±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 435
Total: 435
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Home
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Downloads
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Home
20: Home
21: Downloads
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Photo Gallery
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Home
56: Home
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Home
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Home
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Your Account
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Downloads
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Downloads
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Photo Gallery
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Downloads
141: Home
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: Home
147: Photo Gallery
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: Home
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Home
167: Member Screenshots
168: Home
169: Home
170: Statistics
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Home
179: Home
180: Home
181: Photo Gallery
182: Home
183: Home
184: Home
185: Home
186: Home
187: Member Screenshots
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Downloads
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: Home
196: Home
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Home
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Downloads
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Photo Gallery
211: Member Screenshots
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: News Archive
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Statistics
218: Downloads
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Member Screenshots
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Your Account
226: News Archive
227: Member Screenshots
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Member Screenshots
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Member Screenshots
241: Home
242: News Archive
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Downloads
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Member Screenshots
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Member Screenshots
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Downloads
263: Home
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Member Screenshots
267: Statistics
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Statistics
280: Community Forums
281: Statistics
282: Home
283: Downloads
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Community Forums
292: Member Screenshots
293: News Archive
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Member Screenshots
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: Member Screenshots
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Downloads
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Downloads
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Photo Gallery
328: Photo Gallery
329: Community Forums
330: News Archive
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Downloads
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Home
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Downloads
347: Home
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Downloads
353: Home
354: Home
355: Home
356: Home
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Home
370: Home
371: Home
372: Home
373: Home
374: Home
375: Downloads
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Home
380: Home
381: Home
382: Home
383: Photo Gallery
384: Home
385: Home
386: Home
387: Photo Gallery
388: Home
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Downloads
396: Photo Gallery
397: Member Screenshots
398: Community Forums
399: Home
400: Member Screenshots
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: News Archive
406: Member Screenshots
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Member Screenshots
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Member Screenshots
413: Home
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Statistics
417: Home
418: Member Screenshots
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Member Screenshots
424: Photo Gallery
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Downloads
431: Home
432: Downloads
433: Community Forums
434: Photo Gallery
435: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum