±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 282
Total: 282
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Photo Gallery
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: CPGlang
09: Community Forums
10: Member Screenshots
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Downloads
20: Community Forums
21: CPGlang
22: Home
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Downloads
27: CPGlang
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Home
40: Member Screenshots
41: Downloads
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Home
49: Photo Gallery
50: Downloads
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Home
55: Home
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: CPGlang
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Home
63: Photo Gallery
64: News
65: Home
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: CPGlang
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Statistics
77: Community Forums
78: Downloads
79: Home
80: Home
81: Downloads
82: Downloads
83: Downloads
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Downloads
87: CPGlang
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Photo Gallery
98: News Archive
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: CPGlang
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Home
110: Photo Gallery
111: Home
112: Downloads
113: Photo Gallery
114: News Archive
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Downloads
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Your Account
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Downloads
140: Downloads
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: CPGlang
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: CPGlang
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: News
166: Member Screenshots
167: Community Forums
168: News
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Downloads
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: News
183: Photo Gallery
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: News
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: CPGlang
193: Your Account
194: Community Forums
195: Downloads
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: CPGlang
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: CPGlang
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Member Screenshots
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: CPGlang
225: Member Screenshots
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Home
229: Downloads
230: Downloads
231: Community Forums
232: Downloads
233: Downloads
234: Home
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Downloads
244: Community Forums
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Downloads
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Member Screenshots
264: CPGlang
265: Home
266: Home
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Downloads
270: Community Forums
271: News Archive
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Photo Gallery
277: Home
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
can't have too little spare tracks...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
panthertank
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:43 pm
Post subject: can't have too little spare tracks...

Cool
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:06 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

The track was usually old stuff and used to increase the protection of the vehicle - but then again you probably knew that so this is intended for the consumption of those that didn't...

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:08 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

That makes them Heavy Tanks then, right? Laughing


Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:13 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Razz

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Hellfish6
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 2006
Posts: 151
Location: Orlando
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:47 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Was using tracks for armor effective?
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

An extra few inches of armour - yes it was but it was hard on the engines, transmission & suspension.

Some thought obviously went into the track mounting on the vehicle images as the way its mounted with the spuds towards the armour must provide a modicum of spaced armour effect to protect against heat/hollow charge rounds. It would have been far easier to mount it 'spuds' out.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Hellfish6
Was using tracks for armor effective?


The use of the extra track sections was two-fold. To provide additional protection and to enable the vehicle to carry additional track sections incase of damaged track.

These vehicles are taking the additional protection idea a bit too far. Taht much track per vehicle would seriously hinder mobility and possibly cause mechanical failure.

Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.


d*mn thats it - I kept looking at that image thinking something is strange about it and couldn't quite put my finger on it... I mistakenly assumed the track was chuchill stuff.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:19 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Those tanks must be Canadian. The Canadians were notorious for beefing up the armour on their Shermans. In Normandy Maj. Radley-Walters had 140 track links welded on his tank Caribou for an additional weight of 3.5 tonnes. This seemed to work because Caribou survived 9 hits during the campaign before it was finally knocked out on the 14th of August, 1944.

According to Radley-Walters the trick was to have the tracks only lightly welded so that they had some give. This increased the lightly hood that the shot would not bite into the armour, but would be deflected instead.

Canadians crews were not worried about the life of their drive train, or whether they could drive 500 miles or 800 hours. They just wanted to get through the next battle.

The tracks on the Firefly look like they are from a Panzer IV. I’ve seen other photos where the crews were using Tracks from Panthers, Tigers and Churchills.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- JimWeb
- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.


d*mn thats it - I kept looking at that image thinking something is strange about it and couldn't quite put my finger on it... I mistakenly assumed the track was chuchill stuff.

Cool


I ID'ed it only because I had to do some track repair to 'our' Marder II a few years ago, and those d*mn pins & links were a real pain to replace.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:46 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

In the wouldn't that be cool department, suppose those Shermans were Rad's in the 27th Armoured Regiment (Sherbrooke Fusiliers) and suppose one of them was Bomb ....

www.convoymagazine.com...1oLjpg.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

One also could argue just how effective tracks as extra armor really was for some thought of them as a shot trap and also the tracks themselves were made of a more brittle material than the armor it was reinforcing.


Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:33 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

What I found interesting is a Firefly and a 105mm Sherman in the same unit. I didn't think many 105mm Shermans were provided to Commonwealth units.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:11 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

British and Canadian Armoured Regiments started to receive 105mm M4 Shermans in late 1944. There were four in each Regiment. They could have one attached to each Sqn HQ and one in the Regt. HQ, or all four could be group together as a fire support troop.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:30 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle


Wonder whether it could be CDP (Canadian Dry Pin) tracks rather than German?



Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum