±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: sercrets
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 275
Total: 275
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: CPGlang
24: Home
25: CPGlang
26: Photo Gallery
27: Home
28: Home
29: CPGlang
30: Photo Gallery
31: Home
32: Home
33: CPGlang
34: CPGlang
35: Home
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: News
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Your Account
49: News Archive
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Home
54: CPGlang
55: Home
56: Photo Gallery
57: Home
58: Home
59: Photo Gallery
60: CPGlang
61: CPGlang
62: Home
63: News Archive
64: Home
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: CPGlang
70: News Archive
71: CPGlang
72: Photo Gallery
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Photo Gallery
86: Home
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Community Forums
91: CPGlang
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: CPGlang
95: Home
96: Photo Gallery
97: Home
98: CPGlang
99: CPGlang
100: Photo Gallery
101: CPGlang
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: CPGlang
108: Home
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: CPGlang
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Home
122: CPGlang
123: Community Forums
124: News
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Home
130: News
131: CPGlang
132: Photo Gallery
133: Home
134: News
135: Community Forums
136: News
137: CPGlang
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: Photo Gallery
141: CPGlang
142: Photo Gallery
143: Photo Gallery
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: CPGlang
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: CPGlang
153: Photo Gallery
154: Home
155: Member Screenshots
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Member Screenshots
159: Home
160: Home
161: News Archive
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: CPGlang
173: Your Account
174: Photo Gallery
175: Home
176: Home
177: Photo Gallery
178: CPGlang
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Photo Gallery
186: Home
187: Photo Gallery
188: News Archive
189: Home
190: Photo Gallery
191: Home
192: Home
193: News Archive
194: Photo Gallery
195: Photo Gallery
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Member Screenshots
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: News Archive
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Downloads
211: Home
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Photo Gallery
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: CPGlang
221: Member Screenshots
222: Photo Gallery
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Photo Gallery
228: Photo Gallery
229: CPGlang
230: News Archive
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: CPGlang
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Photo Gallery
239: Home
240: CPGlang
241: Photo Gallery
242: Photo Gallery
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Photo Gallery
246: Home
247: Home
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Member Screenshots
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Home
261: Photo Gallery
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Home
270: Photo Gallery
271: Photo Gallery
272: Photo Gallery
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Castle Archdale Project. :: Archived
Discussions about the FS2004 game.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:11 pm
Post subject: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi All, I have been asked by Adrian to recreate the world war 2 flying boat base at Castle Archdale in Fermanagh, N.I. as an add-on for Flightsim 2004.
It will be only my second project and I would like to know if anyone has any knowledge, photos, maps, etc. which they would be willing to provide via e-mail to help me in this quest.
Thanks for your time
Regards
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Progress so far on the Castle Archdale project.
Built the invisible runway and taxiways for the AI Catalinas on Lough Erne (Lake) and I'm now about to start on the shore base.
Regards
Dave


Taxiing to the Lake1

Taxiing to the Lake2

Taking Off

On Approach

Moored At Castle Archdale

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Shadow_Bshwackr
Janitor

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 7015
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Thank you Dave and keep us posted! I for one am very interested...
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Bushwacker, thanks, nice to know, makes it all worthwhile.
Cheers
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

in case off , still available as guinnee piglet here Dave Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Fled,
sorry it's in the Sunderland airport post. I sent you a reply with my Afcad attached and some piccies,

Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

no worries m8!

I'll jump overthere Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Dave are there any AI Catalinas in RAF Coastal Command colours available? Superb progress todate well done!

And just for reference here is a photo of Castle Archdale which appeared in the other thread, though it is from a later date than the PBY Catalina mission that spotted the Bismarck.

www.junobeach.org/f/4/...p.htm#null

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, I'll look out for some RAF Coastal Command.
You already sent me the picture, mostly nissen huts and trees from which I can make out. I'll have a go.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

maps.google.com/maps?f...006748&t=k

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Quote

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

UnQuote

I am looking at the black and white photo of the Sunderlands at Castle Archdale and it seems to match up pretty well, with the Google satellite shot, I would presume the marina at left is a modern addition. There presumably would not have been much post war development of this base as a military base, since flyingboats as maratime ASW and maratime patrol aircraft would be becoming obsolete by 1945, so the hardstandings and roadways are presumably pretty much now as then. The airfield would have required a launch to act as tender to the flyingboats but my guess is that it operated out of the inserted slipway

maps.google.com/maps?f...7,0.005026

that appears just [ immediately ] to the left of the slip for the flying boats to enter the water and which appears now to have a boat house over the part which would be over water and a desent slope to enter the water just before the boat house.

Hope that helps

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This a FS2004 Tirpitz which was the sistership to the Bismarck

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=23

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This is a FS2004 HMS Hood sunk by the Bismarck during the Battle of the Denmark Strait.

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=22

At approximately 05.30 on Saturday 24 May, as the German squadron was about to leave the Denmark Strait, Prinz Eugen's hydrophones detected the presence of two additional ships some distance to port. By 05.45 both were in sight, although the German fleet had not yet identified the enemy force. In reality, it was a British battle-group comprising the new battleship Prince of Wales, and the battlecruiser Hood, under the command of Rear Admiral Lancelot Holland. Prince of Wales had only recently been completed and was still being worked up (indeed, she sailed to meet Bismarck with civilian technicians still on board completing her fitting-out). Hood had been built as a fast battlecruiser and modified to give her protection more like a battleship, but still had relatively weak deck armour. That other British ships had detected them was not unexpected by the Germans but that they would turn out to be capital ships was a nasty surprise.

At 05.49 Holland ordered fire to be concentrated on the leading German ship, Prinz Eugen, believing it to be Bismarck. Fortunately for the British, the captain of Prince of Wales was soon to realise the error and changed his target. Holland amended his order on the correct ship to be engaged but this did not reach Hood's gunnery control before the first salvo. Hood fired first at 05.52, in daylight, followed very soon afterwards by Prince of Wales. The range to the German ships was c. 12.5 miles.

More than two minutes went by without a reply from the Germans, before Captain Lindemann ordered fire to be returned on the lead British ship. This was the Hood, which the Germans had identified only when the British squadron made a turn towards them at 05.55. This manoeuvre was undertaken, it appears, in an attempt to place themselves in the "zone of immunity". Closer in, the Hood would be less vulnerable to plunging fire and the advantage of superior German gunnery control would be lessened. The disadvantage was that, during the dash, eight of the eighteen British heavy guns could not be brought to bear.

Both Bismarck and Prinz Eugen opened fire on the Hood, at a range of 11 miles. The early gunfire from the German ships was very accurate and within two minutes the Hood had been hit by an 8? shell from Prinz Eugen. It struck the British ship near the mainmast and caused a huge fire which the Hood's crew tried to bring under control. However, Bismarck had also been hit by the Prince of Wales, causing a fuel leak from the forward tanks; therefore Lütjens ordered his cruiser to switch its guns towards the Prince of Wales, which his own secondary guns were now targeting. At 06.00 Hood, which was about to turn to port to bring her full weight of armament to bear on Bismarck, was hit amidships by at least one shell from Bismarck at a distance of under 9 miles. Very shortly afterwards observers on both sides saw a huge jet of flame race skywards, followed by a rumbling explosion that split the huge ship in two. Splinters rained down on Prince of Wales, half a mile away. The Hood's stern rose and sank shortly before the bow, all within three minutes. Admiral Holland and 1,415 crewmen went down with the ship. Only three men (Ted Briggs, Bob Tilburn and Bill Dundas) survived this disaster and were rescued about two hours after the sinking by the destroyer HMS Electra. The British Admiralty later concluded that the most likely explanation for the loss of the Hood was a penetration of her magazines by a single 15? shell from Bismarck, causing the subsequent catastrophic explosion. Recent research by submersible craft suggests that the initial explosion was in the aft 4? magazine and that it spread to the forward 15? magazines via the ammunition trunks.

Prince of Wales had to turn towards the German fleet to avoid hitting the wreckage left by the flagship and was hit hard a number of times, losing several crew on the compass platform. Still, her own gunfire had caused damage to the Bismarck. The British battleship turned away, laying smoke, her aft turret firing briefly under local control. She had received 7 hits (3 of them from Prinz Eugen) and mechanical failures had left her with all but one of her main guns out of action. Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were forced into emergency manoeuvres when they believed they had detected the sounds of torpedoes and then by the appearance of a Sunderland flying-boat. Although Captain Lindemann wanted to chase Prince of Wales and "finish her off", Admiral Lütjens ignored his suggestions since delay risked the possibility of encountering more warships and prejudiced his main task of convoy destruction. Incredibly, in a battle lasting less than 20 minutes Bismarck, with her impressive consort punching far above her weight, had destroyed one capital ship and forced another to turn away, something almost unknown in the Royal Navy and which was to cause the Admiralty to hold a special board of inquiry.

Faulty intelligence had led the Germans to believe that Prince of Wales was not yet ready for action, therefore reports from Bismarck referred to her as King George V, the first of that class, which had been active for some months.

Despite the jubilation onboard the Bismarck, the battleship was not safe. The British knew her position; her forward radar was out of action (a consequence of the skirmish with the British cruisers the previous day); and she had received three hits, one of which caused water to leak into and contaminate fuel oil in storage. From then on, she had to reduce speed to a maximum of 20 knots to conserve fuel. Lütjens eventually decided that he would have to head for the French coast (the dry-dock in St Nazaire) for repairs. The British continued to shadow her, the Prince of Wales having rendezvoused with Norfolk and Suffolk. At one stage Bismarck rounded briefly on her pursuers, in order to give Prinz Eugen the opportunity to detach and escape with the message: "Good hunting".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...p_Bismarck

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, wow, thanks for all that Smile
I believe there was E-boats there as I've seen pictures of E-boat pens?
And in the black and white photo of the two cats over Lough Erne on the front of the book you can make out cats and smaller boat-like objects on the lake.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.