±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: Harold_Biondo
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6644

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 226
Total: 226
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Home
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: CPGlang
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Home
23: Downloads
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Home
29: CPGlang
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: CPGlang
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Home
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: CPGlang
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Home
47: Home
48: Home
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: CPGlang
54: Home
55: CPGlang
56: Home
57: CPGlang
58: Home
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Home
63: Home
64: CPGlang
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: CPGlang
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: CPGlang
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: CPGlang
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Home
90: Photo Gallery
91: News
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: CPGlang
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Statistics
104: Home
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: CPGlang
109: Photo Gallery
110: Home
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Home
117: CPGlang
118: Home
119: Home
120: Home
121: Home
122: Home
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: CPGlang
138: CPGlang
139: Home
140: Home
141: CPGlang
142: Home
143: Home
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: CPGlang
148: Community Forums
149: CPGlang
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Home
164: CPGlang
165: Home
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: CPGlang
170: Home
171: Home
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Downloads
176: Home
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: CPGlang
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Member Screenshots
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: CPGlang
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: Photo Gallery
196: CPGlang
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Home
201: Home
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Home
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: CPGlang
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Home
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Home
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Any special request for Knox this weekend?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Here's my XM800T pictures for good measure...







I think I have more, but they're not immediately handy / on photobucket.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4671
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

YEEEHAAAA!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi AJ2! Hi Folks!

- armyjunk2

Anyone have anything special they would like me to attempt to photograph this weekend, I'll do my best to do it, but no guarantees....


A 360 walk around of the XM800T would be great if you have the time AJ2.

Thanks,
Sgt, Scouts Out!


I'll add my shots of the XM 800 to AJ's excellent series, Roy, but in the continuing saga of "Ft. Knox scenes - pics #3". Was going to do this in a week or so but it seems topical now.

What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4671
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- A-109E
What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn


Continnuing saga of the eternal struggle between wheeled vs. tracked proponents, especially vis-a-vis the recon role...so they built and tested both versions. In the end, neither offered significant mobility advantages over vehicles already in the inventory (like the M113) and represented a huge investment that would have diverted funds from other programs. It was fortunate that neither was pursued because the Bradley was not far over the horizon and this was money far better spent. Too little, too late for the returns.

This is why I maintain now that the Dutch YPR concept series should have been adopted as an interim vehicle instead of wasting money on schemes like this...proven, something we already had experience with. Basically a Product Improved M113A1 without the funky turret/hatch layout of our version that never got off the boards.

The wheeled version:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
- A-109E
What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn


Continnuing saga of the eternal struggle between wheeled vs. tracked proponents, especially vis-a-vis the recon role...so they built and tested both versions. In the end, neither offered significant mobility advantages over vehicles already in the inventory (like the M113) and represented a huge investment that would have diverted funds from other programs. It was fortunate that neither was pursued because the Bradley was not far over the horizon and this was money far better spent. Too little, too late for the returns.

This is why I maintain now that the Dutch YPR concept series should have been adopted as an interim vehicle instead of wasting money on schemes like this...proven, something we already had experience with. Basically a Product Improved M113A1 without the funky turret/hatch layout of our version that never got off the boards.

The wheeled version:


Thanks for the history, Doug. And great action photos: Yeehaaah! times two!

--Bob
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Doug, I think we continue to disagree on the subject, although I'll defer to your Armor Board knowledge. But if Hunnicutt's Bradley has any weight (page 244), it appears that the XM800T at least was superior than the M113:

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV. The XM800W performed well on roads and its quiet operation and high road speed were goals to be achieved for future scout vehicles. However, its limited cross country capability and safety hazards associated with lateral instability and directional control made it less effective than the M113A1."

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4671
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Doug, I think we continue to disagree on the subject, although I'll defer to your Armor Board knowledge. But if Hunnicutt's Bradley has any weight (page 244), it appears that the XM800T at least was superior than the M113:

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV.
Neil


It was, but marginally so, the benefits primarily due to weight and size...but not nearly by enough to justify the cost to field it and the time it would have taken to get it there. See my comment "too little, to late". It would have been nearly 1980 by the time this thing could have been fielded in numbers and the Brad was well in the works by then...a choice had to be made and this wasn't it (even though the role of the Brad wasn't pure Scout, the concept was sacrificed for something the Army wanted more).

On balance, it was a worthwhile sacrifice, IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Okay, understood & granted. We're talking the age-old capability vs cost. Was a dedicated scout vehicle worth the cost.

However, I would point out that the abandonment of the ARSV led to both HMMWV and Bradley mounted scouts. And the Army has recently abandoned HMMWV mounted scout units as too vulnerable, leaving "scouting in a Winnebago" as the only mechanized scout capability (besides Stryker RSTA vehicles - which would probably be good scout vehicles across the board IMO).

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4671
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Okay, understood & granted. We're talking the age-old capability vs cost. Was a dedicated scout vehicle worth the cost.

However, I would point out that the abandonment of the ARSV led to both HMMWV and Bradley mounted scouts. And the Army has recently abandoned HMMWV mounted scout units as too vulnerable, leaving "scouting in a Winnebago" as the only mechanized scout capability (besides Stryker RSTA vehicles - which would probably be good scout vehicles across the board IMO).

Neil

Neil,

After how many years? And only after the experience of Iraq and the IED's attendant thereto. Recall that the forerunner to the HMMWV, the X311, was a proposed wheeled scout vehicle at one time with substantial armament capabilty for the day and was seriously considered. Gotta' consider these things in the context of the times, not what is known today. Wink

D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

True enough, although folks back then I believe knew that the HMMWV was too light for scouts and the Bradley was too heavy...

Certainly the Iraq IED issue exposed one big facet of HMMWV vulnerability in this role - but isnt that merely one aspect (albeit a new one) of an overall vulnerability & inadequacy in the scout role that has been known for some time?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4671
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

There is always a problem with the concept of a dedicated "Scout Vehicle"...if it's mobile/fast enough, it's necessarily vulnerable to all sorts of stuff....the converse situation is obvious. That's why I think a dedicated Scout vehicle (on land) is an anachronism and has been for a couple of decades. Scouting needs to be a combined operation itself...with a light arm and a backup. Not unlike the Cav units that combined tanks with lighter AFV's or even Sheridans for scouting. Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".

Increasingly, the need for this as a dedicated unit is probably diminished over what it was in the '70's, what with UAV's, other imaging, etc., but it's always nice to send somebody out there for a look-see without getting your a$$ shot off just for the effort. And it's nice if you can carry some guys with you, just in case. Three-man scout vehicle...I'm not sure the need still exists..., but that's just me.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Here's the door that was 'unlocked'.


_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:09 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".


I wonder if it's all relative, to wit: Sitting up here at 3000 ft. AGL with a fully-loaded XM-21 Weapons Sub-system seemed relatively safe. Stats bore this out. No one wanted to mess with the front end of this one.


On the other hand, we didn't particularly consider it safe to be down there despite the overhead cover of two gunships. There are two Loaches here and I ain't gonna tell you where they are. You hafta find 'em on your own, then calculate their survival quotient when their rotorwash uncovers a full NVA squad manning their 57mm AA gun.


I mean, it's a very serious situation.

_________________
--Bob Steinbrunn
BSteinIPMS at aol.com


Last edited by A-109E on Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4671
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- A-109E
There are two Loaches here and I ain't gonna tell you where they are. You hafta find 'em on your own,


One just right of center, one at 11o'clock...now you find mine... Mr. Green

(copy and paste "properties" for full size)

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:37 am
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
There is always a problem with the concept of a dedicated "Scout Vehicle"...if it's mobile/fast enough, it's necessarily vulnerable to all sorts of stuff....the converse situation is obvious. That's why I think a dedicated Scout vehicle (on land) is an anachronism and has been for a couple of decades. Scouting needs to be a combined operation itself...with a light arm and a backup. Not unlike the Cav units that combined tanks with lighter AFV's or even Sheridans for scouting. Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".

Increasingly, the need for this as a dedicated unit is probably diminished over what it was in the '70's, what with UAV's, other imaging, etc., but it's always nice to send somebody out there for a look-see without getting your a$$ shot off just for the effort. And it's nice if you can carry some guys with you, just in case. Three-man scout vehicle...I'm not sure the need still exists..., but that's just me.


I agree that UAVs and other sensors are increasingly supplementing, possibly replacing conventional scouting and reconnaissance, but I think there is also still is a role for dedicated scout vehicles. These tend to come in two varieties: the 3-man versions as you mentioned, but now fitted out with lots of sensors; and the scout-team carrier variety. The Army sorely needs a sensor-equipped scout vehicle, especially one with a mast. I understand an NTC rotation a few years back was extremely jealous of the Canadian Army Grizzly (LAV III) recon vehicles that have a mast-mounted sensor. The US Army simply doesnt have this capability today. It was intended for FSCS/TRACER (ie the ARSV successor) and now the FCS MGV RSTA vehicle... The current question appears to be whether scout-team carriers are needed. Recent thinking seems to have shifted away from them, but I suspect Iraq may cause a rethink of this...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum