±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 837
Total: 837
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Photo Gallery
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Your Account
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: News
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Downloads
21: Community Forums
22: News
23: Community Forums
24: News Archive
25: Your Account
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Downloads
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Photo Gallery
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: News
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Your Account
39: Home
40: Member Screenshots
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Downloads
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: News Archive
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: CPGlang
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Downloads
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Search
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Downloads
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: News
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Statistics
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Downloads
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: News
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: News
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: News
142: Photo Gallery
143: Photo Gallery
144: Downloads
145: CPGlang
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Your Account
181: Your Account
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Downloads
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Your Account
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: News
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: News
221: News
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Home
226: Your Account
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Photo Gallery
231: Photo Gallery
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Statistics
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Downloads
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: News
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: News
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: CPGlang
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Your Account
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: News
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: News
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: News
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Your Account
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: CPGlang
344: Your Account
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Downloads
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Downloads
366: Photo Gallery
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Photo Gallery
370: Home
371: News
372: Photo Gallery
373: Member Screenshots
374: Community Forums
375: Downloads
376: News
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Downloads
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: News Archive
389: Downloads
390: Community Forums
391: Photo Gallery
392: Photo Gallery
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: CPGlang
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Home
408: Community Forums
409: Photo Gallery
410: Member Screenshots
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Photo Gallery
414: Downloads
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Member Screenshots
422: Search
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: News
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Your Account
442: Community Forums
443: Photo Gallery
444: Home
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Statistics
449: Photo Gallery
450: Photo Gallery
451: Downloads
452: Your Account
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Home
459: Community Forums
460: Photo Gallery
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Photo Gallery
464: Community Forums
465: Downloads
466: News
467: Community Forums
468: Member Screenshots
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Statistics
472: Photo Gallery
473: News
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Home
483: Photo Gallery
484: Community Forums
485: Home
486: Community Forums
487: Member Screenshots
488: Community Forums
489: Your Account
490: Community Forums
491: Downloads
492: Photo Gallery
493: Photo Gallery
494: Community Forums
495: Photo Gallery
496: Photo Gallery
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Home
500: Community Forums
501: Community Forums
502: Photo Gallery
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Photo Gallery
508: Downloads
509: Photo Gallery
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: News
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Home
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Photo Gallery
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Photo Gallery
527: Photo Gallery
528: Photo Gallery
529: Community Forums
530: News
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: News
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Home
540: Community Forums
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Home
549: Photo Gallery
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: News
555: Community Forums
556: Photo Gallery
557: Photo Gallery
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Statistics
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Photo Gallery
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Home
572: Community Forums
573: CPGlang
574: News
575: Photo Gallery
576: Home
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: News
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Community Forums
584: News
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Home
588: Community Forums
589: Photo Gallery
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Home
593: Home
594: Photo Gallery
595: Home
596: Community Forums
597: Home
598: Community Forums
599: Your Account
600: Photo Gallery
601: CPGlang
602: Home
603: Downloads
604: Community Forums
605: Downloads
606: Home
607: Photo Gallery
608: Home
609: Home
610: CPGlang
611: CPGlang
612: Photo Gallery
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Photo Gallery
616: Community Forums
617: Photo Gallery
618: News Archive
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Community Forums
622: CPGlang
623: Community Forums
624: Downloads
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Photo Gallery
628: Photo Gallery
629: Downloads
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Photo Gallery
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Photo Gallery
637: Home
638: Community Forums
639: Community Forums
640: News
641: Community Forums
642: News
643: News
644: Photo Gallery
645: Photo Gallery
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Photo Gallery
649: Community Forums
650: Downloads
651: Community Forums
652: News
653: Your Account
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Downloads
659: Home
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Downloads
665: CPGlang
666: Photo Gallery
667: Photo Gallery
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Home
671: Community Forums
672: Photo Gallery
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: CPGlang
676: Photo Gallery
677: Photo Gallery
678: Home
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: CPGlang
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Photo Gallery
686: Your Account
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Downloads
693: Community Forums
694: News
695: Statistics
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Community Forums
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: Community Forums
703: Community Forums
704: Community Forums
705: Community Forums
706: News
707: Community Forums
708: Downloads
709: Community Forums
710: Home
711: Community Forums
712: Photo Gallery
713: Photo Gallery
714: Photo Gallery
715: Photo Gallery
716: Photo Gallery
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Photo Gallery
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Photo Gallery
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Home
727: Community Forums
728: Photo Gallery
729: Photo Gallery
730: Community Forums
731: Home
732: Community Forums
733: Home
734: Home
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Photo Gallery
738: Photo Gallery
739: Community Forums
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Statistics
745: Community Forums
746: Photo Gallery
747: Community Forums
748: Home
749: Photo Gallery
750: Home
751: Community Forums
752: Photo Gallery
753: Photo Gallery
754: Community Forums
755: Community Forums
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Downloads
759: Home
760: Your Account
761: Photo Gallery
762: Community Forums
763: Home
764: Photo Gallery
765: Community Forums
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: News
769: Community Forums
770: Photo Gallery
771: Community Forums
772: Community Forums
773: Photo Gallery
774: Community Forums
775: Community Forums
776: Home
777: Community Forums
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums
780: Your Account
781: Home
782: Photo Gallery
783: Community Forums
784: Photo Gallery
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: Photo Gallery
788: Photo Gallery
789: Community Forums
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums
794: Community Forums
795: Photo Gallery
796: Community Forums
797: News
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: CPGlang
801: Community Forums
802: Photo Gallery
803: Community Forums
804: Community Forums
805: Photo Gallery
806: Community Forums
807: Home
808: News Archive
809: Community Forums
810: Community Forums
811: Downloads
812: Community Forums
813: Community Forums
814: Community Forums
815: News Archive
816: Member Screenshots
817: Community Forums
818: Photo Gallery
819: Community Forums
820: Community Forums
821: Community Forums
822: Community Forums
823: Community Forums
824: Community Forums
825: Photo Gallery
826: Community Forums
827: Home
828: Community Forums
829: Community Forums
830: Community Forums
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: News
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Home
837: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Hey Roy!
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:16 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

'Hi Mike, I always wondered why it never made it to the troops as well.'

Think back to those times. Vietnam was sucking all the funds that the Army could get. As that drew down the budget was cut in the anti-military feeling of the time. Then came the carter years of 'belt tightening'

Weapons development programs were all seen as wasteful by the media and there was no support for anything military. The army had to make very hard decisions about what programs it wanted to keep on life support so that they could be revived later. Research for what became the Abrahms and Bradley programs got some funds as did the Attack Helicopter that became Apache and teh lift helicpter that became Blackhawk. Some funds went into Air Defense systems (Patriot and Divads) but lots of promising programs were killed off.

Scary thing is I think I see it happening again

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:38 am
Post subject: Re: Scout vehicles

Hi Folks!

To Recon 4

I agree with you about the Bradley being to big for a Scout vehicle. When I was running M114 (LINGLES) through the forests of Germany, I could get through places only a M151 Jeep could follow. When we upgraded to M113s, that made it harder to get away from other infantry carriers, but it was still easy to find cover and escape from tank units. When I first read in Armor Magazine that the Bradley was going to be used as a Scout vehicle I was shocked. Then I saw a suggested load plan which encluded a motorcycle. That had me thinking that it would be OK. Two scouts working on motorcycles would make up for the size and noise level of a 30+ ton AFV. Your comments about gunnery doesn't surpise me. There is an old saying that goes something like, 'if it looks like a tank, someone will use it like a tank'. The Brads with that 25mm chain gun and the TOW AT system was a setup for going over board into tank gunney type training. I left the scouting field before the Bradleys arrived, but have always tried to keep up with what was going on. Not fielding the motocycle was another one of those cost cutting events that destoryed a lot of the scouting functions of the Bradley. I think the Army should have went ahead and fielded the M800(T). Dropping the M800 ARSV has came back to bit the Army in 6 o'clock position. Sad

To David,
The Red X seams to be related to the Boss's computer. When lurking at home, I can see the photo. Nice looking vehicle. Confused

To Dontos,
Additional personnel...During my time, the scout TOE for a M114 was three people. During my four years in Germany working with a M-TOE, the four squad leader vehicles and the platoon leader only had two people assigned. So in some ways it would be better to have a four man vehicle with four duty positions so headquarters can not take slots away to save on manning. I don't know. I guess it is possible that if the Army had fielded the M800(T) ARSV that a M-TOE would have still been used and we would have seen vehicles running around with only two crewmen. Neutral

To Neil,
I agree with Neil that if the M800(T) had been fielded, it would still be around with some upgrades. Possible a turret right off the Bradley. Comment set of parts and S4/G4 requirments. Razz

Neil quoted a section from Hunnicutt's Bradley book. For the longest time, I understood the comments about "lateral instability and directional control" in reference to the tracked M800. Sometime back while reading that again, I got the impression that the sentence layout was a bit hard to following and the comments were talking about the wheeled XM800W. I request those who have Hunnicutt's book to take another look at that paragraft.

If the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance, how could it have a lateral instability and directional control problems? If it was superior to the M113A1, then the M113s should have had a greater lateral instability and directional control problems.

Does anyone else see what I talking about or am I just lost in the woods?

My 2 cents, sorry for the late follow up folks.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Scout vehicles

- Roy_A_Lingle


To Dontos,
Additional personnel...During my time, the scout TOE for a M114 was three people. During my four years in Germany working with a M-TOE, the four squad leader vehicles and the platoon leader only had two people assigned. So in some ways it would be better to have a four man vehicle with four duty positions so headquarters can not take slots away to save on manning. I don't know. I guess it is possible that if the Army had fielded the M800(T) ARSV that a M-TOE would have still been used and we would have seen vehicles running around with only two crewmen.


Roy

Perhaps I misspoke. Having been in and around the 'Lingle', I assumed a similiar MTOE as a Bradley Scout platoon. Thus mounting more than the crew to enable vehicle functionability and additional dismounted scout activities. Unfortunately, it made sense to me that way.

The Luchs is a small tank. It allows barely enough room for the crew. The M114 is more adapt at facilitating additional personnel, hence the benefit of the M114 in comparison to the Luchs.

The XM800W has no room for attitional crew but would have been a good vehicle for the job (Recon), as I have seen. The XM800T is just a mini Bradley ( 'Bradley-ette?' ) and I'm not sure dismounts would have worked with it either.

I think the commonality of chassis was the intent with the IFV / CFV concept.

Thanks for the clarification,
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

[quote="Neil_Baumgardner"]
- recon4ww2

Nope, scouts definately got screwed in the late 70s/early 80s by the decision to cancel ARSV and merge the requirement with the emerging MICV program that lead to the Bradley. Its probably a good IFV, but its "scouting in a winnebago."

IMO, the XM800T would have made a good scout vehicle and would probably still be in service today - upgraded with a second gen FLIR, etc. I think the XM800s often get a bad rap. Yet note the following from Hunnicutt's Bradley (page 244):

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV. The XM800W performed well on roads and its quiet operation and high road speed were goals to be achieved for future scout vehicles. However, its limited cross country capability and safety hazards associated with lateral instability and directional control made it less effective than the M113A1."

XM800T



Gotta love the plaque: "Armor will achieve this ground mobility [ie the scout role] by organization, training, mission and a state of mind."



XM800W



Neil


Just gotta' get my Armor Board plug in here...(I always loved that line from Hunnicutt's "Bradley").


Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Roy,
I read that line from "Bradley" as meaning the XM800T had superior performance (in all regimes, including firepower) to the other two. The M113 A1 (note the comparison is to an A1) was superior to the XM800 wheeled version because the wheeled version was squirrely in the handling department.

I think the M113 would have faired MUCH better had the comparison been with not just an M113A2, but one up-engined to the Sheridan powerplant, which was just the same DD engine with a turbo, basically. Note in the other thread here from Ft. Irwin what is going into the OSV's....essentially that. More "Ooomph"....and add a power turret and suitable gun and the 113 starts looking pretty darn good.

BTW, Jeff and I watched an M113 OSV running on the same ground as I drove the halftrack on....it obviously had the blown engine and it could really scoot! Ran like a Sheridan on Nitrous....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:07 am
Post subject: Re: M114/Bradley TOEs

Hi Don! Hi Folks!

"Perhaps I misspoke. Having been in and around the 'Lingle', I assumed a similiar MTOE as a Bradley Scout platoon. Thus mounting more than the crew to enable vehicle functionability and additional dismounted scout activities. Unfortunately, it made sense to me that way."

Not completely Don. From what I remember, the Bradley Cav Platoons had the same number of troops as the older M114/M113 platoons did. The big difference was the older platoons had ten (10) vehicles vis only six (6) vehicles in a CFV unit.

If you look up the BRT TOE which was using Hummers, it had the same number of vehicles and troops as the older M114/M113 battalion scout platoons.

I was headed home from CQ on a Saturday morining at Hunter Liggett MR back in the early 1970s. A team from FMC had one of the XM800Ts running around on one of the firing ranges. I knew what it was as soon as I saw it and pulled over and stopped. I walked over to two civilains and talked with them for a few minutes. They were testing a stabiliser system with live ammo. That vehicle had a M139 auto cannon mounted on it and boy was I impressed! The vehicle was running around, turning, stopping, chargeing off and during all that the turret remained on target and the they were just cutting it apart! I got a chance to walk around it and get a good look at it. I wasn't brave enough to ask if I could climb up and look inside. I wished them luck at winning the ARSV contest. Man, I wished I had a camera with me.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:14 am
Post subject: Re: Scout vehicles

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!


Neil quoted a section from Hunnicutt's Bradley book. For the longest time, I understood the comments about "lateral instability and directional control" in reference to the tracked M800. Sometime back while reading that again, I got the impression that the sentence layout was a bit hard to following and the comments were talking about the wheeled XM800W. I request those who have Hunnicutt's book to take another look at that paragraft.

If the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance, how could it have a lateral instability and directional control problems? If it was superior to the M113A1, then the M113s should have had a greater lateral instability and directional control problems.


I understand the lateral instability bit to refer to the XM800W, not the T. Especially considering that the 800T had superior cross-country mobility. Believe the lateral instability & safety issues were due to the W's articulated body.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 3:21 am
Post subject: Re: Status for the XM800s

Hi David! Hi Folks!

Found some status for both 800 vehicles in an old 1976 copy of Jane's World Armoured Fighting Vehicles.

Basic Data...........Tracked...........Wheeled
Crew........................both 3
Weight Loaded......8.618 kg..........7.697 kg
Weight empty.......7.980 kg..........not listed
Length.................4.673 m............4.914 m
Width.................. 3.438 m............2.438 m
Height..................2.399 m............2.489 m over top of weapons
Height..................1.663 m............not listed top of the hull
Ground Clearance..... both .406 m
Track...................1.955m..............1.981m (my note: don't understand this one.)
Track Width..........0.482m
Wheelbase.....................................3.682 m
Lenght of track on ground..2.743m
Ground Pressure.....32 kg/cm2..........43 kg/cm2
Maxium Road Speed 88.5 km/hr........104.6 km/hr
Max Reverse speed..40.23 km/hr.......not listed (my note: I think these is very important to scouts)
Max speed in water...7.2 km/hr...........8 km/hr
Acceleration 0-48 km/hr...10 seconds....8 seconds
Range......................both 725 km
Fuel..........................397 liters.............341 liters
Fording......................both amphibious
Gradient....................both 60%
Side Slope.................both 60%
Vertical Obstacle........0.762 m................0.914 m
Trench.......................1.828 m...............not listed
Engine.......................GM 6V53 AT..........GM 6V53T (my note: wonder what the 'A' stands for in the tracked engine? My guess is the 'T' in both engines stands for tubocharger)
Engine type.................both diesel
Engine HP/RPM.............280/2,800............300/2,100
Armament...................both 1x20 mm cannon (My note: the first layout mounted the M139 20mm auto cannon, same as on the M114A2 Lingle) At that time the Army was running the Brushmaster program to pick a new auto cannon. Both 800s had room to mount the any of the four systems that where being looked at.)
....................................both 1x7.62 mm MG (My note: M-60Ds)
Ammo...........................both 20mmx500 rounds and 7.62mmx2,000 rounds
.....................................Rear hatch to pull power pack out (like the M8 AGS)

David, sorry I took so long, this is another one of those threads that I had to wait until I cleared up home PC problems.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 3:33 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- Neil_Baumgardner


XM800T



Neil


Hey Neil! Is this your photo sir?

If not Neil's, I would like to know who's took it. I would like to use it as the back ground on my home PC.

?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:15 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Roy

I have similiar shots...U want it?

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:47 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hey Roy, thanks very much for the statistics! Smile Smile Smile Now I can make a better comparison between the XM800T and the Lynx. My bet is that physically they are very close (except of course in the electronics department).

Thanks again, well worth waiting for!

Best Regards,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 3:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- Roy_A_Lingle


Hey Neil! Is this your photo sir?



That is indeed my picture feel free to use it. In fact, I'd hesitate to say I dont think you really need to get the owner's permission to just use it for your PC's background. But if you were going to post on the web somewhere, then thats different - I'd ask you to give me credit. My appreciated nonetheless.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- Dontos
Roy

I have similiar shots...U want it?


Hi Don!

Photos received! Thank you SIR!

I am always looking for photos of that vehicle. Someday I hope to try and scratch build a M800(T) with a Bradley turret.

Hey everyone, if you don't already know, check out Mister Bradford's AFV front page, He has added a link to Don's site on the Ontos.

Thanks again Don,
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- Neil_Baumgardner
- Roy_A_Lingle


Hey Neil! Is this your photo sir?



That is indeed my picture feel free to use it. In fact, I'd hesitate to say I dont think you really need to get the owner's permission to just use it for your PC's background. But if you were going to post on the web somewhere, then thats different - I'd ask you to give me credit. My appreciated nonetheless.

Neil


I wasn't sure either, but though it would be better to ask just in case. Thank you Sir!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 6:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hey everyone, if you don't already know, check out Mister Bradford's AFV front page, He has added a link to Don's site on the Ontos.
I am honored to be included in AFV links.

Thanks George!!

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum