±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 341
Total: 341
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: News
06: Member Screenshots
07: News Archive
08: Home
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: News Archive
21: Community Forums
22: News
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Member Screenshots
41: News Archive
42: Community Forums
43: News
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: News Archive
49: Home
50: News
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Home
56: Home
57: Home
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: Home
65: Home
66: Statistics
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Home
74: Downloads
75: Member Screenshots
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: News Archive
80: Home
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Home
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Downloads
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: News Archive
100: Community Forums
101: Treasury
102: Home
103: Member Screenshots
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: News
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Downloads
113: Community Forums
114: Member Screenshots
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Member Screenshots
118: News
119: Home
120: News Archive
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Photo Gallery
126: News
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: News Archive
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Member Screenshots
143: Your Account
144: Member Screenshots
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Search
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: News Archive
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Member Screenshots
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: News Archive
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Member Screenshots
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Community Forums
175: News Archive
176: Downloads
177: Home
178: Photo Gallery
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Downloads
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: News Archive
188: Home
189: Home
190: Photo Gallery
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Your Account
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Member Screenshots
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Member Screenshots
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Member Screenshots
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Member Screenshots
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Downloads
227: Community Forums
228: News Archive
229: Community Forums
230: News Archive
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: News Archive
238: News Archive
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: Community Forums
244: Downloads
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Downloads
253: Community Forums
254: Statistics
255: Community Forums
256: Downloads
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Member Screenshots
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Member Screenshots
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Downloads
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: News Archive
284: Member Screenshots
285: Member Screenshots
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: News Archive
289: Community Forums
290: Treasury
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Member Screenshots
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Downloads
298: News Archive
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Downloads
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Member Screenshots
315: Member Screenshots
316: Photo Gallery
317: Home
318: Member Screenshots
319: News Archive
320: Home
321: Downloads
322: Community Forums
323: Member Screenshots
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: Member Screenshots
328: Home
329: Home
330: Photo Gallery
331: Community Forums
332: Member Screenshots
333: Member Screenshots
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Floatation Kit?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

Yet again, I'm surprised no one ever tested this with an Abrams...

Although I wonder if there might be some sort of difference fording with a turbine vice a diesel?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

Interesting pics, AJ...slick 60 with 'dozer blade and M60A1, so totally different vehicles. Also interesting is that Bell 47 helicopter (forget Army nomenclature) and the lack of any Armor & Engineer Board markings on the M60A1. These pics are before my time at the Board, but lack of markings are mysterious (they had distinctive markings going back to well before WWII). No "test operation", no TEC-EBD. This is a curious series of pictures as there is no indication of what unit is conducting the operation.
I have a suspicion that it might be the Armor School, but even they should have markings....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Yet again, I'm surprised no one ever tested this with an Abrams...

Although I wonder if there might be some sort of difference fording with a turbine vice a diesel?

Neil


Intake/exhaust issues, maybe? Or no perceived need?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

- Doug_Kibbey
- Neil_Baumgardner
Yet again, I'm surprised no one ever tested this with an Abrams...

Although I wonder if there might be some sort of difference fording with a turbine vice a diesel?

Neil


Intake/exhaust issues, maybe? Or no perceived need?


....ISSUES!!! Thats an understatement.
I may be incorrect, but I believe that the fording device was first assembled/used with the Marine Corps M1A1HC's. They had a definite need for beach assaults.

I'd had never seen of even heard of such a thing, until the early 90's when we drew M1A1HC's. Other than the 'turret pump seal', which only inflated to seal the turret ring.

As for 'deliberate fording experiences', the worst that comes to mind was in 1991. Try crossing the Imjim River (Korea) at a ford site, but being a night move the lead vehicle crossed at an unapproved (and untested) location. I was the 5th tank in the Company column, screaming on the FM, of the error.

Getting swamped in the midst of the Imjim river, at 0200 hrs in January, with the tank acting initially as an icebreaker and having 'cross current Ice flow' getting lodged in the side turret bustle rack, the turret ring, and on the hull, Shocked .....NOT MY IDEA OF A FUN TIME.

Luckily we all made it, but talk about serious pucker factor!!! (... my driver learned why he should ALWAYS torque the vision block locking nuts. Freezing water pouring into your lap, while you are literally submerged, is a bad thing!! Mr. Green )

Interesting subject for the R&D period. Guess I need to do some indepth reading.

Anyone else have any information?

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:10 am
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

Deep Fording, what a concept,

Brought on by the old "The Soviets can deep ford/swim, so we have to" mentality. Killed the T-95 and also made an unrealistic requirement for the Bradley, which later was dropped.

AJ2, those pictures are quite interesting, but I can't help but wonder if the M60A1 is from a later time period/exercise. The M60 is either a PV or one of the initial batch made. It still has the "Crouse-Hinds" searchlight stowage mount and has not been upgraded to IR with the VSS-1 system.

BTW, after seeing Doug's pictures of fording at Knox a few months ago I did a little research. Those are actually called "Under Water Fording Kits" and were made specifically for the Army. The "Deep Ford Kit" that I was familiar with is basically the same the Marines used for shore landing. The only difference was the exhaust stack, which the Army did not use. Supposedly it took 8 hours to prep a tank for it's use (the underwater kit), but could be reduced to half and hour with some permanent changes to a tank, bilge pump installation being one.

The M60A1 in the picture (9B5553) was one of the initial batch of production M60A1's sent to Fort Knox for evaluation and testing. I've seen other pictures of her sporting the M9 Dozer kit and other interesting stuff. Across the front slope to the right she was marked with a yellow bridge classification marker and "TEST OPERATION" centered in what looks like 4" white block letters. No other markings other than some un-identifiable stuff on the front fender braces.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:19 am
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

Don,

Man, river crossing in Korea, what fun.

With the introduction of the M1 to Korea crossing rivers got to be a much greater challenge. My first tour and Don’s time there the road networks were pretty crude, so most of our main avenues of movement involved the river beds during the winter/dry season. The Imjin was another story. We had to have the engineers prep the river bed with gravel/spoil so we wouldn't swamp the intakes with water. SOP usually was to mark the left and right limits with engineer stakes and topped with a chem-lite, IR if possible or at least facing us inside the "U" to maintain light discipline. I remember during Team Spirit '91 gingerly entering rivers only to back up quickly when the water started to enter our intakes. Very frustrating. The DIV CAV at that time were still using M60A3's. They had no trouble crossing areas that would stop us cold. The TM's state the M1 and M60 series have about the same shallow ford capability, which technically is true, but in reality the M60 can ford much more easily beyond shallow ford restrictions because the crew can have the tank draw air for the engine through the turret. Just inflate the turret seal and turn off the air cleaner blowers and plug the elbows. In the case of the CAV they had the newer VEDES setup which eliminated the need for elbow plugs.

The turbine can be a much greater challenge to fording. The need for high volumes of air and the greater susceptibility to dirt are just a few. Unlike the M60 there are no provisions to draw air from the turret, so a special air intake had to be made. That’s why when you see M1's coming ashore they have two stacks instead of the single rear mount. Other unique considerations are the Pre-Cleaner scavenge pump and oil cooler fans, both of which have to be disabled when submerged. Any M1 tanker that has experienced water in the intake plenum knows of the familiar sonic boom sound the engine gives off when ingesting water, with the instant loss of power. It doesn’t take much either. Enough water and the engine self-destructs. Once the air filters get wet you loose a lot of power and they are pretty much ruined, needing replacement, since the dust turns into a concrete like substance when dry. All in all I’m very glad the Army did not have/ require their M1's deep ford.

Like Don said, until the USMC got the M1's, we never heard of such a thing. The M1/105 TM only addresses fording "Without Kit" up to 4 feet and "With Kit" a notation of "Kit not yet available".

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
armyjunk2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
Posts: 1416

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

another swimmer
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

Gotta be a test swim,

Notice she's loaded with ammo boxes for weight doesn't even have the Gunner's periscope installed yet. In fact the gun mantel doesn't even look right.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

- Joe_D
Gotta be a test swim,

Notice she's loaded with ammo boxes for weight doesn't even have the Gunner's periscope installed yet. In fact the gun mantel doesn't even look right.

Joe D


No missile-guidance transmitter box.

Interesting photo. I was, among other things like being a crewman, a safety and salvage SCUBA diver for the Armor Board. We never, ever, conducted a swimex or fordex in test operations with more than two people on board the vehicle (driver and TC), as it would just complicate rescue efforts if worst happened (the prospect of entering the water with moving tracks is a daunting one, trust me). Is that not somebody in loader's hatch?

Also, if trying to simulate weight and balance, why is there no .50 mounted...not even a mockup? (We had 'em, for weight and visual simulation).

I'm going to puzzle over this photo for a while....


Last edited by Doug_Kibbey on Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:11 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:09 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

It's a prototype similar to the one at the Patton Museum. Note the cupola is offset from the turret? Production versions weren't like that.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Floatation Kit?

- MarkHolloway
It's a prototype similar to the one at the Patton Museum. Note the cupola is offset from the turret? Production versions weren't like that.


Good point. I think it's a glorified "photo-op" to demonstrate "amphibiosity".
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum