±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 465
Total: 465
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Supporters
02: Community Forums
03: News
04: Member Screenshots
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Member Screenshots
08: Photo Gallery
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: News
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Photo Gallery
17: Member Screenshots
18: Photo Gallery
19: Downloads
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Member Screenshots
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Downloads
43: News Archive
44: Community Forums
45: CPGlang
46: Member Screenshots
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: CPGlang
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Your Account
53: Photo Gallery
54: Tell a Friend
55: Downloads
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Member Screenshots
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Community Forums
65: Search
66: Community Forums
67: Member Screenshots
68: News
69: News Archive
70: Member Screenshots
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: News
74: News Archive
75: Community Forums
76: Supporters
77: Photo Gallery
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: News
84: Home
85: Photo Gallery
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Photo Gallery
90: Member Screenshots
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Member Screenshots
96: Member Screenshots
97: Photo Gallery
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Downloads
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Downloads
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: News
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Member Screenshots
114: Photo Gallery
115: Downloads
116: Photo Gallery
117: Member Screenshots
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: CPGlang
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Downloads
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Member Screenshots
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Member Screenshots
139: Photo Gallery
140: Downloads
141: Photo Gallery
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Downloads
147: Community Forums
148: Member Screenshots
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Photo Gallery
154: Downloads
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: Downloads
158: Member Screenshots
159: CPGlang
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: Member Screenshots
163: Home
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Downloads
167: Community Forums
168: Downloads
169: CPGlang
170: Downloads
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Downloads
175: Home
176: Photo Gallery
177: Photo Gallery
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Community Forums
182: Member Screenshots
183: Member Screenshots
184: Community Forums
185: Member Screenshots
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Photo Gallery
189: Downloads
190: Downloads
191: Member Screenshots
192: News
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Statistics
197: Member Screenshots
198: Community Forums
199: Downloads
200: Member Screenshots
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Downloads
204: Photo Gallery
205: Home
206: Photo Gallery
207: Your Account
208: Photo Gallery
209: Member Screenshots
210: Community Forums
211: CPGlang
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: News
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Photo Gallery
220: Downloads
221: Photo Gallery
222: Downloads
223: Downloads
224: Photo Gallery
225: News
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: CPGlang
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Member Screenshots
234: Statistics
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Your Account
239: Photo Gallery
240: Member Screenshots
241: CPGlang
242: Photo Gallery
243: Member Screenshots
244: Photo Gallery
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Downloads
249: Member Screenshots
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: News Archive
254: Home
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: News Archive
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Member Screenshots
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Member Screenshots
276: Photo Gallery
277: Photo Gallery
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: CPGlang
281: Statistics
282: Community Forums
283: Downloads
284: Photo Gallery
285: CPGlang
286: Community Forums
287: Downloads
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Member Screenshots
291: Community Forums
292: Member Screenshots
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Photo Gallery
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Home
303: Photo Gallery
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: CPGlang
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: News Archive
312: Member Screenshots
313: Member Screenshots
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Photo Gallery
321: Community Forums
322: Your Account
323: Home
324: Member Screenshots
325: Member Screenshots
326: Community Forums
327: Downloads
328: News Archive
329: Community Forums
330: Member Screenshots
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Member Screenshots
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Your Account
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: CPGlang
354: Photo Gallery
355: Downloads
356: News
357: Photo Gallery
358: Downloads
359: Photo Gallery
360: Member Screenshots
361: Photo Gallery
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Photo Gallery
365: Downloads
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: Downloads
369: Photo Gallery
370: Photo Gallery
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Photo Gallery
376: Photo Gallery
377: Photo Gallery
378: Member Screenshots
379: Photo Gallery
380: CPGlang
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Photo Gallery
385: Member Screenshots
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Member Screenshots
391: Community Forums
392: CPGlang
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Photo Gallery
402: News
403: Photo Gallery
404: Photo Gallery
405: Home
406: Photo Gallery
407: Photo Gallery
408: Photo Gallery
409: Photo Gallery
410: Photo Gallery
411: Photo Gallery
412: Member Screenshots
413: Statistics
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: Photo Gallery
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Downloads
429: Photo Gallery
430: Community Forums
431: Photo Gallery
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Photo Gallery
435: CPGlang
436: Member Screenshots
437: Photo Gallery
438: Photo Gallery
439: Photo Gallery
440: Photo Gallery
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Member Screenshots
445: Photo Gallery
446: Downloads
447: Home
448: Home
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Home
456: Member Screenshots
457: Community Forums
458: Home
459: Community Forums
460: News
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Photo Gallery
464: Photo Gallery
465: News

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum