±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: sercrets
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 316
Total: 316
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Downloads
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: CPGlang
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Downloads
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Downloads
20: CPGlang
21: Home
22: CPGlang
23: Downloads
24: Member Screenshots
25: Downloads
26: Home
27: Downloads
28: Home
29: Downloads
30: Downloads
31: Your Account
32: Downloads
33: CPGlang
34: Community Forums
35: Downloads
36: Downloads
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Downloads
42: CPGlang
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Downloads
48: Home
49: Home
50: Downloads
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: CPGlang
57: Downloads
58: Home
59: Downloads
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Downloads
63: Community Forums
64: CPGlang
65: Downloads
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: LinkToUs
69: Home
70: Home
71: CPGlang
72: Downloads
73: Downloads
74: Downloads
75: Downloads
76: News
77: CPGlang
78: CPGlang
79: CPGlang
80: Downloads
81: Home
82: CPGlang
83: Photo Gallery
84: Home
85: Downloads
86: Downloads
87: Downloads
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Member Screenshots
91: Photo Gallery
92: Photo Gallery
93: Downloads
94: Downloads
95: CPGlang
96: Downloads
97: Home
98: Downloads
99: Community Forums
100: Downloads
101: CPGlang
102: Home
103: Home
104: CPGlang
105: Downloads
106: Home
107: CPGlang
108: Home
109: Downloads
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: CPGlang
113: Photo Gallery
114: Downloads
115: Photo Gallery
116: Home
117: Downloads
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: CPGlang
121: CPGlang
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: CPGlang
125: Home
126: Home
127: CPGlang
128: Community Forums
129: Downloads
130: Statistics
131: Downloads
132: Downloads
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Search
136: Home
137: Home
138: Members List
139: Home
140: CPGlang
141: CPGlang
142: CPGlang
143: Your Account
144: Community Forums
145: Statistics
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Photo Gallery
151: CPGlang
152: Photo Gallery
153: Downloads
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: CPGlang
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: CPGlang
161: Downloads
162: Home
163: Downloads
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: CPGlang
167: Downloads
168: CPGlang
169: Downloads
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: News
176: Photo Gallery
177: Home
178: Home
179: CPGlang
180: Downloads
181: Downloads
182: Home
183: Downloads
184: CPGlang
185: Home
186: Home
187: CPGlang
188: Home
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Downloads
192: Home
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: CPGlang
197: Statistics
198: Home
199: CPGlang
200: Downloads
201: CPGlang
202: Home
203: Downloads
204: Community Forums
205: News
206: Home
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Downloads
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Downloads
213: Downloads
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Home
217: CPGlang
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: CPGlang
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Downloads
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Downloads
227: Home
228: Downloads
229: Photo Gallery
230: Downloads
231: Downloads
232: Home
233: Home
234: Downloads
235: Home
236: CPGlang
237: Home
238: Home
239: CPGlang
240: CPGlang
241: Home
242: Downloads
243: Downloads
244: Photo Gallery
245: Downloads
246: Community Forums
247: CPGlang
248: Community Forums
249: Downloads
250: Community Forums
251: Your Account
252: Photo Gallery
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Downloads
256: Home
257: Home
258: Downloads
259: Downloads
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Downloads
264: Home
265: News Archive
266: Downloads
267: Home
268: Downloads
269: Home
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Downloads
273: Home
274: CPGlang
275: Community Forums
276: CPGlang
277: Home
278: Downloads
279: Downloads
280: CPGlang
281: Member Screenshots
282: CPGlang
283: Downloads
284: Downloads
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Home
289: CPGlang
290: Downloads
291: News
292: CPGlang
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Photo Gallery
296: Downloads
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Downloads
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Downloads
303: Downloads
304: Downloads
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: Downloads
308: Home
309: Downloads
310: CPGlang
311: CPGlang
312: Home
313: CPGlang
314: Community Forums
315: CPGlang
316: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
This turret cant be original right? M108?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:55 am
Post subject: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Sorry about spamming the board, but I keep coming across something odd or interesting in this old "Tanks for the Memories" geocaching site...

Seems like they went out of their way to build a turret mockup... Unless this is some wierd prototype I've never heard of...



Its apparently in Hampton, VA....

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:01 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Neil,
Those are the second largest white stars I've ever seen on a U.S. vehicle....the first are the ones on the M48A2's of my AIT class. Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:16 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?


I believe the vehicle pictured is the M108, the predesesor to the M109. The M108 had a 105mm gun. It was replaced by the M109 because in part, the 155 rd was being standardized by NATO at the time, and the carriage was to heavy for such a small caliber. It was phased out in the early 60's if I'm not mistaken. "The Hampton" does appear to have some Modifications made to her. Those rubber skirts seem pieced together from something else. Are there any pictures from other angles?

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:39 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Nope, but notice the "turret" above is also much bigger...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:20 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Looks like a T-108 Prototype,

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:08 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Its the T195 engineering mock-up turret on a T195E1 chassis.

Any images of the front?

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:23 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Sorry about spamming the board, but I keep coming across something odd or interesting in this old "Tanks for the Memories" geocaching site...

Seems like they went out of their way to build a turret mockup... Unless this is some wierd prototype I've never heard of...



Its apparently in Hampton, VA....

Neil


I think I know Hampton VA pretty well (having been stationed at Langley AFB for 9 years :-)) and I don't remember a building like the one in the background. Now I've been gone a few years (like 20) and they may have built it since then, but ...

Are there any lat/long coordinates thaat we could use to locate it?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:55 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

- SFC_Jeff_Button

I believe the vehicle pictured is the M108, the predesesor to the M109. The M108 had a 105mm gun. It was replaced by the M109 because in part, the 155 rd was being standardized by NATO at the time....It was phased out in the early 60's if I'm not mistaken. "The Hampton" does appear to have some Modifications made to her. Those rubber skirts seem pieced together from something else.


The M108 did not preceed the M109. Both vehicles were developed at the same time with the idea of a common tracked chassis to replace both the M52/105 and the M44/155 vehicles. Both started production at the same time. Sense both carriers were almost the same, the cost was almost the same. Some where during the very early fielding of both vehicles, a more buck for your bang desicion was made to upgrade all division artillery SPs with the 155 sense the total cost was equal either way. I am not so sure it was a NATO idea, but more likey the US Army leading NATO sense many NATO countries bought the M109 which countered the Warsaw Pacts 122/152mm cannons.

The rubber skirts? I couldn't make out just what was there. Has me wondering if that might just be part of the floatation kit?

The only time I ever saw some M108s was in Berlin back in 1970. the Berlin Brigade had one battery with six of them. There are a few photos around that shows some M108s in Vietnam. Best I can remember, they looks just like the M109 except for the gun barrel.

My 2 cents and some of my very old history.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Here's the coordinates & map location. Its apparently near Fort Monroe

The picture was taken June last year...

[img]http://map.web.mapquest.com/?e=9&GetMapDataDirect=Gme5diw%2ca%3a9u12%3b%40%24x0%2d7nga72%26%3dt0%21absq67%3ah%2dbg5ryg%26z%40nd0ta0%40b2562%3a9uy2%3bu%24nu67%7c%26a7aq%40%24%3a%26%40ba%21620l67%3a%29zz%26la85u6%24%3a%26ur2u%2da%7c%26yt29%40%24&rnd=9773[/img]

boulter.com/gps/?c=N+3...B0+20.122+

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:05 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

- SFC_Jeff_Button

I believe the vehicle pictured is the M108, the predesesor to the M109. The M108 had a 105mm gun. It was replaced by the M109 because in part, the 155 rd was being standardized by NATO at the time....It was phased out in the early 60's if I'm not mistaken. "The Hampton" does appear to have some Modifications made to her. Those rubber skirts seem pieced together from something else.


The M108 did not preceed the M109. Both vehicles were developed at the same time with the idea of a common tracked chassis to replace both the M52/105 and the M44/155 vehicles. Both started production at the same time. Sense both carriers were almost the same, the cost was almost the same. Some where during the very early fielding of both vehicles, a more buck for your bang desicion was made to upgrade all division artillery SPs with the 155 sense the total cost was equal either way. I am not so sure it was a NATO idea, but more likey the US Army leading NATO sense many NATO countries bought the M109 which countered the Warsaw Pacts 122/152mm cannons.

The rubber skirts? I couldn't make out just what was there. Has me wondering if that might just be part of the floatation kit?

The only time I ever saw some M108s was in Berlin back in 1970. the Berlin Brigade had one battery with six of them. There are a few photos around that shows some M108s in Vietnam. Best I can remember, they looks just like the M109 except for the gun barrel.

My 2 cents and some of my very old history.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile


There is an M108 in storage at Aberdeen. One reason they moved it off the 'tank field' and into storage is that GIs would break into it at night for 'extra curricular activities' With that big turret and the small gun there was plenty of space for 'whatever'

I've been told that beer cnas weren't the only thing the staff would find inside the M108 when they went to investigate the doors being open after a weekend Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:09 am
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Here's the coordinates & map location. Its apparently near Fort Monroe

The picture was taken June last year...

[img]http://map.web.mapquest.com/?e=9&GetMapDataDirect=Gme5diw%2ca%3a9u12%3b%40%24x0%2d7nga72%26%3dt0%21absq67%3ah%2dbg5ryg%26z%40nd0ta0%40b2562%3a9uy2%3bu%24nu67%7c%26a7aq%40%24%3a%26%40ba%21620l67%3a%29zz%26la85u6%24%3a%26ur2u%2da%7c%26yt29%40%24&rnd=9773[/img]

boulter.com/gps/?c=N+3...B0+20.122+

Neil


Interesting, I never got down to that part of town. Back when I was there that wasn't the 'nicest part of town' When we scooted by on the Interstate in recent years I did notice a lot of revitalization. I sometimes wonder how or why T series vehicles get put where they do as monuments

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SteveC86
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Posts: 20
Location: Yorktown, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:05 pm
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

From the map it looks like the vehicle is in or around the Hampton VA hospital. Never been in there, but that's where the sign says the hospital is.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:15 pm
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

makes sense. I wonder if there is another vehicle off to the right of the picture (on the other side of the road) with VA CENTER on it?

The buildings look like it could be part of an older VA center ( probably built to support Civil War and WWI vets)

I keep wanting to go back down to the 'old stomping grounds' Maybe a weekend trip is in order this fall (If I can ever remember what a weekend is supposed to be)

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:21 pm
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

MORTAR FIRE

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"


Last edited by MarkHolloway on Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:35 pm
Post subject: Re: This turret cant be original right? M108?

Hello to all. I had some time off today sfter classes and I drove down to the VA hopsital in Hampton to find this strange arty piece. Sure enough it's there and I snapped a bunch of pic's from different angles, top, inside (through a missing hatch cover), etc... I will also have it's exact location for Neil's armor listings.
I snapped 66 pictures yesterday from Ft Monroe's old Coastal Batteries, to the Hampton National Cemetary, to this arty piece, I just have to down load them all. I can tell tou though that there was a number "5" stamped into each front tow lug, (only markings I could find) so possibly a very early model M108 or T____ model!?
I post these pics later today.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum