±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 402
Total: 402
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Downloads
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Member Screenshots
12: Photo Gallery
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Member Screenshots
16: Your Account
17: Member Screenshots
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Downloads
23: Photo Gallery
24: News Archive
25: Home
26: Photo Gallery
27: News
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Member Screenshots
40: News Archive
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Statistics
44: Photo Gallery
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Downloads
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: News Archive
64: Community Forums
65: News Archive
66: Home
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Home
77: Downloads
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Downloads
82: Member Screenshots
83: Home
84: Photo Gallery
85: Downloads
86: Home
87: Home
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: News Archive
94: News Archive
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Home
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Downloads
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Photo Gallery
119: Downloads
120: Downloads
121: Member Screenshots
122: Member Screenshots
123: Your Account
124: Photo Gallery
125: Photo Gallery
126: News
127: Home
128: Home
129: News Archive
130: Your Account
131: Home
132: Member Screenshots
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Member Screenshots
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Member Screenshots
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Your Account
150: Member Screenshots
151: Community Forums
152: Downloads
153: News Archive
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Downloads
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Downloads
175: Community Forums
176: News Archive
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Home
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: News Archive
189: Community Forums
190: Downloads
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Member Screenshots
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Downloads
200: Member Screenshots
201: Home
202: Member Screenshots
203: Community Forums
204: Downloads
205: Home
206: Member Screenshots
207: Home
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: News
215: Community Forums
216: Downloads
217: Community Forums
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Home
222: Photo Gallery
223: News
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Member Screenshots
228: Member Screenshots
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Downloads
236: Tell a Friend
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: News Archive
243: Home
244: Home
245: Member Screenshots
246: News Archive
247: Home
248: Downloads
249: Statistics
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: Statistics
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: News Archive
259: Home
260: Home
261: News Archive
262: Community Forums
263: News
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Downloads
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Member Screenshots
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: News Archive
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Photo Gallery
281: Home
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Downloads
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: News
292: Photo Gallery
293: Photo Gallery
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Member Screenshots
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Photo Gallery
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Contact
311: Community Forums
312: Downloads
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Photo Gallery
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Your Account
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Member Screenshots
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Downloads
337: Home
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Photo Gallery
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Downloads
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Home
351: Member Screenshots
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Home
363: Member Screenshots
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Downloads
369: Downloads
370: Home
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: News
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Member Screenshots
380: Downloads
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Photo Gallery
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Home
391: Member Screenshots
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Photo Gallery
395: News Archive
396: Community Forums
397: Downloads
398: Community Forums
399: News
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum