±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 748
Total: 748
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Photo Gallery
07: Downloads
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Downloads
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Downloads
23: Photo Gallery
24: Home
25: Member Screenshots
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Downloads
33: Community Forums
34: Member Screenshots
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Member Screenshots
39: Downloads
40: Your Account
41: Home
42: News Archive
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: News Archive
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Statistics
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Photo Gallery
54: Photo Gallery
55: Home
56: News
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: News Archive
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Downloads
66: Statistics
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: News
73: Community Forums
74: News Archive
75: Community Forums
76: News Archive
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Downloads
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Home
99: Home
100: Photo Gallery
101: Photo Gallery
102: Home
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Photo Gallery
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: News
127: Community Forums
128: News Archive
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Downloads
135: Photo Gallery
136: Downloads
137: Home
138: Photo Gallery
139: Downloads
140: Community Forums
141: Downloads
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Downloads
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Supporters
160: Home
161: Member Screenshots
162: Member Screenshots
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Member Screenshots
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: News Archive
172: Home
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: News
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Downloads
186: Member Screenshots
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Member Screenshots
191: News Archive
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Member Screenshots
197: Member Screenshots
198: Member Screenshots
199: Statistics
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Home
218: News Archive
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: News Archive
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Member Screenshots
229: Member Screenshots
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: News Archive
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Photo Gallery
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: News
253: Photo Gallery
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: News Archive
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Member Screenshots
263: Member Screenshots
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Downloads
270: Member Screenshots
271: Community Forums
272: Member Screenshots
273: Photo Gallery
274: News
275: Member Screenshots
276: Photo Gallery
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Downloads
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Downloads
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Downloads
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Member Screenshots
298: News
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Member Screenshots
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Downloads
309: Downloads
310: Search
311: Member Screenshots
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Member Screenshots
317: Photo Gallery
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Home
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Member Screenshots
326: Downloads
327: Member Screenshots
328: Photo Gallery
329: Community Forums
330: News Archive
331: Member Screenshots
332: Home
333: News Archive
334: Home
335: Photo Gallery
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Member Screenshots
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: News Archive
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Statistics
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Photo Gallery
355: Photo Gallery
356: Photo Gallery
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Photo Gallery
367: Community Forums
368: Statistics
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: Downloads
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Photo Gallery
383: Tell a Friend
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: LinkToUs
389: Downloads
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: News
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Photo Gallery
413: Community Forums
414: Member Screenshots
415: Community Forums
416: Member Screenshots
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Downloads
426: Photo Gallery
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: News Archive
430: Photo Gallery
431: Photo Gallery
432: Home
433: Home
434: Member Screenshots
435: Member Screenshots
436: News
437: News Archive
438: Community Forums
439: News
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Downloads
443: Photo Gallery
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Home
450: Member Screenshots
451: Photo Gallery
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Search
456: Downloads
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: News
461: Photo Gallery
462: Downloads
463: Home
464: Member Screenshots
465: Member Screenshots
466: Community Forums
467: Photo Gallery
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Home
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Home
475: Home
476: Community Forums
477: Home
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Photo Gallery
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Home
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Photo Gallery
487: Photo Gallery
488: Member Screenshots
489: Photo Gallery
490: Community Forums
491: Photo Gallery
492: News Archive
493: Community Forums
494: Home
495: Community Forums
496: Home
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Member Screenshots
500: Community Forums
501: Member Screenshots
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Statistics
505: Photo Gallery
506: Community Forums
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Photo Gallery
512: Community Forums
513: Your Account
514: Home
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: News Archive
518: Community Forums
519: Member Screenshots
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: Community Forums
523: News Archive
524: Home
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Photo Gallery
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Photo Gallery
531: Photo Gallery
532: Community Forums
533: Downloads
534: Community Forums
535: Member Screenshots
536: Member Screenshots
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Member Screenshots
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Downloads
545: Photo Gallery
546: Community Forums
547: Photo Gallery
548: Community Forums
549: Photo Gallery
550: Home
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: News Archive
556: Member Screenshots
557: Member Screenshots
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Home
567: Home
568: Photo Gallery
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Downloads
574: News Archive
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Downloads
578: Member Screenshots
579: Member Screenshots
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: News Archive
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Photo Gallery
587: Home
588: Community Forums
589: Downloads
590: Member Screenshots
591: Home
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Home
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Member Screenshots
598: Community Forums
599: Photo Gallery
600: Community Forums
601: Photo Gallery
602: Community Forums
603: Downloads
604: Home
605: Home
606: Home
607: Member Screenshots
608: Home
609: Community Forums
610: Member Screenshots
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Member Screenshots
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Photo Gallery
621: Statistics
622: Member Screenshots
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Photo Gallery
634: Downloads
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Photo Gallery
638: Home
639: Member Screenshots
640: Community Forums
641: Statistics
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Home
649: Home
650: Community Forums
651: Downloads
652: Community Forums
653: Member Screenshots
654: Photo Gallery
655: Member Screenshots
656: Community Forums
657: Photo Gallery
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: News Archive
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Member Screenshots
667: Photo Gallery
668: Photo Gallery
669: Treasury
670: Community Forums
671: Member Screenshots
672: Community Forums
673: Downloads
674: News Archive
675: Downloads
676: Member Screenshots
677: Community Forums
678: Photo Gallery
679: Downloads
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: Member Screenshots
687: Community Forums
688: Downloads
689: Member Screenshots
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Photo Gallery
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: News Archive
701: Downloads
702: Community Forums
703: Photo Gallery
704: Member Screenshots
705: Community Forums
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Member Screenshots
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: News Archive
712: Member Screenshots
713: Photo Gallery
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: News Archive
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Member Screenshots
722: Member Screenshots
723: Statistics
724: Photo Gallery
725: Home
726: Home
727: Community Forums
728: Member Screenshots
729: Member Screenshots
730: Home
731: Photo Gallery
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Community Forums
735: Home
736: Community Forums
737: Tell a Friend
738: Member Screenshots
739: Photo Gallery
740: Downloads
741: Community Forums
742: News Archive
743: Community Forums
744: Member Screenshots
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Home
748: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Skeet
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Mon May 15, 2006 7:12 pm
Post subject: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

The Abrams carries a 120 mm non-rifled cannon. I understand the non-rifled cannon allows a shaped charge projectile to function better, but it also seems to be able to hit targets waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out there.

How's it do that?
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 3:26 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Skeet,
I can name two basic changes. Modern fire control systems that compensate for variables such as Range, Air Temp, Barometric pressure, Ammo temp, Cant, Lead, etc. coupled with ballistic solutions that can be calculated for individual type rounds within 1 meter using this data. All is done with the gunner pressing a lase button. The other is that almost all modern tank rounds are fin stabilized and do not need to be spun to stay accurate. Even the old 105mm rifled guns eventually fired primarily fin stabilzed rounds. Quality of production also reduces round to round dispersion within round types allowing longer more accurate engagements too. I guess that makes three. I can write pages of what has been done in the last 30 years to improve accuracy, but basically what modern electronics has done for automobiles pretty much applies to tanks.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 5:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

I dimmly recall in the early 80s someone (the British?) held a competition to see which gun they were going to choose for their next generation tank. They used the standard 105mm gun as a baseline for comparison, firing its APFSDS round. To everyone's horror the 105mm solidly outperformed all the modern technology 120mm contenders as far as accuracy went. It seems even with driving bands a 105mm APFSDS round would still be given a slight rotation. Apparently this was enough to turn any tendency to drift into a corkscrew path as the dart flew downrange. - I hope I'm recalling this story correctly.

Rheinmetall in particular didn't like the results of those tests. It's possible this embarrassment in trials drove much of the insane standards in modern fire controls. Everything from tube wear to weather to propellant temperature is thrown into the mix.
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

I have a dumb question.
I read somewhere how when firing the Russian 125mm gun the ballistics calculations are adjusted according to propellant temps. I also read somewhere that one flavor of Merkava or another includes temperature-controlled ammo storage to maximize performance (or more accurately, to avoid degradation). At least at one point Israeli 120mm gun ammo was quite temp-sensitive.

Here's the dumb question - What about Abrams? How do they monitor propellant temps? Is that rear turret bustle temp-controlled at all? or is it monitored by a themostat in order to automatically adjust ballistics computations? I believe for T-72s they'd simply take an air temp reading in the morning and use those calculations all day (yesterday was -8 c, today its +40 c).
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

- mike_Duplessis
....Here's the dumb question - What about Abrams? How do they monitor propellant temps? Is that rear turret bustle temp-controlled at all? or is it monitored by a themostat in order to automatically adjust ballistics computations? I believe for T-72s they'd simply take an air temp reading in the morning and use those calculations all day (yesterday was -8 c, today its +40 c).


No such thing as a dumb question....

Actually there is an ammo temp gauge in the turret. One simply input temp into FCS and the 'little hamsters in the white box' ( Shocked - Just kidding on the hamsters...) calculates the ballistic solution with all inputed info.

Ammo 'wells' seem to run much cooler than crew compartment. Ammo doors block out residual heat from turret & outside.

Many times (as am M-1, IPM-1, & M1A1 gunner) I remember temps in ammo wells running in 100-120 degree range. Ft Polk actually seemed to be the worst.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

- mike_Duplessis
I dimmly recall in the early 80s someone (the British?) held a competition to see which gun they were going to choose for their next generation tank. They used the standard 105mm gun as a baseline for comparison, firing its APFSDS round. To everyone's horror the 105mm solidly outperformed all the modern technology 120mm contenders as far as accuracy went. It seems even with driving bands a 105mm APFSDS round would still be given a slight rotation. Apparently this was enough to turn any tendency to drift into a corkscrew path as the dart flew downrange. - I hope I'm recalling this story correctly.

Rheinmetall in particular didn't like the results of those tests. It's possible this embarrassment in trials drove much of the insane standards in modern fire controls. Everything from tube wear to weather to propellant temperature is thrown into the mix.


Mike

In 1988 'we' had some serious problems with the 120mm ammo. Initially it was packaged, shipped, and delivered in wooden crates like the 105 ammo. This caused serious preformance reliability problems.

When 'we' were doing CAT 89 train up, we found that round to round dispersion was way off the scale. 'Our' goal was to hit a coke can at 1500m. With the first generation (training) Sabot, it was difficult to hit the Screening panels at 1500m with more than one round, let alone a coke can.

After 'much pain' it was finally determined that the ammo was at fault. This is about the time that the sealed 'catacomb' containers made their appearence.

Voila!!! We started screening and hitting a 12 inch 'bulls-eye' at 1500m, round after round.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 12:33 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Hey Dontos,
Yeah, there were some issues with the old M865 anyway when it first came out. With the newer PA-116 (I think that's what they're called)containers you probably got the newer M865IP (PIP) or whatever they called it then. We used to have to ID it from the older ones by the groves cut in the petals. Both had the same ID and DODIC. I think we are on our 4th or 5th connotation of the M865 now.
Mike, gotta remember that unless you are firing service ammunition results may vary. Training ammo has to be good but the other factor is cost as opposed to service rounds where money doesn't factor in that much. I can believe the 105 was more accurate during the test just because the rounds for the 120mm were not a mature of a system at that time. My experience with 105 training APDS compared to 120 training APCSDS was that the 105 seemed more accurate. I will tell you when they screened service rounds in Kuwait prior to the war (OIF) the results we most impressive, especially the shot groups. 1st UK didn't screen, they zero'd using L29 and then switched to L27 CHARM. Fired a lot more ammo but I personally believed they had a more accurate final result. They do have some impressive long range gunnery ability.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 1:04 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

PIP...thats it.

I believe it had a lot number of '88F' the only APCSDS-T that we were allowed to use.

In the days prior, (CAT89) we zeroed every different lot we got. 5 rounds. Fire 3 at 'bull', determine MPI, toggle adjust, then fire 2 confirmation rounds. No 'Fleet Zero' for us.

(I still have my zero data from May - June 89.... I'm NOT a 'pack-rat' damn it!!!) Laughing

Of course, that was 'E-ONS' ago.... Cool


_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 2:30 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Dontos,
I still think that zeroing is better than screening Smile , but of course money talks Rolling Eyes . The theory is that if all tanks were made and maintained to a equal level of quality and the ammunition was constructed within certain tolerences than one could reasonably expect the same firing results across the board. Screening just verifies that the tank and ammo meet these tolerances. It may not be the most accurate but the standard is 2 rounds within the circle of the ST-5 panel (formerly ST-4 octogon). If it can accomplish this it meets the accuracy requirements. The problem with zeroing is you can potentially hide a maintenance problem Sad . Just because you can adjust the reticle to get a bulls eye at 1500 meters doesn't mean you can do the same thing at 1000 or 2000. The FCS could be flawed and not correctly calculate the ballistic solution. All you accomplished was make it hit at 1500 meters standing still. Other factors are also mechanical. It can be very frustrating with older systems Evil or Very Mad .That's the reason why Master Gunner's look the way they do on a range. But..., if the tank is good and the ammo is good, zeroing is far more accurate Wink . All comments made are my personal opinion and do not reflect any official doctrin or procedures

Enjoy the Armor conference
Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Skeet
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 10:00 am
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

Thanks folks.

In reply to another question I made, this link was provided:

www.globalsecurity.org...m830a1.htm

That pretty much answers my question. I didn't know that that all the 120mm rounds were fin stabilized.

Interesting idea about using that round being used on helicopters. I wouldn't think you could bring a 120 mm to bear on such a target.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

HI Skeet! Hi Folks!

- Skeet

Interesting idea about using that round being used on helicopters. I wouldn't think you could bring a 120 mm to bear on such a target.


That idea has been around for bit. The MPAT round makes it work a lot better.

Sometime around 1972-73, when I was stationed at Hunter Liggett Military Reservation, the unit I was in conducted a test to see if it was possible for Soviet Tanks to engage US Cobra Attack Helicopters firing Sabot ammo. The unit had five platoons of M60A1 tanks which were fitted with a Soviet type of sight retinal. Using the Great Grand Father version of the system used now days at the NTC, it was learned that Soivet's Tanks using Sabot could not hit a moving Cobra most of the time.

After the test was over, then some one asked the question, "Can US tankers using our current FCS and Sabot, hit a Soviet gunship"? Back to range with the nomal sight retianls reinstalled. It was found that our system could nail a hovering or slowly moving helo. Last I heard of that test program was they where going someplace else to try and learn how much damage a Sabot round could do to a helicopter. I wonder if somewhere in the developement of MPAT round, those old tests had anything to do with it's design?

Some of my old history.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

I recall reading somewhere (warning, I may be remembering this all wrong) that German tanks were slated to get a 'dual-purpose' laser rangefinder for combatting helicopters. I believe the article said - and I'm really shakey on this info - that a laser reflection can give multiple range returns due to laser scatter. A standard ground combat rangefinder will, I think, discard all but the last return. This is the opposite of what you want for a helicopter which would be primary laser return followed by background clutter. So I think the article said the German rangefinders had a switch that would allow either accepting last or first laser return depending on the target type.

What this implies is a helicopter close enough to be within the APFSDS dart's flat trajectory would be dead meat, but if ballistics calculations are involved (beyond 2500m?) then hit probability may be hindered by the ground-optimized ranging equipment.

Any REAL tankers willing to help me on this?
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Abrams, 120 mm cannon accuracy?

- mike_Duplessis
I recall reading somewhere (warning, I may be remembering this all wrong) that German tanks were slated to get a 'dual-purpose' laser rangefinder for combatting helicopters. I believe the article said - and I'm really shakey on this info - that a laser reflection can give multiple range returns due to laser scatter. A standard ground combat rangefinder will, I think, discard all but the last return. This is the opposite of what you want for a helicopter which would be primary laser return followed by background clutter. So I think the article said the German rangefinders had a switch that would allow either accepting last or first laser return depending on the target type.

What this implies is a helicopter close enough to be within the APFSDS dart's flat trajectory would be dead meat, but if ballistics calculations are involved (beyond 2500m?) then hit probability may be hindered by the ground-optimized ranging equipment.

Any REAL tankers willing to help me on this?


Mike

I 'used' to be a REAL Tanker, so I'll try to take a stab at explaining this....

The Abrams LRF has dual settings for '1st return' & 'Last return'.

If lasing on a target on a hill top (or in the air) with a limited possibility of any obstructions then this means the LRF will give a range to the actual target.

Many times multiple range returns are noted due to tree limbs, grass, (etc) that are in the line of sight between the tank and the intended target. When in 'Last Return' the indexed range should be the target you are lying the reticle on.

There is a 'multiple range return' bar in the symbology of the GPS which lets the gunner know that more than one range return has been received. Its up to him to assess if the indexed range seems appropriate.

Hope this helps,
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum