±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 271
Total: 271
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Member Screenshots
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: News Archive
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: News Archive
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: News Archive
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: Member Screenshots
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Downloads
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Member Screenshots
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Member Screenshots
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Home
71: Home
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Member Screenshots
78: News
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: News
85: Member Screenshots
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Member Screenshots
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Downloads
93: News Archive
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Home
109: News
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Downloads
114: Home
115: Downloads
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Home
122: Downloads
123: Statistics
124: Community Forums
125: Downloads
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Home
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Downloads
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Member Screenshots
143: News
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Photo Gallery
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Home
166: News Archive
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Home
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Search
181: Home
182: Downloads
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Statistics
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Downloads
191: Downloads
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: News Archive
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Member Screenshots
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Photo Gallery
209: LinkToUs
210: Community Forums
211: Your Account
212: Community Forums
213: Member Screenshots
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: News Archive
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Member Screenshots
234: Home
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Your Account
238: News
239: Community Forums
240: Statistics
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Member Screenshots
256: Home
257: Downloads
258: Statistics
259: Home
260: Downloads
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Your Account
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
AFVS on Mythbusters
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:14 am
Post subject: AFVS on Mythbusters

I just watched a segment of Mythbusters that caught my attention with an M551 in the teaser at the beginning.

The myth they were 'busting' was that two phone books with the pages interlaced could not be pulled apart. They atrted with one person pulling on each book then stepped up to 5 people on each side. The books would not pull apart. They then took two cars (generic frontwheel drive sedans) and ended up spinning the tires. This attempt was done on dirt.

So they went to Jacque Littlefields place. They had a short but nice photo shoot inside and outside (I didn't realize his buildings were set up as a U shape, I really want to get out there)

They hooked the books up to an M551 and an M113 FSV (The Aussie version with a Saladin turret) using the trailer pintle (I wondered if they should have used the tow hooks) and pulled. This was done on a paved lot.

I'll hold off till tomorrow to tell what happens. I will say that they upgraded the rig that held the rope/cable to the phone books from plywood and nylon rope to heavy metal plates and chains.

Anyone else see this? It was actually a pretty straight forward attempt to bust a myth and I think done in a pretty straight forward manner (I've faulted their methodology on some in the last few years but I think they did this one right)

And for anyone who didn't see it what do you think happened?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DanFong
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:19 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

I saw the show last night too. The one thing I can fault them on in their experiments is that they changed the conditions from the cars to the AFV's. The cars tried to pull while on bare ground and the AFV's pulled from a concrete pad. I wonder if the cars could have done the job if they were on concrete? They should have put the AFV's on bare ground just to be consistant.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:41 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

It depends. Were they trying to see if they could pull the books apart or show that tracked vehicles could do what cars could not? The substrate is really irrelevant in the former and critical in the latter.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

I am curious as to their choice of AFVs. I wonder if there was any reason to choose those particular vehicles. Did they just happen to be the two most readily available? I can see not wanting to use some of the older tanks but I could see an M60 and a Soviet T-54 or T-72 being used.

I think the choice of surface for the cars was the one weak point in the tests. putting them on dirt pretty much guarranteed early wheel spin. but I wonder if it was done on concrete if there could have been transmission damage instead of wheel spin?

I'll wait a little longer before revealing the results Rolling Eyes

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:22 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

- bsmart
I am curious as to their choice of AFVs. I wonder if there was any reason to choose those particular vehicles. Did they just happen to be the two most readily available? I can see not wanting to use some of the older tanks but I could see an M60 and a Soviet T-54 or T-72 being used:


It is my understanding that the Littlefield vehicles are tested and then the fluids are drained for storage/display. These might have been the ones that could be prepped out quickly, plus they are pretty close in visual size.

Gary
Back to top
View user's profile
toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:44 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

I'm giving one of the tours Saturday morning at the MVTF. If Jacques is there, I'll ask why they chose the M551 & M113FSV. BTW, his daughter is driving one of the vehicles used in the show.

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:17 pm
Post subject: Re: AFVS on Mythbusters

No one has made any guesses about the results of the segment so I'll finish it up. The did a quick synopsis of the weight and horsepower of each vehicle and did the obligatory photo shoots of the stars in teh hatches of the vehicles. The AFVs took a strain on the cable. There was a guage in the rig to measure the amount of force being applied. after a few moments of on screen pulling the phone books parted. The guage showed the effort was 8,000 pounds. As they commented later both cars could have been hung from the rig and it wouldn't have pulled the phonebooks apart. Earlier in the show they speculated that something other than just friction causes the large amount of force needed. These were 'City size' phgone books (I think the mentioned 800 pages). I suspect that a combination of the large contact area and the weight of the stack of pages along with the relatively rough surface of phone book paper is the reason

It was an interesting segment.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum