±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 497
Total: 497
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Photo Gallery
11: Photo Gallery
12: Home
13: CPGlang
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: News Archive
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: CPGlang
21: Photo Gallery
22: Downloads
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: News Archive
27: Community Forums
28: CPGlang
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Home
40: News Archive
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Photo Gallery
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Downloads
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Photo Gallery
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Supporters
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: News
100: Your Account
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Downloads
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Photo Gallery
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: CPGlang
115: Downloads
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Downloads
121: Member Screenshots
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Photo Gallery
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: CPGlang
138: Community Forums
139: Downloads
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Your Account
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: News Archive
151: Supporters
152: Photo Gallery
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Photo Gallery
160: Home
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Photo Gallery
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Photo Gallery
169: Photo Gallery
170: Member Screenshots
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: Member Screenshots
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: CPGlang
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: CPGlang
187: Photo Gallery
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Photo Gallery
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Home
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: Community Forums
205: CPGlang
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Photo Gallery
209: Community Forums
210: CPGlang
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Photo Gallery
217: Home
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Photo Gallery
222: Your Account
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Photo Gallery
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: News Archive
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: CPGlang
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: CPGlang
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: CPGlang
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: CPGlang
277: Community Forums
278: CPGlang
279: Community Forums
280: Your Account
281: News Archive
282: Community Forums
283: CPGlang
284: Home
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Downloads
289: Photo Gallery
290: Photo Gallery
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Downloads
294: CPGlang
295: Community Forums
296: Downloads
297: Community Forums
298: News Archive
299: Community Forums
300: News
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: CPGlang
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: CPGlang
312: Photo Gallery
313: CPGlang
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Downloads
317: Your Account
318: Community Forums
319: Photo Gallery
320: Home
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Photo Gallery
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Your Account
331: CPGlang
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Home
337: Photo Gallery
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Downloads
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: CPGlang
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Statistics
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Photo Gallery
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Member Screenshots
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Downloads
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Home
390: Your Account
391: Photo Gallery
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Member Screenshots
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Home
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Home
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Home
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Community Forums
411: CPGlang
412: Photo Gallery
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: CPGlang
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Photo Gallery
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: CPGlang
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Photo Gallery
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Photo Gallery
437: Photo Gallery
438: Photo Gallery
439: CPGlang
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: CPGlang
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Photo Gallery
448: Home
449: Home
450: Photo Gallery
451: Member Screenshots
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Photo Gallery
459: Photo Gallery
460: Community Forums
461: Photo Gallery
462: Photo Gallery
463: Home
464: Downloads
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Photo Gallery
468: Photo Gallery
469: Photo Gallery
470: Community Forums
471: Photo Gallery
472: Community Forums
473: Photo Gallery
474: Community Forums
475: CPGlang
476: Photo Gallery
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Photo Gallery
480: Photo Gallery
481: Home
482: Home
483: Community Forums
484: Downloads
485: Community Forums
486: Photo Gallery
487: Community Forums
488: Photo Gallery
489: Photo Gallery
490: Photo Gallery
491: Downloads
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: CPGlang
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
The dilemma
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:37 am
Post subject: The dilemma

As you know, with the help of members of this forum, I have assembled a PDF file called "Surviving German captured and modified Vehicles".
http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_Modified_Foreign_Vehicles.pdf
It includes the Marder series and German SPGs based on foreign chassis, but it also includes Czech tanks like the LT-35, LT-38 (PzKpfw. 38(t)), TNHs, LTPs and LTL-Hs.

This is an email from Massimo Foti, from which I wonder what should be done :

"Looking at the info we now have, I wonder if it would be better to move the TNHs, LTPs and LTL-Hs into a separated PDF. They look somewhat out of place among the "german" AFVs. There is also hope we may have misseed some tanks in Iran or Perú.

To say it all, while I consider PzKpfw. 38 (t) as german tanks, I have mixed feelings about PzKpfw. 35 (t).

I see a few options:

1) Move TNHs, LTPs and LTL-H into a "Surviving czech tanks" PDF
(which doesn't exist yet)

2) Move TNHs, LTPs and LTL-H into "Surviving neutral states tanks". But
that's already very large
http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_Neutral_States_Tanks.pdf

3) Move swedish tanks into a dedicated PDF, and merge the czech ones with swiss and spanish"

Please help me to take a decision !! I will consider all points of view.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
VonForhud
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Posts: 162

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:59 am
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

I would say make a PDF and call it "Surviving materiel used and modified by the Germans in WWII" or something similar.

Btw check out the latest info on the 105 mm auf Lorraine Schlepper in my Danish vehicles thread.

PS Keep up the good work.

_________________
hvasnakkerduom.blogspo...wagen.html
Back to top
View user's profile
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:25 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

Create:

One big file with all neutral tanks from: Spain, Switzerland, Sweden and Czechoslovakia (today big files aren't a problem).

or

3 files:
-Spain, Switzerland
-Sweden
-Czechoslovakia
Back to top
View user's profile
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

Don't forget about Škoda MU-4 in Lesany

picasaweb.google.com/p...5854090962

picasaweb.google.com/t...6764289522
Back to top
View user's profile
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

P-O, in case it helps, my original Preserved German Tanks books included vehicles built on Czech chassis, such as the Hetzer, because I considered them 'German'. However, as I have expanded my coverage of preserved tanks, just as you are doing, I have changed my mind significantly and I will be doing this differently when I create the next edition. PGT will contain just German vehicles, and there will be a Preserved Czechoslovak Tanks book that will cover the LT vz 35 ('PzKpfw 35t'), TNH/LTL ('PzKpfw 38t') plus vehicles based on their chassis (such as Hetzer).

My view now - and this is just my opinion, I'm not trying to contradict you just putting it strongly to make my point clear - is that the LTL/LTH series is absolutely not a German tank in any respect. It has nothing in common with German designs or the German tank development story and was never produced in Germany. It was just a convenient design that was being manufactured in a country that was taken over so it was handy to keep producing them. The design was called PzKpfw 38(t) to the Germans (and the 't' is highly significant), but was used by many other countries largely unchanged, and they each gave it a different name. To me now, my preference is to consider Czechoslovak development independently of German development, and so the same design can be shown to have preserved examples used by Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, etc. under different names.

I am not actively working on PCT yet, but you can get a very early idea of what it will look like from how tanks already in the database are arranged:

Preserved Czechoslovak Tanks

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:52 am
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

today big files aren't a problem


No a problem in terms of bandwith, but they tend to be harder to read. Scrolling 40+ pages isn't that pleasant.

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:06 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

The taxonomy is going to be arbitrary, no matter what...

I mostly agree with Trevor, but I still would classify the Hetzer as german,
the fact it doesn't have the (t) speaks about it. Just my personal feeling.

The Nahkampfkanone I is another weird case, it was build for sure in Switzerland, but it's not clear (at least not to me) if it was build on an existing Pz 39 chassis, or created out of existing spares. It has a swiss engine and a french gun.

@Rafal, you are right, we should not forget the MU-4

Just to make things more complicated. The Semovente M 42 da 75/18 in Rimini is another edge case, it wasn't captured, it was manufactured for the germans, including some minor changes compared to the italian vehicles (see the drive sprocket). But I consider it along the same line as PzKpfw 38

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

- Massimo_Foti
The taxonomy is going to be arbitrary, no matter what...


that's probably what is called an "editorial line".

- Massimo_Foti
I mostly agree with Trevor, but I still would classify the Hetzer as german,
the fact it doesn't have the (t) speaks about it. Just my personal feeling.


I totally agree with you Massimo. It is the same for some of the Swedish AFVs built on a Czech chassis. The Stridsvagn m/41, Sav m/42 or PBV 301 could be considered as Czech vehicles, since the chassis is the exact copy of the LT-38 (or am I wrong?). These IMO should considered as Swedish vehicles.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:13 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

- Massimo_Foti
I mostly agree with Trevor, but I still would classify the Hetzer as german, the fact it doesn't have the (t) speaks about it. Just my personal feeling.


the official name of the Hetzer is "Jagdpanzer 38(t)".. it still has the (t).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:35 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

I've said my piece, so I won't go on about it much more - but myself I now see vehicles like the PBV301 or NK I as part of the Czech story, developments of a Czech chassis by foreign users. To me it's no different to the PzKpfw38(t) or Panzerwagen 39 - they are Czech vehicles operated by foreign users. Even the tanks have some modifications by the using country, it is just a larger and more obvious modification in the case of the PBV301 or NK I. To me it's the same as covering the Panzer 55/57 or Stridsvagn 101 as part of the Centurion development story.

Personally, in fact, I go further - I don't even consider the country of manufacture as crucial, only the country of design. In my system the T-34-85 is classified as a Soviet design even though it may be manufactured in Poland or Czechoslovakia, though it will have a sub-classification (something like 'Soviet / Polish'). Further, the Type 59 and Type 69 are classified in a similar way (e.g. Soviet / Chinese) since the design is the essentially the same.

I'll end here. But if it helps, I've found my philosophy and argument can actually be summarised quite succinctly in most cases: "Look at the wheels". All those vehicles on my Preserved Czech Tanks page clearly stem from two Czech designs, though they were used/modified by Hungarians, Swiss, Swedes, etc. I think most of us can look at rare or unusual vehicles, used or created by any number of different countries, and spot that superlative and distinctive CKD suspension from a mile away. To me it is core to the Czech tank development story.

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:06 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

- Massimo_Foti

I mostly agree with Trevor, but I still would classify the Hetzer as german


I have sympathy with this view - as I said, the original Preserved German Tanks has a large chapter on the Hetzer. However, I would now say it's Czech - it was designed by CKD and based on their existing highly successful chassis (I suspect it was actually designed by the same man or at least the same team, though I have been unable to confirm this) and built on the same production line in Czechoslovakia. After the war it was used by the Czech army. To me, it's use by Germany during the war - notwithstanding it incorporated a German gun - was essentially the same process as Switzerland using it after the war, they both incorporated in their armies Czech vehicles with customisations.

I was going to stop before this, but it has become an interesting argument - like the old discussions referred to in other threads. Perhaps I should quit, though, before I cause trouble, e.g. by pointing out that in my system the Grizzly is part of the Sherman story (i.e. it's in Preserved American Tanks), and the M1917 is part of the Renault FT story (i.e. it's in Preserved French Tanks). Smile

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:33 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

well, finally I decided to choose a "hybrid" option.

The original "German vehicles based on modified foreign chassis", included the LT-35 and LT-38 (PzKpfw 38 (t)) variants, the SPGs based on French chassis (Lorraine, Hotchkiss) and LT-38 chassis

It was split into :

Czech LT vz. 35 and LT vz. 38 (TNH, LTP, LTH, PzKpfw. 38 (t))

http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_LT35_LT38.pdf

and German Self-propelled Guns based on modified foreign chassis : 10.5 cm leFH 18(Sf) auf Geschützwagen, 15cm sFH 13/1(Sf) auf Geschützwagen, Marder I, Panzerjäger I, Marder III, Grille, Munitionspanzer 38 (t)

http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_Modified_Foreign_Vehicles.pdf

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:54 am
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

I have sympathy with this view - as I said, the original Preserved German Tanks has a large chapter on the Hetzer. However, I would now say it's Czech - it was designed by CKD and based on their existing highly successful chassis (I suspect it was actually designed by the same man or at least the same team, though I have been unable to confirm this) and built on the same production line in Czechoslovakia.


The main designer at CKD was the engineer Alexander Surin, emigrated from Russia, where it was part of the General Wrangel's army.

A very interesting book on the subject:
www.mbi.wz.cz/nab/2/ramecnab.htm

Review here:
www.missing-lynx.com/r...bihetz.htm

More in general, all MBI's books on tanks are a great:
www.mbi.wz.cz/

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:41 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

New LTP in Peru:
modelforum.cz/viewtopi...25#p765825

video:
www.ct24.cz/domaci/816...nk-z-peru/

There is a project to bring this tank to Czech Republick
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: The dilemma

- bialy-r
New LTP in Peru:

There is a project to bring this tank to Czech Republick


do you think that Peru will let this tank leave and go back to CZ ?

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum