Skip to main Skip to content Skip to menu

Com-Central.net

`±`Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

`±`User Info-big

Welcome Anonymous

Membership:

Latest: HighestAce

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 6648

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 2482

Total: 2482

Who Is Where:

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Forum FAQ

Moderators

Tank ID 1940
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2 Next

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:52 pm Post subject: Tank ID 1940
Fort Knox _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

the_shadock
Power User

Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
looks like an M2 light tank, but I don't recognize the turret type.. P-O _________________ soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:05 am Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
I've been looking at the 'snub nose' .50 cal. What the heck is it? _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:16 am
Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940

- MarkHolloway

I've been looking at the 'snub nose' .50 cal. What the heck is it?

Definitely a .50 reciever/barrel combination, but I've never seen a snubby like that.

That cavalry plaque on the turret side looks way too ornate for a typical service vehicle. I'd guess this is some kind of sale-of-concept image for army in-house use or as a proposal from a vendor.

Somebody here is selling something. Either that, or this is some extremely vain senior officer's vehicle.

toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:30 am
Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940

- Doug_Kibbey

- MarkHolloway

I've been looking at the 'snub nose' .50 cal. What the heck is it?

Definitely a .50 reciever/barrel combination, but I've never seen a snubby like that.

That cavalry plaque on the turret side looks way too ornate for a typical service vehicle. I'd guess this is some kind of sale-of-concept image for army in-house use or as a proposal from a vendor.

Somebody here is selling something. Either that, or this is some extremely vain senior officer's vehicle.

It's actually a M1 or M1A1 Combat Car. The cavalry plaque was a standard fit during the inter-war period. Tanks belonging to the infantry had plaques with crossed rifles.

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:13 am Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
I'm wondering if that's a blank adapter barrel, IOW specifically made just for blanks. The M19 BFA wasn't around back then. Maybe I need to research some of my M2 TM's. _________________ Joe_D

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:35 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
My wild guess is that it may actually be a .30 cal machine gun. _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

JimWeb
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
- MarkHolloway My wild guess is that it may actually be a .30 cal machine gun. There goes another reputation _________________ TTFN Jim If your not a member of JED then your not serious about anything military.. ********************* www.jedsite.info JED Military Equipment *********************

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
Here's another "snub nosed 50" _________________ "TUMBLEWEED" Last edited by MarkHolloway on Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:22 pm; edited 1 time in total

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:15 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
That one looks like a .30 cal, Notice the cloth belt and the TC holding the pistol grip. Quite an unusual picture. _________________ Joe_D

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:31 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
I can't figure out the bumper number. 1st Brigade 66th Armored Division? No such thing I don'e believe. Maybe 1st Training Brigade, 66th Armor? _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:37 pm Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
You got a better/bigger image, Shoulder patches aren't subdued and mightgive a good clue. Suspect the picture was between 63-66, since she is equipped with the VSS-1 search light fittings but still has the old M28 periscope for the TC's cupola. _________________ Joe_D

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:25 am Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940
I can't figure it out. See: farm3.static.flickr.co...5f51_b.jpg _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

C_Sherman
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:52 am
Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940

Hi,

63-66 would make it under that weird TOE that was in effect for a while? Atomic Divisions, or somesuch?

I recall that they used "Battle Groups" instead of brigades, so 1BG would be 1st Battle Group...maybe?

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:38 am
Post subject: Re: Tank ID 1940

- C_Sherman

Hi,

63-66 would make it under that weird TOE that was in effect for a while? Atomic Divisions, or somesuch?

I recall that they used "Battle Groups" instead of brigades, so 1BG would be 1st Battle Group...maybe?

C

I think you are right! I got to looking around and 66th Armor was part of the Combat Arms Regimental System. 'CARS' consisted of battalions, squadrons or BATTLE GROUPS.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2

All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2 Next

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

±Recent Visitors

±User Info-big

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big