±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 429
Total: 429
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Home
20: Home
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: News
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Downloads
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Photo Gallery
60: Home
61: Home
62: Downloads
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Home
88: Supporters
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Downloads
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Contact
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Member Screenshots
108: Home
109: Home
110: Downloads
111: Home
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Home
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Home
126: Member Screenshots
127: Home
128: Member Screenshots
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Home
133: Downloads
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Home
140: Member Screenshots
141: Home
142: Home
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Member Screenshots
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Member Screenshots
167: Home
168: Home
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: News Archive
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Treasury
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Home
195: Downloads
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Photo Gallery
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Statistics
210: Home
211: Photo Gallery
212: Home
213: Home
214: News
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Downloads
225: Member Screenshots
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Downloads
230: Home
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: News
238: Home
239: Home
240: Member Screenshots
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Member Screenshots
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Home
253: Home
254: Member Screenshots
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Member Screenshots
260: Downloads
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Member Screenshots
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Statistics
277: Photo Gallery
278: Home
279: Downloads
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Your Account
291: Community Forums
292: Downloads
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Home
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: News Archive
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Member Screenshots
316: Community Forums
317: News Archive
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Photo Gallery
322: Home
323: Member Screenshots
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Home
328: Photo Gallery
329: Home
330: News Archive
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Home
338: Photo Gallery
339: Home
340: Home
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Photo Gallery
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Member Screenshots
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Home
354: Home
355: News Archive
356: Home
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Member Screenshots
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Member Screenshots
363: Home
364: Member Screenshots
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Home
369: News Archive
370: Home
371: Downloads
372: Community Forums
373: Home
374: News Archive
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Home
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Home
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Home
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Member Screenshots
393: Home
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Community Forums
409: Member Screenshots
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Member Screenshots
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Home
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Downloads
422: Home
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum