±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big

Welcome Anonymous


Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 353
Total: 353
Who Is Where:
01: Community Forums
02: News Archive
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Photo Gallery
09: Photo Gallery
10: Home
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Downloads
15: Photo Gallery
16: News
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Downloads
30: Photo Gallery
31: Photo Gallery
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Downloads
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: CPGlang
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Member Screenshots
50: Photo Gallery
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Home
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: News
58: Community Forums
59: Photo Gallery
60: Photo Gallery
61: Member Screenshots
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Your Account
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Photo Gallery
71: Member Screenshots
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Member Screenshots
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Photo Gallery
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Member Screenshots
90: Your Account
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: News Archive
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Contact
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Photo Gallery
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Member Screenshots
110: News Archive
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Member Screenshots
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Member Screenshots
127: Community Forums
128: News
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: News
138: News
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Member Screenshots
157: Downloads
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: News
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Photo Gallery
179: Member Screenshots
180: Home
181: Photo Gallery
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Downloads
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Photo Gallery
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: LinkToUs
206: Photo Gallery
207: CPGlang
208: Photo Gallery
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Statistics
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Home
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Home
233: Downloads
234: Photo Gallery
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Statistics
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Downloads
248: Photo Gallery
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Member Screenshots
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Your Account
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Downloads
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: Member Screenshots
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Photo Gallery
277: Home
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Treasury
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: Photo Gallery
289: CPGlang
290: Photo Gallery
291: News Archive
292: CPGlang
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Member Screenshots
298: Downloads
299: Photo Gallery
300: Photo Gallery
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Downloads
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Photo Gallery
314: Member Screenshots
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Statistics
325: Photo Gallery
326: Photo Gallery
327: Member Screenshots
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: CPGlang
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: CPGlang
339: Photo Gallery
340: Photo Gallery
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Your Account
344: News Archive
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: News Archive
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:52 pm
Post subject: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

okay fellas, happened to catch the tail end report on the news this evening in re: an anti-RPG system or something. it was developed by the IDF, called Trophy?

do any of you who know more about this, feel that you can comment, shed more light on how this is supposed to work?

Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

Not adopted by anyone yet as it is useless in built-up areas and poses a hazard to any of the dismounts around the vehicle. It is strictly a wide-open spaces and everyone under armour system.

TRAPS is a much better system that can be used even with personnel stood beside it...



If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

JED Military Equipment
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 03, 2005
Posts: 575

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

maybe this might be intresting, i checked and its ok to link to it, www.thesop.org/index.php?id=878 i was recently discusing this with a IDF friend so the link was handy. hope it helps.

Lay me place and bake me Pie
I'm starving for me Gravy
Back to top
View user's profile
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 3:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

I believe Trophy may have seen some limited use in Lebanon last year. There's been a recent media stink about the U.S. turning its nose up to Trophy in favor of a home-grown version that's still pretty far down the road.

My own ill-informed concern with Trophy is its electronic footprint. Radars scannning for incoming rockets sounds like an opponent should be able to pick up and isolate vehicle signatures from miles away. 'Captain, I'm reading three Trophy signatures off the port bow!"
Back to top
View user's profile
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

thanks, i know i am not the only one who feels this way, the media can get my blood boiling...

oh my goodness, i cant believe i was going to use this term, the "drive-by" media, lisa meyers or whomever she was, reported on the trophy system,
presenting views and opinions that i dont feel are accurate, trying to make the govt or army out to be the bad guys and not putting the lives of the soldier first, blah, blah, blah.

this type of defense has some good pros, but too many cons at the present...
this is the first i have heard of it. sounds viable, but how useful would it really be?
seems like sci-fi, force fields around vehicles and such, seems cool

the story had mentioned something to do with an auto-loader, how did that fit into the system?

thanks for shedding some light on this for me, and for the link. i will check it out.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

Army Committed to Force Protection, Not False Security
By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Sept. 8, 2006 – Army leaders are committed to ensuring soldiers have the best force-protection capability possible, but also want to avoid giving soldiers a false sense of security, service officials said here today.

Maj. Gen. Jeffrey A, Sorenson, the Army’s deputy for acquisition and systems management, took exception to an NBC News report that said the Army is not buying an Israeli system, called Trophy, that could protect soldiers and their vehicles from rocket-propelled grenades. The report alleges the Army manipulated information in favor of a competing Raytheon system, called Quick Kill.

Both the Israeli and Raytheon systems are designed to fire missiles that intercept RPGs in flight. The Israeli system may be six months ahead of the Raytheon system, but it has limitations. The NBC report made it sound as if the Army refused to field a perfectly fine combat system that would save lives, officials said.

Sorenson said they system is not a “produceable item.� The Israelis have been working on the Trophy system for 10 or 11 years, Sorenson said. “If this thing was ready to go, my question would be, why wasn’t it on the particular tanks that went into Lebanon?� he said. No Israeli Merkava tanks carried the Trophy system, he said.

Other problems include the fact that the system right now has no reloading capability. Once it fires, that side of the vehicle is vulnerable. Which brings up another shortcoming: the Trophy can only be mounted to protect one axis. This means officials would have to mount multiple missile systems on every vehicle. The Quick Kill missile has 360-degree capability and a reload capability.

Another worry is collateral damage, he said. “In a tight urban area, the Trophy system may take out the RPG, but we may kill 20 people in the process,� Sorenson said. “That is a concern we have that we haven’t fully evaluated.�

The general said there also is confusion on the contract award. “It was awarded by the lead system integrator and the government team,� Sorenson said. “It was not done by Raytheon. There was confusion in the report that the Army was cooking the books and which was absolutely false, blatantly false.�

Sorenson said the Army has standards of performance for force-protection capabilities. “These have not only been dictated by lessons learned in theater, but all the work we have done heretofore on all the systems prior to this,� he said. “We will not put anything out there that has not demonstrated that it is capable of doing what it is alleged to do.�

The bottom line is that if a system “does not have the ‘Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval’ it does not go forward,� Sorenson said.

The general said that every soldier lost is a tragedy. But, of the more than 1,400 soldiers killed in Iraq, most died from improvised explosive devices. A total of 148 soldiers have been lost due to an RPG or an RPG and other weapons. Sixty-three soldiers died by RPG only, he said. Broken down further, 10 soldiers died as a result of an RPG hit to a U.S. combat system -- an Abrams tank, Bradley fighting vehicle, Stryker wheeled vehicle or M-113 armored personnel carrier.

“The reason that is so low is that those combat systems already have good force-protection systems applied,� Sorenson said. There are reactive armor tiles on the Bradley. Officials added slat-armor protection to the Stryker, and all combat vehicles have protection built into them, officials said.
Back to top
View user's profile
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

Some describe the debate as a contest between a high-tech one-shot reactive system that may cost more than the vehicle itself vs a cheap steel cage with bars spaced 3 inches apart. of course a cheap steel cage doesn't boost Raytheon profit margin.

D'oh! I almost forgot to mention. Our gracious host 'AFV News' had a brief article on Trophy in its journal a short while ago. Is your magazine subscription up-to-date? Wink
Back to top
View user's profile
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

Ah! By sheer coincidence I got home from work early last night, just in time to see an NBC news report pretty darned critical of Pentagon procurement in regards to Trophy. Not that they didn't field it, more that they did everything possible to keep from even looking at it! So the old story's still got legs.
Back to top
View user's profile
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

I saw the story on NBC also. It was a pretty pointed and damning piece. Their focus was 'Army Does everything it can to keep from testing a system which may save soldiers lives to protect the FCS program which their (The Armys) favored contractor is developing' Including the old 'The Army refused our requests for interviews' which NEVER plays well.

Also nothing about cost or potential danger to dismounts (Which is the big problem I've always felt was there with active/reactive systems)

Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Trophy-- anit-RPG technology?

Nobody's mentioned Humvee Protection,
Just curious if it would apply to them, since the majority of the traffic is of those type of vehicles. Pardon my ignorance but can it be used with a crewmember exposed in an open cupola??? If not the value would be even less. I will say that protective upgrades are happening all the time and as soon as you get used to one another comes out even better. IED's are the most common and biggest killer. RPG's can mess your day up, but at least there's a person you can kill if he tries to engage you. Can't fight an IED.
Did not see the NBC program, kinda glad I don't have regular access to it based on what everyone has said. Let's hope this story doesn't end up prompting some Congressman to start another uneccesary investigation that will either buy us a system we don't really need and siphon off funds needed elsewhere (Counter IED) or prevent the fielding of one in a timely manner that does work.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum