±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 342
Total: 342
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Home
10: Home
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Statistics
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Your Account
22: Photo Gallery
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Photo Gallery
30: Downloads
31: Photo Gallery
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Photo Gallery
36: Downloads
37: Home
38: Home
39: Downloads
40: Statistics
41: Photo Gallery
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Photo Gallery
53: Downloads
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: CPGlang
59: Downloads
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Home
66: Home
67: CPGlang
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Statistics
73: Community Forums
74: News Archive
75: Member Screenshots
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: CPGlang
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Member Screenshots
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Photo Gallery
96: Home
97: Members List
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: CPGlang
103: Home
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: CPGlang
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Photo Gallery
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Home
130: Downloads
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Downloads
135: Home
136: Photo Gallery
137: Community Forums
138: CPGlang
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Home
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: CPGlang
161: Search
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: CPGlang
165: Home
166: Photo Gallery
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Home
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Home
198: News Archive
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: CPGlang
202: CPGlang
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: CPGlang
209: CPGlang
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Photo Gallery
216: Photo Gallery
217: Photo Gallery
218: CPGlang
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: CPGlang
230: Photo Gallery
231: Home
232: CPGlang
233: Statistics
234: Photo Gallery
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Photo Gallery
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Downloads
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Downloads
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Downloads
251: CPGlang
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: Home
256: Home
257: Home
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: CPGlang
261: Home
262: Photo Gallery
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: CPGlang
271: Home
272: CPGlang
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: CPGlang
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Photo Gallery
290: Photo Gallery
291: Downloads
292: Community Forums
293: Downloads
294: Home
295: Downloads
296: Downloads
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Downloads
301: CPGlang
302: Photo Gallery
303: Home
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Downloads
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Downloads
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Photo Gallery
323: Photo Gallery
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Photo Gallery
328: Photo Gallery
329: Home
330: News Archive
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Downloads
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Home
341: Home
342: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Castle Archdale Project. :: Archived
Discussions about the FS2004 game.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:11 pm
Post subject: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi All, I have been asked by Adrian to recreate the world war 2 flying boat base at Castle Archdale in Fermanagh, N.I. as an add-on for Flightsim 2004.
It will be only my second project and I would like to know if anyone has any knowledge, photos, maps, etc. which they would be willing to provide via e-mail to help me in this quest.
Thanks for your time
Regards
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Progress so far on the Castle Archdale project.
Built the invisible runway and taxiways for the AI Catalinas on Lough Erne (Lake) and I'm now about to start on the shore base.
Regards
Dave


Taxiing to the Lake1

Taxiing to the Lake2

Taking Off

On Approach

Moored At Castle Archdale

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Shadow_Bshwackr
Janitor

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 7019
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Thank you Dave and keep us posted! I for one am very interested...
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Bushwacker, thanks, nice to know, makes it all worthwhile.
Cheers
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

in case off , still available as guinnee piglet here Dave Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Fled,
sorry it's in the Sunderland airport post. I sent you a reply with my Afcad attached and some piccies,

Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

no worries m8!

I'll jump overthere Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Dave are there any AI Catalinas in RAF Coastal Command colours available? Superb progress todate well done!

And just for reference here is a photo of Castle Archdale which appeared in the other thread, though it is from a later date than the PBY Catalina mission that spotted the Bismarck.

www.junobeach.org/f/4/...p.htm#null

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, I'll look out for some RAF Coastal Command.
You already sent me the picture, mostly nissen huts and trees from which I can make out. I'll have a go.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

maps.google.com/maps?f...006748&t=k

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Quote

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

UnQuote

I am looking at the black and white photo of the Sunderlands at Castle Archdale and it seems to match up pretty well, with the Google satellite shot, I would presume the marina at left is a modern addition. There presumably would not have been much post war development of this base as a military base, since flyingboats as maratime ASW and maratime patrol aircraft would be becoming obsolete by 1945, so the hardstandings and roadways are presumably pretty much now as then. The airfield would have required a launch to act as tender to the flyingboats but my guess is that it operated out of the inserted slipway

maps.google.com/maps?f...7,0.005026

that appears just [ immediately ] to the left of the slip for the flying boats to enter the water and which appears now to have a boat house over the part which would be over water and a desent slope to enter the water just before the boat house.

Hope that helps

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This a FS2004 Tirpitz which was the sistership to the Bismarck

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=23

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This is a FS2004 HMS Hood sunk by the Bismarck during the Battle of the Denmark Strait.

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=22

At approximately 05.30 on Saturday 24 May, as the German squadron was about to leave the Denmark Strait, Prinz Eugen's hydrophones detected the presence of two additional ships some distance to port. By 05.45 both were in sight, although the German fleet had not yet identified the enemy force. In reality, it was a British battle-group comprising the new battleship Prince of Wales, and the battlecruiser Hood, under the command of Rear Admiral Lancelot Holland. Prince of Wales had only recently been completed and was still being worked up (indeed, she sailed to meet Bismarck with civilian technicians still on board completing her fitting-out). Hood had been built as a fast battlecruiser and modified to give her protection more like a battleship, but still had relatively weak deck armour. That other British ships had detected them was not unexpected by the Germans but that they would turn out to be capital ships was a nasty surprise.

At 05.49 Holland ordered fire to be concentrated on the leading German ship, Prinz Eugen, believing it to be Bismarck. Fortunately for the British, the captain of Prince of Wales was soon to realise the error and changed his target. Holland amended his order on the correct ship to be engaged but this did not reach Hood's gunnery control before the first salvo. Hood fired first at 05.52, in daylight, followed very soon afterwards by Prince of Wales. The range to the German ships was c. 12.5 miles.

More than two minutes went by without a reply from the Germans, before Captain Lindemann ordered fire to be returned on the lead British ship. This was the Hood, which the Germans had identified only when the British squadron made a turn towards them at 05.55. This manoeuvre was undertaken, it appears, in an attempt to place themselves in the "zone of immunity". Closer in, the Hood would be less vulnerable to plunging fire and the advantage of superior German gunnery control would be lessened. The disadvantage was that, during the dash, eight of the eighteen British heavy guns could not be brought to bear.

Both Bismarck and Prinz Eugen opened fire on the Hood, at a range of 11 miles. The early gunfire from the German ships was very accurate and within two minutes the Hood had been hit by an 8? shell from Prinz Eugen. It struck the British ship near the mainmast and caused a huge fire which the Hood's crew tried to bring under control. However, Bismarck had also been hit by the Prince of Wales, causing a fuel leak from the forward tanks; therefore Lütjens ordered his cruiser to switch its guns towards the Prince of Wales, which his own secondary guns were now targeting. At 06.00 Hood, which was about to turn to port to bring her full weight of armament to bear on Bismarck, was hit amidships by at least one shell from Bismarck at a distance of under 9 miles. Very shortly afterwards observers on both sides saw a huge jet of flame race skywards, followed by a rumbling explosion that split the huge ship in two. Splinters rained down on Prince of Wales, half a mile away. The Hood's stern rose and sank shortly before the bow, all within three minutes. Admiral Holland and 1,415 crewmen went down with the ship. Only three men (Ted Briggs, Bob Tilburn and Bill Dundas) survived this disaster and were rescued about two hours after the sinking by the destroyer HMS Electra. The British Admiralty later concluded that the most likely explanation for the loss of the Hood was a penetration of her magazines by a single 15? shell from Bismarck, causing the subsequent catastrophic explosion. Recent research by submersible craft suggests that the initial explosion was in the aft 4? magazine and that it spread to the forward 15? magazines via the ammunition trunks.

Prince of Wales had to turn towards the German fleet to avoid hitting the wreckage left by the flagship and was hit hard a number of times, losing several crew on the compass platform. Still, her own gunfire had caused damage to the Bismarck. The British battleship turned away, laying smoke, her aft turret firing briefly under local control. She had received 7 hits (3 of them from Prinz Eugen) and mechanical failures had left her with all but one of her main guns out of action. Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were forced into emergency manoeuvres when they believed they had detected the sounds of torpedoes and then by the appearance of a Sunderland flying-boat. Although Captain Lindemann wanted to chase Prince of Wales and "finish her off", Admiral Lütjens ignored his suggestions since delay risked the possibility of encountering more warships and prejudiced his main task of convoy destruction. Incredibly, in a battle lasting less than 20 minutes Bismarck, with her impressive consort punching far above her weight, had destroyed one capital ship and forced another to turn away, something almost unknown in the Royal Navy and which was to cause the Admiralty to hold a special board of inquiry.

Faulty intelligence had led the Germans to believe that Prince of Wales was not yet ready for action, therefore reports from Bismarck referred to her as King George V, the first of that class, which had been active for some months.

Despite the jubilation onboard the Bismarck, the battleship was not safe. The British knew her position; her forward radar was out of action (a consequence of the skirmish with the British cruisers the previous day); and she had received three hits, one of which caused water to leak into and contaminate fuel oil in storage. From then on, she had to reduce speed to a maximum of 20 knots to conserve fuel. Lütjens eventually decided that he would have to head for the French coast (the dry-dock in St Nazaire) for repairs. The British continued to shadow her, the Prince of Wales having rendezvoused with Norfolk and Suffolk. At one stage Bismarck rounded briefly on her pursuers, in order to give Prinz Eugen the opportunity to detach and escape with the message: "Good hunting".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...p_Bismarck

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, wow, thanks for all that Smile
I believe there was E-boats there as I've seen pictures of E-boat pens?
And in the black and white photo of the two cats over Lough Erne on the front of the book you can make out cats and smaller boat-like objects on the lake.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.