±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 228
Total: 228
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Member Screenshots
05: Community Forums
06: Downloads
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: CPGlang
13: CPGlang
14: CPGlang
15: CPGlang
16: Community Forums
17: CPGlang
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Statistics
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: CPGlang
28: Downloads
29: Statistics
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: CPGlang
33: CPGlang
34: Community Forums
35: CPGlang
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: CPGlang
39: Downloads
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Member Screenshots
49: CPGlang
50: Community Forums
51: CPGlang
52: CPGlang
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: CPGlang
58: Home
59: CPGlang
60: Community Forums
61: Statistics
62: Community Forums
63: CPGlang
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: CPGlang
68: CPGlang
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: CPGlang
75: CPGlang
76: CPGlang
77: Community Forums
78: CPGlang
79: CPGlang
80: Community Forums
81: CPGlang
82: Community Forums
83: CPGlang
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: CPGlang
87: CPGlang
88: Community Forums
89: CPGlang
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: CPGlang
95: Community Forums
96: CPGlang
97: CPGlang
98: Community Forums
99: Downloads
100: CPGlang
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: CPGlang
104: Community Forums
105: CPGlang
106: Downloads
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: CPGlang
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: CPGlang
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: CPGlang
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: CPGlang
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Downloads
129: CPGlang
130: CPGlang
131: Community Forums
132: CPGlang
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: CPGlang
136: Photo Gallery
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: CPGlang
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: News Archive
153: Community Forums
154: CPGlang
155: Community Forums
156: CPGlang
157: Community Forums
158: CPGlang
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: CPGlang
164: CPGlang
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: CPGlang
169: Community Forums
170: CPGlang
171: Member Screenshots
172: CPGlang
173: Community Forums
174: CPGlang
175: Community Forums
176: CPGlang
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: CPGlang
182: CPGlang
183: CPGlang
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: CPGlang
189: Community Forums
190: CPGlang
191: CPGlang
192: Community Forums
193: CPGlang
194: Community Forums
195: CPGlang
196: CPGlang
197: Your Account
198: CPGlang
199: Community Forums
200: CPGlang
201: CPGlang
202: CPGlang
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: CPGlang
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: CPGlang
209: CPGlang
210: CPGlang
211: Community Forums
212: CPGlang
213: Community Forums
214: CPGlang
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: CPGlang
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: CPGlang
223: CPGlang
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: CPGlang
227: CPGlang
228: CPGlang

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6256
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2061
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2061
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum