±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 500
Total: 500
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Photo Gallery
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Downloads
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Statistics
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Photo Gallery
26: Photo Gallery
27: Photo Gallery
28: Photo Gallery
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Home
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Photo Gallery
36: Photo Gallery
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: Downloads
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: News Archive
50: Home
51: CPGlang
52: Community Forums
53: Downloads
54: Photo Gallery
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: CPGlang
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Photo Gallery
74: Photo Gallery
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Statistics
78: Photo Gallery
79: CPGlang
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: CPGlang
100: Home
101: Home
102: Photo Gallery
103: Photo Gallery
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Member Screenshots
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: News Archive
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: CPGlang
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Your Account
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Photo Gallery
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Photo Gallery
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Statistics
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Downloads
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Your Account
167: Photo Gallery
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Contact
176: Home
177: Downloads
178: CPGlang
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Photo Gallery
182: News Archive
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Photo Gallery
190: Home
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Photo Gallery
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Photo Gallery
215: Photo Gallery
216: Photo Gallery
217: Photo Gallery
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Statistics
227: Downloads
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Photo Gallery
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Your Account
238: Photo Gallery
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Contact
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Member Screenshots
248: Downloads
249: Photo Gallery
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: News Archive
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Downloads
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Downloads
259: Photo Gallery
260: Home
261: CPGlang
262: Photo Gallery
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: CPGlang
277: Photo Gallery
278: Photo Gallery
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Your Account
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Community Forums
289: Photo Gallery
290: Photo Gallery
291: CPGlang
292: Community Forums
293: News Archive
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Your Account
301: Community Forums
302: News Archive
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Statistics
307: Home
308: CPGlang
309: Photo Gallery
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Member Screenshots
313: Home
314: Downloads
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Photo Gallery
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: CPGlang
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Downloads
330: Photo Gallery
331: Your Account
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Photo Gallery
340: Photo Gallery
341: Your Account
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Member Screenshots
346: Photo Gallery
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Photo Gallery
350: Downloads
351: Downloads
352: Member Screenshots
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Photo Gallery
358: CPGlang
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: Community Forums
364: Photo Gallery
365: Photo Gallery
366: Home
367: Your Account
368: Photo Gallery
369: Community Forums
370: Photo Gallery
371: Photo Gallery
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Photo Gallery
379: Community Forums
380: Photo Gallery
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Downloads
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: CPGlang
387: Photo Gallery
388: Photo Gallery
389: Home
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Contact
393: Community Forums
394: CPGlang
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Community Forums
399: Downloads
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Photo Gallery
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Your Account
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Home
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Photo Gallery
416: Community Forums
417: Photo Gallery
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: Photo Gallery
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: CPGlang
430: Community Forums
431: CPGlang
432: Member Screenshots
433: Photo Gallery
434: Photo Gallery
435: CPGlang
436: Photo Gallery
437: Community Forums
438: Photo Gallery
439: Photo Gallery
440: Photo Gallery
441: Community Forums
442: CPGlang
443: Home
444: Home
445: Home
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Member Screenshots
450: Community Forums
451: Your Account
452: Photo Gallery
453: CPGlang
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Photo Gallery
458: Community Forums
459: News Archive
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Photo Gallery
470: Home
471: Photo Gallery
472: Photo Gallery
473: Photo Gallery
474: Community Forums
475: Home
476: Photo Gallery
477: Photo Gallery
478: Community Forums
479: Photo Gallery
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Photo Gallery
483: Member Screenshots
484: Home
485: Photo Gallery
486: Photo Gallery
487: Photo Gallery
488: Photo Gallery
489: Home
490: Community Forums
491: Photo Gallery
492: CPGlang
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Member Screenshots
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Never seen this one before....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:08 am
Post subject: Never seen this one before....

Found this photo while surfing around. Never seen this before.



FYI
Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:59 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Don! Hi Folks!

Doesn't surprise me. The Marines are always looking for something a bit smaller that what the Army uses so their helicopters have more range when airlifting.

I wonder if by chance, that vehicle will fit inside a CH-53 or maybe a V-22?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:06 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Its a Gelandewagen - plenty of images on JED

www.jedsite.info/trans...eries.html

MerecedesBenz manufacture - its the first IFAV I've seen with a TOW mount though.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Ya..its the Corps Mercedes "SUV," theres a row of them sitting in a lot at Camp Lejeune. It seems the Corps still had not at the time they put these "tincan" fighting vehicles in service lerned the differance between a fighting vehicle and just another bad idea. The first thing they (the USMC) found out was that when engaged in a fight the personnel in the front seats were dead ducks....so they remove the front doors to allow the personnel a chance to bail out ..Oh they also forgot the the vehicle has no armor so the bullets just go through one side (and who ever is inside) and out the other, and the maint of these vehicles was contracted out side the Corps. And no it won't fit in a V-22, one thing the Corps forgot to mention during the hipe campaign for the V-22 was there wasn't a single vehicle in the inventory that would fit in this aircraft....So without calling to much attention the corps has let a contract out for the development of a vehicle that will fit inside...oh and the total lifting cap. of the V-22 is 10,000 lbs. so we now know it won't be a fighting vehicle huh.
Back to top
View user's profile
L.Delsing
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Looks like the good old MB290. In the early days of the air mobile brigade over here they used also MB290s with TOWs.

IIRC they are now replaced by LSVs with Gills.

BTW is it normal on ranges that you don't use camo, hessian etc?
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

I think these should be replaced by the new Internally Transportable Vehicles (ITV):

hqinet001.hqmc.usmc.mi...ehicle.pdf



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

- oldertop
Ya..its the Corps Mercedes "SUV," theres a row of them sitting in a lot at Camp Lejeune. It seems the Corps still had not at the time they put these "tincan" fighting vehicles in service lerned the differance between a fighting vehicle and just another bad idea. The first thing they (the USMC) found out was that when engaged in a fight the personnel in the front seats were dead ducks....so they remove the front doors to allow the personnel a chance to bail out ..Oh they also forgot the the vehicle has no armor so the bullets just go through one side (and who ever is inside) and out the other, and the maint of these vehicles was contracted out side the Corps. And no it won't fit in a V-22, one thing the Corps forgot to mention during the hipe campaign for the V-22 was there wasn't a single vehicle in the inventory that would fit in this aircraft....So without calling to much attention the corps has let a contract out for the development of a vehicle that will fit inside...oh and the total lifting cap. of the V-22 is 10,000 lbs. so we now know it won't be a fighting vehicle huh.


IFAV served the same purpose as its predecessors and its replacement as a fast attack vehicle - it isn't and never was intended to stand there and slog it out hence the lack of armour.

As for the Osprey thing - the IFAV fits in the CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-53 Sea Stallion and the Osprey. In the case of the Osprey its was one of the design criteria.

Just added some more images to JED.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Jim,
You mean the ITV would fit in the -46, 53 and V-22 right? According to the pdf, the IFAV can fit in a -53, but not a V-22.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Ya all it needs is to have a top speed of 2,000+ fps so it can out run the bullets,Its listed as a fighting vehicle so what kind of fight will it get into...snowballs! If this vehicle is used on patrols they'll need a spoon and plastic bag to pick up whats left of the crew, it does not fit in a V-22's cargo area and thats why theres a development contract for a new vehicle, the "Globe" announced the development contract two months ago . Have you ever seen the cargo space of the V-22 (and yes I have as well as been in one) and theres no way in hell you'er going to get that SUV in it, its a damn tight fit for 18 combat ready troopers as it is.
As for this vehicles predecessor (remember its the Marine Corps) they had brought back the M151 (someone saw to many "The Desert Rats" TV shows) , but the U.S. Navy was madder than hell about it because once again they would have't have gasoline storage for these vehicles on they'er landing support ships, what finely killed off the M151s was the parts shortage (there was none in the system).
I'll bet someone will come up with the well used quote " this vehicle was never designed to go near the front lines", and the answer to that is "this nation hasn't fought a war with a frontline in 35 years!"
As for the dimension of the V22 (given 5.10 ft.) what hey don't mention is that its "T" shaped with the smaller with dimensions at the lower section.


Last edited by oldertop on Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

The maximum width of a G-wagen is 5.6 - the minimum cargo area width of an Osprey is 5.10 tight yes but still feasible.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

then why let a development contract?
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:08 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

As for the Osprey thing - the IFAV fits in the CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-53 Sea Stallion and the Osprey.


If the IFAV(G-wagon) fits, then why does the USMC Concepts + Programs 2005 pdf say: "The Interim Fast Attack Vehicle is currently fielded and is deployable inside the CH-53 aircraft, but the GCE currently has no (<<<<<?????) ground mobility platform that can deploy inside (<<<<<<?????) the MV-22."

I read that to mean the IFAV (G-wagon) does NOT fit inside a MV-22.

- JimWeb

In the case of the Osprey its was one of the design criteria.


I understand the ITV (mini-M151) was designed to fit inside the MV-22. Are you saying the IFAV(G-wagon) was picked because it would fit inside the MV-22?

Very confuzed. Confused
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:21 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

No actually what I am working my way round to saying is the USMC would probably have their funding for the new vehicle cut or removed if, officially, the IFAV did fit in the Osprey.

Do you follow my reasoning?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:57 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Odertop! Hi Folks!

- oldertop

Ya all it needs is to have a top speed of 2,000+ fps so it can out run the bullets,Its listed as a fighting vehicle so what kind of fight will it get into...snowballs! If this vehicle is used on patrols they'll need a spoon and plastic bag to pick up whats left of the crew, ...
.....As for this vehicles predecessor (remember its the Marine Corps) they had brought back the M151 (someone saw to many "The Desert Rats" TV shows) , .....
.....I'll bet someone will come up with the well used quote " this vehicle was never designed to go near the front lines", .....


I see the IFAV(G-wagon) as the newest version of the WW II gun jeep where Scouts armed with machine guns and light mortars leading the main force units. The Army has deployed Scouts with light wheeled vehicles ever sense the first jeeps. It wasn't until the M1114 uparmored Hummer was fielded that scouts had a wheeled vehicle with some armor. A vehicle that, do to it's large size, many claim is the wrong type of vehicle for scouts.

I agree that this type of vehicle is a bit new to the Corps and I am not sure just what the plan is for them. But then I am still trying to understand why the Corps has four light armored recon battalions using 8x8 armored cars.

My guess is those light wheeled vehicles will be used on patrols (and scouting missions) and the crews and their leadership will taking on much more than snowballs. Just like Army Scouts have been sense WWII. Nothing new about using none armored wheeled vehicles in a shooting match.

"The Desert Rats" TV show is good entainment. All Scouts get a good laugh watching a jeep with a machine gun take out a M47 medium tank. Lesson to be learned is NEVER try that in real shooting match.

As for someone claiming those vehicles where not designed to go near a front line, that's true! They are designed to be airlifted over and dropped behind the front lines. Wink

The Marines are changing, hopefully they will be able to put the right mix of riflemen and supporting equipment together for the next mission.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

This is quite a different photo.

Found it in a newsletter from a Texas Military site. Lost the link, but printed up a couple of pages with interesting photos. I'll dig up the link and post it.




Edit: I found it. Here is the link: Texas Military Museum Newsletter

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum