenshots
97: Member Screenshots
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Member Screenshots
103: Photo Gallery
104: Member Screenshots
105: Photo Gallery
106: Photo Gallery
107: Home
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Community Forums
112: Member Screenshots
113: News Archive
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Member Screenshots
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Downloads
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Photo Gallery
131: Community Forums
132: Member Screenshots
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Downloads
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Downloads
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: News Archive
145: Downloads
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Downloads
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Downloads
159: Community Forums
160: Member Screenshots
161: Downloads
162: Member Screenshots
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Your Account
166: Member Screenshots
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Downloads
170: Community Forums
171: Member Screenshots
172: News Archive
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Member Screenshots
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: News Archive
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Downloads
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: News Archive
192: Community Forums
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: News Archive
197: Home
198: Photo Gallery
199: News Archive
200: Home
201: Downloads
202: Photo Gallery
203: Member Screenshots
204: Community Forums
205: Member Screenshots
206: Member Screenshots
207: Community Forums
208: Photo Gallery
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Member Screenshots
216: Member Screenshots
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: News Archive
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Member Screenshots
227: Downloads
228: Member Screenshots
229: Home
230: Downloads
231: News Archive
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: News Archive
236: Downloads
237: Downloads
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: Community Forums
241: News Archive
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Member Screenshots
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Member Screenshots
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Member Screenshots
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: News
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: News Archive
262: Home
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: News Archive
269: Member Screenshots
270: Member Screenshots
271: Member Screenshots
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Your Account
278: News Archive
279: News Archive
280: Member Screenshots
281: Member Screenshots
282: Member Screenshots
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Downloads
286: News Archive
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Member Screenshots
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Member Screenshots
298: Member Screenshots
299: Photo Gallery
300: News Archive
301: Home
302: Member Screenshots
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Member Screenshots
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Tell a Friend
312: News Archive
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Member Screenshots
316: News
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Downloads
321: Member Screenshots
322: Downloads
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Downloads
327: Member Screenshots
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: News Archive
341: Member Screenshots
342: Community Forums
343: News
344: Downloads
345: Downloads
346: Member Screenshots
347: Community Forums
348: News Archive
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Member Screenshots
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Member Screenshots
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Statistics
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: News Archive
369: News Archive
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Member Screenshots
374: Home
375: Downloads
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Statistics
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Photo Gallery
382: Photo Gallery
383: Photo Gallery
384: Downloads
385: Community Forums
386: News Archive
387: News Archive
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Member Screenshots
391: Home
392: Member Screenshots
393: Photo Gallery
394: Home
395: Downloads
396: Community Forums
397: News Archive
398: Community Forums
399: Tell a Friend
400: Community Forums
401: Member Screenshots
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Photo Gallery
409: Home
410: Community Forums
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Home
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: News Archive
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Member Screenshots
423: Community Forums
424: Photo Gallery
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: Member Screenshots
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: News Archive
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Photo Gallery
439: News Archive
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: News Archive
445: Home
446: Member Screenshots
447: Community Forums
448: Member Screenshots
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Member Screenshots
453: Community Forums
454: Member Screenshots
455: Community Forums
456: Member Screenshots
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Photo Gallery
460: Home
461: Downloads
462: Member Screenshots
463: Home
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Member Screenshots
468: Photo Gallery
469: Member Screenshots
470: Downloads
471: Photo Gallery
472: Community Forums
473: Downloads
474: Downloads
475: Member Screenshots
476: Downloads
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Member Screenshots
481: Member Screenshots
482: Member Screenshots
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: News Archive
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Member Screenshots
491: Community Forums
492: Member Screenshots
493: Photo Gallery
494: Home
495: Member Screenshots
496: Home
497: Photo Gallery
498: Photo Gallery
499: Home
500: Home
501: Community Forums
502: Photo Gallery
503: Photo Gallery
504: Photo Gallery
505: Community Forums
506: Member Screenshots
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Member Screenshots
510: Photo Gallery
511: Home
512: Photo Gallery
513: Member Screenshots
514: Community Forums
515: Member Screenshots
516: News Archive
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Photo Gallery
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: News Archive
531: Home
532: Community Forums
533: Home
534: Member Screenshots
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Member Screenshots
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Member Screenshots
542: News Archive
543: Photo Gallery
544: Photo Gallery
545: Home
546: Downloads
547: Community Forums
548: Photo Gallery
549: Home
550: Home
551: Your Account
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Photo Gallery
555: Home
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Photo Gallery
559: Community Forums
560: Photo Gallery
561: News Archive
562: Community Forums
563: Downloads
564: Community Forums
565: Home
566: Community Forums
567: Home
568: Home
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Photo Gallery
572: Member Screenshots
573: Community Forums
574: Home
575: Community Forums
576: Member Screenshots
577: Community Forums
578: Home
579: Your Account
580: Community Forums
581: Home
582: Downloads
583: Photo Gallery
584: Community Forums
585: News Archive
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Downloads
589: Member Screenshots
590: News Archive
591: Community Forums
592: Member Screenshots
593: Member Screenshots
594: Downloads
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Photo Gallery
601: Community Forums
602: Downloads
603: News Archive
604: Home
605: Member Screenshots
606: Community Forums
607: Downloads
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Home
611: Community Forums
612: Home
613: News Archive
614: Home
615: Home
616: Community Forums
617: News Archive
618: Home
619: Community Forums
620: Downloads
621: Member Screenshots
622: Tell a Friend
623: Community Forums
624: Member Screenshots
625: Photo Gallery
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Statistics
631: Community Forums
632: Photo Gallery
633: Community Forums
634: Photo Gallery
635: Community Forums
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Community Forums
640: Home
641: News Archive
642: Community Forums
643: Downloads
644: Community Forums
645: News Archive
646: Home
647: Photo Gallery
648: Community Forums
649: Photo Gallery
650: Downloads
651: Community Forums
652: News Archive
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Member Screenshots
656: Member Screenshots
657: News
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Photo Gallery
662: Member Screenshots
663: Downloads
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Photo Gallery
668: Your Account
669: Member Screenshots
670: News Archive
671: News Archive
672: Member Screenshots
673: Community Forums
674: News Archive
675: Community Forums
676: Home
677: Member Screenshots
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Member Screenshots
682: Member Screenshots
683: News Archive
684: Home
685: News Archive
686: Member Screenshots
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Home
690: Downloads
691: Photo Gallery
692: Treasury
693: Photo Gallery
694: Member Screenshots
695: Downloads
696: News Archive
697: Member Screenshots
698: News Archive
699: Member Screenshots
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: Downloads
703: Statistics
704: Member Screenshots
705: Downloads
706: Home
707: Member Screenshots
708: Member Screenshots
709: Member Screenshots
710: News Archive
711: Community Forums
712: Member Screenshots
713: Member Screenshots
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Member Screenshots
717: Member Screenshots
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Member Screenshots
724: Photo Gallery
725: Community Forums
726: Community Forums
727: Downloads
728: Member Screenshots
729: Community Forums
730: News Archive
731: Member Screenshots
732: Member Screenshots
733: Member Screenshots
734: Community Forums
735: Home
736: Member Screenshots
737: News Archive
738: Home
739: Member Screenshots
740: Downloads
741: Member Screenshots
742: Community Forums
743: Member Screenshots
744: Member Screenshots
745: Community Forums
746: Your Account
747: Downloads
748: Member Screenshots
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Home
752: Community Forums
753: Home
754: Downloads
755: Member Screenshots
756: Downloads
757: Home
758: Member Screenshots
759: Home
760: Photo Gallery
761: Community Forums
762: Member Screenshots
763: Home
764: Community Forums
765: Member Screenshots
766: Home
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Community Forums
772: News Archive
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Photo Gallery
776: Member Screenshots
777: Member Screenshots
778: Community Forums
779: Home
780: Member Screenshots
781: Community Forums
782: Community Forums
783: Community Forums
784: Statistics
785: Home
786: Member Screenshots
787: Community Forums
788: Community Forums
789: Home
790: Downloads
791: Member Screenshots
792: Member Screenshots
793: Member Screenshots
794: Community Forums
795: Community Forums
796: Community Forums
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: News Archive
801: Community Forums
802: Community Forums
803: News Archive
804: Home
805: Community Forums
806: Member Screenshots
807: Downloads
808: Community Forums
809: Member Screenshots
810: Photo Gallery
811: Member Screenshots
812: Photo Gallery
813: Community Forums
814: Member Screenshots
815: Photo Gallery
816: Community Forums
817: Community Forums
818: Home
819: Community Forums
820: Home
821: Downloads
822: Community Forums
823: Community Forums
824: Home
825: Member Screenshots
826: Community Forums
827: Community Forums
828: Member Screenshots
829: Home
830: Photo Gallery
831: Community Forums
832: Photo Gallery
833: Community Forums
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Home
837: News Archive
838: Community Forums
839: Community Forums
840: Home
841: Home
842: Community Forums
843: Member Screenshots
844: Home
845: Downloads
846: Photo Gallery
847: Community Forums
848: Home
849: Community Forums
850: News Archive
851: Home
852: Community Forums
853: Community Forums
854: Community Forums
855: Home
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: News Archive
859: Home
860: Community Forums
861: Community Forums
862: Community Forums
863: Community Forums
864: News
865: Community Forums
866: Photo Gallery
867: Photo Gallery
868: LinkToUs
869: Community Forums
870: Community Forums
871: Downloads
872: Community Forums
873: Home
874: Community Forums
875: Community Forums
876: Member Screenshots
877: Member Screenshots
878: Photo Gallery
879: Home
880: Community Forums
881: Contact
882: Home
883: LinkToUs
884: Downloads
885: Downloads
886: Community Forums
887: Community Forums
888: Home
889: Community Forums
890: Community Forums
891: Community Forums
892: Member Screenshots
893: Home
894: Home
895: Community Forums
896: Member Screenshots
897: Community Forums
898: Community Forums
899: Member Screenshots
900: Home
901: Community Forums
902: Community Forums
903: Photo Gallery
904: Community Forums
905: Downloads
906: Community Forums
907: Downloads
908: Community Forums
909: Downloads
910: Community Forums
911: News Archive
912: News Archive
913: Member Screenshots
914: News Archive
915: Community Forums
916: Community Forums
917: Member Screenshots
918: Community Forums
919: Home
920: Photo Gallery
921: Member Screenshots
922: Community Forums
923: Community Forums
924: Community Forums
925: Home
926: Community Forums
927: Community Forums
928: Community Forums
929: Member Screenshots
930: Community Forums
931: Downloads
932: Member Screenshots
933: Home
934: Community Forums
935: News Archive
936: Tell a Friend
937: Community Forums
938: Community Forums
939: Downloads
940: Home
941: Community Forums
942: Member Screenshots
943: Member Screenshots
944: Community Forums
945: Member Screenshots
946: Community Forums
947: Photo Gallery
948: Home
949: Community Forums
950: Home
951: Home
952: Community Forums
953: Community Forums
954: Home
955: Photo Gallery
956: Home
957: Community Forums
958: News Archive
959: Community Forums
960: Community Forums
961: Community Forums
962: Community Forums
963: Photo Gallery
964: Member Screenshots
965: Member Screenshots
966: Photo Gallery
967: Downloads
968: Photo Gallery
969: Downloads
970: Community Forums
971: Community Forums
972: Member Screenshots
973: Member Screenshots
974: Member Screenshots
975: Community Forums
976: Downloads
977: News Archive
978: News Archive
979: Community Forums
980: Community Forums
981: Home
982: News Archive
983: Photo Gallery
984: Downloads
985: Photo Gallery
986: Community Forums
987: Member Screenshots
988: Community Forums
989: Home
990: Member Screenshots
991: Community Forums
992: News Archive
993: Community Forums
994: Community Forums
995: Community Forums
996: Community Forums
997: Community Forums
998: News
999: Home
1000: Downloads
1001: Community Forums
1002: Member Screenshots
1003: Community Forums
1004: Community Forums
1005: Community Forums
1006: News
1007: Photo Gallery
1008: Photo Gallery
1009: Downloads
1010: Community Forums
1011: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tiger I – pathetic reliability?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

This was posted on a forum on BoardGameGeek (I have the quote below so you do not have to use the link - for some reason BGG web pages can take a long time to download).

Geek List: wargames worth pre-ordering

The game’s designer gives some history of one of the units:

BTW, a little history of that counter....

That counter is schwere Panzer-Kompanie Hummel (K.St.N. 1176(f.g)) and was equipped with 14 PzKpfw VI Tiger Is...

It was formed in July 1944 at the Pz.Ers.Abt.500 in Paderborn, Germany as an "Alarmeinheit". After recovering from wounds in Italy, Hauptmann Hans Hummel was placed in command. Hummel selected his subcommanders available at PzErsAbt 500 from the officers present he knew from fighting in Italy with Pz.Abt 504.

His unit was alerted at around 12:30am on September 18th and was ordered to report to the Arnhem area. The unit arrived at Bocholt station on the morning of the 19th.

With the rail line blocked from allied air interdiction and other traffic proceeding in both directions, and with no tank transporters available, Hummel was ordered to proceed the 80 kms with the Tigers under their own power.

Tigers, as many of you might know, are not the most reliable of tanks under heavy use and all but 2 broke down during the trip. The two lucky tanks to make the trip without braking down were commanded by Leutnant Knaack and Feldwebel Barneki. They arrived around nightfall of the 19th at the Arnhem bridge perimeter.

The entire unit was not fully formed until the 24th - sans 3 Tigers.


Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?

What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?

What about 14 AFVs with which you have personal experience (including post WWII)?

I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.

Any comments, knowledge and experience greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The Tiger got a bad reputation (mechanically) at Kursk because they were deployed without first working all of the bugs out of them. Additionally, in wintery muddy weather, the mud would freeze between the road wheels overnight and immobilize the tank.

It also suffered from poor fuel consumption. I do not know the range of the tank off hand, but I believe it was less than 100 miles.

The Sherman was a mechanically sound vehicle and a 50 mile trip would have been easy to accomplish. The Sherman came with about four different engine types and fuel efficiency and reliability depended on which engine was being used.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
PattonCurator
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Agree about the Shermans - very reliable - probably 13 of the 14 would make the 50 mile trip (and the 14th would probably make it late after the crew repaired it. The T34 also has the same rugged reliability.

Charles
Back to top
View user's profile
Dubliner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

nt


Last edited by Dubliner on Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- lehr
Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?


The Tiger was a heavy and fairly complicated vehicle which needed a lot of maintenance to operate properly. IIRC the operation manuals for the Tiger states that the crew has to check a number of things on the vehicle for every 15km of road march and fix any problems encountered. So you need crews that know their mount, you need conditions that allows the crew to take care of the vehicle and of course you need spares and maintenance units to fix any problems that occur during the roadmarch. Once you start removing some of those prerequisites for keeping your Tiger happy, chances are there will be trouble.

Tigers of s.SS-PzAbt 101 travelled about 300 kilometers on the road from Northern France to Normandy in June 1944, starting out with 45 tanks on June 7th and was down to 17 operational Tigers on June 12th. Most of the reminder had broken down along the road. It is evident that once tanks start to brake down along a 300 kilometer journey, it is impossible for the maintenance company to help everyone and things will start to fall apart. I has to be said that this battalion did come under allied air attack as well, which clearly didn't help the situation any. AFAIK no Tigers were lossed to allied airpower until June 13th.
A major problem for s.SS-PzAbt 101 was that their new Tiges used the steel-rimmed wheels which were very hard on the tracks, particularily the tracks pins, when travelling on hard surfaces.

IIRC Kompanie Hummel took over their Tigers from Pz.Ers.u.Ausb.Abt 500, a training formation, so they might have been well used vehicles to begin with.

- lehr
What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?


WWII tanks were generally fragile beasts compared with modern equipment, but neither the Sherman nor the T-34 were as heavy and complex as the Tiger I. They would probably suffer a lot less from the strains of a long roadmarch and the Sherman in particular would benefit from its rubber rimmed wheels and rubber-bushed track pins.

That said, T-34s were not really known for their production quality or reliability, at least through parts of the war, so my money would be on the Sherman as the more reliable, everything else being equal.

- lehr
I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.


Indeed. But I think we have to keep in mind the day and age of these machines. In WWI, you could start with 400 tanks and in a couple of days you would have very few left in operational condition, the rest being mostly broken down or stuck rather than destroyed. That lesson was carried over to WWII which is why early war German armoured divisions had up to 350 tanks. That way they could afford to have half of them out of order and still pack a punch. That was clearly demonstrated during the Battle for France when a division could drop to 50% of its strength in a few days of operation and then raise the figure to 80% after a day or two of maintenance and repair.

My 2 ørers worth anyway

Claus B

PS: Sabot, the Tiger was first employed around Leningrad in November 1942, I think you are confusing it with the Panther, which had some serious issues during its combat debut at Kursk in 1943 (and several months after that as well, but that's a different issue).
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

I rather wonder if it was less a problem with the Tigers and more a problem with German maintenance units. You hear about American tank maintenance units doing heroic work all night long in order to get the tanks back up and running in the morning. Now that i recall, the book "Deathtraps" had some especially nasty things to say about the original Sherman radial engine. In that book I recall he broke-down what proportion of men in a Tank Battalion were involved in vehicle maintenance, and it was a grotesquely large number. By '44 Germany probably couldn't afford the manpower for an effective maintenance section.
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori. On 23 May, the company advanced across a railway embankment and engaged Allied armour, but during the crossing three Tigers were disabled, two with track problems and one with gearbox failure. The Tiger's 2.02m (6ft Sin) barrel-overhang also proved a problem, as two other Tiger tanks accidentally jammed their guns into the soil as they came down the steep-sided embankment and had to be towed clear. Eventually 13 Tigers continued the advance during which they knocked out six Sherman tanks. During this attack, however, Allied artillery damaged another Tiger which withdrew back to a German workshop. The next day Allied anti-tank fire disabled another Tiger which was blown up by its crew.

“The company was then ordered to withdraw. While five Tigers held back an Allied attack, the remaining six tanks tried to tow away the three disabled Tigers by the embankment. However, the strain caused four of the six towing Tigers to break down. The Germans then had to destroy the three disabled tanks by the embankment and use the remaining two Tigers to tow back the four that had broken down. By the time the company had withdrawn to Cori, two of its five rearguard tanks had been disabled (one by Allied fire and the other because of a gearbox fault) while one of the two towing tanks had also broken down. Hence, while the three operational rearguard Tigers continued to block the Allied advance, back at Cori the company commander could deploy just one working Tiger and six disabled ones. With the rearguard now unable to stop the Allied advance into Cori, and with recovery vehicles unable to reach the company in time, the commander ordered the destruction of the six disabled Tigers to prevent them falling into Allied hands, while his remaining four tanks withdrew north. The company had lost 12 Tigers, but only three had been disabled by Allied fire. Clearly, the Tiger's mechanical unreliability was more of a threat than Allied fire.�
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

As a career Tanker, I can only imagine the utter frustration of the crews. Knowing that they man such a powerful vehicle, but having to 'scuttle' them due to mechanical unreliability.

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- J.McGillivray
The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori.


In all fairness, this particular example is one of the worst performances of a Tiger unit and hardly typical. The unit was 3. Kompanie s.PzAbt 508 and there are at least two different accounts of what happened.

The company was caught in the middle of a major allied advance and apparently had no backup from the battalion maintenance company which had the heavy recovery vehicles. In the end, tanks with even minor damage, combat or mechanical, had to blown up or left to the enemy as the allies were advancing past the damaged vehicles. In such situations, armour losses are always high, regardless of type.

If you look at the incident, you start with three tanks breaking down on May 23rd. Two threw their tracks, which was not, to my knowledge, a common complaint with the Tiger, so it should probably not be put down to unreliability but rather accident (bad maintenance, bad driving, bad terriain or bad luck). One had transmission trouble, which is more like the kind of fault you would ascribe to mechanical deficiencies.

Then they try to recover the three broken down tanks by towing them after six other Tigers. AFAIK this procedure was actually forbidden unless there was imminent danger of the damaged tank falling into enemy hands. Tigers were not designed for such work, they had enough trouble shifting their own weight around.
Here the stories start to differ. In the Hart & Hart account, four of the towing tanks brakes down with transmission damage and one additional tank brakes down towing while two Tigers are trying to tow four other Tigers - a somewhat dubious claim, I think! In any case, this means that five Tigers broke down with transmission damage from towing.
In the report quoted by Jentz, four tanks of the six towing brakes down and then gets towed in turn by four other Tigers. These four Tigers make it, but later two of them brakes down transmission damage as well and it is tempting to assume that this had to do with the fact that they had been acting as recovery vehicles for most of the day. Another one of these four also brakes down later in the day with unspecified "technical problems".

Hart & Hart mentions another, non-towing Tiger braking down with transmission trouble later as well, which makes it two "unprovoked" transmission failures. In the Jentz account, you can argue that only one tank suffered from "unprovoked" transmission trouble while all the others broke down because of misuse.

When the allied forces neared the collection point for the damaged vehicles, the Tigers were blown up - six according to Hart & Hart, nine according to the Jentz report.

One could argue that if the company had the support from the necessary recovery vehicles, they might have lost between five and seven fewer tanks, namely those that broke down trying to recover the other losses.

During its time in Italy prior to this incident (from mid-february), the battalion managed to keep about 57% of its vehicles operational on average, with a low of 17% and a high of 93%. And it did see a fair amount of combat in the period.

Bottom line is that I think this story is more about the Tigers mechanical fragility than it unreliability. It did not stand up well to abuse, but does that make it unreliable? And of course it speaks of the problems involved in being overrun by the enemy!

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Thanks to all for your replies. It's easy to see the importance of firepower, armor and mobility, but now I have a greater appreciation for the importance of reliability and maintenance support.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dirk
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 115
Location: South Africa
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

great thread - interesting discussion .

My 2 cents - The Tiger did the job it was designed for and thus could perhaps be viewed as a success.

Only thing was that the support system for the Tiger was not implemented , IIRC from a post-graduate course in Logistics Engineering I had :

Support the design and design the support .

My humble opinion Wink

Dirk
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.

Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- mike_Duplessis
One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.


Or just doing sloppy work due to lack of training, skill, and motivation. But definately a factor - in one German plant (MAN Nürnberg), 55% of the work was made by foreign labour, non-Germans drafted as workers in the occupied countries.

- mike_Duplessis
Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.


That is really a different issue. Reliability, logistics and production concerns probably becomes a moot point if you are in the field, looking down the barrel of a bigger and badder enemy tank. On the other hand, if reliability, logistics and production does not work, you wont even have a tank, at least not at working one Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Robin Neillands in his book “The Desert Rats 7th Armoured Division 1940 – 1945� sums things up nicely as followers:

“At this point it may be necessary to explain to a section of the readership that the successful development of a new weapon is far from being the end of the story. The weapon will have a designed range of technical features and benefits, but at least half the effectiveness of any weapon in battle will depend on how it is used, manned, serviced and deployed in battle….. How a weapon is used is therefore as critical to its success as its designed technical performance.�

People who sing the praises of the German cats often talk of their performance under ideal theoretical conditions; although those conditions were seldom encountered in the field. One must take into consideration the actual conditions there the cats were used, or misused.

For example the Panthers with their excellent gun and well sloped armoured, were often thrown into reckless, rushed, poorly planned and poorly supported counter attacks, in Normandy; which exposed the weaknesses of their design.

The most important fact that one must consider is that the Germans, in spite of their Tigers and Panthers, still lost the war. In other words the big cats failed to get the job done!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum