±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 144
Total: 144
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Home
07: Home
08: CPGlang
09: CPGlang
10: Community Forums
11: CPGlang
12: Photo Gallery
13: CPGlang
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: CPGlang
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: CPGlang
21: CPGlang
22: CPGlang
23: Community Forums
24: CPGlang
25: CPGlang
26: Home
27: CPGlang
28: Community Forums
29: CPGlang
30: Community Forums
31: CPGlang
32: CPGlang
33: CPGlang
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: CPGlang
37: CPGlang
38: Home
39: CPGlang
40: CPGlang
41: Community Forums
42: CPGlang
43: CPGlang
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: CPGlang
47: CPGlang
48: CPGlang
49: CPGlang
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: CPGlang
53: CPGlang
54: Home
55: CPGlang
56: Community Forums
57: CPGlang
58: CPGlang
59: Statistics
60: CPGlang
61: CPGlang
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: CPGlang
65: Home
66: CPGlang
67: CPGlang
68: CPGlang
69: Community Forums
70: CPGlang
71: CPGlang
72: Home
73: CPGlang
74: Home
75: Photo Gallery
76: CPGlang
77: Community Forums
78: CPGlang
79: CPGlang
80: Your Account
81: Community Forums
82: CPGlang
83: CPGlang
84: CPGlang
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: CPGlang
88: CPGlang
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: CPGlang
94: Home
95: CPGlang
96: CPGlang
97: Community Forums
98: CPGlang
99: CPGlang
100: CPGlang
101: Photo Gallery
102: CPGlang
103: CPGlang
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: CPGlang
107: CPGlang
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: CPGlang
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Downloads
118: Community Forums
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: CPGlang
122: Community Forums
123: CPGlang
124: CPGlang
125: Community Forums
126: CPGlang
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: CPGlang
131: CPGlang
132: Home
133: CPGlang
134: Community Forums
135: CPGlang
136: CPGlang
137: CPGlang
138: CPGlang
139: CPGlang
140: Community Forums
141: CPGlang
142: CPGlang
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Interesting New US Army Base Vehicle Policy
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:29 am
Post subject: Interesting New US Army Base Vehicle Policy

www.dcuc.org/PDF%20Fil...0Decal.pdf

www.ftleetraveller.com...o.facebook

No More Vehicle Decals

Fort Lee Provost Marshal Office | 0 comments

Department of Defense vehicle stickers or temporary day passes will no longer be required for motor vehicles entering Fort Lee after the Sept. 1 implementation of a revised DoD policy (ALARACT 343/2011). “We are doing away with the need to have stickers on privately owned vehicles,” said Fort Lee Provost Marshal Maj. David Martin.

The change, designed to protect military members, will allow non-DoD visitors to drive to any access point or gate, show a government-issued identification such as a driver’s license and enter the post without stopping at the Lee Gate visitor’s center to get a pass.

Fort Lee, home of the Combined Arms Support Command and Sustainment Center of Excellence, is ahead of many Army posts in the implementation of the new policy. Some Air Force and Navy bases have already instituted this change, Martin said. He also re-emphasized the primary purpose of protecting personnel who work on military installations.

“Across the board, it is a matter of force protection,” he said. “(A decal) doesn’t always identify a vehicle as belonging to a Department of Defense employee, and just having the sticker can potentially make an individual a target.”

In this post-Sept. 11 era, Defense Department personnel are at an increased risk of being targeted by terrorists. Martin cited the May 2007 case in which six men were arrested and charged with planning to gain access to Fort Dix, N.J., to kill as many Soldiers as they could. “There should be no question in anyone’s mind that the terrorist threat to military personnel is real,” he added.

Any step to reduce the visibility of military personnel would naturally decrease the possibility of individual service members being targeted by terrorists. Martin also mentioned other measures like mandatory anti-terrorism training each year and not requiring military personnel to wear uniforms during official travel, and said that eliminating base decals on vehicles is just another step that will further decrease the risk to service members.

Lead Sgt. Rico Williams with the Police Operations section here noted that the requirement for base decals and temporary access passes has been around for many years – well before 9-11. The possibility of terrorists trying to obtain or counterfeit base decals has always been a threat as well. Furthermore, DoD personnel haven’t always been accountable for the decals they were issued – some were improperly transferred from one car to another or not removed when the car was sold. It wasn’t uncommon to find vehicles with DoD stickers still attached in used car lots.
Thinking along those lines, and the fact that anyone with a sticker or pass is still required to show a valid military identification card and is subject to random inspection, “the decal requirement seems redundant,” Williams said.

“The change in access procedures should also increase awareness and add emphasis to the thorough inspection of identification documents,” he added. “Requiring police and security personnel to perform checks for a valid driver’s license and a current registration is a more effective way to ensure the accuracy of these documents than checking them only when drivers apply for a decal.”

Martin noted that existing decals don’t have to be removed from vehicles when the new access rules go into effect. All post stickers will be accepted until their expiration.

The PMO emphasized that all vehicles driven onto Fort Lee are still required to be properly licensed, registered and insured according to state and local laws. Those entering the post are subject to a 100 percent identification check and inspection by security personnel.

To address the issue of suspended base driving privileges, Fort Lee will create a database (including pictures) of those whose privileges have been revoked.

AR 385-10 still requires motorcycle riders on military bases to present the certification card that proves they have completed the required safety course.

The projected financial benefit of eliminating base decals service-wide is fairly significant. While it will result in an annual savings of approximately $39,000 per year for Fort Lee, the tally is more than $500,000 Army-wide for printing costs alone, said Williams. The requirement to process applications for decals and temporary passes will be eliminated as well, resulting in reduced costs for personnel. In addition, the time standing in line to renew temporary passes and apply for decals would also be saved.
“Everyone still needs to remain vigilant to the terrorist threat and not let bureaucracy stand in the way of positive change where it’s needed,” said Williams. “Force protection is still a top Army priority.”
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting New US Army Base Vehicle Policy

Ft Knox has been that way for some time,.....but then why would anyone want to visit here anymore.....

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum