±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 431
Total: 431
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Downloads
06: Member Screenshots
07: Home
08: Member Screenshots
09: Community Forums
10: Member Screenshots
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: News
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: News Archive
22: Member Screenshots
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Home
27: Member Screenshots
28: Home
29: Member Screenshots
30: Home
31: Home
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Downloads
37: Downloads
38: Community Forums
39: Member Screenshots
40: Your Account
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: News Archive
46: Home
47: CPGlang
48: Home
49: News
50: Home
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Member Screenshots
55: Home
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Downloads
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: CPGlang
62: Member Screenshots
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: News Archive
68: Home
69: Photo Gallery
70: Home
71: Member Screenshots
72: Downloads
73: Downloads
74: Home
75: Home
76: Member Screenshots
77: Member Screenshots
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Downloads
81: Home
82: Home
83: Member Screenshots
84: Member Screenshots
85: Member Screenshots
86: Downloads
87: Home
88: Home
89: Photo Gallery
90: Home
91: Member Screenshots
92: Member Screenshots
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Downloads
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: Statistics
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Photo Gallery
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: CPGlang
118: Member Screenshots
119: Photo Gallery
120: Home
121: Home
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: News
125: Member Screenshots
126: Member Screenshots
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: News Archive
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: CPGlang
141: Community Forums
142: Member Screenshots
143: Photo Gallery
144: Member Screenshots
145: Community Forums
146: Member Screenshots
147: Community Forums
148: Member Screenshots
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Downloads
153: Photo Gallery
154: Home
155: Downloads
156: CPGlang
157: Member Screenshots
158: Home
159: Photo Gallery
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: News Archive
163: CPGlang
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Photo Gallery
170: Downloads
171: Downloads
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Downloads
178: Home
179: Downloads
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: CPGlang
189: Community Forums
190: News
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Downloads
200: Community Forums
201: News
202: Photo Gallery
203: Photo Gallery
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Member Screenshots
208: News Archive
209: Home
210: Home
211: CPGlang
212: News Archive
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Member Screenshots
216: Downloads
217: Home
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Member Screenshots
225: Community Forums
226: Downloads
227: Member Screenshots
228: Home
229: CPGlang
230: Community Forums
231: News Archive
232: Home
233: Downloads
234: News
235: Downloads
236: Member Screenshots
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Photo Gallery
242: Community Forums
243: Your Account
244: Home
245: Home
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Member Screenshots
251: CPGlang
252: Downloads
253: Photo Gallery
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Downloads
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Home
274: Member Screenshots
275: Home
276: Photo Gallery
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Downloads
280: Member Screenshots
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Downloads
284: Community Forums
285: Downloads
286: Home
287: Downloads
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Member Screenshots
292: Community Forums
293: Photo Gallery
294: Downloads
295: Home
296: Member Screenshots
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Home
300: Member Screenshots
301: Community Forums
302: News Archive
303: Downloads
304: CPGlang
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Member Screenshots
309: CPGlang
310: Member Screenshots
311: News
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Member Screenshots
316: Community Forums
317: Photo Gallery
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Downloads
325: Photo Gallery
326: News
327: Member Screenshots
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Member Screenshots
332: Your Account
333: Home
334: Home
335: Home
336: Community Forums
337: CPGlang
338: Member Screenshots
339: Home
340: Home
341: Member Screenshots
342: Home
343: Photo Gallery
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Member Screenshots
348: Home
349: CPGlang
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Photo Gallery
357: Community Forums
358: News Archive
359: Home
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Downloads
364: Home
365: Downloads
366: Community Forums
367: Downloads
368: Member Screenshots
369: Member Screenshots
370: Home
371: Home
372: Member Screenshots
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Member Screenshots
376: Member Screenshots
377: Member Screenshots
378: Member Screenshots
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Home
389: Downloads
390: Community Forums
391: Home
392: Photo Gallery
393: Community Forums
394: Downloads
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Home
398: Downloads
399: Photo Gallery
400: Downloads
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Member Screenshots
409: CPGlang
410: Community Forums
411: News Archive
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: News Archive
416: Home
417: Photo Gallery
418: Photo Gallery
419: Photo Gallery
420: Home
421: CPGlang
422: Community Forums
423: Member Screenshots
424: Home
425: Home
426: Home
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: CPGlang
431: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
3.7in AP Shot
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:23 am
Post subject: 3.7in AP Shot

Here are some photos of a 3.7in gun being test fired on the ranges in Valcartier Quebec in Feb. 1943. The round being loaded into the gun appears to be painted black indicating that it is AP shot. This appears to be a setup to measure muzzle velocity. Note that the 3.7in AA Gun has a much lower profile when in a horizontal firing position, then the German 8.8cm Flak guns










Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:48 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

Zooming in on the 'loading' image reveals a projectile with a flat nose - its more than likely a proof round used to test the gun after manufacture.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
A2_Prius
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 112

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:06 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7 in.

Was the 3.7 in. ever employed in the AT role fulfilled by the 8.8 cm.? By '43 the Allies were well acquainted with the latter's "dual role" capability, and it seems to me that the 3.7 in. gun probably had the same potential.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

No I've read it was specifically not fitted with ground sites when issued to units so that it could not be diverted from it's primary role as an AA gun.

Especially in the desert the role of protecting the base area around the Suez Canal was considered too critical to allow it to be diverted. Between use there and in UK based AA units production could barely keep up with demand

I assume the 17pdr was considered adequate. I also read recently that the 32pdr At gun that was being developed at the end of the war was based on the 3.7" but the towed version of that gun was a monster to move around. I think in the 32 pdr form it was used in the Tortoise (The British vehicle similar to the T28)

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

According to the regimental history of the 2nd Cdn HAA Regt. their 3.7in AA guns were fitted with sights to engage ground targets both by direct and indirect fire. Besides the AA role their training also involved anti-tank drills and artillery shoots.

Looking at the photo closer it dose look like the round is a Flathead. Since these are also solid shot they would be painted black like the AP Shot.



Below are diagrams of the three main types of ammo for the 3.7in AA Guns. First the 3.7in AP Shot Mk 3T, the 3.7in HE Shell and the 3.7in Shrapnel shell.





Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:46 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7 in.

- A2_Prius
Was the 3.7 in. ever employed in the AT role fulfilled by the 8.8 cm.? By '43 the Allies were well acquainted with the latter's "dual role" capability, and it seems to me that the 3.7 in. gun probably had the same potential.


Several books mention that they were used against tanks during the fall of Tobruk - the regiment responsible for the air defence of the harbour held off rommels panzers for several hours until they ran out of ammunition. The ammunition in question was unfuzed HE (normal HE round with transit plug fitted in place of fuze) apparently...

The unit in question IIRC was 68 HAA Regt RA and I think the Peter Cochrane book mentions it.

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:03 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

- bsmart
No I've read it was specifically not fitted with ground sites when issued to units so that it could not be diverted from it's primary role as an AA gun.

Especially in the desert the role of protecting the base area around the Suez Canal was considered too critical to allow it to be diverted. Between use there and in UK based AA units production could barely keep up with demand.


There were different models of the 3.7in AA gun going up to the Mark 6. There were both static and mobile types. It sounds like the guns sighted along the Suez Canal may have been static types. The 2Cdn.HAA Regimental states that “…in Africa; the gunners with the 8th Army had also on occasion used their 3.7 guns against enemy columns and concentrations.�

In NWE the 3.7in AA guns were most often used in the field artillery role, especially for counter battery and counter mortar shoots. I have heard one report that the British had used their 3.7in AA guns to snipe at German tanks across the Rhine River in 1945.

Note that 3.7in AA guns were also manufactured in Canada and Australia during the war.
Back to top
View user's profile
David_Clark
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:48 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

Field Marshall Sir Alan Brooke's memoirs include several mentions of visits to demonstrations of 3.7" guns in the anti-tank role. If I remember correctly, the demonstrations mainly took place prior to the introduction of the 17pdr.

Perhaps while the anti-tank potential of the 3.7" gun was evident, the introduction of the 17pdr eliminated the operational requirement for the 3.7" gun to be used against ground targets.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:21 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

The introduction of the proximity fuze also made them effect against dug-in infantry and they were used in this role in NWE and Burma.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roger_Lucy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

[quote="J.McGillivray"]Here are some photos of a 3.7in gun being test fired on the ranges in Valcartier Quebec in Feb. 1943. The round being loaded into the gun appears to be painted black indicating that it is AP shot. This appears to be a setup to measure muzzle velocity. Note that the 3.7in AA Gun has a much lower profile when in a horizontal firing position, then the German 8.8cm Flak guns

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In July 1942 the Canadian Army Technical Development Board commisioned a one-off 3.7 inch SP on a Ram chassis. The gun used was a Mk.II 3.7-inch anti-aircraft gun, on a Mk.III mounting (less its wheels, predictor and other parts below the roller race) made by General Electric in Peterborough Ont. Aside from the standard AA sights it had both a No.9 dial sight for indirect fire and a modified No.33 anti-tank sight.
In trials in the UK the Ram 3.7 inch SP was not terribly effective in either an AA or in-direct fire role, but tests carried out on 23 March, 1943 at the Combined Operations School in Poole, showed it performed very well in a direct fire role.

Paper studies were then carried out to look at the feasibility of mounting either a 17-pounder or a 3.7 inch AA gun on the Ram Sexton chassis. The 3.7 inch was deemed to offer marginally (5mm) superior armour penetration out to 1,000 yards, and significantly better beyond that range. A paper study was also done for a 3.7 inch as an assault gun mounted on an M4 chassis, for use against beach fortifications. Neither of these studies got beyond the drawing board but do show that the 3.7 inch AA gun was seen as potentially ahighly effective direct fire weapon.
For more details on these projects see my "Secret Weapons of the Canadian Army" Service Publications 2006.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:50 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

[quote="Roger_Lucy"]
- J.McGillivray

For more details on these projects see my "Secret Weapons of the Canadian Army" Service Publications 2006.


I'm waiting for the film version Wink

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roger_Lucy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

I'm waiting for the film version ;-)

8)[/quote]
I wish! There are lots of references to films being taken of various equipment trials, but all that seems to have survived are a few stills- such as this one of the Ram 3.7 inch SP wading ashore during the 23 March 1943 trials at Poole.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:16 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

In this article in US Field Artillery Magazine from Jan. 1943 there are references to the British 3.7in AA gun being used in the anti-tank role like the German 8.8cm Flak gun.
sill-www.army.mil/FAMA..._25_27.pdf
Source
sill-www.army.mil/FAMA...chives.htm
Back to top
View user's profile
warddw
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

I have a nice example of the 3.7" AP Ammunition in my collection...let me know if you want a picture posted...
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

It would be nice to see a photo of the 3.7in AP shot.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum