±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 352
Total: 352
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: Downloads
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Photo Gallery
21: Photo Gallery
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Member Screenshots
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: Home
39: Home
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Community Forums
50: Your Account
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Home
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Photo Gallery
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: News Archive
80: Photo Gallery
81: Statistics
82: Photo Gallery
83: Member Screenshots
84: Community Forums
85: Downloads
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Member Screenshots
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Photo Gallery
92: Member Screenshots
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Downloads
101: Home
102: Home
103: Photo Gallery
104: Community Forums
105: Downloads
106: Home
107: Photo Gallery
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Member Screenshots
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Home
121: Photo Gallery
122: Home
123: Home
124: Downloads
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Home
133: Home
134: Downloads
135: Home
136: Home
137: Photo Gallery
138: Member Screenshots
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Photo Gallery
144: Downloads
145: News Archive
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Photo Gallery
180: Downloads
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Photo Gallery
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Downloads
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: News
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: Downloads
216: Photo Gallery
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Downloads
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Photo Gallery
257: Photo Gallery
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Your Account
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Member Screenshots
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Home
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: News Archive
294: Community Forums
295: Downloads
296: Home
297: Statistics
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Downloads
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Member Screenshots
308: Photo Gallery
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: News
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Home
346: Home
347: Home
348: Photo Gallery
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Castle Archdale Project. :: Archived
Discussions about the FS2004 game.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:11 pm
Post subject: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi All, I have been asked by Adrian to recreate the world war 2 flying boat base at Castle Archdale in Fermanagh, N.I. as an add-on for Flightsim 2004.
It will be only my second project and I would like to know if anyone has any knowledge, photos, maps, etc. which they would be willing to provide via e-mail to help me in this quest.
Thanks for your time
Regards
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Progress so far on the Castle Archdale project.
Built the invisible runway and taxiways for the AI Catalinas on Lough Erne (Lake) and I'm now about to start on the shore base.
Regards
Dave


Taxiing to the Lake1

Taxiing to the Lake2

Taking Off

On Approach

Moored At Castle Archdale

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Shadow_Bshwackr
Janitor

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 7019
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Thank you Dave and keep us posted! I for one am very interested...
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Bushwacker, thanks, nice to know, makes it all worthwhile.
Cheers
Dave Smile

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

in case off , still available as guinnee piglet here Dave Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Fled,
sorry it's in the Sunderland airport post. I sent you a reply with my Afcad attached and some piccies,

Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

no worries m8!

I'll jump overthere Wink


fled
Cool
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Dave are there any AI Catalinas in RAF Coastal Command colours available? Superb progress todate well done!

And just for reference here is a photo of Castle Archdale which appeared in the other thread, though it is from a later date than the PBY Catalina mission that spotted the Bismarck.

www.junobeach.org/f/4/...p.htm#null

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, I'll look out for some RAF Coastal Command.
You already sent me the picture, mostly nissen huts and trees from which I can make out. I'll have a go.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

maps.google.com/maps?f...006748&t=k

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr

maps.google.com/maps?f...iwloc=addr
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Quote

Hi Adrian, yes that's a great map, thanks, can you point out to me what is 1940's and what is new? I can see the old taxiways and roads, is the marina on the left part of it or seperate? What about the jetties , were they there then?
Regards
Dave

UnQuote

I am looking at the black and white photo of the Sunderlands at Castle Archdale and it seems to match up pretty well, with the Google satellite shot, I would presume the marina at left is a modern addition. There presumably would not have been much post war development of this base as a military base, since flyingboats as maratime ASW and maratime patrol aircraft would be becoming obsolete by 1945, so the hardstandings and roadways are presumably pretty much now as then. The airfield would have required a launch to act as tender to the flyingboats but my guess is that it operated out of the inserted slipway

maps.google.com/maps?f...7,0.005026

that appears just [ immediately ] to the left of the slip for the flying boats to enter the water and which appears now to have a boat house over the part which would be over water and a desent slope to enter the water just before the boat house.

Hope that helps

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This a FS2004 Tirpitz which was the sistership to the Bismarck

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=23

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Adrian_Wainer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

This is a FS2004 HMS Hood sunk by the Bismarck during the Battle of the Denmark Strait.

www.fs-shipyards.org/i...ew&iden=22

At approximately 05.30 on Saturday 24 May, as the German squadron was about to leave the Denmark Strait, Prinz Eugen's hydrophones detected the presence of two additional ships some distance to port. By 05.45 both were in sight, although the German fleet had not yet identified the enemy force. In reality, it was a British battle-group comprising the new battleship Prince of Wales, and the battlecruiser Hood, under the command of Rear Admiral Lancelot Holland. Prince of Wales had only recently been completed and was still being worked up (indeed, she sailed to meet Bismarck with civilian technicians still on board completing her fitting-out). Hood had been built as a fast battlecruiser and modified to give her protection more like a battleship, but still had relatively weak deck armour. That other British ships had detected them was not unexpected by the Germans but that they would turn out to be capital ships was a nasty surprise.

At 05.49 Holland ordered fire to be concentrated on the leading German ship, Prinz Eugen, believing it to be Bismarck. Fortunately for the British, the captain of Prince of Wales was soon to realise the error and changed his target. Holland amended his order on the correct ship to be engaged but this did not reach Hood's gunnery control before the first salvo. Hood fired first at 05.52, in daylight, followed very soon afterwards by Prince of Wales. The range to the German ships was c. 12.5 miles.

More than two minutes went by without a reply from the Germans, before Captain Lindemann ordered fire to be returned on the lead British ship. This was the Hood, which the Germans had identified only when the British squadron made a turn towards them at 05.55. This manoeuvre was undertaken, it appears, in an attempt to place themselves in the "zone of immunity". Closer in, the Hood would be less vulnerable to plunging fire and the advantage of superior German gunnery control would be lessened. The disadvantage was that, during the dash, eight of the eighteen British heavy guns could not be brought to bear.

Both Bismarck and Prinz Eugen opened fire on the Hood, at a range of 11 miles. The early gunfire from the German ships was very accurate and within two minutes the Hood had been hit by an 8? shell from Prinz Eugen. It struck the British ship near the mainmast and caused a huge fire which the Hood's crew tried to bring under control. However, Bismarck had also been hit by the Prince of Wales, causing a fuel leak from the forward tanks; therefore Lütjens ordered his cruiser to switch its guns towards the Prince of Wales, which his own secondary guns were now targeting. At 06.00 Hood, which was about to turn to port to bring her full weight of armament to bear on Bismarck, was hit amidships by at least one shell from Bismarck at a distance of under 9 miles. Very shortly afterwards observers on both sides saw a huge jet of flame race skywards, followed by a rumbling explosion that split the huge ship in two. Splinters rained down on Prince of Wales, half a mile away. The Hood's stern rose and sank shortly before the bow, all within three minutes. Admiral Holland and 1,415 crewmen went down with the ship. Only three men (Ted Briggs, Bob Tilburn and Bill Dundas) survived this disaster and were rescued about two hours after the sinking by the destroyer HMS Electra. The British Admiralty later concluded that the most likely explanation for the loss of the Hood was a penetration of her magazines by a single 15? shell from Bismarck, causing the subsequent catastrophic explosion. Recent research by submersible craft suggests that the initial explosion was in the aft 4? magazine and that it spread to the forward 15? magazines via the ammunition trunks.

Prince of Wales had to turn towards the German fleet to avoid hitting the wreckage left by the flagship and was hit hard a number of times, losing several crew on the compass platform. Still, her own gunfire had caused damage to the Bismarck. The British battleship turned away, laying smoke, her aft turret firing briefly under local control. She had received 7 hits (3 of them from Prinz Eugen) and mechanical failures had left her with all but one of her main guns out of action. Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were forced into emergency manoeuvres when they believed they had detected the sounds of torpedoes and then by the appearance of a Sunderland flying-boat. Although Captain Lindemann wanted to chase Prince of Wales and "finish her off", Admiral Lütjens ignored his suggestions since delay risked the possibility of encountering more warships and prejudiced his main task of convoy destruction. Incredibly, in a battle lasting less than 20 minutes Bismarck, with her impressive consort punching far above her weight, had destroyed one capital ship and forced another to turn away, something almost unknown in the Royal Navy and which was to cause the Admiralty to hold a special board of inquiry.

Faulty intelligence had led the Germans to believe that Prince of Wales was not yet ready for action, therefore reports from Bismarck referred to her as King George V, the first of that class, which had been active for some months.

Despite the jubilation onboard the Bismarck, the battleship was not safe. The British knew her position; her forward radar was out of action (a consequence of the skirmish with the British cruisers the previous day); and she had received three hits, one of which caused water to leak into and contaminate fuel oil in storage. From then on, she had to reduce speed to a maximum of 20 knots to conserve fuel. Lütjens eventually decided that he would have to head for the French coast (the dry-dock in St Nazaire) for repairs. The British continued to shadow her, the Prince of Wales having rendezvoused with Norfolk and Suffolk. At one stage Bismarck rounded briefly on her pursuers, in order to give Prinz Eugen the opportunity to detach and escape with the message: "Good hunting".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...p_Bismarck

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Nelson
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Good Old Blighty
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Castle Archdale Project.

Hi Adrian, wow, thanks for all that Smile
I believe there was E-boats there as I've seen pictures of E-boat pens?
And in the black and white photo of the two cats over Lough Erne on the front of the book you can make out cats and smaller boat-like objects on the lake.
Regards
Dave

_________________
Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  FSXFS2004 :: Archives
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.