±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 331
Total: 331
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Member Screenshots
03: Community Forums
04: Your Account
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Member Screenshots
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: News
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Search
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Photo Gallery
48: Home
49: Home
50: Home
51: Downloads
52: Home
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Home
59: Home
60: Statistics
61: Community Forums
62: News
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Downloads
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Photo Gallery
101: Home
102: Home
103: Home
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Home
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Member Screenshots
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Downloads
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Home
122: Member Screenshots
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Home
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Photo Gallery
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Your Account
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: News
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Member Screenshots
177: Home
178: Home
179: Photo Gallery
180: Home
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: News Archive
196: Downloads
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Home
203: Downloads
204: Home
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Home
213: Home
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Home
218: Your Account
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Member Screenshots
236: Home
237: Statistics
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Your Account
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Photo Gallery
254: Downloads
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Member Screenshots
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Home
277: Home
278: Photo Gallery
279: Home
280: Home
281: News Archive
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Home
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Home
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Downloads
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Search
299: Home
300: Photo Gallery
301: Member Screenshots
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Downloads
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Member Screenshots
318: Member Screenshots
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Downloads
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Member Screenshots
331: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum