±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 302
Total: 302
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Downloads
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Downloads
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Home
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Downloads
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Downloads
33: Community Forums
34: News Archive
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Downloads
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: News Archive
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Downloads
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Downloads
53: Community Forums
54: Downloads
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Member Screenshots
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Community Forums
71: Downloads
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Downloads
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: News Archive
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Photo Gallery
91: Downloads
92: Home
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Community Forums
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: News Archive
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Member Screenshots
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Downloads
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Downloads
116: Member Screenshots
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Downloads
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Home
127: Member Screenshots
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Home
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: News Archive
147: Home
148: Downloads
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Your Account
152: Community Forums
153: News Archive
154: Member Screenshots
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Member Screenshots
160: Member Screenshots
161: News Archive
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Downloads
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: News Archive
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Member Screenshots
197: Home
198: News
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Member Screenshots
202: Downloads
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: News Archive
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: Home
216: Your Account
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Downloads
223: Home
224: Photo Gallery
225: Home
226: News Archive
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: LinkToUs
232: Photo Gallery
233: Member Screenshots
234: Home
235: News Archive
236: Member Screenshots
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: News Archive
247: Community Forums
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: Treasury
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: News Archive
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Search
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Downloads
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Downloads
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Home
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Photo Gallery
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Search
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Member Screenshots
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum