±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 465
Total: 465
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Home
06: Downloads
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Member Screenshots
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Member Screenshots
21: Photo Gallery
22: Home
23: Photo Gallery
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Member Screenshots
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Downloads
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Statistics
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Photo Gallery
66: CPGlang
67: Community Forums
68: Member Screenshots
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Downloads
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Member Screenshots
78: Downloads
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Member Screenshots
82: Community Forums
83: News Archive
84: Your Account
85: Member Screenshots
86: Member Screenshots
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Photo Gallery
90: Member Screenshots
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Member Screenshots
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Home
104: Downloads
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Downloads
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Your Account
116: CPGlang
117: CPGlang
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Downloads
121: Home
122: Member Screenshots
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: News
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Member Screenshots
130: Photo Gallery
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Downloads
136: Home
137: News Archive
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Home
157: Photo Gallery
158: Member Screenshots
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: CPGlang
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: CPGlang
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: Your Account
181: Photo Gallery
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Photo Gallery
189: Photo Gallery
190: Home
191: Photo Gallery
192: Your Account
193: Home
194: Home
195: Photo Gallery
196: News
197: Photo Gallery
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Downloads
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: News Archive
210: Downloads
211: Photo Gallery
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Photo Gallery
215: Downloads
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Statistics
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Member Screenshots
227: Downloads
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Photo Gallery
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Downloads
241: Community Forums
242: Downloads
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Home
246: Photo Gallery
247: Community Forums
248: Member Screenshots
249: Member Screenshots
250: Photo Gallery
251: Home
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: News Archive
259: Photo Gallery
260: Photo Gallery
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Downloads
266: Home
267: Photo Gallery
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Photo Gallery
276: Home
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Photo Gallery
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Photo Gallery
286: Downloads
287: Photo Gallery
288: Downloads
289: Community Forums
290: News Archive
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Member Screenshots
297: Community Forums
298: Photo Gallery
299: Downloads
300: Photo Gallery
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Photo Gallery
309: Home
310: Downloads
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: CPGlang
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Member Screenshots
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Photo Gallery
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Photo Gallery
337: Home
338: Home
339: News Archive
340: Community Forums
341: Member Screenshots
342: Home
343: Your Account
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Member Screenshots
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Member Screenshots
352: Member Screenshots
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Photo Gallery
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Photo Gallery
362: CPGlang
363: Downloads
364: Photo Gallery
365: Photo Gallery
366: Home
367: CPGlang
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Photo Gallery
371: Community Forums
372: News Archive
373: Photo Gallery
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Member Screenshots
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Photo Gallery
382: Home
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Photo Gallery
389: Home
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Photo Gallery
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: CPGlang
398: News
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: Downloads
404: Home
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Downloads
409: Photo Gallery
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Photo Gallery
415: Home
416: Downloads
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Downloads
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Photo Gallery
426: Home
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Photo Gallery
430: Home
431: Downloads
432: Member Screenshots
433: Community Forums
434: Photo Gallery
435: Home
436: Downloads
437: Downloads
438: CPGlang
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: News Archive
442: Home
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Member Screenshots
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Home
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: Community Forums
456: Member Screenshots
457: Photo Gallery
458: Downloads
459: Photo Gallery
460: Home
461: Home
462: Member Screenshots
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum