±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 658
Total: 658
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: News Archive
07: News Archive
08: Photo Gallery
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Member Screenshots
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: CPGlang
23: CPGlang
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: News
37: Photo Gallery
38: Photo Gallery
39: Photo Gallery
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Photo Gallery
45: Photo Gallery
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: Home
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Statistics
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Member Screenshots
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: CPGlang
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: CPGlang
70: Photo Gallery
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Photo Gallery
75: Photo Gallery
76: Home
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Statistics
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Home
94: CPGlang
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Photo Gallery
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Member Screenshots
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: CPGlang
107: Photo Gallery
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: CPGlang
115: Downloads
116: Home
117: Member Screenshots
118: News
119: Home
120: Home
121: Your Account
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: News
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: CPGlang
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: CPGlang
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: CPGlang
145: Home
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Photo Gallery
152: News Archive
153: Downloads
154: Home
155: Photo Gallery
156: Home
157: Photo Gallery
158: Home
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Photo Gallery
164: Photo Gallery
165: CPGlang
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: CPGlang
173: Member Screenshots
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: CPGlang
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: CPGlang
193: Photo Gallery
194: Downloads
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: CPGlang
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: CPGlang
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: CPGlang
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Your Account
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: Home
218: Photo Gallery
219: Member Screenshots
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: CPGlang
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Photo Gallery
226: CPGlang
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Photo Gallery
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Photo Gallery
235: CPGlang
236: Member Screenshots
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Your Account
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: News Archive
246: Photo Gallery
247: CPGlang
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: CPGlang
256: CPGlang
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Photo Gallery
260: Member Screenshots
261: CPGlang
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Photo Gallery
277: Photo Gallery
278: Photo Gallery
279: Home
280: Photo Gallery
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Downloads
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Photo Gallery
288: Community Forums
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Photo Gallery
298: Photo Gallery
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Downloads
303: Photo Gallery
304: Photo Gallery
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: News Archive
308: News Archive
309: CPGlang
310: Photo Gallery
311: Home
312: Home
313: Member Screenshots
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: News
317: Photo Gallery
318: Home
319: Home
320: CPGlang
321: Photo Gallery
322: Home
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: CPGlang
326: Downloads
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: CPGlang
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Member Screenshots
334: Community Forums
335: CPGlang
336: Community Forums
337: CPGlang
338: CPGlang
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Member Screenshots
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: News
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Photo Gallery
355: Community Forums
356: News Archive
357: Downloads
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Member Screenshots
361: Community Forums
362: Downloads
363: Photo Gallery
364: CPGlang
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: CPGlang
368: Photo Gallery
369: Community Forums
370: Photo Gallery
371: Community Forums
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: CPGlang
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: CPGlang
385: Community Forums
386: Photo Gallery
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: CPGlang
397: Downloads
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: CPGlang
404: CPGlang
405: Photo Gallery
406: CPGlang
407: News Archive
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Community Forums
411: News
412: Photo Gallery
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Member Screenshots
416: Your Account
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Member Screenshots
420: Photo Gallery
421: Home
422: Community Forums
423: Home
424: Statistics
425: CPGlang
426: Photo Gallery
427: Member Screenshots
428: Photo Gallery
429: Your Account
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Search
438: Photo Gallery
439: Member Screenshots
440: Photo Gallery
441: Downloads
442: CPGlang
443: Home
444: Community Forums
445: CPGlang
446: Community Forums
447: Home
448: Photo Gallery
449: Downloads
450: Community Forums
451: Home
452: CPGlang
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Member Screenshots
457: Photo Gallery
458: Photo Gallery
459: News
460: Community Forums
461: CPGlang
462: CPGlang
463: Home
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Member Screenshots
467: Community Forums
468: Photo Gallery
469: Community Forums
470: CPGlang
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Photo Gallery
474: CPGlang
475: Statistics
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Member Screenshots
479: CPGlang
480: Home
481: Photo Gallery
482: Member Screenshots
483: Home
484: Community Forums
485: Downloads
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Member Screenshots
491: News
492: Member Screenshots
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: CPGlang
496: Community Forums
497: CPGlang
498: Home
499: Downloads
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: CPGlang
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Home
508: Community Forums
509: CPGlang
510: Photo Gallery
511: Community Forums
512: Statistics
513: Photo Gallery
514: Photo Gallery
515: Home
516: Community Forums
517: CPGlang
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Photo Gallery
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Member Screenshots
525: Photo Gallery
526: Photo Gallery
527: CPGlang
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Photo Gallery
533: Community Forums
534: News Archive
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: Photo Gallery
538: Community Forums
539: CPGlang
540: Home
541: Member Screenshots
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Photo Gallery
545: Downloads
546: Home
547: Photo Gallery
548: CPGlang
549: Photo Gallery
550: Community Forums
551: Photo Gallery
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: CPGlang
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: CPGlang
559: Photo Gallery
560: Community Forums
561: CPGlang
562: Community Forums
563: Photo Gallery
564: News
565: Community Forums
566: Downloads
567: Downloads
568: CPGlang
569: Photo Gallery
570: Photo Gallery
571: Community Forums
572: Photo Gallery
573: Community Forums
574: News
575: Photo Gallery
576: Photo Gallery
577: Home
578: Your Account
579: Community Forums
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: Member Screenshots
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Home
588: News Archive
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: CPGlang
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Photo Gallery
597: Community Forums
598: Photo Gallery
599: Home
600: CPGlang
601: Photo Gallery
602: Photo Gallery
603: Photo Gallery
604: Your Account
605: Home
606: Community Forums
607: Photo Gallery
608: Downloads
609: Home
610: Member Screenshots
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: Photo Gallery
616: Home
617: Home
618: CPGlang
619: Home
620: Downloads
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: CPGlang
624: CPGlang
625: Photo Gallery
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: CPGlang
629: Photo Gallery
630: Downloads
631: Member Screenshots
632: Home
633: Community Forums
634: Photo Gallery
635: Community Forums
636: Photo Gallery
637: Photo Gallery
638: CPGlang
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Photo Gallery
643: Community Forums
644: Home
645: Home
646: Photo Gallery
647: Community Forums
648: Photo Gallery
649: Photo Gallery
650: Photo Gallery
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Member Screenshots
654: Home
655: Photo Gallery
656: Home
657: CPGlang
658: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum