±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 647
Total: 647
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Photo Gallery
05: Home
06: Downloads
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Member Screenshots
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Member Screenshots
29: Home
30: Downloads
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: Photo Gallery
39: Home
40: Home
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Photo Gallery
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Home
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Photo Gallery
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Downloads
75: Member Screenshots
76: Photo Gallery
77: Home
78: Photo Gallery
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Photo Gallery
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: News
89: Home
90: Home
91: Downloads
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Photo Gallery
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Downloads
103: Home
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Home
116: News
117: Home
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Downloads
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: Home
128: Home
129: Home
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Member Screenshots
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Home
156: News Archive
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Downloads
160: Photo Gallery
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Photo Gallery
184: Home
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Home
202: Home
203: Home
204: Home
205: Home
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Home
211: Home
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Photo Gallery
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Photo Gallery
240: Home
241: Home
242: Downloads
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: Home
255: Downloads
256: Community Forums
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Home
275: Member Screenshots
276: Member Screenshots
277: Statistics
278: Home
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Home
285: Home
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: News
296: Home
297: Home
298: Home
299: Home
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Home
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Home
317: Home
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Photo Gallery
325: Home
326: Home
327: Home
328: Downloads
329: Home
330: Home
331: Home
332: Home
333: Home
334: Home
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Home
338: Home
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Home
347: Home
348: Home
349: Home
350: Home
351: Home
352: Home
353: Home
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: News
357: Community Forums
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Downloads
362: Downloads
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Photo Gallery
371: Home
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Photo Gallery
376: Photo Gallery
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Member Screenshots
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Downloads
387: Community Forums
388: Photo Gallery
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Photo Gallery
393: Home
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Home
399: News
400: Home
401: Home
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Home
406: Photo Gallery
407: Home
408: Photo Gallery
409: Home
410: Home
411: Home
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Home
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Home
422: Your Account
423: Home
424: Home
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Downloads
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Downloads
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Home
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Home
442: Home
443: Home
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Downloads
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: Home
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Home
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Downloads
460: Community Forums
461: Home
462: Downloads
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Home
466: Community Forums
467: Member Screenshots
468: Home
469: Home
470: Home
471: Photo Gallery
472: News Archive
473: Home
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Home
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Home
483: Home
484: Home
485: Community Forums
486: Home
487: Photo Gallery
488: Statistics
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: Photo Gallery
495: Home
496: Community Forums
497: Home
498: Home
499: Member Screenshots
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Home
505: Community Forums
506: Home
507: Home
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Home
511: Home
512: Home
513: Home
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Home
517: Home
518: Your Account
519: Home
520: Home
521: Home
522: News Archive
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Photo Gallery
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Photo Gallery
535: Home
536: Home
537: Home
538: Home
539: Home
540: Community Forums
541: Home
542: Home
543: Home
544: Home
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Home
548: Photo Gallery
549: Home
550: Home
551: Home
552: Home
553: Home
554: Community Forums
555: Home
556: Home
557: Home
558: Home
559: Home
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Member Screenshots
563: Photo Gallery
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Statistics
568: Home
569: Home
570: Home
571: Downloads
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Home
575: Home
576: Home
577: Home
578: Home
579: Home
580: Member Screenshots
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Home
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Community Forums
588: News
589: Member Screenshots
590: Photo Gallery
591: Photo Gallery
592: Photo Gallery
593: Community Forums
594: Photo Gallery
595: Home
596: Home
597: Home
598: Photo Gallery
599: Home
600: Home
601: Home
602: Community Forums
603: Home
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Photo Gallery
610: Home
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Home
614: Home
615: Home
616: Home
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Home
620: Home
621: Photo Gallery
622: Home
623: Photo Gallery
624: Downloads
625: Home
626: Home
627: Home
628: Community Forums
629: Home
630: Home
631: Home
632: Photo Gallery
633: Home
634: Home
635: Community Forums
636: Home
637: Home
638: Community Forums
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Home
643: Home
644: Community Forums
645: Member Screenshots
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum