±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 528
Total: 528
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: News
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: CPGlang
08: Home
09: Home
10: Downloads
11: Downloads
12: Home
13: Downloads
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Member Screenshots
18: Downloads
19: Community Forums
20: Downloads
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Contact
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: News Archive
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Photo Gallery
43: Your Account
44: Community Forums
45: CPGlang
46: Community Forums
47: Photo Gallery
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Home
53: Photo Gallery
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Downloads
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: CPGlang
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Photo Gallery
68: Downloads
69: Community Forums
70: Your Account
71: Photo Gallery
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Photo Gallery
75: Photo Gallery
76: Home
77: Your Account
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Member Screenshots
88: Your Account
89: Member Screenshots
90: Photo Gallery
91: Photo Gallery
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Photo Gallery
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Photo Gallery
107: Community Forums
108: News Archive
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Downloads
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: News Archive
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Your Account
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: CPGlang
133: Photo Gallery
134: Photo Gallery
135: Home
136: Photo Gallery
137: Photo Gallery
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Photo Gallery
143: Downloads
144: News
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Your Account
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Member Screenshots
174: Your Account
175: Community Forums
176: Statistics
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Home
184: Your Account
185: Member Screenshots
186: Photo Gallery
187: Home
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Home
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: News
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Downloads
211: Statistics
212: Photo Gallery
213: Your Account
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Photo Gallery
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Photo Gallery
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Photo Gallery
247: Community Forums
248: Photo Gallery
249: Your Account
250: Downloads
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Home
256: Photo Gallery
257: Photo Gallery
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Downloads
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Downloads
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Member Screenshots
282: CPGlang
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Photo Gallery
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Downloads
302: Community Forums
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: News Archive
307: Community Forums
308: Your Account
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Photo Gallery
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: News Archive
317: Home
318: Photo Gallery
319: Statistics
320: Downloads
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Photo Gallery
331: Downloads
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Statistics
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Member Screenshots
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Photo Gallery
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Photo Gallery
355: Community Forums
356: Photo Gallery
357: Photo Gallery
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: News Archive
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Photo Gallery
366: CPGlang
367: Photo Gallery
368: Community Forums
369: Photo Gallery
370: Downloads
371: Downloads
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Statistics
382: Photo Gallery
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Statistics
387: Member Screenshots
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Photo Gallery
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Photo Gallery
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Photo Gallery
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Member Screenshots
409: Community Forums
410: Member Screenshots
411: Community Forums
412: Photo Gallery
413: Photo Gallery
414: Photo Gallery
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Photo Gallery
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Photo Gallery
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: CPGlang
429: Photo Gallery
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: News Archive
434: Statistics
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Your Account
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: CPGlang
442: Home
443: Downloads
444: Photo Gallery
445: Community Forums
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Photo Gallery
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Community Forums
457: CPGlang
458: Photo Gallery
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Photo Gallery
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Downloads
467: Photo Gallery
468: Home
469: Photo Gallery
470: News Archive
471: Community Forums
472: Photo Gallery
473: Photo Gallery
474: Photo Gallery
475: Member Screenshots
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Photo Gallery
479: Community Forums
480: Photo Gallery
481: Home
482: Home
483: Photo Gallery
484: News Archive
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Photo Gallery
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Photo Gallery
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Photo Gallery
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Photo Gallery
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Photo Gallery
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Downloads
507: Photo Gallery
508: Photo Gallery
509: Home
510: Photo Gallery
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Photo Gallery
516: Community Forums
517: Photo Gallery
518: Photo Gallery
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Downloads
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Photo Gallery
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum